99-27274. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 56279-56281]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-27274]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-354-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 757 series 
    airplanes. This proposal would require replacement of transmission 
    assemblies for the trailing edge flaps with modified transmission 
    assemblies. This proposal is prompted by reports of broken bolts that 
    attach the transmission assemblies for the trailing edge flaps. The 
    actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent damage to 
    the flap system, adjacent system, or structural components; and 
    excessive skew of the trailing edge flap; which could result in reduced 
    controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by December 3, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-NM-354-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert C. Jones, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
    SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1118; fax (425) 
    227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by
    
    [[Page 56280]]
    
    interested persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact 
    concerned with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the 
    Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 98-NM-354-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 98-NM-354-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has received reports indicating that certain bolts that 
    attach the transmission assemblies for the trailing edge flaps have 
    broken in service. Analysis has shown that the bolts broke because the 
    torque limiters on the subject trailing edge flap transmissions did not 
    ``lock out'' at their designated load limits. Tests have shown that the 
    torque limiter may ``lock out'' at loads higher than the designed 
    maximum limits. If the torque limiter fails to ``lock out'' at the 
    designated maximum limits, damage to the flap system, adjacent system, 
    or structural components can occur. Additionally, if the torque limiter 
    fails to ``lock out,'' a skewed flap condition may not be limited to 
    safe levels. This condition, if not corrected, could result in reduced 
    controllability of the airplane.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Service Bulletin 757-
    27A0127, Revision 1, dated September 2, 1999, which describes 
    procedures for replacement of transmission assemblies for the trailing 
    edge flaps with modified transmission assemblies. The modified 
    transmission assemblies include new torque limiters that can prevent 
    damage to the airplane from high system loads at the transmission 
    assemblies, and can prevent excessive skew of the trailing edge flap. 
    Accomplishment of the actions specified in the service bulletin is 
    intended to adequately address the identified unsafe condition.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions specified in 
    the service bulletin described previously, except as discussed below.
    
    Differences Between Proposed Rule and Service Bulletin
    
        Operators should note that this proposed AD would require 
    replacement of the existing transmission assemblies with modified parts 
    within 36 months after the effective date of this AD. The service 
    bulletin recommends that this action should be accomplished, ``during 
    the next scheduled flap transmission overhaul when materials are 
    available.'' In developing an appropriate compliance time for this 
    proposed action, the FAA considered not only the degree of urgency 
    associated with addressing the subject unsafe condition, but the 
    availability of required parts. The FAA has determined that 36 months 
    represents an appropriate interval of time allowable wherein an ample 
    number of required parts will be available for modification of the U.S. 
    fleet within the proposed compliance period. The FAA also finds that 
    such a compliance time will not adversely affect the safety of the 
    affected airplanes.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 796 airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 500 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 
    32 work hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed replacement, and 
    that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts would 
    cost approximately $85,104 per airplane. Based on these figures, the 
    cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $43,512,000, or $87,024 per airplane.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of 
    this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in 
    the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Boeing: Docket 98-NM-354-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 757 series airplanes, as listed in Boeing 
    Service Bulletin 757-27A0127, Revision 1, dated September 2, 1999; 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent damage to the flap system, adjacent system, or 
    structural components;
    
    [[Page 56281]]
    
    and excessive skew of the trailing edge flap; which could result in 
    reduced controllability of the airplane; accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, 
    replace the transmission assemblies for the trailing edge flaps with 
    transmission assemblies modified in accordance with Boeing Service 
    Bulletin 757-27A0127, Revision 1, dated September 2, 1999.
    
        Note 2: Replacements accomplished in accordance with Boeing 
    Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0127, dated September 10, 1998, are 
    considered acceptable for compliance with paragraph (a) of this AD.
    
        (b) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install 
    on any airplane, a trailing edge flap transmission assembly, unless 
    it has been modified in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 757-
    27A0127, Revision 1, dated September 2, 1999.
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 13, 1999.
    D.L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-27274 Filed 10-18-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/19/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
99-27274
Dates:
Comments must be received by December 3, 1999.
Pages:
56279-56281 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-354-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-27274.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13