96-25102. Dried Prunes Produced in California; Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 2, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 51356-51357]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-25102]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 993
    
    [Docket No. FV96-993-1 FIR]
    
    
    Dried Prunes Produced in California; Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting as a 
    final rule, without change, the provisions of an interim final rule 
    establishing an assessment rate for the Prune Marketing Committee 
    (Committee) under Marketing Order No. 993 for the 1996-97 and 
    subsequent crop years. The Committee is responsible for local 
    administration of the marketing order which regulates the handling of 
    dried prunes produced in California. Authorization to assess prune 
    handlers enables the Committee to incur expenses that are reasonable 
    and necessary to administer the program.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kate Nelson, Marketing Assistant, 
    Marketing Order Administration Branch, California Marketing Field 
    Office, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, suite 102B, 2202 
    Monterey Street, Fresno, California 93721, telephone 209-487-5901; FAX 
    209-487-5906, or Martha Sue Clark, Program Assistant, Marketing Order 
    Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. 
    Box 96456, room 2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, telephone 202-720-
    9918; FAX 202-720-5698. Small businesses may request information on 
    compliance with this regulation by contacting: Jay Guerber, Marketing 
    Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, 
    P.O. Box 96456, room 2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, telephone 202-
    720-2491; FAX 202-720-5698.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement and Order No. 993, both as amended (7 CFR part 993), 
    regulating the handling of dried prunes produced in California, 
    hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under 
    the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
    601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive 
    Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California 
    prune handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the 
    order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the 
    assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable 
    prunes beginning August 1, 1996, and continuing until amended, 
    suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local 
    laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
    conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not 
    later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this rule on small entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 1,400 producers of dried prunes in the 
    production area and approximately 21 handlers subject to regulation 
    under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers have been 
    defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those 
    having annual receipts of less than $500,000, and small agricultural 
    service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than 
    $5,000,000. The majority of California dried prune producers and 
    handlers may be classified as small entities.
        The California prune marketing order provides authority for the 
    Committee, with the approval of the Department, to formulate an annual 
    budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer 
    the program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of 
    California dried prunes. They are familiar with the Committee's needs 
    and with the costs of goods and services in their local area and are 
    thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment 
    rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public 
    meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to 
    participate and provide input.
        The Committee met on June 27, 1996, and unanimously recommended 
    1996-97 expenditures of $283,500 and an assessment rate of $1.50 per 
    salable ton of dried prunes. In comparison, last year's budgeted 
    expenditures were $275,280. The assessment rate of $1.50 per salable 
    ton is $0.05 lower than last year's established rate. Major 
    expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 1996-97 crop year 
    include $142,120 for salaries and wages, $30,000 for research and 
    development, $22,000 for office rent, $20,000 for travel, $11,000 for 
    an acreage survey, $8,430 for the reserve for contingency, and $6,500 
    each for office supplies and data processing. Budgeted expenses for 
    these items in 1995-96 were $131,320, $30,000, $22,000, $20,000, 
    $10,500, $19,310, $5,000, and $3,500, respectively.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of California dried 
    prunes. Dried prune shipments for the year are estimated at 189,000 
    salable tons which should provide $283,500 in assessment income. Income 
    derived from handler assessments will be adequate to cover budgeted 
    expenses. Any funds not expended by the Committee during a crop year 
    may be used, pursuant to Sec. 993.81(c), for a period of five months 
    subsequent to that crop year. At the end of such period, the excess 
    funds are returned or credited to handlers.
        An interim final rule regarding this action was published in the 
    July 31, 1996, issue of the Federal Register (61 FR 39842). That 
    interim final rule added Sec. 993.347 to establish an assessment rate 
    for the Committee. That rule provided
    
    [[Page 51357]]
    
    that interested persons could file comments through August 30, 1996. No 
    comments were received.
        This action will reduce the assessment obligation imposed on 
    handlers. While this rule will impose some additional costs on 
    handlers, the costs are in the form of uniform assessments on all 
    handlers. Some of the additional costs may be passed on to producers. 
    However, these costs will be offset by the benefits derived from the 
    operation of the marketing order. Therefore, the AMS has determined 
    that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
        The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in 
    effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by the 
    Secretary upon recommendation and information submitted by the 
    Committee or other available information.
        Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite 
    period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each 
    crop year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
    recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
    times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or the 
    Department. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested 
    persons may express their views at these meetings. The Department will 
    evaluate Committee recommendations and other available information to 
    determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. 
    Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 
    1996-97 budget and those for subsequent crop years will be reviewed 
    and, as appropriate, approved by the Department.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined that good 
    cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 
    30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The 
    Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are 
    incurred on a continuous basis; (2) the 1996-97 crop year began August 
    1, 1996, and the marketing order requires that the rate of assessment 
    for each crop year apply to all assessable dried prunes handled during 
    such crop year; (3) handlers are aware of this action which was 
    unanimously recommended by the Committee at a public meeting and is 
    similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past years; and (4) 
    an interim final rule was published on this action which provided a 30-
    day comment period, and no comments were received.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993
    
        Marketing agreements, Plums, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        Note: This section will appear in the Code of Federal 
    Regulations.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 993 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 993--DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 993 which 
    was published at 61 FR 39842 on July 31, 1996, is adopted as a final 
    rule without change.
    
        Dated: September 25, 1996.
    Sharon Bomer Lauritsen,
    Acting Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 96-25102 Filed 10-01-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/1/1996
Published:
10/02/1996
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-25102
Dates:
August 1, 1996.
Pages:
51356-51357 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV96-993-1 FIR
PDF File:
96-25102.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 993