95-26325. Jojoba Oil; Exemption from Tolerance Requirement  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 25, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 54637-54641]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-26325]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 3E4230/P634; FRL-4981-7]
    RIN 2070-AC18
    
    
    Jojoba Oil; Exemption from Tolerance Requirement
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA proposes to establish an exemption from the requirement 
    for a tolerance for residues of jojoba oil in or on all raw 
    agricultural commodities when applied at not more than 1.0% of the 
    final spray as an insecticide or as a pesticide spray tank adjuvant in 
    accordance with good agricultural practices. Amvac Chemical Corp. 
    submitted a petition pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic 
    Act (FFDCA) requesting the proposed regulation to establish an 
    exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.
    
    DATES: Comments, identified by the document control number [PP 3E4230/
    P634], must be received on or before November 24, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to: Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202. Information submitted 
    as a comment concerning this document may be claimed confidential by 
    marking any part or all of that information as ``Confidential Business 
    Information'' (CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except 
    in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the 
    comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in 
    the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed 
    publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written comments will be 
    available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at the address 
    
    [[Page 54638]]
    given above, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 
    legal holidays.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically by sending 
    electronic mail (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic 
    comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
    characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data will also be 
    accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1 file format or ASCII file 
    format. All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by 
    the docket number [PP 3E4230/P634]. No Confidential Business 
    Information (CBI) should be submitted through e-mail. Electronic 
    comments on this proposed rule may be filed online at many Federal 
    Depository Libraries. Additional information on electronic submissions 
    can be found below in this document.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Michael L. Mendelsohn, 
    Regulatory Action Leader, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention 
    Division (7501W), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
    Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office 
    location and telephone number: 5th Floor, CS #1, 2800 Crystal Drive, 
    Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-308-8715; e-mail: 
    mendelsohn.michael@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Amvac Chemical Corp., 2110 Davie Ave., City 
    of Commerce, CA 90040, has submitted pesticide petition (PP) 3E4230 to 
    EPA proposing to amend 40 CFR part 180 by establishing a regulation 
    pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act 
    (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to exempt from the requirement of a 
    tolerance simmondsia liquid wax (jojoba oil) and the product Detur for 
    use as an inert ingredient in pesticide formulations applied to growing 
    crops or to raw agricultural commodities after harvest. Subsequent to 
    its petition, Amvac informed EPA that it had transferred all Detur 
    assets to Imperial Jojoba Oils of El Centro, CA. EPA has, of its own 
    initiative, expanded the original petition to include pesticidal uses 
    of jojoba oil in this proposed exemption from the requirement of a 
    tolerance.
        The data submitted in the petition and all other relevant material 
    have been evaluated and a discussion of the submitted data and 
    literature referenced follows.
        The source of jojoba oil is the Simmondsia chinensis shrub, 
    commonly called the jojoba plant. The plant is a woody evergreen shrub, 
    2 to 3 feet high with thick, leathery, bluish-green leaves and dark 
    brown, nutlike fruit. Two techniques are used to release the oil from 
    the plant fruit (also called a nut, bean, or seed). The oil may be 
    extracted by pressing or by solvent extraction methods used 
    commercially to isolate vegetable oils. The expressed oil is clear and 
    golden in color.
        The exact composition of the oil varies dependent upon geographic 
    location of the plant and can vary from bean to bean within a single 
    plant. Jojoba oil is composed almost completely of wax esters of 
    monounsaturated, straight-chain acids and alcohols with high molecular 
    weights (C16-C26). Jojoba oil has been defined as a liquid 
    wax ester with the generic formula RCOOR''. RCO represents oleic acid, 
    eicosanoic acid (C20:1), and/or erucic acid (C22:1) moieties. -OR'' 
    represents eicosenyl alcohol (C20:1), docosenyl alcohol (C22:1) and/or 
    tetrasenyl alcohol (C24:1) moieties. Crude jojoba oil contains 0.8 ppm 
    elemental lead (Pb) and less than 0.1 ppm arsenic (AS2S3).
        The jojoba bean contains 2 glycosides with toxic effects: 
    simmondsin [2-(cyanomethylene)-3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethoxycyclohexyl-D-
    glucoside] at 2.3% and simmondsin-2'-ferulate at 1% (Verbiscar and 
    Banigan, 1978. J. Ag. Fd. Chem. 26:1456-60). In addition, related 
    conjugated organonitriles including demethyl simmondsin and 
    didemethylsimmondsin are present (Abbott, T.P., Nakamura, L.K., 
    ``Microbial Detoxification of Jojoba Toxins,'' Agricultural Research 
    Service, 1990). As set forth below, this proposed exemption does not 
    cover these ingredients, and they are therefore not permitted to be 
    present in the jojoba oil subject to this exemption. A third toxic 
    component which makes up to 14% of jojoba oil is erucic acid. Erucic 
    acid is also found in rapeseed oil in amounts up to 50% (``The 
    Chemistry and Technology of Jojoba Oil'' by James Wisniak). The amount 
    of erucic acid likely to be present in residues of jojoba oil under 
    this exemption is less than 1/10 of the amount (2%) permitted in 
    rapeseed oil defined by FDA as low erucic acid rapeseed oil.
    
