97-28222. Installment Payment Financing for Personal Communications Services (PCS) Licensees  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 55375-55380]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-28222]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Parts 1 and 24
    
    [WT Docket No. 97-82; FCC 97-342]
    
    
    Installment Payment Financing for Personal Communications 
    Services (PCS) Licensees
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In this Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making the Commission 
    proposes auction rules and procedures for the reauction of licenses 
    surrendered to the Commission pursuant to the Commission's decision in 
    the Second Report and Order in Docket 97-82, FCC 97-342 (released 
    October 16, 1997). These proposed rules are necessary to ensure that 
    any licenses surrendered to the Commission can be awarded to parties 
    who are capable of providing service to the public as rapidly as 
    possible. The intended effect of this action is to seek comment on 
    proposed rules and procedures for the reauction of all surrendered C 
    block licenses.
    
    DATES: Comments are due on or before November 13, 1997. Reply comments 
    are due on or before November 24, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20554.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Bollinger, Auctions and Industry 
    Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-
    0660.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making 
    in WT Docket No. 97-82, adopted on September 25, 1997, and released on 
    October 16, 1997, is available for inspection and copying during normal 
    business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, 
    N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. The complete text may be purchased from 
    the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
    Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800. 
    The complete Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making also is available 
    on the Commission's Internet home page (http://www.fcc.gov).
    
    SUMMARY OF ACTION:
    
    I. Background
    
        1. On September 25, 1997, the Federal Communications Commission 
    (Commission) adopted a Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making seeking 
    comment on proposed changes to its C block rules to govern the 
    reauction of any licenses or spectrum surrendered pursuant to the 
    provisions adopted in the Second Report and Order. See Amendment of the 
    Commission's Rules Regarding Installment Payment Financing for Personal 
    Communications Services (PCS) Licensees, Second Report and Order, WT 
    Docket No. 97-82, FCC 97-342 (released October 16, 1997) (``Second 
    Report and Order'').
    
    II. Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making
    
        2. In the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, the Commission 
    proposes to reauction all licenses and spectrum surrendered to the 
    Commission under the Second Report and Order. The Commission believes 
    that a reauction of licenses surrendered to the Commission will assure 
    rapid provision of service to the public. A reauction also will ensure 
    that these licenses are available to all applicants in a rapid and fair 
    fashion. A simultaneous reauction of all the licenses turned in to the 
    Commission will benefit all bidders because they will be able to bid 
    for a number of licenses in a single reauction, instead of a series of 
    piecemeal auctions after defaults and revocations, in which 
    opportunities for aggregation might be less favorable.
    A. Licenses to be Reauctioned
        3. The Commission proposes that the reauction include the following 
    licenses: (1) All licenses representing the disaggregated spectrum 
    surrendered to the Commission under the disaggregation option; (2) all 
    licenses surrendered to the Commission on or before January 15, 1998, 
    by incumbent licensees who choose to take advantage of the Commission's 
    prepayment or amnesty options; and (3) all PCS C block licenses 
    currently held by the Commission as a result of previous defaults. By 
    including all available licenses in the reauction, the Commission can 
    efficiently and fairly speed service to the public. In addition, 
    offering all available licenses will allow for the most efficient 
    aggregation of licenses. The Commission seeks comment on this proposal.
    B. Eligibility for Participation
        4. As the Commission stated in the Second Report and Order, all 
    entrepreneurs, all entities that applied for the original C block 
    auction, and all current C block licensees with exceptions, are 
    eligible to bid in the reauction. The Commission seeks comment on 
    whether it should restrict participation in the reauction to entities 
    that have not defaulted on any FCC payments. See 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(5). 
    Should the Commission presume that an entity's prior default on 
    payments for an FCC license or authorization makes that entity not 
    financially or otherwise fit to acquire a reauctioned C block license? 
    Alternatively, the Commission could review financial qualifications 
    through several other means. For instance, the Commission could allow 
    such entity to participate in an auction, but if the applicant is a 
    winning bidder, set for expedited hearing the financial qualifications 
    of the bidder, and allow the applicant to rebut a presumption that it 
    is not financially qualified. See 47 CFR 24.832(e), 1.2108(d)(3). 
    Another alternative would be to request that the entity submit more 
    detailed financial information at the application stage, or require 
    that the entity submit a higher upfront payment amount (e.g., a 50% 
    upfront payment requirement) to participate in the reauction. With 
    regard to C block licensees who elect the disaggregation, amnesty, or 
    prepayment options adopted in the Second Report and Order, the 
    Commission observes that by making such election and related payments 
    they are not in default on their C block licenses and, thus, would not 
    be restricted from participation in the reauction (except as otherwise 
    set forth in the Second Report and Order).
    C. Reauction Procedures
        5. The Commission proposes below auction design and application 
    procedures for the reauction of C block licenses.
    1. Competitive Bidding Design
        6. The Commission proposes that all licenses and spectrum 
    surrendered be awarded by means of a simultaneous multiple-round 
    electronic auction. The Commission bases this proposal on its desire to 
    quickly auction available licenses and thereby to promote the most 
    efficient assignment of the spectrum. Consistent with the Commission's 
    normal practice, the specific procedural requirements of the auction 
    would be set out by public notice prior to the auction. In general,
    
