97-27642. Proposed Collection; Comment Request  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 54434-54435]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-27642]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    Office of the Secretary
    
    
    Proposed Collection; Comment Request
    
    AGENCY: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction 
    Act of 1995, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) 
    announces the proposed review of the Technology Reinvestment Project 
    (TRP) and seeks public comment on the information collection and 
    provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
    collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
    the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
    have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
    the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance 
    the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; 
    and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on 
    respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
    techniques or other forms of information technology.
    
    DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
    19, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comment and recommendations on the proposed 
    information collection should be sent to: Mr. John D. Jennings, DARPA/
    JDUPO, 3803 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this 
    proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and 
    associated collection instruments, please write to the above address or 
    call Mr. John D. Jennings (DARPA/JDUPO) at 703-526-1930.
        Title; Associated Forms; and OMB Number: TRP Review Project, No 
    form number.
        Needs and Uses: The TRP is no longer receiving Federal funding, but 
    new initiatives have begun to broaden and normalize the application of 
    dual-use technologies and products. As part of its support of these 
    initiatives, DARPA is sponsoring this review project to quantitatively 
    express the status and performance of the TRP projects and to document 
    lessons learned. This review will also provide an opportunity to 
    present TRP products and technologies to the Services for adoption. The 
    information collected will be used by DARPA's Joint Dual Use Program 
    Office (JDUPO) and the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to 
    define and document the status of each TRP project and to derive 
    performance metrics suitable for the Government Performance Results Act 
    (GPRA).
        TRP project successes and failures and lessons learned from the TRP 
    will be compiled from the information gathered as well as materials for 
    education and training. Because the TRP projects are nearing 
    completion, this data must be collected now or it will become nearly 
    impossible to track down. If that happens, the opportunity will be lost 
    to assess the benefits of the TRP and to learn lessons that will help 
    to expand dual-use and embed it into the Military Services. It is also 
    a last chance to develop quantitative assessment data for GPRA.
        Affected Public: Business or other for profit; not-for-profit.
        Annual Burden Hours: 280.
        Number of Respondents: 140.
        Responses per Respondent: 1.
        Average Burden per Response: 2 hours.
        Frequency: On occasion, generally only one time.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Several steps are being taken to minimize 
    the burden of this data collection on participating businesses. 
    Duplication will be avoided by carefully formulating the questions 
    which must be asked, and by designating a Review Team which will 
    conduct the review consistently, while sharing resulting insights as 
    they emerge. In addition, whenever possible, data collection will be 
    combined with regularly scheduled project review
    
    [[Page 54435]]
    
    meetings. While industry will receive the questions early, the data 
    will generally be developed with a Review Team member. Government 
    program managers and agents will be consulted for data prior to 
    interviewing industrial participants in order to further reduce the 
    latter's time expenditure. For example, DARPA personnel in the JDUPO 
    have been consulted as to the availability of material. Their files 
    have been used to minimize further collection. In addition, Service, 
    Department of Transportation (DOT), Department of Energy (DOE), 
    National Science Foundation (NSF), and other agencies involved have 
    been contacted and consulted. Further, this review will be conducted 
    only once (as opposed to yearly) although a follow-up will be made on 
    each unfinished project in order to update the data.
        There is no need for respondents to make any capital expenditures 
    to support this effort. The average time required of the respondents is 
    estimated at two hours. (Since most of the questions have already been 
    addressed as part of normal business practices, little preparation is 
    usually needed).
    
        Dated: October 14, 1997.
    L.M. Bynum,
    Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
    [FR Doc. 97-27642 Filed 10-17-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/20/1997
Department:
Defense Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
97-27642
Dates:
Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 19, 1997.
Pages:
54434-54435 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-27642.pdf