    Toxicology
    
        EPA's evaluation of the toxicological properties of jojoba oil is 
    based in part upon numerous toxicology studies conducted both for the 
    purposes of evaluating the use of jojoba oil in cosmetic products and 
    as a pesticide. In addition, the Agency took into consideration the 
    fact that jojoba oil has been widely distributed in commerce and 
    available to the general public throughout the United States for 
    cosmetic uses without any evidence of significant adverse effects to 
    humans or the environment.
        Chronic data was not deemed necessary to support the proposed 
    exemption because of the low application levels allowed and the fact 
    that most of the jojoba oil injested orally is excreted in the feces 
    (Yaron, A. ``Metabolism and Physiological Effects of Jojoba Oil'' in 
    The Chemistry and Technology of Jojoba Oil, 1987, Wisniak, J.). The 
    expected dietary exposure to humans as a result of the use of this 
    substance as an inert or active pesticide ingredient applied at 1% of 
    the final spray is far below levels that produced no adverse effects in 
    laboratory animals.
        As noted above, formulations of jojoba oil may contain erucic acid 
    and the glycosides simmondsin and simmondsin-2-ferulate (as well as 
    related conjugated organonitriles including demethyl simmondsin and 
    didemethylsimmondsin), ingredients which are of toxicological concern.
        Erucic acid, which has been identified as a potential contributing 
    factor in heart disease, makes up approximately 14% of jojoba oil. 
    However, this proposed exemption only exempts residues resulting from 
    the application of a final spray diluted to no more than 1% jojoba oil, 
    the level of erucic acid in the spray applied to raw agricultural 
    commodities will fall from 14% to 0.14% This is less than one-tenth the 
    2% erucic acid level permitted for low erucic acid rapeseed oil (see 
    FDA regulations at 21 CFR 184.1555(c)), and therefore does not pose a 
    hazard to human health.
        The Agency lacks sufficient information to conclude that simmondsin 
    and simmondsin-2-ferulate as well as related conjugated organonitriles 
    including demethyl simmondsin and didemethylsimmondsin would not cause 
    adverse health effects when applied under the terms of this proposed 
    exemption. For this reason, the proposed exemption only applies to 
    formulations of jojoba oil not containing simmondsin and simmondsin-2-
    ferulate.
        A summary of the the available toxicological data for simmondsin, 
    simmondsin-2-ferulate, erucic acid, and jojoba oil is set forth below.
    
    A. Simmondsin and Simmondsin-2'-Ferulate
    
        Simmondsin and/or its breakdown products have been linked to diet 
    rejection or restriction in rats (Booth, A.N., C.A. Elliger, A.J. 
    Waiss, 1974. ``Isolation of a Toxic Factor from Jojoba Meal,'' Life 
    Sci. 15:1115). 
    
