[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 206 (Monday, October 26, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57078-57081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-28538]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-232-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400, 757, 767, and 777
Series Airplanes Equipped With Allied Signal RIA-35B Instrument Landing
System (ILS) Receivers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the supersedure of an existing
airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-
400, 757, 767, and 777 series airplanes, that currently requires a
revision to the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to prohibit certain types
of approaches. That action also requires repetitive inspections to
detect certain faults of all RIA-35B ILS receivers, and replacement of
discrepant ILS receivers with new, serviceable, or modified units; or,
alternatively, an additional revision to the AFM and installation of a
placard to prohibit certain operations. That AD was prompted by a
report of errors in the
[[Page 57079]]
glide slope deviation provided by an ILS receiver. This action would
require accomplishment of the previously optional terminating action.
The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent
erroneous localizer deviation provided by faulty ILS receivers, which
could result in a landing outside the lateral boundary of the runway.
DATES: Comments must be received by December 10, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-NM-232-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from AlliedSignal Aerospace, Technical Publications, Dept. 65-
70, P.O. Box 52170, Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2170. This information may
be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Yi, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1013; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 98-NM-232-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 98-NM-232-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion
On June 29, 1998, the FAA issued AD 98-14-10, amendment 39-10643
(63 FR 36549, July 7, 1998), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-
400, 757, 767, and 777 series airplanes, to require a revision to the
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to prohibit certain types of approaches if
only one instrument landing system (ILS) receiver is operational. That
action also requires repetitive inspections to detect certain faults of
all RIA-35B ILS receivers, and replacement of discrepant ILS receivers
with new, serviceable, or modified units; or, alternatively, an
additional revision to the AFM and installation of a placard to
prohibit certain operations. That action also provides for an optional
terminating action for the AFM revisions and repetitive inspections.
That action was prompted by a report indicating that errors were
detected in the glide slope deviation provided by an ILS receiver. The
requirements of that AD are intended to detect and correct faulty ILS
receivers, and to ensure that the flightcrew is advised of the
potential hazard of performing ILS approaches using a localizer
deviation from a faulty ILS receiver and also advised of the procedures
necessary to address that hazard. Erroneous localizer deviation could
result in a landing outside the lateral boundary of the runway.
Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule
When AD 98-14-10 was issued, it contained a provision for the
optional replacement of all existing RIA-35B ILS receivers with
modified units, which, if accomplished, would constitute terminating
action for the AFM revisions and repetitive inspections required by
that AD. In the preamble to AD 98-14-10, the FAA indicated that the
actions required by that AD were considered ``interim action'' and that
further rulemaking action was being considered to require the
replacement of all existing RIA-35B ILS receivers with modified parts.
The FAA now has determined that further rulemaking action is indeed
necessary, and this proposed AD follows from that determination.
Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the
proposed AD would supersede AD 98-14-10, amendment 39-10643, to
continue to require a revision to the AFM to prohibit certain types of
approaches if only one ILS receiver is operational. This proposed AD
also would continue to require repetitive inspections to detect certain
faults of all RIA-35B ILS receivers, and replacement of discrepant ILS
receivers with new, serviceable, or modified units; or, alternatively,
an additional revision to the AFM and installation of a placard to
prohibit certain operations. This proposed AD also would require
replacement of all ILS receivers, part number 066-50006-0101, with
modified ILS receivers, which would constitute terminating action for
the repetitive inspections and AFM revisions described previously.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 74 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 74 airplanes of U.S. registry
would be affected by this proposed AD.
The AFM revision to prohibit certain types of approaches that
currently is required by AD 98-14-10, and retained in this proposed AD,
takes approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish, at an
average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the currently required AFM revision on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $4,440, or $60 per airplane.
In lieu of the AFM revision and placard installation to prohibit
certain types of operations, the visual inspection that currently is
provided in AD 98-14-10 takes approximately 1 work hour per airplane to
accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the cost impact of the inspection on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $4,440, or $60 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
In lieu of the visual inspection, the AFM revision and placard
installation that currently is provided in AD 98-14-10 takes
approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish, at an average
labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based
[[Page 57080]]
on these figures, the cost impact of the AFM revision and placard
installation on U.S. operators is estimated to be $4,440, or $60 per
airplane.