    [[Page 55376]]
    
    the Commission has indicated that the auction procedures chosen for 
    each service should be those that will best promote the policy 
    objectives identified by Congress. The Commission further concluded in 
    Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--Competitive 
    Bidding, Second Report and Order, 59 FR 22980 (May 4, 1994) 
    (``Competitive Bidding Second Report and Order'') that in most cases 
    the goals set forth in Section 309(j) will be best achieved by 
    designing auctions that award authorizations to the parties that value 
    them most highly. As the Commission explained, such parties are most 
    likely to deploy new technologies and services rapidly, and to promote 
    the development of competition for the provision of those and other 
    services.
        7. Also, multiple-round bidding during the auction will provide 
    more information to bidders about the value of licenses than single 
    round bidding. With better information, bidders have less incentive to 
    shade their bids downward in order to avoid the ``winner's curse,'' 
    that is, the tendency for the winner to be the bidder who most 
    overestimates the value of the item being auctioned. Finally, multiple-
    round bidding is likely to be fairer than single-round bidding. Every 
    bidder has the opportunity to win if it is willing to pay the most for 
    it. Thus, the Commission tentatively concludes that multiple-round 
    bidding would be the best method of auctioning all available licenses 
    and the Commission seeks comment on this tentative conclusion.
        8. The Commission also tentatively concludes that all surrendered C 
    block licenses should be awarded in a single simultaneous multiple-
    round auction. A single simultaneous auction will facilitate any 
    aggregation strategies that bidders may have, and it would provide the 
    most information to bidders about license values at a time that they 
    can best put that information to use. The Commission seeks comment on 
    this tentative conclusion.
        9. Finally, if the Commission adopts simultaneous multiple-round 
    bidding as its method of auctioning all available licenses, the 
    Commission tentatively concludes that bidding should be allowed only by 
    electronic means, rather than by telephone. Given the Commission's 
    desire to conduct the reauction quickly, as well as recent improvements 
    in the Commission's electronic bidding software, the Commission 
    tentatively concludes that telephonic bidding should be permitted only 
    in exceptional circumstances, to be determined by the Wireless 
    Telecommunications Bureau (``Bureau'') in each instance.
    2. Bidding Procedures
        10. Subject to the exceptions discussed below, which are designed 
    to speed the reauction process, the Commission tentatively concludes 
    that the reauction should be conducted in conformity with the general 
    competitive bidding rules set forth in part 1, subpart Q of the 
    Commission's rules, 47 CFR part 1, subpart Q, as revised (the 
    Commission initiated a proceeding last February to revise its part 1 
    rules; See Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules--Competitive 
    Bidding Proceeding, Order, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of 
    Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket No. 97-82, 62 FR 13540 (March 21, 1997) 
    (``Part 1 Proceeding''), and substantially consistent with the auctions 
    that have been employed in other wireless services. The Commission also 
    proposes to use its part 24 rules, 47 CFR part 24, applicable to the C 
    block to the extent that such rules do not conflict with the 
    Commission's part 1 rules or rules specifically adopted in the Second 
    Report and Order for the reauction of C block licenses. Specifically, 
    except as set forth herein, the Commission proposes to apply the part 1 
    rules regarding competitive bidding mechanisms (47 CFR Sec. 1.2104); 
