[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 23, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55019-55025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-27115]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LITERACY
[CFDA No. 84.257M]
Application for Adult Learning System Reform and Improvement
Grant: Stage II Collaborative Development of Equipped for the Future
(EFF) Adult Literacy Standards Cooperative Agreements
AGENCY: The National Institute for Literacy.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Institute for Literacy invites applications for a
grant to support the development of content standards for the role of
parent/family member through a consensus-building process. This grant
will be part of the third phase of a four-phased initiative whose
ultimate goal is to reform and improve America's adult learning systems
in order to enhance progress toward National Education Goal 6. This aim
will be achieved through the development of voluntary content standards
that communicate a clear vision for what adults need to know and be
able to do in their roles as citizen, worker, and parent/family member
and the building of consensus about these standards among key
constituencies at the grassroots, state, and national levels.
DATES: Applications must be received at the NIFL office by 4:30 pm on
December 20, 1996; items delivered after that date will not be
accepted.
Note to Applicants: This notice is a complete application
package, except for required forms. Together with the NIFL Equipped
for the Future Orientation Package, and the statute authorizing the
program and applicable regulations governing the program, including
the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR),
this notice contains all the information, regulations and
instructions needed to apply for a grant under this competition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sondra Stein, National Institute for Literacy, 800 Connecticut Avenue,
NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006, TEL: 202-632-1508; FAX 202-632-
1512, e-mail sstien@nifl.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For purposes of this notice, the following definitions apply:
``Literacy'' is an individual's ability to read, write, and speak
in English, and compute and solve problems at levels of proficiency
necessary to function on the job and in society, to achieve one's goals
and develop one's knowledge and potential (as stated in the National
Literacy Act of 1991).
``Adult Literacy System'' means all individuals, programs, and
organizations that are involved, directly and indirectly, in the
delivery of literacy and basic skills services to adults. This
includes, but is not limited to, people and groups involved in literacy
policymaking, research and development, technical assistance, and
service delivery.
``Adult Roles'' means the following three major arenas of adult
life and the obligations that pertain to each:
Parent/family member.
Citizen.
Worker.
``Constituencies'' are national, state or local organizations and
individuals (in the public, nonprofit, and private sectors) that have a
stake in developing content and performance standards for the relevant
role because the quality of role performance impacts their
organization's achievement of its goals/mission.
``Consensus-building'' includes the development of a convincing
public argument for the use of ``Equipped for the Future'' standards by
key constituencies and the conscious, ongoing effort to expand the
number of individuals from key constituencies involved in standards
development, use, marketing, and dissemination and to leverage the use
of the standards at the national, state, and local levels by key
segments of the workforce development system.
``Content Standards'' are specific descriptions of what adults need
to know and be able to do to perform the key activities identified in
the standards framework.
``Generative skills'' are skills or knowledge that are core to the
performance of a wide range of tasks found in multiple roles and that
are durable over time in face of changes in technology, work processes,
and occupational demand.
``National Policy Group'' is the body of nationally-recognized
leaders in literacy and workforce development invited by the NIFL to
provide policy guidance and consensus-building support to the EFF
initiative.
``Performance Indicators'' are descriptions of how achievement of
the content standards will be demonstrated. They reflect the consensus
of key stakeholders identified for the role being addressed.
``Planning Grant Recipients'' are the eight projects that were
funded to complete Phase 2 of the ``Equipped for the Future''
initiative. These grants end September 30, 1997.
``Purposes for Literacy,'' based on NIFL's survey of adult
learners, means the following four general purposes that literacy
serves in helping adults fulfill their roles:
Providing access to information so adults can orient
themselves in the world.
Enabling adults to give voice to their ideas and have an
impact on the world around them.
Enabling adults to make decisions and act independently,
without needing to rely on others.
Building a bridge to the future by laying a foundation for
continued learning, so adults can keep up with the world as it changes.
