94-26055. Anhydrous Sodium Metasilicate From France; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 202 (Thursday, October 20, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-26055]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: October 20, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [A-427-098]
    
     
    
    Anhydrous Sodium Metasilicate From France; Preliminary Results of 
    Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
    
    agency: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    action: Notice of preliminary results of Antidumping Duty 
    Administrative Review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    summary: In response to a request by the petitioner, the PQ 
    Corporation, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting 
    an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on anhydrous 
    sodium metasilicate (ASM) from France. This review covers Rhone Poulenc 
    Chime DeBase (Rhone Poulenc), a manufacturer/exporter of this 
    merchandise to the United States, and the period January 1, 1993 
    through December 31, 1993. The firm failed to submit a timely response 
    to our questionnaire. As a result, we have preliminarily determined to 
    use best information available for cash deposit and appraisement 
    purposes.
        Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary 
    results.
    
    effective date: October 20, 1994.
    
    for further information contact: Joseph A. Fargo or Richard Rimlinger, 
    Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International 
    Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
    Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
    4733.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On January 5, 1994, the Department published in the Federal 
    Register (59 FR 564) a notice of ``Opportunity to Request an 
    Administrative Review'' of the antidumping duty order on ASM from 
    France. On January 24, 1994, the petitioner, the PQ Corporation, 
    requested an administrative review of Rhone Poulenc, a manufacturer/
    exporter of this merchandise to the United States. We initiated the 
    review, covering the period January 1, 1993, through December 31, 1993, 
    on March 14, 1994 (59 FR 11769). The Department is now conducting this 
    review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as 
    amended (the Tariff Act).
    
    Scope of the Review
    
        Imports covered by the review are shipments of ASM, a crystallized 
    silicate (Na2 SiO3) which is alkaline and readily soluble in 
    water. Applications include waste paper de-inking, ore-flotation, 
    bleach stabilization, clay processing, medium or heavy duty cleaning, 
    and compounding into other detergent formulations. This merchandise is 
    classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedules (HTS) item numbers 
    2839.11.00 and 2839.19.00. The HTS item numbers are provided for 
    convenience and Customs purposes. The written description remains 
    dispositive.
        The review covers Rhone Poulenc and the period January 1, 1993 
    through December 31, 1993.
    
    Use of Best Information Available
    
        We mailed the antidumping questionnaire to Rhone Poulenc, the only 
    manufacturer/exporter of this merchandise to the United States. Rhone 
    Poulenc failed to submit a timely response to our questionnaire. The 
    Department has therefore decided to use the best information available 
    (BIA) in determining the rate for this firm.
        When a company fails to provide the information requested in a 
    timely manner, or otherwise significantly impedes the Department's 
    review, the Department considers the company uncooperative and 
    generally assigns to that company the higher of: (1) the highest rate 
    assigned to any company in a previous review or the investigation or 
    (2) the highest rate for a responding company with shipments during the 
    review period. See 19 CFR 353.37(b) and Final Results of Antidumping 
    Duty Administrative Review Portable Electric Typewriters from Japan 
    (November 4, 1991, 56 FR 56393). In this case, for BIA, we assigned to 
    Rhone Poulenc a margin of 60 percent, the highest rate from a prior 
    review. See Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
    Anhydrous Sodium Metasilicate from France (52 FR 33856, September 8, 
    1987).
    
    Preliminary Results of the Review
    
        As a result of our review, we preliminarily determine that a margin 
    of 60 percent exists for Rhone Poulenc for the period January 1, 1993 
    through December 31, 1993.
        Parties to the proceeding may request disclosure within five days 
    of the date of publication of this notice. Any interested party may 
    request a hearing within 10 days of publication. Case briefs and/or 
    written comments from interested parties may be submitted not later 
    than 30 days after the date of publication. Rebuttal brief sand 
    rebuttals to written comments, limited to issues raised in the case 
    briefs and comments, may be filed not later than 37 days after the date 
    of publication. Any hearing, if requested, will be held 44 days after 
    the date of publication, or the first workday thereafter. The 
    Department will publish the final results of the administrative review, 
    including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any such 
    written comments or at a hearing.
        Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department will 
    issue appraisement instructions directly to the Customs Service.
        Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective 
    upon publication of the final results of administrative review for all 
    shipments of ASM from France, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
    consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 
    751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the reviewed 
    company will be that established in the final results of this 
    administrative review; (2) for exporters not covered in this review, 
    but covered in previous reviews or the original less-than-fair-value 
    (LTFV) investigation, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
    company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the 
    exporter is not a firm covered in this review, previous reviews, or the 
    original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 
    rate will be that established for the most recent period for the 
    manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
    other manufactures or exporters will be 60 percent. On May 25, 1993, 
    the Court of International trade in Floral Trade Council v. United 
    States, 822 F. Supp 766 (1993), and Federal-Mogul Corporation and 
    Terrington Company v. United States, 822 F. Supp. 822 (1993), 
    determined that once an ``all others'' rate is established for a 
    company, it can only be changed through an administrative review. The 
    Department has determined that in order to implement these decisions it 
    is appropriate to maintain the original ``all others'' rate from the 
    LTFV investigation or that rate as amended for correction of clerical 
    errors or as a result of litigation in proceedings governed by 
    antidumping duty orders for the purposes of establishing cash deposits 
    in all current and future administrative reviews.
        Because this proceeding is governed by an antidumping duty order, 
    the ``all others'' rate for the purposes of this review will be 60 
    percent, the ``all others'' rate established in the final notice of the 
    LTFV investigation (46 FR 1667, January 7, 1981).
        These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
    publication of the final results of the next administrative review.
        This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
    responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate regarding the 
    reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
    relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
    requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
    reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
    assessment of double antidumping duties.
        This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
    section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 
    353.22.
    
        Dated: October 5, 1994.
    Susan G. Esserman,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 94-26055 Filed 10-19-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/20/1994
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of preliminary results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.
Document Number:
94-26055
Dates:
October 20, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: October 20, 1994, A-427-098