    bidding application and certification procedures and prohibition of 
    collusion (47 CFR Sec. 1.2105); submission of upfront payment, down 
    payment and filing of long-form applications (47 CFR Secs. 1.2106, 
    1.2107); procedures for filing long form applications (47 CFR 
    Sec. 1.2108); and procedures regarding license grant, denial and 
    default (47 CFR Sec. 1.2109). The Commission seeks comment on this 
    proposal.
        11. Activity Rules. The Commission tentatively concludes that, as 
    it has done in other simultaneous multiple-round auctions, it will 
    conduct the reauction in three stages. Three stages, with bidders 
    required to be more active in each stage, serves to provide bidders 
    with the flexibility to pursue backup strategies as the auction 
    progresses. However, because the Commission believes that efficiently 
    assigning these licenses for rapid service to the public and increased 
    competition in the CMRS marketplace requires a swift reauction of the 
    licenses, the Commission proposes to use high activity requirements in 
    the reauction. In recent auctions, for example, the Commission has 
    required bidders to be active on 80% of their eligible licenses in 
    Stage I, 90% in Stage II, and 98% in Stage III. The Commission proposes 
    to use similar activity levels in the C block reauction and, to further 
    expedite the auction, to require the Bureau to use its delegated 
    authority to aggressively schedule bidding rounds, quickly transition 
    into the next stage of the auction when bidding activity falls, and use 
    higher minimum bid increments for very active licenses. The Commission 
    seeks comment on these proposals and tentative conclusions.
        12. Reserve Price, Minimum Opening Bid, and Minimum Bid Increments. 
    Section 1.2104 of the Commission's rules provides that the Commission 
    may establish reserve prices or suggested minimum opening bids. See 47 
    CFR Sec. 1.2104. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Public Law 105-33, 
    111 Stat. 251 (1997) (to be codified at 47 U.S.C. Sec. 309(j)(4)(F)) 
    (``Balanced Budget Act'') directed the Commission to prescribe methods 
    by which a reasonable reserve price will be required or a minimum 
    opening bid will be established, unless the Commission determines that 
    a reserve price or a minimum opening bid is not in the public interest. 
    This legislative directive establishes a presumption in favor of 
    reserve prices or minimum opening bids in the reauction. A minimum 
    opening bid is the minimum bid price set at the beginning of the 
    auction below which no bids are accepted. Customarily, an auctioneer 
    has the discretion to lower a minimum opening bid in the course of the 
    auction. A minimum opening bid in the C block reauction, more than a 
    reserve price, will help make certain that the public is fairly 
    compensated for spectrum surrendered to the Commission, expedite the 
    auction and give the Commission the flexibility to make adjustments 
    based on the competitiveness of the auction. The Commission seeks 
    comment on this proposal. The Commission also seeks comment on the 
    methodology to be used to establish minimum opening bids and what 
    factors the Commission should consider in doing so. The Commission 
    proposes minimum opening bids for each market equal to 10% of the 
    corresponding high bid for the market in the original C block auction. 
    Such an approach will scale the minimum opening bids in a way that 
    reflects the relative value of the licenses. The Commission also asks 
    that commenters address whether the amount of the minimum opening bid 
    should be capped to ensure that bidding is not deterred on high 
    valuation markets, in particular. Finally, if commenters believe that a 
    minimum opening bid equal to 10% of the high bid in the original C 
    block auction will result in substantial unsold licenses, or is not a
    
    [[Page 55377]]
    