The EFF ``Standards Framework'' describes the building blocks for
EFF content and performance standards. It provides a consensus
definition, for
[[Page 55020]]
each adult role, of the broad areas of responsibility, key activities,
and skills and knowledge adults require to fulfill these roles;
articulates the core elements of a theory for adult learning based on
the four learner-identified purposes for literacy; demonstrates how the
four purposes enable us to identify the core skills and knowledge that
form the basis for content standards; and identifies criteria for EFF
content and performance standards for communicate what customers,
investors, and partners can expect from the adult literacy system.
These elements link the framework explicitly to other standards
development and implementation efforts.
``Validation'' demonstrates the degree to which the standards
address the important aspects of role performance.
``Human Resource Development System'' is the sum of the myriad of
public and private programs that are linked by their focus on building
the skills and knowledge of youth and adults including: adults and
family literacy programs, welfare-to-work programs, vocational
education and training programs, school-to-work programs, industry-
based skill standards programs, K-12 education programs, postsecondary
education, Job Training Partnership Act programs, community college/
postsecondary education programs, employer-sponsored training programs,
apprenticeship programs, one-stop career centers, dislocated worker
programs, and related programs in the public, private, and nonprofit
sectors.
Background
The National Institute for Literacy (NIFL) was created by the
National Literacy Act of 1991 to provide a national focal point for
literacy activities and to facilitate the pooling of ideas and
expertise across a fragmented field. NIFL is authorized to carry out a
wide range of activities that will improve and expand the system for
delivery of adult literacy services nationwide.
In the first phase of this initiative, the NIFL identified a common
framework of four fundamental purposes for literacy that emerge from
the writings of 1,500 adults in literacy programs nationwide. As
detailed in the NIFL report, Equipped for the Future: A Customer Driven
Vision for Adult Literacy and Lifelong Learning, these four purposes
are to--
Gain access to information so adults can orient themselves
in the world;
Give voice to ideas, so that they will be heard and can
have an impact on the world around them;
Make decisions and act independently; and
Build a bridge to the future, by learning how to learn in
order to keep up with the world as it changes.
In October, 1995 the NIFL awarded eight one-year planning grants as
the second phase of this multi-year initiative to assure that adults
are ``equipped for the future.'' These planning grants provided the
NIFL with considerable information regarding how to structure and carry
out a national standards development initiative aimed at broad-reaching
system reform. The grantees, working collaboratively with each other,
with NIFL and its National Policy Group, developed a set of Guiding
Principles for the conduct and products of the Equipped for the Future
initiative, and produced reports (due at NIFL July 15, 1996) that are
currently being synthesized to produce a draft standards framework,
defining what adults need to know and be able to do to be effective in
their roles as parent/family member, worker, and citizen, that will be
the basis for work in Phase 3 of EFF.
This solicitation of grant applications addresses the third project
phase: standards development through consensus-building. This phase of
the Equipped for the Future initiative will build on the results of
Phase I and 2 of EFF to create a strong foundation for national reform
of adults and family literacy and basic skills education as well as for
an effective national system of workforce development. To achieve this
end, this phase of the Equipped for the Future initiative will be
developed in partnership with the following Federal agencies: the U.S.
Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administrative, for the
role of worker; the U.S. Department to Education, Office of Elementary
and Secondary Education, for the role of parent/family member.
Eligible Applicants: Applications will be accepted from consortia
of public and private for-profit and not-for-profit organizations and
agencies that meet the following criteria: (a) Operate at a local,
state, regional (multi-state) and national level; (b) include literacy
consumer, practitioner, provider, administrator, and funder
constituencies; and (c) include technical experts in standards
development and assessment. While such consortia may include for-profit
organizations, no grant will be made to a for-profit organization.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: Applications must be
received at the NIFL office by 4:30 pm on December 20, 1996; items
delivered after that date will not be accepted.
Available Funds: $200,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: One award for the role of parent/family
member.
Estimated Amount of Each Award: Up to $200,000.
