96-25201. Cranberries Grown in the States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York; Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 2, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 51353-51354]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-25201]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 929
    
    [Docket No. FV96-929-3 FIR]
    
    
    Cranberries Grown in the States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, 
    Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, 
    Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York; Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting as a 
    final rule, without change, the provisions of an interim final rule 
    establishing an assessment rate for the Cranberry Marketing Committee 
    (Committee) under Marketing Order No. 929 for the 1996-97 and 
    subsequent fiscal periods. The Committee is responsible for local 
    administration of the marketing order which regulates the handling of 
    cranberries grown in the States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, 
    Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, 
    Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York. Authorization to 
    assess cranberry handlers enables the Committee to incur expenses that 
    are reasonable and necessary to administer the program.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 1, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen M. Finn, Marketing 
    Specialist, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 
    Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-
    6456, telephone (202) 720-1509, FAX# (202) 720-5698, or Tershirra 
    Yeager, Program Assistant, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2523-S, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456, telephone (202) 720-5127, FAX# (202) 720-
    5698. Small businesses may request information on compliance with this 
    regulation by contacting: Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration 
    Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, Room 
    2523-S, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491, FAX# 
    (202) 720-5698.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order 
    No. 929 (7 CFR part 929), as amended, regulating the handling of 
    cranberries grown in the States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, 
    Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, 
    Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York, hereinafter 
    referred to as the ``order.'' The marketing order is effective under 
    the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
    601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, cranberry 
    handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the order are 
    derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate 
    as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable cranberries 
    beginning September 1, 1996, and continuing until amended, suspended, 
    or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, 
    regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
    conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not 
    later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this rule on small entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 1,050 producers of cranberries in the 
    production area and approximately 30 handlers subject to regulation 
    under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers have been 
    defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those 
    having annual receipts less than $500,000, and small agricultural 
    service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than 
    $5,000,000. The majority of cranberry producers and handlers may be 
    classified as small entities. Interested persons are invited to submit 
    information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this action 
    on small businesses.
        The cranberry marketing order provides authority for the Committee, 
    with the approval of the Department, to formulate an annual budget of 
    expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the 
    program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of 
    cranberries. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with the 
    costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a 
    position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The 
    assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, 
    all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and 
    provide input.
        The Committee met on March 4, 1996, and recommended by a 7 to 1 
    vote an assessment rate of $0.04 per barrel of cranberries. A mail vote 
    was conducted by the Committee regarding the budget, requiring 
    responses by June 20, 1996. Seven out of eight responses were received 
    in favor of the proposed budget. The 1996-97 recommended
    
    [[Page 51354]]
    
    expenditures are $192,980. In comparison, last year's budgeted 
    expenditures were $201,336. The assessment rate of $0.04 is $0.01 
    higher than last year's established rate. Major expenditures 
    recommended by the Committee for the 1996-97 year include $63,764 for 
    administrative expenses, and $66,732 for compensation.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of cranberries. 
    Cranberry shipments for the year are estimated at 4,737,000 barrels 
    which should provide $189,480 in assessment income. Income derived from 
    handler assessments, along with interest income, will be adequate to 
    cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the reserve will be kept within the 
    maximum permitted by the order.
        An interim final rule regarding this action was published in the 
    August 12, 1996, issue of the Federal Register (61 FR 41729). That rule 
    provided a 30-day comment period. No comments were received.
        While this rule will impose some additional costs on handlers, the 
    costs are in the form of uniform assessments on all handlers. Some of 
    the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these 
    costs will be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the 
    marketing order. Therefore, the AMS has determined that this rule will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
        The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in 
    effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by the 
    Secretary upon recommendation and information submitted by the 
    Committee or other available information.
        Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite 
    period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each 
    fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
    recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
    times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or the 
    Department. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested 
    persons may express their views at these meetings. The Department will 
    evaluate Committee recommendations and other available information to 
    determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. 
    Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 
    1996-97 budget and those for subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed 
    and, as appropriate, approved by the Department.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined that good 
    cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this action until 
    30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The 
    Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are 
    incurred on a continuous basis; (2) the 1996-97 fiscal period began on 
    September 1, 1996, and the marketing order requires that the rate of 
    assessment for each fiscal period apply to all assessable cranberries 
    handled during such fiscal period; (3) handlers are aware of this 
    action which was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a public 
    meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past 
    years; and (4) an interim final rule was published on this action, 
    providing a 30-day comment period, and no comments were received.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 929
    
        Cranberries, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 929 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 929--CRANBERRY MARKETING COMMITTEE
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 929 which 
    was published at 61 FR 41729 on August 12, 1996, is adopted as a final 
    rule without change.
    
        Dated: September 26, 1996.
    Sharon Bomer Lauritsen,
    Acting Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 96-25201 Filed 10-1-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/1/1996
Published:
10/02/1996
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-25201
Dates:
September 1, 1996.
Pages:
51353-51354 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV96-929-3 FIR
PDF File:
96-25201.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 929