94-26469. Pesticide Tolerance for 3,5-Dichloro-N-(1,1-Dimethyl-2- Propynyl)Benzamide  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 26, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-26469]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: October 26, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 0E3907/P588; FRL-4907-4]
    RIN 2070-AC18
    
     
    
    Pesticide Tolerance for 3,5-Dichloro-N-(1,1-Dimethyl-2-
    Propynyl)Benzamide
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA proposes to establish a tolerance for combined residues of 
    the herbicide 3,5-dichloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl)benzamide and its 
    metabolites in or on the raw agricultural commodity radicchio greens 
    (tops). The Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4) submitted to 
    EPA the petition requesting the maximum permissible level for residues 
    of the herbicide.
    
    DATES: Comments, identified by the document control number [PP 0E3907/
    P588], must be received on or before November 25, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to: Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202. Information submitted 
    as a comment concerning this document may be claimed confidential by 
    marking any part or all of that information as ``Confidential Business 
    Information'' (CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except 
    in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the 
    comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in 
    the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed 
    publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written comments will be 
    available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at the address given above, 
    from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Hoyt L. Jamerson, 
    Registration Division (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location and telephone number: Sixth Floor, Crystal Station #1, 
    2800 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-308-8783.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Interregional Research Project No. 4 
    (IR-4), New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, P.O. Box 231, 
    Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, has submitted pesticide 
    petition (PP) 0E3907 to EPA on behalf of the Agricultural Experiment 
    Station of California. This petition requests that the Administrator, 
    pursuant to section 408(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
    (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(e), establish a tolerance for combined residues 
    of the herbicide 3,5-dichloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl)benzamide 
    (also referred to in this document as pronamide) and its metabolites 
    (calculated as 3,5-dichloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl)benzamide) in or 
    on the raw agricultural commodity radicchio greens (tops) at 2 parts 
    per million (ppm).
        The scientific data submitted in the petition and other relevant 
    material have been evaluated. The toxicological data considered in 
    support of the proposed tolerance include:
        1. A 90-day feeding study with rats administered pronamide in the 
    diet at concentrations of 0, 40, 200, 1,000, or 4,000 ppm (equivalent 
    to 0, 2.5, 12.3, 60.0, or 254.0 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg)/day in 
    males; 0, 3.1, 15.0, 74.6, or 289.2 mg/kg/day in females). A systemic 
    no-observed-effect level (NOEL) was established at 200 ppm (12.3 mg/kg/
    day/male; 15 mg/kg/day/female). A systemic lowest-effect level (LEL) 
    was established at 1,000 ppm (60.0 mg/kg/day/male; 74.6 mg/kg/day/
    female), based on increased liver relative weight and incidence of 
    liver histopathology in both sexes, decreased body/weight gain and feed 
    consumption in females, and increased blood cholesterol level in males. 
    Effects observed at the high dose (4,000 ppm) include decreases in body 
    weight/weight gain and feed consumption in both sexes, and increases in 
    liver-related effects and in the histopathology of the thyroid (both 
    sexes) and anterior pituitary (males).
        2. A 52-week chronic feeding study with dogs fed diets containing 
    0, 300, 875, or 1,750 ppm (equivalent to 0, 11.9, 33.1, or 67.7 mg/kg/
    day in males; or 0, 11.9, 36.1, or 69.0 mg/kg/day in females) with a 
    NOEL established at 300 ppm, based on increases in serum alkaline 
    phosphatase in males and thyroid weight in females, and in liver 
    pathology in both sexes at the 875-ppm dose level. Additional effects 
    observed at the highest dose tested (1,750 ppm) include decreases in 
    body weight/feed consumption, increases in serum alkaline phosphatase 
    and gamma glutamyl transferase in both sexes, increases in serum 
    alanine aminotransferase in females, and increases in testes relative 
    weight in males.
        3. An 18-month carcinogenicity study with B6C3F1 mice fed diets 
    containing 0, 1,000, or 2,000 ppm (approximately 0, 150, or 300 mg/kg/
    day) with a dose-related increase in incidence of hepatocellular 
    carcinomas in male mice sacrificed at 18 months. The increases in tumor 
    rates observed at 1,000 and 2,000 ppm were statistically significant by 
    pair-wise comparison with the control. There were no carcinogenic 
    effects observed in female mice under the conditions of the study.
        4. A 24-month chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study with rats fed 
    diets containing 0, 40, 200, or 1,000 ppm (equivalent to 0, 1.73, 8.46, 
    or 42.59 mg/kg/day/male and 0, 2.13, 10.69, or 55.09 mg/kg/day/female). 
    The NOEL for systemic (nonneoplastic) effects was established at 8.46 
    mg/kg/day/males and 10.69 mg/kg/day females, based on decreased body 
    weight/body weight gain and increased liver weight, as well as an 
    increased incidence of hepatic centrilobular hypertrophy, eosinophilic 
    cell alterations, and thyroid follicular cell hypertrophy in both sexes 
    at the high-dose level. Rats fed at the high-dose level also showed an 
    increased incidence of thyroid tumor (thyroid follicular cell adenomas) 
    and testicular tumor (benign testicular interstitial cell tumors) 
    rates, which exceeded historical control ranges. There was no 
    progression from thyroid and testicular tumors to carcinomas.
        5. A two-generation reproduction study with rats fed diets 
    containing 0, 40, 200, or 1,500 ppm (approximately 0, 3.0, 15.4, or 
    114.0 mg/kg/day/P1 males and 0, 3.2, 16.5, or 127.3 mg/kg/day/P2 males 
    during pre-mating period; group time-weighted average approximately 0, 
    4.1, 20.2, and 158.2 mg/kg/day/P1 females and 0, 4.0, 19.8, or 157.4 
    mg/kg/day/P2 females). The reproductive NOEL was established at 200 