Project Period: One year, with an option to renew for up to two
additional project years. Funds awarded are for the first year only.
Description of Program
The overall purposes of the Equipped for the Future initiative are
to:
Develop a new customer-driven definition of adult literacy
that demystifies the route to success in our society for adult learners
and clarifies the contributions of adult literacy programs to building
that success.
Engage broad-based support among key constituencies for a
system of human resource development that effectively links literacy
with industry skill standards and K-12 academic standards as well as
provides a common framework for skills development across myriad and
diverse programs.
Develop a set of voluntary national standards that show
the portability of skills across the three adult roles and make clear
the knowledge and skills adults need to be ``equipped for the future.''
The specific objectives for grantees funded for Phase 3 of the EFF
initiative are to:
(1) Build consensus at the national, state, and local levels for
the EFF vision, standards framework, and the standards relevant to the
role addressed in the grantee's application;
(2) Develop and refine content standards and performance indicators
for the role addressed by the grantee, and, working in collaboration
with the National Institute for Literacy, its Federal partners in this
initiative, and the other grantees, across all three roles; and
(3) Collaborate with the National Institute for Literacy, its
Federal partners, and the other grantees to create a national framework
for reform of the adult education and training delivery systems.
Consortia receiving a grant under this program shall launch a
standards development and consensus-building initiative to provide a
solid foundation for comprehensive, collaborative system reform and
improvement. This program represents the third phase of a four-phase
initiative:
Phase 1: Survey of 1,500 adult learners to identify what
they need to know and be able to do to be equipped for the future. This
study, fully elaborated in the report Equipped for
[[Page 55021]]
the Future: A Customer-Driven Vision for Adult Literacy and Lifelong
Learning, identified four purposes for literacy that enable adults to
fulfill their responsibilities as parent, citizens, and workers. These
purposes are to:
--Gain access to information so adults can orient themselves in the
world;
--Give voice to ideas, so that they will be heard and can have an
impact on the world around them;
--Make decisions and act independently;
--Build a bridge to the future, by learning how to learn in order to
keep up with the world as it changes.
Phase 2: Planning grants to eight organizations and
consortia of organizations to engage key literacy constituencies
(learners, practitioners, and other stakeholders) in building a common
understanding of the four adult learner-defined purposes for literacy
as they relate to the adult roles of parent/family member, citizen, and
worker. The result of this phase will be a common standards framework
(completed October, 1996) defining what an adult needs to know and be
able to do in each of the key roles, and a common vision of system
reform.
Phase 3: Further development and refinement of the
Equipped for the Future standards framework, resulting in:
--A consensus map of the broad areas of responsibility, key activities
and knowledge and skills for each role;
--Development of content standards for each adult role and across all
three adult roles;
--Development of performance indicators for each standard;
--Engaging key constituencies, including adult literacy programs, in
developing and refining content standards and performance indicators in
order to build support for the standards and their use;
--Development of a strategy for validation of content standards and
performance indicators through pilot implementation in adult education
delivery systems.
Phase 4: Implement system reform initiatives that are
based on the Equipped for the Future Standards.
During the grant period--January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997, the
grantee will engage in the following activities:
1. Establish a national project advisory group to provide broad
guidance and assure that all key constituencies for the role addressed
by the grant applicant have a meaningful role in the standards
development process, leading to buy-in and formal approval of the draft
standards. The advisory group shall include representatives of the key
constituencies for the role addressed as well as technical expert(s) in
standards development and assessment. The project advisory group shall
meet no less than three times per year and be comprised of individuals
who legitimately represent a key constituency whose buy-in is critical
to achieving widespread acceptance of the standards. The project
advisory group members shall represent national, state, and grassroots
constituencies (both organizations and individuals) and be charged with
ensuring buy-in and formal approval of the draft standards by the
constituency they represent. While project advisory group membership
will vary from role to role (see #3 below), all groups shall include
representatives of adult learners and practitioners.