    [[Page 54639]]
    
        Ingested Simmondsin, a glycoside in jojoba bean, caused rats to 
    avoid food. Administration of 6,000 ppm of simmondsin in the diet of 
    rats produced a 24% body weight decrease. Twenty percent of mice fed 
    with 10% simmondsin in the diet died within 1 week (Letter from Andrew 
    Laumbach (FDA) to Don Barioni (Jojoba Oil Oils, CA) dated July 8, 
    1992). (Letter from Karen Korman to Don Barioni dated July 22, 1992).
        When weanling rats were given simmondsin orally for 5 days at 750 
    mg/kg/day, all rats lost weight and died within 10 days (R.K. Locke, 
    FDA memo 3/22/78)).
        A dose of 2.5 g/kg simmondsin orally did not decrease body weight 
    in rats (Khalsa, J.H. FDA memo May 27, 1983; R.K. Locke, FDA memo 3/22/
    78).
        A dose of 3.6 g/kg simmondsin by i.p. injection had no effect on 
    rats' body weight (Khalsa, J.H. FDA memo May 27, 1983; R.K. Locke, FDA 
    memo 3/22/78).
        A single oral dose of 4 g/kg of simmondsin to weanling rats 
    produced no effects during a 14-day observation (Khalsa, J.H. FDA memo 
    May 27, 1983; R.K. Locke, FDA memo 3/22/78).
        A diet containing 0.6% of Simmondsin produced weight loss in rats 
    as did a diet containing 10% jojoba oil (Locke, R.K. to L.J. Lin, FDA 
    memo 3/22/78).
    
    B. Erucic Acid
    
        Erucic acid (13%) in jojoba oil may contribute to heart disease. 
    Nestle Technical Product Assistance-Orbe, Switzerland.
        Jojoba oil contains 14% of erucic acid which has been shown to 
    cause myocardial fibrosis (Abdullatif, A.M.M. and E.O Vles, 1971. Nutr. 
    Metabol. 13:63-74).
    
    C. Jojoba Oil Acute Oral Toxicity Studies
    
        Fewer than 50% of rats died when orally administered 21.5 mL/kg of 
    jojoba oil (Wisniak, J., 1977, ``Jojoba Oil and Derivatives.'' Proc. 
    Chem. Fats and Lipids 15(3):167-218.). Four groups (10 males and 10 
    females/group) rats were orally administered 0.5, 0.75, 1.13 and 1.69 
    mL/10 g of crude jojoba oil. After 7 days, rats were killed and 
    necropsied. One rat died before the end of the 7 days; renal capsule 
    discoloration was noted in all groups; peritonitis was noted in one 
    1.69 mL/10g group (Taguchi, M. and Kunimoto, 1977. ``Toxicity Studies 
    on Jojoba Oil for Cosmetic Uses,'' Cosmetics Toiletries, 19:53-62 
    (September issue).CS (RP)).
        The oral LD50 for crude jojoba oil in mice is greater than 
    1.69 mL/10 g. No death or clinical signs were noted (Taguchi, Masayuki, 
    1990. ``Test Results on Safety on Jojoba oil to be Used for Cosmetics'' 
    in La Jojoba, Apache Junction, AZ; p 149-170.).
        Four groups (10 males and 10 females/group) of rats were fed basal 
    diet (5g/feeding containing 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 g of refined jojoba 
    oil. The first two groups were dosed for 7 days, and the last two 
    groups were dosed for 4 days. Signs of toxicity were noted in five rats 
    in the 1.0-g group and six rats each in the 2.0-g and 3.0-g groups. One 
    rat died in each of the 1.0-, 2.0-, and 3.0-g dose groups (Hamm, D. J., 
    1984. ``Preparation and Evaluation of Trail-koxytricarballylate, 
    Trialhoxycitrate, Trailkoxyglycerylether, Jojoba Oil and Sucrose 
    Polyester as Low calories Replacements of edible Fats and Oils'' J. of 
    Food Science (49):419-428). (OW)
        Twenty percent of weanling mice died when fed a diet with 10% 
    jojoba oil (Locke, R.K. to L.J. Lin, FDA memo, 3/22/1978).
        A single oral administration at 5,050 mg/kg of DETUR (a pesticide 
    product containing 97.5% jojoba oil) to HSD:SD rats did not produce 
    death in any animal. The oral LD50 for DETUR in HSD:SD rats is 
    greater than 5,050 mg/kg body weight which is classified as toxicity 
    category IV for pesticide precautionary labeling purposes.
        In the testing of a lip balm product containing 20% jojoba oil, 
    none of the rats (5 males and 5 females) died when orally administered 
    with 5.0 g/kg of 20% jojoba oil (lip balm product) (CTFA, 1985. CIR 
    Safety Data Test Summary Response Form. Acute oral toxicity study on 
    lip balm product containing 20% jojoba oil, 1 p.)
    