    ppm, based on decreased combined male/female pup weight per litter at 
    the 1,500-ppm dose level. A NOEL for parental systemic effects was 
    established at 200 ppm, based on decreased body weight and food 
    consumption and histopathology of the liver and adrenal in both sexes, 
    the thyroid in females, and the anterior pituitary in males at the 
    1,500-ppm dose level. These effects were observed in both P1 and P2 
    generations.
        6. A developmental toxicity study with rabbits given gavage doses 
    of 0, 5, 20, or 80 mg/kg/day during gestation days 7 through 19 with a 
    developmental NOEL established at 20 mg/kg/day, based on late 
    resorption (2 of 5 abortions at the 80 mg/kg/day dose level each showed 
    one incidence of late resorption). The maternal NOEL was established at 
    20 mg/kg/day, based on one mortality, abortions in 5 of 16 animals, 
    body weight loss, and liver histopathology at the 80 mg/kg/day dose 
    level.
        7. A developmental toxicity study with rats given gavage doses of 
    0, 5, 20, 80, or 160 mg/kg/day on gestation days 6 through 15 with no 
    clinical signs of toxicity under the conditions of the study.
        8. Mutagenicity tests, including gene mutation (Ames test), forward 
    gene mutation (CH V79 cells), structural chromosome aberration in vitro 
    (CHO cells), structural chromosome aberration in vivo (mouse bone 
    marrow cells), and UDNA synthesis (primary hepatocytes of rats), were 
    all negative. The results of the mutagenicity test indicate that 
    pronamide does not appear to be mutagenic.
        The Office of Pesticide Programs' Carcinogenicity Peer Review 
    Committee has classified pronamide as a Group B2 carcinogen (a probable 
    human carcinogen), based on the findings of two types of tumors in the 
    rat (uncommon benign testicular interstitial cell tumors and thyroid 
    follicular cell adenomas) and one type (liver carcinomas) in the mouse. 
    The upper limit on the carcinogenic risk from dietary exposure 
    resulting from established uses of pronamide and the proposed use on 
    radicchio is estimated at 4.9 X 10-7 for the general population. 
    The carcinogenic risk assessment for pronamide was calculated based on 
    a potency estimator (Q*) of 1.54 X 10-2 (mg/kg/day)-1 
    and an Anticipated Residue Contribution (ARC) calculated at 0.000032 
    mg/kg/body weight/day.
        The reference dose (RfD) is established at 0.080 mg/kg of body 
    weight/day. The RfD is based on an NOEL of 8.46 mg/kg/day from the rat 
    2-year feeding study and an uncertainty factor of 100. The ARC from 
    established uses and the proposed use of pronamide utilizes less than 1 
    percent of the RfD for the U.S. population and all subgroups of the 
    population currently evaluated by EPA's Dietary Risk Evaluation System.
        The nature of the residue in plants is adequately understood. The 
    residues of concern are pronamide and its metabolites containing the 
    3,5-dichlorophenyl moiety. An adequate analytical method, gas 
    chromatography, is available for enforcement purposes. The analytical 
    method for enforcing this tolerance has been published in the Pesticide 
    Analytical Manual, Vol. II (PAM II). There is no reasonable expectation 
    that secondary residues will occur in milk, eggs, or meat of livestock 
    and poultry: radicchio greens are not considered to be livestock feed 
    items.
        There are presently no actions pending against the continued 
    registration of this chemical.
        Based on the information and data considered, the Agency has 
    determined that the tolerance established by amending 40 CFR part 180 
    would protect the public health. Therefore, it is proposed that the 
    tolerance be established as set forth below.
        Any person who has registered or submitted an application for 
    registration of a pesticide, under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 
    and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended, which contains any of the 
    ingredients listed herein, may request within 30 days after publication 
    of this document in the Federal Register that this rulemaking proposal 
    be referred to an Advisory Committee in accordance with section 408(e) 
    of the FFDCA.
        Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the 
    proposed regulation. Comments must bear a notation indicating the 
    document control number, [PP 0E3907/P588]. All written comments filed 
    in response to this petition will be available in the Public Response 
    and Program Resources Branch, at the address given above from 8 a.m. to 
    4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except legal holidays.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order (i.e., 
    Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines ``significant'' as 
    those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an annual effect on 
    the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially 
    affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal 
    governments or communities (also known as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues 
    arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the 
    principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
    Dated: October 3, 1994.
    
    Stephen L. Johnson,
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 180 be amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In Sec. 180.317, by amending paragraph (a) in the table therein 
    by adding and alphabetically inserting the commodity radicchio greens 
    (tops), to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.317   3,5-Dichloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl)benzamide; 
    tolerances for residues.
    
        (a) *  *  * 
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Parts per 
                             Commodity                             million  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                                      *****                                 
    Radicchio greens (tops)....................................          2.0
                                                                            
                                      *****                                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    * * * * *
    
    [FR Doc. 94-26469 Filed 10-26-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/26/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
94-26469
Dates:
Comments, identified by the document control number [PP 0E3907/ P588], must be received on or before November 25, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: October 26, 1994, PP 0E3907/P588, FRL-4907-4
RINs:
2070-AC18
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.317