2. Work in collaboration with the other two grantees, the NIFL, its
Federal partners, and the Equipped for the Future National Policy
Group, to refine the common standards framework for Equipped for the
Future starting with the draft framework developed in the second phase
of the EFF initiative. The framework will ensure that:
The standards for each role are based on a consensus map
of the broad areas of responsibility for that role, key activities
within those areas of responsibility, and what adults need to know and
be able to do to perform those key activities;
That skills and knowledge common to more than one role are
clearly identified and result in the development of content standards
across the three roles;
The standards development process is based on common
definitions and assumptions about the development and use of content
standards and performance indicators;
The standards share a common format and structure.
The standards framework and the resulting standards shall build
upon a thorough familiarity with key documents and major initiatives
supported by NIFL's Federal partners, including the U.S. Departments of
Education, Labor; and Health and Human Services, as well as other
local, state and national efforts including:
The SCANS/NJAS (the Secretary's Commission on Achieving
Necessary Skills/the National Job Analysis Study) and O*NET
initiatives, U.S. Department of Labor;
The work of the National Skill Standards Board and other
national skill standards initiatives;
The New Standards Project and related academic content
standards; and
Other efforts to identify appropriate performance results
from learning, such as the NIFL Performance Measurement Reporting
Improvement Systems (PMRIS) initiative and the work of the National
Association of State Directors of Adult Education to identify
performance outcomes for adult education.
This work will result in a fully elaborated consensus standards
framework for EFF by April 1997.
3. Develop content standards and related performance indicators for
what adults need to know and be able to do to fulfill their roles as
parent/family member, citizen and worker. The content standards and
performance indicators shall be developed within the common standards
framework described above, jointly elaborated and refined by the three
grantees and NIFL with the guidance of NIFL's Federal partners and its
National Policy Group, and through ongoing collaboration with key
constituencies (including adult learners and teachers) so they are
grounded in the needs of these constituencies.
The content standards and performance indicators development
process must demonstrate that key constituencies have participated and
contributed to the standards development and that the grantee's
advisory group has approved the standards developed as a basis for
national validation.
The standards development process must incorporate significant
collaboration with the key constituencies to assure that the standards
are customer-driven (e.g., through group processes for standards
refinement with key constituencies and other methods for constituency
involvement and feedback throughout the developmental process). Group
process for standards development and refinement must include
mechanisms for assuring on-going piloting of content standards in adult
education and training classrooms in multiple locations across the
country. Content standards with the performance indicators will be
identified by July, 1997.
4. Actively engage key constituencies in the standards development
process in order to build ownership and support of the standards and to
assure they are truly ``customer-driven.'' (January 1997 through
December, 1997). Key constituencies/end users who are critical to
assuring widespread use of the standards must be identified in the
grant application. They key constituencies/end users identified
[[Page 55022]]
should include but not be limited to teachers, learners, employers,
parents, civic organizations, and other standards-setting initiatives
related to the role being addressed by the grantee.
For the role of parents, these constituencies should include such
groups as the National Coalition for Parental Involvement in Education,
the National Head Start Association, the National Coalition for Family
Resources, the National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral
Agencies, Even Start State Coordinators, The Center for Law and
Education, the National Education Association, the American Federation
of Teachers, Parent-Teacher Associations, and Even Start, Head Start
and other family literacy providers.
For the role of worker, these constituencies should include such
groups as: employers and employer associations, unions, the National
Skill Standards Board, State Human Resource Investment Councils, State
skill standards initiatives, local private industry councils and job
training administrative organizations, apprenticeship or other training
sponsored by organized labor, school-to-work, workplace literacy, and
providers of other related programs.
For the role of citizens, these constituencies should include such
groups as the Center for Civic Education, developers of the National
Standards for Civics and Government (K-12 education), Kettering
Foundation/National Issues Forum, American Bar Association, League of
Women Voters, National League of Cities, VERA, The Center for Civic
Literacy, the National Urban League, and other grassroots, state and
national organizations and associations that focus on civil rights,
neighborhood action, etc.