    Acute Dermal Toxicity Studies
    
        A single dose of 2,020 mg/kg of DETUR (a pesticide product 
    containing 97.5% jojoba oil) was topically applied to the shaved intact 
    skin of 5 male and 5 female rabbits for 24 hours and treated rabbits 
    were observed for 14 days. No mortality was noted; transient skin 
    irritation and diarrhea were noted; one female had mottled liver. The 
    acute dermal LD50 of DETUR is greater than 2,020 mg/kg body weight 
    and classified as Toxicity category III for pesticide precautionary 
    labeling purposes.
    
    Primary Eye Irritation Studies
    
        Instillation of refined Jojoba Oil (0.1 mL) into the eyes of six 
    male rabbits produced slight ablepharia and slight conjunctival 
    hyperemia at 1 hour after instillation. All signs cleared by 24 hours 
    post-instillation (Taguchi, M. and Kunimoto, 1977. ``Toxicity Studies 
    on Jojoba Oil for Cosmetic Uses,'' Cosmetics Toiletries, 19:53-62 
    (September issue). CS (RP) Instillation of lip balm product containing 
    20% of jojoba oil (0.1 mL) into the eyes of six rabbits produced eye 
    irritation score of 0.3  0.8 (Draize scale) at 24 hours 
    post-instillation. All reactions were cleared at 48 hours post-
    instillation (CTFA, 1985 as reported in Diener, Robert M. ed., 1992. 
    ``Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Jojoba Oil and Jojoba Wax.'' 
    Nineteenth Report of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel. J. 
    American College of Toxicology, Vol. 11(1):57-82).
        Administration of DETUR (a pesticide product containing 97.5% 
    jojoba oil) into rabbit eyes caused positive conjunctival irritation in 
    rabbits for 48 hours. DETUR is considered to be a mild eye irritant and 
    is classified as EPA toxicity category III for precautionary labeling 
    purposes.
    
    Primary Dermal Irritation Studies
    
        Refined jojoba oil (0.5 mL) as well as olive oil and light liquid 
    paraffin (0.5 mL) serving as controls were topically applied to the 
    shaved skin of three groups of 5 guinea pigs daily for 15 days. The 
    same procedure was conducted in the other three groups of 5 guinea pigs 
    daily for 30 days. A Draize scoring system was used. No significant 
    reactions to jojoba oil and olive oil were noted. Flare reactions to 
    liquid paraffin were noted on the third day of the study (Taguchi, M. 
    and Kunimoto, 1977. ``Toxicity Studies on Jojoba Oil for Cosmetic 
    Uses.'' Cosmetics Toiletries, 19:53-62 (September issue)). CS (RP).
        Jojoba oil (10.0% w/w in refined Jojoba oil) was topically applied 
    to albino marmots according to Draize method. No skin reactions were 
    noted in any animals (Taguchi, Masayuki, 1990. ``Test Results on Safety 
    on Jojoba oil to be Used for Cosmetics'' in La Jojoba, Apache Junction, 
    AZ; p. 149-170.).
        A topical application of lip balm product containing 20% jojoba oil 
    to New Zealand white rabbits produced a primary irritation score of 
    0.33--minimally irritating (CTFA, 1985 as reported in Diener, Robert 
    M., ed., 1992. ``Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Jojoba Oil 
    and Jojoba Wax. Nineteenth Report of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review 
    Expert Panel.'' J. American College of Toxicology, Vol. 11(1): 57-82.).
        Application of 0.5 mL of DETUR (a pesticide product containing 
    97.5% jojoba oil) on the shaved dorsal skin of 6 rabbits did not 
    produce deaths or other signs of systemic toxicity. Transient erythema/
    eschar formation was seen in two males and two females. Within 24 hours 
    all treated skin sites were normal. The primary dermal 
    
    [[Page 54640]]
    irritation index was 0.17. DETUR is considered to be slightly 
    irritating and in EPA's toxicity category IV for precautionary labeling 
    purposes.
    
