99-27845. Mississippi Regulatory Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 57567-57571]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-27845]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
    
    30 CFR Parts 924
    
    [SPATS No. MS-015-FOR]
    
    
    Mississippi Regulatory Program
    
    AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) 
    is approving an amendment to the Mississippi regulatory program 
    (Mississippi program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation 
    Act of 1977 (SMCRA). Mississippi proposed revisions to regulations 
    concerning formal hearings; bond release; hydrologic balance; cessation 
    orders; formal review of citations; definitions; areas where mining is 
    prohibited or limited; performance bonds; pre-blasting surveys; 
    permitting; inspections; coal exploration; qualified laboratories; 
    disposal of excess spoil; coal mine waste impounding structures; 
    backfilling and grading; roads; and coal preparation plant performance 
    standards. The State also proposed to correct typographical errors and 
    make other non-substantive revisions. Mississippi intends to revise its 
    program to be consistent with the corresponding Federal regulations.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: October 26, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arthur W. Abbs, Director, Birmingham 
    Field Office, Office of Surface Mining,
    
    [[Page 57568]]
    
    135 Gemini Circle, Suite 215, Homewood, Alabama 35209. Telephone: (205) 
    290-7282. Internet: aabbs@balgw.osmre.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    I. Background on the Mississippi Program
    II. Submission of the Proposed Amendment
    III. Director's Findings
    IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
    V. Director's Decision
    VI. Procedural Determinations
    
    I. Background on the Mississippi Program
    
        On September 4, 1980, the Secretary of the Interior approved the 
    Mississippi program. You can find background information on the 
    Mississippi program, including the Secretary's findings and the 
    disposition of comments, in the September 4, 1980, Federal Register (45 
    FR 58520). You can find later actions on the program at 30 CFR 924.10, 
    924.15, 924.16, and 924.17.
    
    II. Submission of the Proposed Amendment
    
        By letter dated July 1, 1999 (Administrative Record No. MS-0373), 
    Mississippi sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA. 
    Mississippi sent the amendment in response to required program 
    amendments at 30 CFR 924.16(f)-(h), (j), (k), (m), and (n). The 
    amendment also included changes made at Mississippi's own initiative. 
    Mississippi proposed to amend the Mississippi Surface Coal Mining 
    Regulations.
        We announced receipt of the amendment in the July 26, 1999, Federal 
    Register (64 FR 40326). In the same document, we opened the public 
    comment period and provided an opportunity for a public hearing or 
    meeting on the adequacy of the proposed amendment. The public comment 
    period closed on August 25, 1999. Because no one requested a public 
    hearing or meeting, we did not hold one.
    
    III. Director's Findings
    
        Following, under SMCRA and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15 
    and 732.17, are our findings concerning the amendment. Any revisions 
    that we do not discuss below concern minor wording changes, or revised 
    cross-references and paragraph notations to reflect organizational 
    changes resulting from this amendment.
    
    A. Non-Substantive Revisions and Correction of Typographical Errors
    
        1. Mississippi assigned an incorrect section number (Section 5343.) 
    to its regulatory provisions for ``Use of Explosives: Pre-blasting 
    Survey.'' Mississippi proposed to change this incorrect section number 
    to Section 5349.
        2. Mississippi proposed to correct typographical errors and to make 
    other non-substantive revisions in the following sections: Section 105. 
    Definitions; Section 407. Contents of Application for Exemption; 
    Section 413. Conditions of Exemption and Right of Inspection and Entry; 
    Section 1105. Areas Where Mining is Prohibited or Limited; Section 
    2103. Permit Requirements for Exploration Removing More Than 250 Tons 
    of Coal, or Occurring on Lands Designated as Unsuitable for Surface 
    Coal Mining Operations; Section 2105. Coal Exploration Compliance 
    Duties; Section 2313. Permit Term Information; Section 3113. Review of 
    Permit Applications; Section 3121. Permit Terms; Section 3509. Permit 
    Renewals: Completed Applications; Section 3713. Qualified Laboratories; 
    Section 5359. Disposal of Excess Spoil: General Requirements; Section 
    5377. Coal mine waste: Impounding structures; Section 5391. Backfilling 
    and Grading: General Grading Requirements; Section 5393. Backfilling 
    and grading: Thin Overburden; Section 53111. Roads: General; Section 
    5703. Steep Slopes: Backfilling and grading: Steep slopes; and Section 
    5903. Coal Preparation Plants: Performance Standards.
        Correction of these typographical errors and other non-substantive 
    revisions clarify the existing regulations. These revisions are no less 
    effective than the Federal regulations and will not negatively impact 
    the effectiveness of the Mississippi regulations.
    
