95-25567. Airworthiness Directives; Teledyne Continental Motors (formerly Bendix) S-20, S-1200, D-2000, and D-3000 Series Magnetos  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 199 (Monday, October 16, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 53557-53560]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-25567]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 53558]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 93-ANE-07]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Teledyne Continental Motors (formerly 
    Bendix) S-20, S-1200, D-2000, and D-3000 Series Magnetos
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking; reopening of 
    comment period.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice revises an earlier proposed airworthiness 
    directive (AD), applicable to Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) 
    (formerly Bendix) S-20, S-1200, D-2000, and D-3000 series magnetos 
    equipped with impulse couplings, that would have superseded an AD that 
    currently requires inspections for wear, and replacement, if necessary, 
    of the impulse coupling assemblies. The proposed rule would have 
    retained the repetitive inspections for wear required by the current 
    AD, but would have also required replacement, if necessary, of riveted 
    impulse coupling assemblies with newly designed, improved, snap ring 
    impulse coupling assemblies. In addition, the proposed AD would have 
    required marking the magneto data plate to indicate installation of a 
    snap ring impulse coupling assembly. Installation of snap ring impulse 
    coupling assemblies would have constituted terminating action to the 
    inspection requirements of the AD. That proposal was prompted by 
    availability of an improved design for the impulse coupling assembly. 
    This action revises the proposed rule by allowing installation of 
    replacement serviceable riveted as well as snap ring impulse couplings. 
    The actions specified by this proposed AD are intended to prevent 
    magneto failure and subsequent engine failure.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by December 15, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 93-ANE-07, 12 New England 
    Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    except Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Teledyne Continental Motors, P.O. Box 90, Mobile, AL 
    36601; telephone (334) 438-3411. This information may be examined at 
    the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Robinette, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Atlanta Certification Office, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Campus 
    Building, 1701 Columbia Avenue, Suite 2-160, College Park, GA, 30337-
    2748; telephone (404) 305-7371, fax (404) 305-7348.
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 93-ANE-07.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 93-ANE-07, 12 New England Executive Park, 
    Burlington, MA 01803-5299.
    
    Discussion
    
        On January 4, 1983, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 
    issued airworthiness directive (AD) 78-09-07 R3, Amendment 39-4538 (48 
    FR 1482, January 13, 1983), to require inspections for wear, and 
    replacement, if necessary, of the impulse coupling assemblies on 
    certain Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) (formerly Bendix) S-20, S-
    1200, D-2000, and D-3000 series magnetos equipped with impulse 
    couplings. That action was prompted by reports of numerous magneto 
    failures. That condition, if not corrected, could result in magneto 
    failure and subsequent engine failure.
        A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations was 
    published as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal 
    Register on September 21, 1993 (58 FR 48987). That NPRM would have 
    retained the repetitive inspections for wear required by the current 
    AD, but would have also required replacement, if necessary, of the 
    riveted impulse coupling assembly with newly designed, improved, snap 
    ring impulse coupling assemblies. In addition, the proposed AD would 
    have required marking the magneto data plate to indicate installation 
    of a snap ring impulse coupling assembly. Installation of snap ring 
    impulse coupling assemblies would have constituted terminating action 
    to the inspection requirements of this AD. That NPRM was prompted by 
    the manufacturer redesigning the impulse coupling assembly to include 
    snap ring fastening technology which strengthens the cam axle and 
    reduces wear. The snap ring impulse coupling assembly was believed not 
    to have the failure mode of the previous design.
        Since the issuance of that NPRM, the FAA received reports of snap 
    ring impulse coupling assemblies being worn beyond limits. The FAA 
    determined that it was necessary to reopen the proposal for public 
    comment, so a Supplemental NPRM was published in the Federal Register 
    on November 17, 1994 (59 FR 59391). That Supplemental NPRM proposed to 
    retain the 500 hour repetitive inspections for wear required by the 
    current AD, but would require these inspections for magnetos equipped 
    with snap ring impulse coupling assemblies as well.
        Since the publication of that Supplemental NPRM, the FAA has 
    received comments. One commenter supports the AD as written. The other 
    two commenters state that they basically support the AD, but feel that 
    serviceable riveted impulse couplings should be permitted as 
    replacement units as well as the snap ring design. The FAA concurs, 
    while there has been no production of riveted impulse couplings since 
    January 1992, distributors may still have some left as this was a 
    common, relatively high use item. This new Supplemental NPRM has 
    therefore been revised to propose replacement of worn impulse couplings 
    with serviceable impulse couplings of either design.
    