5. By October 30, 1997, develop a plan for nationwide validation
and implementation of the content standards and related performance
indicators in adult education and job training delivery systems, in
cooperation with NIFL, its Federal partners, the National Policy group
and the other grantees. These plans should reflect the use of the EFF
standards in building linkages with other key components of the nations
workforce development system. Validation strategies may also include
national surveys, constituency group review and analysis of the
standards or similar strategies. The elements and criteria for the
validation process will be developed jointly with NIFL and the other
grantees.
6. Identify technical assistance needed to assure the success of
steps 1-5 above of the EFF initiative. Technical assistance
requirements are expected to include the unique needs of the applicant
as well as needs that are common to all grantees. The NIFL will engage
technical assistance services to support the work of the EFF projects
under this grant.
7. Participate in two, three-day project meetings in, March 1997
and July 1997 in Washington, DC.
8. Participate in monthly project conference calls of two hours
duration.
9. Maintain regular e-mail and other contact with other grantees
throughout the grant period, in order to maximize sharing of
information and assure the development of standards within a common
framework.
10. Cooperate with a third-party evaluation of the standards
development and constituency-building process, lessons learned and
outcomes, providing project reports and other project documentation to
the evaluation team, participating in interviews, and assisting in
collecting evaluation data, and in other ways cooperating with the
project evaluation.
Proposal Narrative:
The applicant's proposal narrative must be organized and contain
the information as described in the following sections.
(1) Approach of Standards Development for System Reform describes
the applicant's view of why standards development is important in the
adult literacy and human resource development field and how the
applicant envisions standards being used to improve the quality of the
service delivery system. This section also includes the applicant's
criteria for effective standards, philosophy of standards development
and consensus-building, and an overview of the key features of the
applicant's approach for supporting the purposes of the EFF initiative
and achieving the project objectives described above.
In particular, the applicant should describe its approach to
effectively building on the work accomplished in Phases 1 and 2 of the
Equipped for the Future Initiative and related work appropriate to each
role. This work is particularly substantial for the role of worker,
including the U.S. Department of Labor's work on SCANS, the National
Job Analysis Study which builds on SCANS to identify the work
activities that are critical in the most competitive business
environments, the O*NET to replace the DOT with a relational database
that contains comprehensive information about worker requirements and
characteristics, experience requirements and occupational requirements
and characteristics useful to students, educators, employers and
workers (further information in EFF Orientation Packet).
Using the draft materials from Phase 2 provided in the EFF
Orientation Packet, the applicant should demonstrate its technical
approach to standards development, including the specific standards
development issues to be addressed in moving to a common standards
framework that embraces all three adult roles.
(2) Plan of Operation includes the project goal and objectives,
work plan, timeline, and project management plan. The applicant's plan
of operation should include:
(a) What techniques the applicant will use for refining the
standards framework, developing content standards, and identifying
performance indicators;
(b) how the applicant will involve key constituencies in project
decisionmaking and standards development, implementation, marketing/
dissemination, and validation tasks;
(c) how the applicant will work with the two other grantees to
assure that the standards share a common format, structure, and
language and that this initiative results in a unified standards
framework and consistency in the standards across the three grantees;
and
(d) how the applicant will document and monitor project processes
and results.
(3) Organizational Capability demonstrates the ability and
experience of the applicant and the members of its consortium to
perform the tasks required in this project and its skills, technical
expertise and knowledge in standards development, adult literacy
instruction, and consensus-building among diverse constituencies at the
national, state, and local levels.
(4) Qualifications of Key Personnel describes the qualifications of
each staff person for the project position to which they have been
assigned, identifies his/her employing organization, and provides an
overview of his/her experience, knowledge, and capability to perform
the work described as demonstrated by the conduct of similar work in
related settings.