    Dermal Sensitization Studies
    
        The skin sensitization potential of jojoba alcohol (10.0% w/w in 
    refined Jojoba oil) was evaluated according to the maximization test 
    using albino marmots (10 males and 10 females). Two groups of marmots 
    (10 males and 10 females) were used as the controls. No sensitization 
    reaction was observed 24 or 48 hours after the challenge application 
    (Taguchi, Masayuki, 1990. ``Test Results on Safety on Jojoba oil to be 
    Used for Cosmetics.'' La Jojoba, Apache Junction, AZ; p. 149-170.).
        Five out of six human subjects suspected to be sensitive to jojoba 
    oil had positive reactions when patch tested with jojoba olive oil and 
    jojoba oil-petrolatum mixtures. Twenty-eight human subjects with no 
    known sensitivities did not have sensitization reactions to pure jojoba 
    oil (Scott, M.J. and M.J. Scott, Jr., 1982, ``Jojoba Oil,'' J. Am. 
    Acad. Dermatology 6(4):545.).
        The skin irritation and sensitization test of lip balm product 
    containing 20% jojoba oil in humans produced no skin sensitization and 
    irritation (CTFA, 1988, as reported in Diener, Robert M., ed., 1992. 
    ``Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Jojoba Oil and Jojoba Wax. 
    Nineteenth Report of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel.'' J. 
    American College of Toxicology, Vol. 11(1): 57-82.).
        The skin irritation and sensitization test of topical product 
    containing 10% jojoba oil was conducted in humans using the Draize-
    Shelanski repeat insult patch test. No skin sensitization or irritation 
    was evident (CTFA, 1988 as reported in Diener, Robert M., ed., 1992. 
    ``Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Jojoba Oil and Jojoba Wax. 
    Nineteenth Report of the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel.'' J. 
    American College of Toxicology, Vol. 11(1): 57-82).
    
    90-Day Feeding Toxicity Study in Rodents and Dogs
    
         Jojoba oil incorporated in the diet of rat at 0.5, 5.0, and 10.0% 
    (w/w) for 2 months produced elevations of transaminase and alkaline 
    phosphatase at weeks 4 and 13 of the study period. Nestle Product 
    Technical Assistance - Orbe, Switzerland (n.d)
    
    Metabolism and Absorption Studies
    
    Effects of Ingestion of Jojoba Oil on Blood Cholesterol Levels and 
    Lipoprotein Patterns in New Zealand White Rabbits
    
        This study was conducted to determine the cholesterol-lowering 
    effect of crude jojoba if fed to animals. Six groups (4 per group) of 
    New Zealand White Rabbits were fed for 30 days with various combination 
    of basal diet mixed with cholesterol, jojoba oil, and safflower. Blood 
    cholesterol was then determined. Two or six percent crude jojoba oil 
    added to the atherogenic diet containing 1% cholesterol resulted in a 
    40% reduction of blood cholesterol as compared to cholesterol control 
    rabbits. Under the same conditions, 2% safflower oil was not effective 
    in lowering blood cholesterol levels. The authors suggested that jojoba 
    oil was absorbed across the intestinal mucosa, contrary to the 
    hypothesis that it is totally excreted and not metabolized (Clarke, 
    J.A. and D.M. Yermanos, 1981. ``Effects of Ingestion of Jojoba Oil on 
    Blood Cholesterol Levels and Lipoprotein Patterns in New Zealand White 
    Rabbits.'' Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication 
    102(4):14091415).
    
    Preparation and Evaluation of Trailkoxytricarballylate, 
    Trialkoxycitrate, Trailkoxyglycerylether, Jojoba Oil, and Sucrose 
    Polyester as Low Calories Replacements of Edible Fats and Oils
    