    reasonable amount, they should explain why this is so, and comment on 
    the desirability of a higher or lower minimum opening bid.
    3. Procedural and Payment Issues
        13. Pre-Auction Application Procedures. Auction applicants are 
    required to file a short-form application, FCC Form 175, prior to the 
    start of each auction. Although the Commission previously has allowed 
    both electronic and manual filing of such applications, the Commission 
    tentatively concludes that it should require electronic filing of all 
    short-form applications for the reauction. The Commission believes that 
    electronic filing of applications would serve the best interests of 
    auction participants as well as the members of the public monitoring 
    the reauction. The Commission also believes that an electronic filing 
    requirement will help ensure that the reauction will be completed 
    within the time frame contemplated by this Further Notice of Proposed 
    Rule Making. The Commission have developed user-friendly electronic 
    filing software and Internet World Wide Web forms to give applicants 
    the ability to easily and inexpensively file and review applications. 
    This software helps applicants ensure the accuracy of their 
    applications as they are filling them out, and assists them in avoiding 
    errors and omissions. In addition, by shortening the time required for 
    the Commission to process applications before the auction, electronic 
    filing will increase the lead time available to applicants to pursue 
    business plans and arrange necessary financing before the short-form 
    deadline. The Commission's experiences from recent auctions show that 
    bidders are confident that the electronic filing system is reliable. 
    For example, in the broadband PCS D, E, and F block auction, 94% of the 
    qualified bidders filed their short-form applications electronically. 
    In the recently completed Wireless Communications Services (``WCS'') 
    auction, all winning bidders filed their long-form applications 
    electronically. In addition, the Commission notes that in the Part 1 
    Proceeding, the Commission tentatively concluded that Secs. 1.2105(a) 
    and 1.2107(c) of its rules should be amended to require electronic 
    filing of all short-form and long-form applications. See 47 CFR 
    Secs. 1.2105(a) and 1.2107(c). The Commission seeks comment on this 
    tentative conclusion.
        14. Upfront Payment. The Commission's part 1 rules, 47 CFR Part 1, 
    require the submission of an upfront payment as a prerequisite to 
    participation in spectrum auctions. The Commission proposes to set the 
    amount of the upfront payment for the reauction at $.06 per MHz per 
    pop. The Commission adopted the same upfront payment amount for its 
    most recent broadband PCS auction, the D, E, and F block auction, in 
    which all applicants for all blocks made a $.06 per MHz per pop upfront 
    payment. In the Competitive Bidding Second Report and Order, the 
    Commission indicated that the upfront payment should be set using a 
    formula based upon the amount of spectrum and population (or ``pops'') 
    covered by the license or licenses for which parties intend to bid. The 
    Commission reasoned that this method of determining the required 
    upfront payment would enable prospective bidders to tailor their 
    upfront payment to their bidding strategies. At the same time, however, 
    the Commission noted that determining an appropriate upfront payment 
    involved balancing the goal of encouraging bidders to submit serious, 
    qualified bids with the desire to simplify the bidding process and 
    minimize implementation costs imposed on bidders. The Commission 
    concluded that the best approach would be to maintain the flexibility 
    to determine the amount of the upfront payment on an auction-by-auction 
    basis because this balancing may yield different results depending upon 
    the particular licenses being auctioned. In light of the its desire 
    that only serious, qualified applicants participate in the reauction, 
    the Commission's proposal of a $.06 per MHz per pop is appropriate. The 
    Commission seeks comment on this proposal. The Commission also seeks 
    comment on alternative methods of establishing an upfront payment, and 
    in particular, on how the Commission may estimate the present market 
    value of the spectrum to be auctioned.
        15. Down Payment and Full Payment. Consistent with the procedures 
    used in prior auctions, the Commission tentatively concludes that every 
    winning bidder in an auction should be required to tender a down 
    payment sufficient to bring its total amount on deposit with the 
    Commission up to 20% of its winning bid within 10 business days after 
    the issuance of a public notice announcing the winning bidder for the 
    license. See 47 CFR Sec. 1.2107(b). The Commission seeks comment on 
    this tentative conclusion.
        16. If a winning bidder makes its down payment in a timely manner, 
    the Commission proposes that it file an FCC Form 600 long-form 
    application and follow the long-form application procedures in 
    Sec. 1.2107 of the Commission's rules. See 47 CFR Sec. 1.2107. See 
    also, 47 CFR Sec. 24.707. After reviewing the winning bidder's long-
    form application, and after verifying receipt of the winning bidder's 
    20% down payment, the Commission would announce the application's 
    acceptance for filing, thus triggering the filing window for petitions 
    to deny. The Commission notes that the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 
    authorizes the Commission to establish a shortened period for the 
    filing of petitions to deny. In light of this authority, as well as the 
    Commission's desire to conclude the reauction process as quickly as 
    possible, the Commission proposes that parties then have 15 days 
    following public notice that an application was accepted for filing to 
    file a petition to deny. If, pursuant to Section 309(d) of the 
    Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sec. 309(j), the Commission 
    dismisses or denies any and all petitions to deny, the Commission would 
    announce by public notice that it is prepared to award the license, and 
    the winning bidder would then have 10 business days to submit the 
    balance of its winning bid. If the bidder does so, the license would be 
    granted. If the bidder fails to submit the required down payment or the 
    balance of the winning bid or the license is otherwise denied, the 
    Commission would assess a default payment as discussed below. The 
    Commission seeks comment on these proposals.
        17. Amendments and Modifications of Applications. To encourage 
    maximum bidder participation, the Commission proposes to allow 
    applicants to amend or modify their short-form applications as provided 
    in Sec. 1.2105. See 47 CFR Sec. 1.2105. In the broadband PCS context, 
    the Commission modified its rules to permit ownership changes that 
    result when consortium investors drop out of bidding consortia, even if 
    control of the consortium changes due to this restructuring. See 
    Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--Competitive 
    Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253, Fourth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 59 
    FR 24947 (October 24, 1994). The Commission proposes to adopt the same 
    exception to our rule prohibiting major amendments in the reauction. 
    The Commission seeks comment on these proposals.
        18. Bid Withdrawal, Default and Disqualification. The Commission 
    tentatively concludes that the withdrawal, default, and 
    disqualification rules for the reauction should be based upon the 
    procedures established in the Commission's general competitive bidding 
    rules. With regard to bids that are submitted in error, the Commission 
    proposes to apply the guidelines that the Commission has fashioned to 
    provide for relief from the
    
