97-27638. Robert M. Binenfeld, M.D. Revocation of Registration  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 54468-54469]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-27638]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    
    Drug Enforcement Administration
    [Docket No. 97-21
    
    
    Robert M. Binenfeld, M.D. Revocation of Registration
    
        On June 23, 1997, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
    Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an 
    Order to Show Cause to Robert M. Binenfeld, M.D., (Respondent), of 
    Monroe, New York. The Order to Show Cause notified him of an 
    opportunity to show cause as to why DEA should not revoke his DEA 
    Certificate of Registration, AB4921210, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 
    824(a)(3), and deny any pending applications for registration pursuant 
    to 21 U.S.C. 823(f), for reason that he is not currently authorized to 
    handle controlled substances in the State of New York.
        On July 11, 1997, Respondent filed a request for a hearing, and the 
    matter was docketed before Administrative Law Judge Gail A. Randall. On 
    July 21, 1997, Judge Randall issued an Order for Prehearing Statements. 
    Thereafter, on August 8, 1997, the Government filed a Motion for 
    Summary Disposition and Motion to Stay Proceedings, alleging that 
    effective December 19, 1994, the State of New York, Department of 
    Health, State Board for Professional Medical Conduct (Board) revoked 
    Respondent's license to practice medicine and therefore, Respondent is 
    not authorized to handle controlled substances in that state.
        On August 11, 1997, Judge Randall issued an Order providing 
    Respondent with an opportunity to respond to the Government's motion. 
    In addition, Judge Randall stayed the proceedings pending her ruling on 
    the Government's motion.
        On August 21, 1997, Respondent filed a response to the Government's 
    motion, arguing that, ``[m]any statements made by the [Board] are 
    untrue.'' Respondent however, did not deny that he is not currently 
    authorized to handle controlled substances in the State of New York.
        On August 26, 1997, Judge Randall issued her Opinion and 
    Recommended Decision, finding that Respondent lacked authorization to 
    handle controlled substances in the State of New York; granting the 
    Government's Motion for Summary Disposition; and recommending that 
    Respondent's DEA Certificate of Registration be revoked. Neither party 
    filed exceptions to her opinion, and on October 1, 1997, Judge Randall 
    transmitted the record of these proceedings to the Acting Deputy 
    Administrator.
        The Acting Deputy Administrator has considered the record in its 
    entirety, and pursuant to 21 C.F.R. 1316.67, hereby issues his final 
    order based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law as hereinafter 
    set forth. The Acting Deputy Administrator adopts, in its entirety, the 
    Opinion and Recommended Decision of the Administrative Law Judge.
        The Acting Deputy Administrator finds that the Hearing Committee of 
    the Board issued a Decision and Order dated August 26, 1994, finding 
    among other things, that Respondent committed gross negligence, gross 
    incompetence, negligence and incompetence in his practice of medicine. 
    As a result, the Hearing Committee ordered the revocation of 
    Respondent's license to practice medicine in the State of New York. 
    Effective December 19, 1994, the Board's Administrative Review Board 
    affirmed the Hearing Committee's decision to revoke Respondent's 
    medical license. Subsequently, on February 21, 1995, the State of New 
    York, supreme Court-Appellate Division, Third Judicial Department 
    denied Respondent's request for a stay of the Board's order.
        Therefore, the Acting Deputy Administrator finds that Respondent is 
    not currently authorized to practice medicine in the State of New York. 
    As a result, the Acting Deputy Administrator concludes that it is 
    reasonable to infer that Respondent is not authorized to handle 
    controlled substances in that state.
        The DEA does not have statutory authority under the Controlled 
    Substances Act to issue or maintain a registration if the applicant or 
    registrant is without state authority to handle controlled substances 
    in the state in which he conducts his business. 21 U.S.C. 802(21), 
    823(f) and 824(a)(3). This prerequisite has been consistently upheld. 
    See Romeo J. Perez, M.D. 62 FR
    
    [[Page 54469]]
    
    16,193 (1997); Demetris A. Green, M.D., 61 FR 60,728 (1996); Dominick 
    A. Ricci, M.D., 58 FR 51,104 (1993). Since Respondent lacks authority 
    in the State of New York to handle controlled substances, he is not 
    entitled to a DEA registration in that state.
        While, Respondent argues that many untrue statements were made by 
    the Board in revoking his license to practice medicine, he does not 
    dispute that he is currently not authorized to handle controlled 
    substances in the State of New York. Under the circumstances, Judge 
    Randall properly granted the Government's Motion for Summary 
    Disposition. It is well-settled that when no question of material fact 
    is involved, a plenary, adversary administrative proceeding involving 
    evidence and cross-examination of witnesses is not obligatory. See 
    Phillip E. Kirk, M.D., 48 FR 32,887 (1983) aff'd sub nom Kirk V. 
    Mullen, 749 F.2d 297 (6th Cir. 1984); NLRB v. International Association 
    of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, AFL-CIO, 549 F.2d 634 
    (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., 44 
    F.2d 432 (9th Cir. 1971).
        Accordingly, the Acting Deputy Administrator of the Drug 
    Enforcement Administration, pursuant to the authority vested in him by 
    21 U.S.C. 823 and 824 and 28 C.R.F. 0.100(b) and 0.104, hereby orders 
    that DEA Certificate of Registration AB4921210, previously issued to 
    Robert M. Binenfeld, M.D., be, and it hereby is, revoked. The Acting 
    Deputy Administrator further orders that any pending applications for 
    the renewal of such registration be, and they hereby are denied. This 
    order is effective November 19, 1997.
    
        Dated: October 10, 1997.
    James S. Milford,
    Acting Deputy Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 97-27638 Filed 10-17-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/20/1997
Department:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-27638
Pages:
54468-54469 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-27638.pdf