[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 204 (Monday, October 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54640-54641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-26865]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-776-000]
Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Southwest Missouri Expansion
Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues
October 15, 1996.
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the construction and operation of
the facilities proposed in the Southwest Missouri Expansion Project.\1\
This EA will be used by the Commission in its decision-making process
to determine whether an environmental impact statement is necessary and
whether to approve the project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Williams Natural Gas Company's application was filed with
the Commission under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157
of the Commission's regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of the Proposed Project
Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG) wants to expand the capacity of
its facilities in Kansas and Missouri to transport an additional 20,316
dekatherms per day (Dth/d) of natural gas to five customers. WNG seeks
authority to construct and operate:
A 3.2-mile-long extension of the Springfield Loop Line HS
in Christian County, Missouri (looping its 16-inch-diameter Line HQ);
and
A 9.5-mile-long extension of the Southern Trunk Loop Line
FR in Montgomery and Labette Counties, Kansas (looping its 20-inch-
diameter Line F).
The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix
1.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available from the
Commission's Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, or call (202) 208-1371.
Copies of the appendices were sent to all those receiving this
notice in the mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Requirements for Construction
Construction of the proposed facilities would require about 154
acres of land. Following construction, land would be restored and about
38 acres would be maintained as new permanent right-of-way along with
about 63 acres of existing permanent right-of-way that was used during
construction. The remaining 53 acres of land would revert to its former
use.
The EA Process
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals.
We call this ``scoping''. The main goal of the scoping process is to
focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By
this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the
scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received
are considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local
government representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents
of this proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of
concern.
The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the
construction and operation of the proposed project under these general
headings:
Geology and soils.
Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands.
Vegetation and wildlife.
Endangered and threatened species.
Public safety.
Land use.
Cultural resources.
Air quality and noise.
Hazardous waste.
We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project
or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen
or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending
on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be
published and mailed to Federal, state, and local agencies, public
interest groups, interested individuals, affected landowners,
newspapers, libraries, and the Commission's official service list for
this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA
is published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we
recommend that the Commission approve or not approve the project.
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
We have already identified several issues that we think deserve
attention
[[Page 54641]]
based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and the
environmental information provided by WNG. This preliminary list of
issues may be changed based on your comments and our analysis.
Two perennial and 13 intermittent streams would be
crossed.
At least one perennial stream, the Verdigris River, would
be crossed by directional drilling.
Two wetlands would be crossed by the project.
Three domestic water wells would be located within 200
feet of the construction right-of-way.
One residence would be located within 50 feet of the
construction right-of-way.
Additional temporary workspace may be needed at stream,
road, and utility crossings and for equipment/materials storage.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by sending a letter addressing your
specific comments or concerns about the project. You should focus on
the potential environmental effects of the proposal, alternatives to
the proposal (including alternative routes), and measures to avoid or
lessen environmental impact. The more specific your comments, the more
useful they will be. Please follow the instructions below to ensure
that your comments are received and properly recorded:
Address your letter to: Lois Cashell, Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., N.E., Washington, DC
20426.
Reference Docket No. CP96-776-000;
Send a copy of your letter to: Ms. Jennifer Goggin, EA
Project Manager, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St.,
N.E., PR-11.2, Washington, DC 20426; and
Mail your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, DC on or before November 14, 1996.
If you wish to receive a copy of the EA, you should request one
from Ms. Goggin at the above address.
Becoming an Intervenor
In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an official party to the proceeding or become an
``intervenor''. Among other things, intervenors have the right to
receive copies of case-related Commission documents and filings by
other intervenors. Likewise, each intervenor must provide copies of its
filings to all other parties. If you want to become an intervenor you
must file a motion to intervene according to Rule 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see
appendix 2).
The date for filing timely motions to intervene in this proceeding
has passed. Therefore, parties now seeking to file late interventions
must show good cause, as required by section 385.214(b)(3), why this
time limitation should be waived. Environmental issues have been viewed
as good cause for late intervention.
You do not need intervenor status to have your scoping comments
considered.
Additional information about the proposed project is available from
Ms. Jennifer Goggin, EA Project Manager, at (202) 208-2226.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-26865 Filed 10-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