    [[Page 55378]]
    
    bid withdrawal payment requirements under certain circumstances. The 
    Commission seeks comment on this approach.
    4. Anti-Collusion Rules
        19. In the Competitive Bidding Second Report and Order, the 
    Commission adopted rules to prevent collusion in connection with 
    competitive bidding, explaining that these rules, which are codified at 
    47 CFR Sec. 1.2105, would enhance the competitiveness of both the 
    auction process and the post-auction market structure. The Commission 
    proposes to apply these same rules to the reauction of licenses 
    surrendered to the Commission. The Commission seeks comment on this 
    proposal.
    5. Designated Entity Provisions
        20. The Commission proposes to provide small business bidders in 
    the C block reauction with a two tiered bidding credit, which will 
    provide a greater discount to very small businesses. In the C block 
    auction, a winning bidder that qualified as a small business or a 
    consortium of small businesses was able to use a bidding credit equal 
    to 25% of its winning bid. For the reauction, however, the Commission 
    tentatively concludes that it should offer tiered bidding credits, as 
    the Commission did for F block and, more recently, Local Multipoint 
    Distribution Service (LMDS) small business bidders. The Commission 
    proposes to define a second tier of small business, which the 
    Commission will refer to as ``very small businesses,'' as entities 
    that, together with their affiliates and persons or entities that hold 
    interest in such entities and their affiliates, have average gross 
    revenues of not more that $15 million for the preceding three years. 
    Creation of this subcategory of small business enables the Commission 
    to tailor a bidding credit to meet the needs of entities that may be 
    interested in bidding on spectrum surrendered by C block licensees. 
    Thus, the Commission proposes a 35% bidding credit for very small 
    businesses and a 25% bidding credit for small businesses. The 
    Commission seeks comment on these proposals and tentative conclusions.
        21. The Commission also tentatively conclude that an installment 
    payment program will not be offered in the reauction. The Commission 
    has conducted several auctions without installment payments. The 
    Commission must balance competing objectives in 47 U.S.C. Sec. 309(j) 
    that require, inter alia, that it promote the development and rapid 
    deployment of new spectrum-based services and ensure that designated 
    entities are given the opportunity to participate in the provision of 
    such services. In assessing the public interest, the Commission must 
    try to ensure that all the objectives of Section 309(j) are considered. 
    The Commission has found, for example, that obligating licensees to pay 
    for their licenses as a condition of receipt ensures greater financial 
    accountability from applicants. Thus, the Commission tentatively 
    concludes that it should not extend installment payments to winners in 
    the reauction, given the incentives to entrepreneurs established 
    through the various proposals discussed above. The Commission seeks 
    comment on these tentative conclusions.
    