(5) Demonstrated Commitment of Partners and Key Constituencies
provides evidence (e.g., letters of commitment) that show that (a)
project advisory board members and other partners in the consortia
understand their roles and are prepared to fulfill them at the level
described in the proposal; and (b) key constituencies significant to
the relevant role are
[[Page 55023]]
supportive of the applicant's grant application.
Selection Criteria
In evaluating applications for a grant under this competition, the
Director uses the following selection criteria (Total 105 points):
(1) Approach to Standards Development (30 points): The Director
reviews each application to determine the extent to which the
applicant's approach to standards development and consensus-building is
appropriate to achieving the goals of Equipped for the Future,
including:
(a) the extent to which the applicant's proposed approach to
standards development:
(i) demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the Equipped for
the Future Initiative, its products to date and long term goals;
(ii) demonstrates knowledge of and understanding of key documents
and initiatives related to the role it proposes to develop standards
for; including the research literature;
(iii) builds on the first two project phases and other related
initiatives rather than ``reinventing'' that work; and
(iv) demonstrates a philosophy of collaborative standards
development that is consistent with the EFF approach and philosophy;
(b) the extent to which the applicant's proposed approach leverages
standards development tasks to build consensus among key constituencies
and effect system reform;
(c) the quality of the technical approach demonstrated in the
applicant's evaluation of the draft standards in the EFF Orientation
Packet, including the identification of specific issues and challenges
to be addressed in moving to a common standards framework that embraces
all three adult roles.
(2) Plan of Operation (30 points): The Director reviews each
application to determine the quality of the plan for developing
standards and building consensus among key constituencies, including:
(a) the extent to which the applicant states clear and measurable
goals and objectives for the project;
(b) the extent to which the applicant provides a fully detailed
plan and timeline for achieving these goals which
(i) includes specific strategies and techniques for refining the
standards framework, developing and refining content standards, and
identifying performance indicators on a national basis;
(ii) identifies specific mechanisms for involving adult learners
and practitioners as well as other key constituencies in these
activities; and
(iii) addresses the 10 key project activities and dates described
in the Description of Program above;
(c) the quality of the applicant's plan for working with the two
other grantees to assure that the standards share a common format,
structure, and language, including strategies recommended to assure
this initiative results in a unified standards framework and
consistency in the standards across the three grantees;
(d) the quality of the applicant's plan to involve key
constituencies in project decisionmaking and standards development,
implementation, marketing/dissemination, and validation tasks;
(e) the soundness of the plan for documenting and monitoring the
project processes and results.
(3) Organizational Capability and Qualifications of Key Personnel
(25 points): The Director reviews each application to determine the
capability of the applicant to achieve the goals of the project
including:
(a) the extent to which the applicant provides a full description
of each of the organizations that make up the consortium, including how
that organization contributes to the consortium's experience and
capability to:
(i) lead a broad-based collaborative national process for adult
learning systems reform and improvement that is standards-driven;
(ii) develop technically defensible customer-driven content
standards of what adults need to know and be able to do, related
performance indicators and validate them on a national basis; and
(iii) leverage the commitment and involvement of key constituencies
at the national, state, and local levels;
(b) the soundness of the staffing and organization plan for the
consortium, including
(i) how roles and responsibilities will be assigned among the
organizations within the consortium to assure clear lines of
decisionmaking and effective use of each organization's strengths;
(ii) a statement of clear performance objectives for key staff;
(iii) the scope and nature of their responsibilities;
(iv) the level of effort they will devote to this project; and
(v) the inclusion of a project organization chart;
(c) the extent to which staff assigned to key positions include
appropriate qualifications, in terms of knowledge, experience and
proven capability to perform the work described;
(d) the inclusion among the staff of individuals with specific
expertise, including;
(i) individuals with demonstrated experience in related standards
development efforts;
(ii) individuals with direct experience in adult literacy
instruction and/or curriculum development; and
(iii) individuals with a broad understanding of the workforce
development system and the ability to leverage the involvement of
influential representatives from other program areas that constitute
this system.
