94-26325. Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Disposable Pocket Lighters From Thailand  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-26325]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: October 24, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    International Trade Administration
    [A-549-810]
    
     
    
    Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
    Value: Disposable Pocket Lighters From Thailand
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: October 24, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Boyland or Susan Strumbel, 
    Office of Countervailing Investigations, Import Administration, 
    International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
    Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 
    (202) 482-4198 and 482-1442, respectively.
    
    Preliminary Determination: We preliminarily determine that disposable 
    pocket lighters from Thailand are being, or are likely to be, sold in 
    the United States at less than fair value, as provided in section 733 
    of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the ``Act''), as amended. The estimated 
    margins of sales at less than fair value are shown in the ``Suspension 
    of Liquidation'' section of this notice.
    
    Case History
    
        Since the initiation of this investigation on May 31, 1994 (59 FR 
    29412), the following events have occurred:
        On June 29, 1994, the United States International Trade Commission 
    (``ITC'') issued an affirmative preliminary injury determination (see 
    ITC Investigation No. 731-TA-701).
        In accordance with 19 CFR 353.42(b)(1994), an antidumping duty 
    questionnaire was presented on July 1, 1994, to Thai Merry Co., Ltd. 
    (``Thai Merry'') which accounts for over 60 percent of all Thai exports 
    of lighters to the United States during the POI. On August 11, 1994, we 
    sent a deficiency questionnaire regarding respondent's section A 
    questionnaire response. On August 19, 1994, the Department granted 
    respondent's request to extend the deadline for response to section B 
    and C of the Department's questionnaire, as well as the section A 
    deficiency questionnaire. On September 6, 1994, the Department received 
    responses to section B and C of the Department's questionnaire, as well 
    as the section A deficiency questionnaire. On September 13, 1994, the 
    Department issued a deficiency questionnaire with regard to 
    respondent's section B and C responses. On September 22, 1994, the 
    Department received the response to the second deficiency 
    questionnaire. On September 29, 1994, respondent was requested to 
    submit information regarding the single national distributor in the 
    home market. On October 3, 1994, the Department received additional 
    information regarding the home market national distributor.
    
    Scope of the Investigation
    
        The products covered by this investigation are disposable pocket 
    lighters, whether or not refillable, whose fuel is butane, isobutane, 
    propane, or other liquified hydrocarbon, or a mixture containing any of 
    these, whose vapor pressure at 75 degrees fahrenheit (24 degrees 
    celsius) exceeds a gage pressure of 15 pounds per square inch. Non-
    refillable pocket lighters are imported under subheading 9613.10.0000 
    of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). 
    Refillable, disposable pocket lighters would be imported under 
    subheading 9613.20.0000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided 
    for convenience and Customs purposes, our written descriptions of the 
    scope of these proceedings are dispositive.
    
    Period of Investigation
    
        The period of investigation (``POI'') is December 1, 1993 through 
    May 31, 1994.
    
    Product Comparisons
    
        We have determined that the class or kind of merchandise subject to 
    this investigation constitutes a single such or similar category. In 
    making our fair value comparisons, in accordance with the Department's 
    standard methodology, we first compared merchandise identical in all 
    respects. If no identical merchandise was sold, we compared the most 
    similar merchandise, as reflected in Appendix V of the questionnaire 
    (``Appendix V'') (on file in Room B-099 of the main building of the 
    Department of Commerce (``Public File'')) and incorporated by Thai 
    Merry in its response. For the U.S. sales compared to sales of similar 
    merchandise, we made an adjustment, pursuant to 19 CFR 353.57, for 
    physical differences in merchandise.
    
    Fair Value Comparisons
    
        To determine whether Thai Merry's sales for export to the United 
    States were made at less than fair value, we compared the United States 
    price (``USP'') to the foreign market value (``FMV''), as specified in 
    the ``United States Price'' and ``Foreign Market Value'' sections of 
    this notice.
        Because all of Thai Merry's sales to the U.S. were made to national 
    distributors, respondent has argued that the Department should base FMV 
    on sales to a national distributor in Thailand and that sales to other 
    home market distributors should be excluded from the Department's 
    analysis. The Department normally makes its comparisons at the same 
    level of trade when sales are made to customers who fall into broad 
    categories such as retailers, distributors, and original equipment 
    manufacturers (see, Import Administration Policy Bulletin 92/1). Thai 
    Merry has claimed that there are different ``levels of trade'' within 
    the general category of distributors.
        The ``levels of trade'' claimed by Thai Merry, i.e., national 
    distributor vs. distributor, are not clearly delineated. Both are 
    resellers, and the record does not establish that different functions 
    are involved in performing this activity. Hence, we would require 
    further information to determine whether national distributors and 
    other distributors are actually different levels of trade, rather than 
    simply different names for a common level.
        We have preliminarily determined that respondent has not provided 
    sufficient information demonstrating that these two types of 
    distributors perform different selling functions. The Department has 
    requested that Thai Merry supply additional information to support its 
    claim, and we will evaluate this issue further for purposes of the 
    final determination. For purposes of this preliminary determination, we 
    are basing FMV on Thai Merry's sales to all distributors in Thailand.
    