    III. Procedural Matters
    
    A. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
        22. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 
    Sec. 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility 
    Analysis (IRFA) of the expected impact on small entities of the rules 
    proposed in the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making. Written public 
    comments are requested on the IRFA. Comments on the IRFA must have a 
    separate and distinct heading designating them as responses to the IRFA 
    and must be filed by the deadlines for comments on the Further Notice 
    of Proposed Rule Making. The Commission will send a copy of the Further 
    Notice of Proposed Rule Making, including this IRFA, to the Chief 
    Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. In addition, 
    the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making and IRFA (or summaries 
    thereof) will be published in the Federal Register.
    1. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
        23. This Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is being initiated 
    to secure comment on proposed changes to auction rules to govern the 
    reauction of returned broadband PCS spectrum in the C block. Among 
    other goals, Section 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as 
    amended, directs the Commission to disseminate licenses among a wide 
    variety of applicants, including small businesses and other designated 
    entities. 47 U.S.C. Sec. 309(j)(3)(B). Section 309(j) also requires 
    that the Commission ensure the development and rapid deployment of new 
    technologies, products, and services for the benefit of the public, and 
    recover for the public a portion of the value of the public spectrum 
    resource made available for commercial use. 47 U.S.C. 
    Secs. 309(j)(3)(A), (C). The Commission is seeking comment on proposed 
    changes to auction rules to govern the reauction of returned broadband 
    PCS spectrum in the C block.
    2. Legal Basis
        24. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 5(b), 5(c)(1), 
    303(r), and 309 (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 
    U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 155(b), 155(c)(1), 303(r), and 309(j).
    3. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which 
    the Proposed Rules Will Apply
        25. The Commission is required to provide a description of and, 
    where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that will 
    be affected by its rules. See 5 U.S.C. Secs. 603(b)(3), 604(a)(3). The 
    RFA directs agencies to provide a description of and, where feasible, 
    an estimate of the number of small entities that will be affected by 
    the Commission's rules. 5 U.S.C. Secs. 603(b)(3), 604(a)(3). The RFA 
    generally defines the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning 
    as the terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small 
    governmental jurisdiction.'' 5 U.S.C. Sec. 601(6). In addition, the 
    term ``small business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small 
    business concern'' under Section 3 of the Small Business Act. See 5 
    U.S.C. Sec. 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of 
    ``small business concern'' in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 632). Under the Small 
    Business Act, a ``small business concern'' is one which: (1) is 
    independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of 
    operation; and (3) meets any additional criteria established by the 
    Small Business Administration (SBA). 15 U.S.C. Sec. 632.
        26. The rule changes proposed in the Further Notice of Proposed 
    Rule Making will affect all small businesses which avail themselves of 
    these rule changes, including small businesses currently holding C 
    block and F block broadband PCS licenses who choose to participate and 
    other small businesses who may acquire licenses through reauction. The 
    Commission, with respect to broadband PCS, defines small entities to 
    mean those having gross revenues of not more than $40 million in each 
    of the preceding three calendar years. See 47 CFR Sec. 24.720(b)(1). 
    This definition has been approved by the SBA. On May 6, 1996, the 
    Commission concluded the broadband PCS C block auction. The broadband 
    PCS D, E, and F block auction closed on January 14, 1997. Ninety 
    bidders (including the C block reauction winners, prior to any defaults 
    by winning bidders) won 493 C block
    
    [[Page 55379]]
    