(4) Commitment of Partners and Key Constituencies (15 points); The
Director reviews each application to determine the quality of the plan
for engaging partners and key constituencies, including:
(a) the extent to which the applicant has;
(i) assembled a national advisory group that represents key
constituencies for their rule; and
(iii) secured written documentation of each member's ability to
represent that constituency on the advisory group;
(b) the extent to which the applicant has identified other
appropriate constituencies to participate in the project;
(c) the quality of the applicant's plan for assuring that each
constituency has the opportunity for appropriate and meaningful
involvement in project activities;
(d) the explicit and documented commitment of each constituency to
participate in the project.
(5) Budget and Cost Effectiveness (5 points): The Director reviews
each application to determine the extent to which:
(a) The budget is adequate to support grant activities;
(b) The costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives of the
project;
(c) The budgets for any subcontracts are detailed and appropriate;
and
(d) The budget details any resources, cash or in-kind, that the
applicant will provide or seek in order to supplement grant funds.
Other Application Requirements
The application shall include the following:
Project Summary: The proposal must contain a one page summary of
the proposed project suitable for publication. It should not be an
abstract of the application, but rather a self-contained description of
the project goals, approach and the activities proposed. The summary
must include the following information:
a. Name of applicant organization.
[[Page 55024]]
b. Description of the consortium proposing the project and the key
constituencies represented.
c. Adult role to be addressed in the plan: parent/family member.
Proposal Narrative: This narrative should not exceed twenty (20)
single-spaced pages, or forth (40) double-spaced pages. The narrative
may be amplified by material in attachments and appendices, but the
body should stand alone to give a complete picture of the project.
Applications which exceed 20 single-spaced pages or 40 double-spaced
pages will not be reviewed.
Summary Proposal Budget: The proposal must contain a budget for
support requested. The budget format may be reproduced as needed.
Facsimiles may be used, but do not make substitutions in prescribed
budget categories. Additional pages for budget explanation and
amplification should be attached and must be consistent with the data
and categories on the form. All budget requests must be documented and
justified.
The Institute is reviewing the possibility of restricting indirect
cost to 8% for this grant.
Budget Proposal: The Budget proposal should be a separate document.
Personnel items should include the names (or position titles) of key
staff, number of hours, and applicable hourly rates. Discussion of
equipment, supplies, and travel should include both the cost and the
purpose and justification. Budgets should include all applicant's costs
and should identify contributed costs, and support from other sources,
if any. Sources of support should be clearly identified in all
instances. The financial aspects of any cost sharing and joint or
cooperative funding by members of a consortium formed for purposes of
the applications should be shown in a detailed for each party. These
budgets should reflect the arrangements among the parties, and should
show exactly what cost-sharing is proposed for each budget item.
Disclosure Of Prior Institute Support: If any subcontractor,
partner, consortium member, or organization has received Institute
funding in the past two years, the following information on the prior
awards is required:
Institute award number, amount and period of support;
A summary of the results of the completed work; and
A brief description of available materials and other
related research products not describe elsewhere.
If the applicant has received a prior award, the reviewers will be
asked to comment on the quality of the prior work described in this
section of the application.
Current and Pending Support: All current project support from
whatever source (such as Federal, State, or local government agencies,
private foundations, commercial organizations) must be listed. The list
must include the proposed projects and all other projects requiring a
portion of time of the Project Director and other project personnel,
even if they receive no salary support from the project(s). The number
of person-months or percentage of effort to be devoted to the projects
must be stated, regardless of source of support. Similar information
must be provided for all proposals that are being considered by or will
be submitted soon to other sponsors.
If the project now being submitted has been funded previously by
another source, the information requested in the paragraph above should
be furnished for the immediately preceding funding period. If the
proposal is being submitted to other possible sponsors, all of them
must be listed. Concurrent submission of a proposal to other
organizations will not prejudice its review by the Institute.