The new replacement that is proposed in this AD action would take
approximately 3 work hours per airplane (1 work hour per receiver, 3
receivers per airplane) to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60
per work hour. Required parts would cost approximately $235 per
airplane ($78.33 per receiver). Based on these figures, the cost impact
of the replacement proposed by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated
to be $30,710, or $415 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the current or proposed
requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish
those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is
determined that this proposal would not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-10643 (63 FR
36549, July 7, 1998), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD),
to read as follows:
Boeing: Docket 98-NM-232-AD. Supersedes AD 98-14-10, amendment
39-10643.
Applicability: Model 747-400, 757, 767, and 777 series
airplanes; equipped with AlliedSignal RIA-35B Instrument Landing
System (ILS) receivers, part number (P/N) 066-50006-0101;
certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent erroneous localizer deviation provided by faulty ILS
receivers, which could result in a landing outside the lateral
boundary of the runway, accomplish the following:
Restatement of the Requirements of AD 98-14-10
(a) Within 10 days after July 22, 1998 (the effective date of AD
98-14-10, amendment 39-10643), revise the Limitations Section of the
FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to include the following
statement. This may be accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD
into the AFM.
``Any Instrument Landing System (ILS) or Localizer approach with
only one operative AlliedSignal ILS receiver, P/N 066-50006-0101,
installed is prohibited.''
Note 2: On Model 747-400 and 777 series airplanes, the existence
of only one operative ILS receiver is indicated by the Engine
Indication and Crew Alerting System advisory message, ``SNGL SOURCE
ILS.'' On Model 757 and 767 series airplanes, failure of an ILS
receiver is indicated by an ILS flag on the display of the
Electronic Flight Instrument System when approach mode is selected.
(b) Within 30 days after July 22, 1998, accomplish the
requirements of either paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD.
(1) Perform a visual inspection of the 64 flight legs of the
internal fault memory of all AlliedSignal RIA-35B ILS receivers, P/N
066-50006-0101, for fault codes ``Nl'' (glide slope antialias fault)
or ``Nm'' (localizer antialias fault). Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 64 flight cycles. If any fault
code ``Nl'' or ``Nm'' is found, prior to further flight, replace the
existing ILS receiver with a new or serviceable ILS receiver having
the same P/N; or with an ILS receiver that has been modified to P/N
066-50006-1101 in accordance with AlliedSignal Electronic and
Avionics Systems Service Bulletin M-4426 (RIA-35B-34-6), Revision 3,
dated May 1998. Installation of an ILS receiver that has been
modified (and the P/N converted) in accordance with the service
bulletin constitutes terminating action for the inspection
requirement of paragraph (b)(1) of this AD for that part.
(2) Accomplish the actions required by paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and
(b)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Revise the Limitations Section of the FAA-approved AFM to
include the following statement. This may be accomplished by
inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM. ``Category II and III
operations are prohibited with AlliedSignal ILS receiver P/N 066-
50006-0101 installed.''
(ii) Install a placard on the forward instrument panel of the
cockpit in clear view of the pilots, which states: ``Category II and
III operations are prohibited.''
(c) As of July 22, 1998, no person shall install on any airplane
an RIA-35B ILS receiver, P/N 066-50006-0101, that has been found to
be discrepant (that is, on which fault codes ``Nl'' or ``Nm'' were
found during an inspection of the internal fault memory) unless the
discrepancy has been corrected by modifying the ILS receiver in
accordance with AlliedSignal Electronic and Avionics Systems Service
Bulletin M-4426 (RIA-35B-34-6), Revision 3, dated May 1998.
New Requirements of This AD
(d) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
all existing RIA-35B ILS receivers, P/N 066-50006-0101, with RIA-35B
ILS receivers that have been modified in accordance with
AlliedSignal Electronic and Avionics Systems Service Bulletin M-4426
(RIA-35B-34-6), Revision 3, dated May 1998; and that have had their
P/N's converted to 066-50006-1101. Such replacement constitutes
terminating action for the requirements of this AD. After the
replacement has been accomplished, the AFM limitations required by
paragraphs (a) and (b)(2)(i) of this AD may be removed from the AFM,
and the placard required by (b)(2)(ii) may be removed from the
cockpit.
Note 3: Modification of all AlliedSignal RIA-35B ILS receivers,
P/N 066-50006-0101, prior to July 22, 1998, in accordance with
Allied Signal Electronic and Avionics Systems Service Bulletin M-
4426 (RIA-35B-
[[Page 57081]]
34-6), dated December 1997; Revision 1, dated January 1998; or
Revision 2, dated April 1998; is considered acceptable for
compliance with the applicable action specified in this amendment.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Seattle ACO.
(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 19, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager,Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-28538 Filed 10-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