    licenses and 88 bidders won 491 F block licenses. Small businesses 
    placing high bids in the C and F block auctions were eligible for 
    bidding credits and installment payment plans. For purposes of our 
    evaluations and conclusion in this IRFA, the Commission assumes that 
    all of the 90 C block broadband PCS licensees and 88 F block broadband 
    PCS licensees, a total of 178 licensees potentially affected by this 
    order, are small entities. In addition to the 178 current small 
    business licensees who may participate at the reauction of C block 
    licenses, a number of additional small business entities may seek to 
    acquire licenses through reauction, and thus be affected by these 
    rules.
        27. In addition, the Commission proposes to provide small business 
    bidders in the C block reauction with bidding credits, and to that end 
    proposes a two tiered bidding credit which will provide a greater 
    discount to ``very small businesses.'' In the C block auction, a 
    winning bidder that qualified as a small business or a consortium of 
    small businesses was able to use a bidding credit equal to 25 percent 
    of its winning bid. For the reauction, the Commission proposes tiered 
    bidding credits, as were offered for F block and, more recently, Local 
    Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) small business bidders. The 
    Commission proposes to define the second tier of very small business as 
    entities that, together with their affiliates and persons or entities 
    that hold interest in such entities and their affiliates, have average 
    gross revenues of not more that $15 million for the preceding three 
    years. Creation of this subcategory of small business will enable the 
    Commission to tailor a bidding credit to meet the needs of entities 
    that may be interested in bidding on spectrum returned by C block 
    licensees. Thus, the Commission proposes a 35 percent bidding credit 
    for very small businesses and a 25 percent bidding credit for small 
    businesses.
        28. To assist the Commission analyzing the total number of affected 
    small entities, commenters are requested to provide information 
    regarding how many total broadband PCS small business entities would be 
    affected by the rules proposed in this Further Notice of Proposed Rule 
    Making. In particular, the Commission seeks estimates of how many 
    broadband PCS entities, existing and potential, will be considered 
    small businesses or very small businesses.
    4. Description of Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance 
    Requirements
        29. There are no additional reporting, recordkeeping, or other 
    compliance requirements as a result of the Further Notice of Proposed 
    Rule Making.
    5. Steps Taken to Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small 
    Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
        30. The Commission proposes to apply the same rules that were used 
    in the C block auction to the reauction of C block licenses, with some 
    modifications designed to encourage participation by small businesses 
    while at the same time helping to ensure the best use of the spectrum 
    through the competitive bidding process. The Commission proposes to 
    conduct the C block reauction in three stages. Having three stages, 
    with bidders required to be more active in each stage, serves to 
    provide bidders with the flexibility to pursue backup strategies as the 
    auction progresses. The Commission proposes to use high activity 
    requirements in the reauction. In addition, the Commission proposes to 
    use similar activity levels in the C block reauction and, to further 
    expedite the auction, require the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to 
    use its delegated authority to aggressively schedule bidding rounds, 
    quickly transition into the next stage of the auction when bidding 
    activity falls, and use higher minimum bid increments for very active 
    licenses.
        31. The Commission proposes to establish a minimum opening bid for 
    the reauction. A minimum opening bid is the minimum bid price set at 
    the beginning of the auction below which no bids are accepted. A 
    minimum opening bid in the C block reauction will help ensure that the 
    public is fairly compensated for licenses returned to the Commission, 
    expedite the auction and give the Commission the flexibility to make 
    adjustments based on the competitiveness of the auction. The Commission 
    proposes minimum opening bids for each market equal to ten percent of 
    the corresponding high bid for the market in the original C block 
    auction. Such an approach will scale the minimum opening bids in a way 
    that reflects the relative value of the licenses.
        32. The Commission proposes to require electronic filing of all 
    short-form applications for the reauction. Electronic filing of 
    applications would serve the best interests of auction participants as 
    well as the members of the public monitoring the reauction. The 
    Commission believes that an electronic filing requirement will help 
    ensure that the reauction will be completed within the time frame 
    contemplated by this Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making.
        33. The Commission proposes to set the amount of the upfront 
    payment for the reauction at $.06 per megahertz per population (``MHz 
    per pop'').
        34. The Commission proposes that parties have fifteen (15) days to 
    file a petition to deny following public notice that an application was 
    accepted for filing. If, pursuant to Section 309(d) of the 
    Communications Act, the petitions to deny are dismissed or denied, the 
    Commission would announce by public notice that it is prepared to award 
    the license, and the winning bidder would then have ten (10) business 
    days to submit the balance of its winning bid. If the bidder does so, 
    the license would be granted. If the bidder fails to submit the 
    required down payment or the balance of the winning bid or the license 
    is otherwise denied, a default payment would be assessed.
        35. Section 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 
    directs the Commission to disseminate licenses among a wide variety of 
    applicants, including small businesses and other designated entities. 
    See 47 U.S.C. Sec. 309(j)(3)(B). Section 309(j) also requires that the 
    Commission ensure the development and rapid deployment of new 
    technologies, products, and services for the benefit of the public, and 
    recover for the public a portion of the value of the public spectrum 
    resource made available for commercial use. 47 U.S.C. 
    Secs. 309(j)(3)(A), (C). The Commission believes these provisions in 
    the Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making help meet those goals and 
    promote efficient competition while maintaining fairness and 
    efficiencies of process in the Commission's rules.
    6. Federal Rules Which Overlap, Duplicate, or Conflict With These Rules
        None.
    
