95-26461. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 25, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 54597-54599]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-26461]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [IA-18-1-6984a; FRL-5303-9]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: By this action the EPA gives full approval to the State 
    Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the state of Iowa for the 
    purpose of fulfilling the requirements set forth in the EPA's General 
    Conformity rule. The SIP was submitted by the state to satisfy the 
    Federal requirements in 40 CFR 51.852 and 93.151.
    
    DATES: This action will be effective December 26, 1995 unless by 
    November 24, 1995 adverse or critical comments are received. If the 
    effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the 
    Federal Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the documents relevant to this action are 
    available for public inspection during normal business hours at the: 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Air Branch, 726 Minnesota Avenue, 
    Kansas City, Kansas 66101; and EPA Air & Radiation Docket and 
    Information Center, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa V. Haugen at (913) 551-7877.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act, as 
    amended (the Act), requires the EPA to promulgate criteria and 
    procedures for demonstrating and ensuring conformity of Federal actions 
    to an applicable implementation plan developed pursuant to section 110 
    and part D of the Act. Conformity to an SIP is defined in the Act as 
    meaning conformity to an SIP's purpose of eliminating or reducing the 
    severity and number of violations of the National Ambient Air Quality 
    Standards (NAAQS), and achieving expeditious attainment of such 
    standards. The Federal agency responsible for the action is required to 
    determine if its actions conform to the applicable SIP. On November 30, 
    1993, the EPA promulgated the final rule (hereafter referred to as the 
    General Conformity rule), which establishes the criteria and procedures 
    governing the determination of conformity for all Federal actions, 
    except Federal highway and transit actions.
        The General Conformity rule also establishes the criteria for EPA 
    approval of SIPs. See 40 CFR 51.852 and 93.151. These criteria provide 
    that the state provisions must be at least as stringent as the 
    requirements specified in EPA's General Conformity rule, and that they 
    can be more stringent only if they apply equally to Federal and 
    nonfederal entities (Section 51.851(b)).
        On March 10, 1994, the EPA promulgated a nonattainment designation 
    for part of Muscatine County, Iowa, in response to violations of the 
    SO2 NAAQS. Section 51.851 and section 93.151 of the General 
    
    [[Page 54598]]
    Conformity rule require that states submit an SIP revision containing 
    the criteria and procedures for assessing the conformity of Federal 
    actions to the applicable SIP, within 12 months after November 30, 
    1993, or within 12 months of an area's designation to nonattainment, 
    whichever is later. As a result of EPA's promulgation of the 
    nonattainment designation, an SIP revision addressing the requirements 
    of the General Conformity rule became due on April 11, 1995.
        On January 26, 1995, the state of Iowa submitted an SIP revision 
    meeting the requirements of Secs. 51.851 and 93.151 of the General 
    Conformity rule. The submission adopts by reference 40 CFR part 93, 
    subpart B, except 40 CFR 93.151. The omitted section contains the 
    criteria for EPA approval of General Conformity SIP revisions, and also 
    states the effect of EPA approval of an SIP revision. It is not a 
    necessary component of the state's substantive rules governing general 
    conformity determinations.
        The Iowa rule also modifies 40 CFR 93.160(f) and 40 CFR 93.160(g) 
    to adapt the language in the Federal regulations to the state rule. It 
    deletes the language in Sec. 93.160(f) stating that the 
    ``implementation plan revision required in Sec. 93.151 shall provide 
    that,'' and retains the substantive requirement in paragraph (f). It 
    also revises paragraph (g) to refer to adoption and approval of the 
    Iowa SIP revision, in place of the reference in EPA's rule to SIP 
    revisions generally.
        A public hearing was held on November 14, 1994. The rule was filed 
    on December 30, 1994, and became effective on January 18, 1995.
        Because the Iowa rule adopts the substantive requirements of EPA's 
    rule by reference, it meets the criteria in Secs. 51.851 and 93.151 for 
    approval of General Conformity SIP revisions.
    
    EPA Action
    
        By this action EPA grants full approval of Iowa's January 26, 1995, 
    submittal. This SIP revision meets all of the requirements set forth in 
    40 CFR 51.851 and 93.151.
        The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because 
    the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates 
    no adverse comments. However, in a separate document in the Federal 
    Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision 
    should adverse or critical comments be filed.
        If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn 
    before the effective date by publishing a subsequent notice that will 
    withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be 
    addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a 
    proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on 
    this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should 
    do so at this time.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be 
    considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and 
    environmental factors, and in relation to relevant statutory and 
    regulatory requirements.
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the CAA 
    do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements 
    that the state is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP 
    approval does not impose any new requirements, EPA certifies that it 
    does not have a significant impact on any small entities affected. 
    Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-state relationship under the 
    CAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute 
    Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The 
    CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds 
    (Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 
    42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)).
        This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature 
    by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the 
    Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a 
    July 10, 1995, memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator 
    for Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
    exempted this regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
    Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 
    1995, EPA must undertake various actions in association with proposed 
    or final rules that include a Federal mandate that may result in 
    estimated costs of $100 million or more to the private sector, or to 
    state, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate.
        Through submission of this SIP, the state has elected to adopt the 
    program provided for under section 110 of the the CAA. These rules may 
    bind state and local governments to perform certain actions, and also 
    require the private sector to perform certain duties. To the extent 
    that the rules being finalized for approval by this action will impose 
    new requirements, sources are already subject to these regulations 
    under state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to state or local 
    governments, or to the private sector, result from this final action. 
    EPA has also determined that this final action does not include a 
    mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to 
    state or local governments in the aggregate or to the private sector.
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
    of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
    the appropriate circuit by December 26, 1995. Filing a petition for 
    reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
    the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review, nor does 
    it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
    filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
    This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
    requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
    reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Sulfur oxides.
    
        Dated: September 6, 1995.
    William Rice,
    Acting Regional Administrator.
    
        Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart Q--Iowa
    
        2. Section 52.820 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(62) to read as 
    follows: 
    
    [[Page 54599]]
    
    
    
    Sec. 52.820  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (62) Revised chapter 31, rule 567-31.2, submitted on January 26, 
    1995, incorporates by reference EPA's regulations relating to 
    determining conformity of general Federal actions to State or Federal 
    Implementation Plans.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) Amendment to chapter 31, ``Nonattainment Areas'' Iowa 
    Administrative Code, rule 567-31.2. Effective February 22, 1995.
    
    [FR Doc. 95-26461 Filed 10-24-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/26/1995
Published:
10/25/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
95-26461
Dates:
This action will be effective December 26, 1995 unless by November 24, 1995 adverse or critical comments are received. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
Pages:
54597-54599 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IA-18-1-6984a, FRL-5303-9
PDF File:
95-26461.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.820