Any fee proposed to paid to be a collaborating or ``partner'' for-
profit entity should be indicated. (Fees will be negotiated by the
Grants Officer.) Any copyright, patent or royalty agreements (proposed
or in effect) must be described in detail, so that the rights and
responsibilities of each party are made clear. If any part of the
project is to be subcontracted, a budget and work plan prepared and
duly signed by the subcontractor must be submitted as part of the
overall application and addressed in the narrative.
Instructions for Transmittal of Applications
(1) The original and two (2) copies of the application must be
received by December 20, 1996, at the address below. Applicants are
encouraged, but not required, to submit three (3) additional copies of
the application, but will not be penalized if additional copies are not
received. National Institute for Literacy, 800 Connecticut Avenue, NW,
Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006, Attention: (CFDA #84.257).
(2) The National Institute for Literacy will mail a Grant Applicant
Receipt Acknowledgment to each applicant. If an applicant fails to
receive the notification of application receipt within 15 days from the
date of mailing the application, the applicant should call the National
Institute of Literacy at (202) 632-1500.
(3) The applicant must indicate on the envelope and in Item 10 of
the Application for Federal Assistance (ED Form 424 [Revised 4/94]) the
X257M number of the competition under which the application is being
submitted.
Application Forms: The appendix to this announcement is divided
into three parts plus a statement regarding estimated public reporting
burden and various assurances and certifications. These parts and
additional materials are organized in the same manner that the
submitted application should be organized. The parts and additional
materials are as follows:
Part I: Application for Federal assistance (ED Form 424, Rev. 4-94)
and instructions.
Part II: Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs (ED Form
524) and instructions.
Part III: Application Narrative.
Additional Materials
Estimated Public Reporting Burden.
Assurances--Non-Construction Programs (Standard Form 424B).
Certification Regarding Lobbying; Debasement, Suspension, and other
Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (ED 90-
0013).
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and
Voluntary Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED 80-0014, 9/90)
and instructions.
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL) (if
applicable) and instructions.
Note: ED 80-0014 is intended for the use of recipients and
should not be transmitted to the National Institute for Literacy.
An applicant may submit information on a photostat copy of the
application and budget forms, the assurances and the certifications.
However, the application form, the assurances, and certifications must
each have original certifications and must each have an original
signature. No award can be made unless a completed application has been
received.
Grant Administration: The administration of the grant is governed
by the conditions of the award letter. The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations, (EDGAR) 34 CFR Parts 4, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81,
82, 85 and 86 (July 1, 1993), set forth administrative and other
requirements. This document is available through your public library
and the National Institute for Literacy. It is recommended that
appropriate administrative officials become familiar with the policies
and procedures in the EDGAR which are applicable to this award. If a
proposal is
[[Page 55025]]
recommended for an award, the Grants Officer will request certain
organizational, management, and financial information.
The following information on grant administration dealing with
questions such as General Requirements, Prior Approval Requirements,
Transfer of Project Director, and Suspension or termination of Award,
should be referred to the Grants Officer.
Reporting: In addition to working closely with the Institute, the
applicant will be required to submit an annual report of activities,
and other products as described in the DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM above and
in the cooperative agreement between the applicant and the NIFL.
Acknowledgment of Support and Disclaimer: An acknowledgment of
Institute support and a disclaimer must appear in publications of any
material, whether copyrighted or not, based on or developed under NIFL-
supported projects: ``This material is based upon work supported by the
National Institute for Literacy under Grant No. (Grantee should enter
NIFL grant number).''
Except for articles of papers published in professional journals,
the following disclaimer should be included: ``Any opinion, findings,
and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those
of the authors) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
National Institute for Literacy.''
Instructions for Estimated Public Reporting Burden
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
valid OMB control number. The valid control number for this information
collection is 3200-0033, Expiration date August 1999. The time required
to complete this information collection is estimated to average 80
hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search
existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and
review the information collection.
Carolyn Staley,
Deputy Director, National Institute for Literacy.
[FR Doc. 96-27115 Filed 10-22-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6055-01-M
