96-27260. Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From the Requirements of Title 49 CFR Part 236  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 207 (Thursday, October 24, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 55183]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-27260]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or 
    Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From the 
    Requirements of Title 49 CFR Part 236
    
        Pursuant to Title 49 CFR Part 235 and 49 U.S.C. App. 26, the 
    following railroads have petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration 
    (FRA) seeking approval for the discontinuance or modification of the 
    signal system or relief from the requirements of Title 49 CFR Part 236 
    as detailed below.
    
    Block Signal Application (BS-AP)-No. 3405
    
    Applicant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, Mr. P. M. Abaray, Chief 
    Engineer-Signals/Quality, 1416 Dodge Street, Room 1000, Omaha, Nebraska 
    68179-0001
    
        The Union Pacific Railroad Company seeks approval of the proposed 
    modification of the traffic control signal system, on the two main 
    tracks, at Stockton, California, milepost 91.8, on the Canyon 
    Subdivision, consisting of the discontinuance and removal of controlled 
    signals ``L'' and ``R''.
        The reason given for the proposed changes is that train operations 
    in the area no longer require signals at this location.
    
    BS-AP-No. 3408
    
    Applicant: R. J. Corman Railroad Company, Mr. J.D. Boles, Supervisor of 
    Signals, P.O. Box 337, Guthrie, Kentucky 42234
    
        The R.J. Corman Railroad Company seeks approval of the proposed 
    discontinuance and removal of the North and South absolute signals, on 
    the single main track, governing movements over the Cumberland River 
    Bridge, milepost 178.0, near Clarksville, Tennessee, Memphis Line, 
    Clarksville Subdivision, associated with the installation of mast 
    mounted stop signs.
        The reason given for the proposed changes is that the signal 
    appliances are in very poor, nonmaintainable, and broken condition due 
    to extensive vandalism and age of the devices, and the amount of 
    business performed on this area of trackage does not warrant the 
    extensive repairs to maintain the absolute signals.
    
    BS-AP-No. 3409
    
    Applicant: Northern Vermont Railway Company, Mr. Robert T. Schmidt, 
    President and CEO, Northern Main Junction Park, RR2 Box 45, Bangor, 
    Maine 04401-9602
    
        The Northern Vermont Railway Company seeks approval of the proposed 
    discontinuance and removal of the train signal system, on the single 
    main track, between Newport, Vermont, milepost 1.8 and Wells River, 
    Vermont, milepost 63.7, on the Lyndonville Subdivision; and between 
    milepost 58.3 and milepost 55.3, near Newport, Vermont, on the Newport 
    Subdivision, a total distance of approximately 65 miles.
        The reasons given for the proposed changes are that freight train 
    service has altered the operations in the application area, there have 
    been no train meets for several years on the Lyndonville Subdivision, 
    and the maintenance and repair of the signal system is very expensive.
        Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an 
    application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the 
    protest is made, and contain a concise statement of the interest of the 
    protestant in the proceeding. The original and two copies of the 
    protest shall be filed with the Associate Administrator for Safety, 
    FRA, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590 within 45 
    calendar days of the date of issuance of this notice. Additionally, one 
    copy of the protest shall be furnished to the applicant at the address 
    listed above.
        FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without oral 
    hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is 
    accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present 
    his or her position by written statements, an application may be set 
    for public hearing.
    
        Issued in Washington, D.C. on October 16, 1996.
    Phil Olekszyk,
    Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Compliance and Program 
    Implementation.
    [FR Doc. 96-27260 Filed 10-23-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/24/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-27260
Pages:
55183-55183 (1 pages)
PDF File:
96-27260.pdf