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
    
        36. This Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making contains either a 
    proposed or modified information collection. As part of its continuing 
    effort to reduce paperwork burdens, the Commission invites the general 
    public and the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') to take this 
    opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this 
    Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, as required by the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law No. 104-13. Public and agency 
    comments are due at the same time as other
    
    [[Page 55380]]
    
    comments on this Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making; OMB comments 
    are due 60 days from date of publication of this Further Notice of 
    Proposed Rule Making in the Federal Register. Comments should address: 
    (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the 
    proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including 
    whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy 
    of the Commission's burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
    utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to 
    minimize the burden of the collection of information on the 
    respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or 
    other forms of information technology.
    Dates
        Written comments by the public on the proposed or modified 
    information collections in this Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making 
    are due on or before December 1, 1997. Written comments must be 
    submitted by OMB on the modified information collections on or before 
    December 1, 1997.
    Address
        In addition to filing comments with the Secretary, a copy of any 
    comments on the information collections contained herein should be 
    submitted to Judy Boley, Federal Communications Commission, Room 234, 
    1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to 
    jboley@fcc.gov and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725--
    17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to 
    fain__t@al.eop.gov.
    Further Information
        For additional information concerning the information collections 
    contained in this Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making contact Judy 
    Boley, Federal Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, 
    N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov.
    Supplementary Information
        Title: Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding Installment 
    Payment Financing for Personal Communications Services (PCS) Licensees.
        Type of Review: Proposed or Modified Collection.
        Respondents: The Commission estimates that no more than 255 
    respondents (i.e., previous C block bidders) will participate in this 
    information collection. The Commission estimates that this information 
    collection, that eligibility is based on previous participation in a C 
    block auction and the bidder identification number from the previous 
    auction, will take 0.5 hours to complete. In addition, the Commission 
    proposes that C block reauction applicants submit more detailed 
    financial information, if necessary. The Commission estimates that this 
    information collection will take 1.0 hours to complete. The Commission 
    estimates that the total burden will be 1.5 hours per respondent or 
    377.5 total hours.
        Estimate of total cost burden to respondents: The Commission 
    estimates that there will be no additional cost burden to respondents.
        The cost to the Federal Government is estimated to be:
    
    GS 7 Legal Instrument Examiners at $14.06 per hour to review the 
    documentation for approximately 0.5 hours per submission, times 255 
    submissions = $1,581.75
    GS 12 Attorneys to review the financial documentation at $24.95 per 
    hour, for approximately 2.0 hours per submission, times 255 submissions 
    = $11,227.50
    Total = $12,809.25
    
    C. Ex Parte Presentations
    
        The Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is a permit but disclose 
    notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are 
    permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. 
    See generally 47 CFR Secs. 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a).
    
    D. Comments
    
        38. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Secs. 1.415 and 
    1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments 
    on or before November 13, 1997, and reply comments on or before 
    November 24, 1997. In addition, a courtesy copy should be delivered to 
    Mark Bollinger, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless 
    Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 2025 M 
    Street, Room 5202, Washington, DC 20554. All relevant and timely 
    comments will be considered by the Commission before final action is 
    taken in this proceeding. To file formally in this proceeding, 
    participants must file an original and five copies of all comments, 
    reply comments, and supporting comments. If participants want each 
    Commissioner to receive a personal copy of their comments, an original 
    plus ten copies must be filed. Comments and reply comments should be 
    sent to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 
    Washington, DC 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for 
    public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference 
    Center (Room 239) of the Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M 
    Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    47 CFR Part 1
    
        Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    47 CFR Part 24
    
        Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    William F. Caton,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-28222 Filed 10-23-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/24/1997
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
97-28222
Dates:
Comments are due on or before November 13, 1997. Reply comments are due on or before November 24, 1997.
Pages:
55375-55380 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
WT Docket No. 97-82, FCC 97-342
PDF File:
97-28222.pdf