    United States Price
    
        Because Thai Merry's U.S. sales of disposable pocket lighters were 
    made to unrelated purchasers prior to importation into the United 
    States, and the exporter's sales price methodology was not indicated by 
    other circumstances, in accordance with section 772(b) of the Act, we 
    based USP on the purchase price (``PP'') sales methodology. We 
    calculated Thai Merry's PP sales based on packed, CIF prices to 
    unrelated customers in the United States. We made deductions to the 
    U.S. price, where appropriate, for foreign inland freight, foreign 
    brokerage/handling expenses, marine insurance, and ocean freight. In 
    calculating U.S. credit expense, we used the borrowing rate in the 
    United States on short-term dollar-denominated loans. For a further 
    discussion of the Department's treatment of U.S. credit expense, please 
    see Memorandum from Barbara R. Stafford to Susan G. Esserman (September 
    26, 1994) on file in room B-099 of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
        In accordance with Section 772(d)(1)(B) of the Act, we made an 
    addition to the U.S. price for the amount of import duties imposed on 
    inputs which were subsequently rebated upon exportation of the finished 
    merchandise to the United States.
        We made an adjustment to U.S. price for VAT taxes paid on the 
    comparison sales in Thailand, in accordance with our practice, pursuant 
    to the Court of International Trade (CIT) decision in Federal-Mogul, et 
    al v. United States, 834 F. Supp. 1993. See Preliminary Antidumping 
    Duty Determination and Postponement of Final Determination; Color 
    Negative Photographic Paper and Chemical Components Thereof from Japan, 
    59 FR 16177, 16179, April 6, 1994, for an explanation of this tax 
    methodology.
    
    Foreign Market Value
    
        In order to determine whether there was a sufficient volume of 
    sales in the home market to serve as a viable basis for calculating 
    FMV, we compared the volume of home market sales of subject merchandise 
    to the volume of third country sales of subject merchandise, in 
    accordance with section 773(a)(1)(B) of the Act. As a result, we 
    determined that the home market was viable.
        We calculated FMV based on delivered prices, inclusive of packing, 
    to customers in the home market. From the delivered price, we deducted 
    home market packing and added U.S. packing costs. Pursuant to section 
    773(a)(4)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 353.56(a)(2), we made circumstance-
    of-sale-adjustments for differences in movement charges between 
    shipments to the United States and shipments in the home market. We 
    also made circumstance-of-sale-adjustments for differences in 
    advertising expenses and expenses related to securing credit (i.e., 
    bank charges, and the imputed cost of credit).
        For packing, movement, credit, and advertising expense we adjusted 
    respondent's reported values by using the net unit price as the 
    multiple of the value-based allocation factor. Additionally, because 
    average credit days were reported in the home market, as opposed to 
    transaction specific data, we are using average credit days to 
    calculate an imputed credit cost for all home market sales.
    
    Currency Conversion
    
        We made currency conversions based on the official exchange rates 
    in effect on the dates of the U.S. sales as certified by the Federal 
    Reserve Bank of New York.
    
    Verification
    
        As provided in section 776(b) of the Act, we will verify 
    information used in making our final determination.
    
    Suspension of Liquidation
    
        In accordance with section 733(d)(1) of the Act, we are directing 
    the Customs Service to suspend liquidation of all entries of disposable 
    pocket lighters from Thailand, as defined in the ``Scope of the 
    Investigation'' section of this notice, that are entered, or withdrawn 
    from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of 
    this notice in the Federal Register. The Customs Service shall require 
    a cash deposit or posting of a bond equal to the estimated dumping 
    margins, as shown below. This suspension of liquidation will remain in 
    effect until further notice. The weighted-average dumping margins are 
    as follows: 
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Margin 
                    Manufacture/producer/exporter                    percent
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Thai Merry....................................................     14.74
    All others....................................................    14.74 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ITC Notification
    
        In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we have notified the 
    ITC of our determination. If our final determination is affirmative, 
    the ITC will determine whether these imports are materially injuring, 
    or threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry within 75 days after 
    our final determination.
    
    Public Comment
    
        Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a 
    written request to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, 
    U.S. Department of Commerce, Room B-099, within ten days of the 
    publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's 
    name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; 
    and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed.
        In accordance with 19 CFR 353.38, case briefs or other written 
    comments in at least ten copies must be submitted to the Assistant 
    Secretary no later than November 28, 1994, and rebuttal briefs no later 
    than December 5, 1994. A hearing, if requested, will be held on 
    December 8, 1994, at 1:00 pm at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room 
    1815. Parties should confirm by telephone the time, date, and place of 
    the hearing 48 hours prior to the scheduled time. In accordance with 19 
    CFR 353.38(b), oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in 
    the briefs.
        We will make our final determination not later than 75 days after 
    this preliminary determination.
        This determination is published pursuant to section 733(f) of the 
    Act and 19 CFR 353.15(a)(4).
    
        Dated: October 17, 1994.
    Susan G. Esserman,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 94-26325 Filed 10-21-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/24/1994
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-26325
Dates:
October 24, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: October 24, 1994, A-549-810