    [[Page 53559]]
    
        Since this change expands the scope of the originally proposed 
    rule, the FAA has determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment 
    period to provide additional opportunity for public comment.
        The FAA has reviewed and approved the technical contents of TCM 
    Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. MSB645, dated April 4, 1994, that 
    describes procedures for inspection of the impulse coupling assemblies 
    for wear; and TCM SB No. 639, dated March 1993, that clarifies 
    procedures for installation of impulse coupling assemblies.
        The FAA estimates that 130,000 magnetos would be affected by this 
    proposed AD, that the required inspection would take 1 work hour, plus 
    1 work hour to change the impulse coupling, and that the average labor 
    rate is $60 per work hour. The average utilization of the fleet of 
    these airplanes is estimated to be evenly divided between commercial/
    commuter service and private owners. The commercial/commuter service 
    population is estimated to operate 500 hours time in service (TIS) per 
    year; therefore the cost to perform the inspections required by the 
    proposed AD would be approximately $3,900,000 per year. The FAA 
    estimates that private owners operate their aircraft between 50 and 100 
    hours TIS per year; therefore it will take approximately 5 to 10 years 
    to reach 500 hours time in service. The estimated cost for these owners 
    would also be $3,900,000 spread over a time period of 5 to 10 years or 
    780,000 per year for 5 years or $390,000 for 10 years. The cost to 
    replace the impulse coupling assembly is $125 per magneto plus one work 
    hour at $60 per work hour for a total of $185 per magneto. While all 
    the riveted impulse coupling assemblies will eventually have to be 
    replaced, it is not possible to estimate the cost per year. The total 
    cost for replacement for U.S. operators would be $24,050,000.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40101, 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Teledyne Continental Motors: Docket No. 93-ANE-07.
    
        Applicability: Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) (formerly 
    Bendix) S-20, S-1200, D-2000, and D-3000 series magnetos equipped 
    with impulse couplings, installed on but not limited to 
    reciprocating engine powered aircraft manufactured by Beech, Cessna, 
    Mooney, and Piper.
    
        Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each 
    magneto identified in the preceding applicability provision, 
    regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in 
    the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For magnetos that 
    have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of 
    the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use 
    the authority provided in paragraph (c) to request approval from the 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This approval may address 
    either no action, if the current configuration eliminates the unsafe 
    condition, or different actions necessary to address the unsafe 
    condition described in this AD. Such a request should include an 
    assessment of the effect of the changed configuration on the unsafe 
    condition addressed by this AD. In no case does the presence of any 
    modification, alteration, or repair remove any magneto from the 
    applicability of this AD.
    
        Note 2: The FAA has received reports of some confusion as to 
    what is meant by S-20, S-1200, D-2000, and D-3000 series magnetos as 
    referenced in TCM Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. MSB645, dated 
    April 4, 1994, and this airworthiness directive (AD). A typical 
    example is S6RN-25, where the S designates single type ignition unit 
    (a D designates a dual ignition unit), the 6 designates the number 
    of cylinders, the R designates right hand rotation, the N is the 
    manufacturer designation (this did not change when TCM purchased the 
    Bendix magneto product line), and the number after the dash 
    indicates the series (a-25 is a S-20 series magneto while a -3200 is 
    a D-3000 series magneto, etc.).
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent magneto failure and subsequent engine failure, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) For magnetos with riveted or snap ring impulse coupling 
    assemblies, having less than 450 hours time in service (TIS) since 
    new, or overhaul, or since last inspection, on the effective date of 
    this AD, accomplish the following:
        (1) Prior to the accumulation of 500 hours TIS since new, or 
    overhaul, or since last inspection, inspect riveted or snap ring 
    impulse coupling assemblies for wear, and replace, if necessary, 
    prior to further flight, with serviceable riveted or snap ring 
    impulse coupling assemblies, in accordance with the Detailed 
    Instructions of TCM MSB No. MSB645, dated April 4, 1994, and TCM SB 
    No. 639, dated March 1993.
        (2) Thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 500 hours TIS since 
    the last inspection, inspect riveted or snap ring impulse coupling 
    assemblies for wear, and replace, if necessary, prior to further 
    flight, with serviceable riveted or snap ring impulse coupling 
    assemblies, in accordance with the Detailed Instructions of TCM MSB 
    No. MSB645, dated April 4, 1994, and TCM SB No. 639, dated March 
    1993.
        (b) For magnetos with riveted or snap ring impulse coupling 
    assemblies, having 450 or more hours TIS since new, or overhaul, or 
    since last inspection, on the effective date of this AD, or an 
    unknown TIS on the effective date of this AD, accomplish the 
    following:
        (1) Within the next 50 hours TIS after the effective date of 
    this AD, inspect riveted or snap ring impulse coupling assemblies 
    for wear, and replace, if necessary, prior to further flight, with 
    serviceable riveted or snap ring impulse coupling assemblies in 
    accordance with the Detailed Instructions of TCM MSB No. MSB645, 
    dated April 4, 1994, and TCM SB No. 639, dated March 1993.
        (2) Thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 500 hours TIS since 
    the last inspection, inspect riveted or snap ring impulse coupling 
    assemblies for wear, and replace, if necessary, prior to further 
    flight, with serviceable riveted or snap ring impulse coupling 
    assemblies, in accordance with the Detailed Instruction of TCM MSB 
    No. MSB645, dated April 4, 1994, and TCM SB No. 639, dated March 
    1993.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification 
    Office. The request should be forwarded through an appropriate 
    
    [[Page 53560]]
    FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office. NOTE: Information 
    concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of 
    compliance with this airworthiness directive, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office.
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on October 3, 1995.
    Jay J. Pardee,
    Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-25567 Filed 10-13-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/16/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking; reopening of comment period.
Document Number:
95-25567
Dates:
Comments must be received by December 15, 1995.
Pages:
53557-53560 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 93-ANE-07
PDF File:
95-25567.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13