         This study evaluated the digestibility and caloric availability of 
    test oils including refined jojoba oil. Crude jojoba oil was refined by 
    a standard alkali refining process which is used to refine edible 
    vegetable oils. In the refined jojoba oil, free fatty acids were 
    reduced to 0.023% from 1.45% in the crude oil. A trace nitrogen level 
    of 6  2 ppm was found in the refined oil which translated 
    to an upper limit of 160  54 ppm of Simmondsin in the 
    finished oil. Simmondsin and/or its breakdown products have been linked 
    with the diet rejection or restriction in rats. Four groups of 10 
    Sprague-Dawley rats each were fed with 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 grams of 
    refined jojoba oil once a day for 7 consecutive days. Feces were 
    collected, weighed and then the percentages of water, ash, fat, 
    protein, and carbohydrate were analyzed. No diet rejection was noted in 
    any dose group. Weakness and depression were noted in 50% of 1.0-g 
    dosed rats and in all 2.0- and 3.0-gms dosed rats; one rat in each of 
    these dose groups died during the study. Jojoba oil was poorly absorbed 
    and resistant to digestion, but anal leakage was noted. Jojoba oil can 
    act as a laxative and interfere with certain vitamin and mineral 
    absorption from the gut. (Hamm, D. J., 1984. ``Preparation and 
    Evaluation of Trailkoxytricarballylate, Trialhoxycitrate, 
    Trailkoxyglycerylether, Jojoba Oil and Sucrose Polyester as Low 
    calories Replacements of Edible Fats and Oils,'' J. of Food Science 
    (49):419-428). (OW)
    
    Conclusion
    
        The Agency estimates that the dietary exposure to humans from 
    jojoba oil when applied in accordance with the limitations set forth in 
    this proposed exemption is far below the levels that produced no 
    adverse effects in laboratory animals. For this reason, and upon review 
    of its use, EPA has determined that jojoba oil, when used in accordance 
    with good agricultural practices is useful and poses no hazard to the 
    public health. Accordingly, EPA proposes to exempt jojoba oil from the 
    requirements of a tolerance under the conditions set forth below.
        Any person who has registered or submitted an application for 
    registration of a pesticide, under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 
    and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended, which contains any of the 
    ingredients listed herein, may request within 30 days after publication 
    of this notice in the Federal Register that this rulemaking proposal be 
    referred to an Advisory Committee in accordance with section 408(e) of 
    the FFDCA.
        Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the 
    proposed regulation. Comments must bear a notation indicating the 
    document control number, [PP 3E4230/P634]. All written comments filed 
    in response to this petition will be available in the Public Response 
    and Program Resources Branch, at the address given above from 8 a.m. to 
    4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except legal holidays.
         A record has been established for this rulemaking under docket 
    number [PP 3E4230/P634] (including comments and data submitted 
    electronically as described below). A public version of this record, 
    including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does 
    not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection 
    from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays. The public record is located in Room 1132 of the Public 
    Response and Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Crystal Mall #2, 
    
    [[Page 54641]]
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-Docket@epamail.epa.gov
    
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
    EPA will transfer all comments received electronically into printed, 
    paper form as they are received and will place the paper copies in the 
    official rulemaking record which will also include all comments 
    submitted directly in writing. The official rulemaking record is the 
    paper record maintained at the address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the 
    beginning of this document.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order (i.e., 
    Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines ``significant'' as 
    those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an annual effect on 
    the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially 
    affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal 
    governments or communities (also known as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues 
    arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the 
    principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
        This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates under Title II of 
    the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Pub. L. 104-4 for State, 
    local, or tribal governments or the private sector because it would not 
    impose enforceable duties on them.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: September 29, 1995.
    
    Janet L. Andersen,
    Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, 
    Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 180 be amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In subpart D, by adding new Sec. 180.1160, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.1160 Jojoba oil; exemption from the requirement of a 
    tolerance.
    
        The insecticide and spray tank adjuvant jojoba oil is exempted from 
    the requirement of a tolerance in or on all raw agricultural 
    commodities when applied at the rate of 1.0% or less of the final spray 
    in accordance with good agricultural practices, provided the jojoba oil 
    does not contain simmondsin, simmondsin-2-ferulate and related 
    conjugated organonitriles including demethyl simmondsin and 
    didemethylsimmondsin.
    
    [FR Doc. 95-26325 Filed 10-24-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/25/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
95-26325
Dates:
Comments, identified by the document control number [PP 3E4230/ P634], must be received on or before November 24, 1995.
Pages:
54637-54641 (5 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 3E4230/P634, FRL-4981-7
RINs:
2070-AC18
PDF File:
95-26325.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.1160