    B. Revisions to Mississippi's Regulations that are Required at 30 CFR 
    924.16
    
    1. Section 3301. Formal Hearing
        In accordance with the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 775.11(b)(2) 
    and 43 CFR 4.1367, we required the State to add provisions at section 
    3301(b) that pertain to temporary relief concerning permit decisions. 
    Mississippi revised paragraph (b) to read as follows:
    
        Any party may file a petition for temporary relief from the 
    Permit Board's action in conjunction with the filing of the request 
    for a formal hearing or at any time before a final decision is 
    issued by the Permit Board after a formal hearing.
    
        We find that the provision at section 3301(b) is consistent with 
    and no less effective than the counterpart Federal regulations at 30 
    CFR 775.11(b)(2) and 43 CFR 4.1367. Therefore, we are approving this 
    revision and removing the required program amendment at 30 CFR 
    924.16(f).
    2. Section 4501. Procedures for Seeking Release of Performance Bond
        Mississippi proposed to revise paragraph (c) to clarify that 
    Federal, State, and local governmental agencies which have special 
    expertise with respect to any environmental, social, or economic impact 
    involved in the coal mining operation are allowed to file written 
    objections to the proposed bond release and to request public hearings. 
    We find that the provision at section 4501(c) is consistent with and no 
    less effective than the counterpart Federal regulation at 30 CFR 
    800.40(f) and no less stringent than section 519(f) of SMCRA. 
    Therefore, we are approving this revision and removing the required 
    program amendment at 30 CFR 924.16(g).
    3. Section 5333. Hydrologic Balance: Surface- and Ground-Water 
    Monitoring
        Mississippi proposed to revise paragraph (b)(3)(A) to require the 
    operator to demonstrate that the coal mining operation has minimized 
    disturbance to the hydrologic balance in the permit and adjacent areas. 
    We find that the provision at section 5333 is substantively identical 
    to and is no less effective than the counterpart Federal regulation at 
    30 CFR 816.41(e)(3)(i). Therefore, we are approving this revision and 
    removing the required program amendment at 30 CFR 924.16(h).
    4. Section 6501. Cessation Orders
        Mississippi proposed to revise paragraph (c)(4) to replace a 
    reference to Sec. 53-9-69 with a reference to Sec. 6509. We find that 
    the provision at section 6501(c)(4) is substantively the same as and no 
    less effective than the counterpart Federal regulation at 30 CFR 
    843.11(c)(4). Therefore, we are approving this revision and removing 
    the required program amendment at 30 CFR 924.16(j).
    5. Section 6511. Formal Review of Citations
        a. At paragraph (a), Mississippi proposed to add a requirement that 
    the Commission notify parties in writing of the time and place of the 
    hearing at least five working days before the hearing date. We find 
    that the provision at section 6511(a) is consistent with and no less 
    stringent than section 525(a)(2) of SMCRA and no less effective than 
    the Federal regulation at 43 CFR 4.1167. Therefore, we are approving 
    this revision and removing the required program amendment at 30 CFR 
    924.16(k). Mississippi also proposed to revise paragraph (a) to require 
    interested parties to request formal reviews within
    
    [[Page 57569]]
    
    30 days of the date of the Commission, the Executive Director, or the 
    Executive Director's authorized representative took the action that is 
    being contested during the formal review. We are approving this 
    revision because it is consistent with and no less stringent than 
    section 525(a)(1) of SMCRA.
        b. Mississippi proposed to revise paragraph (1)(1) by changing the 
    reference room Sec. 6511(e) to Sec. 6511(a). We find that the provision 
    at section 6511(1)(1) is substantively identical to and no less 
    effective than the counterpart Federal regulation at 43 CFR 
    4.1186(a)(1). Therefore, we are approving this revision and removing 
    the required program amendment at 30 CFR 924.16(m).
        c. Mississippi proposed to revise paragraph (n)(9) to read as 
    follows:
    
        (9) Any party desiring to appeal a decision of the Commission 
    granting or denying an application for expedited review may appeal 
    to and seek relief from the appropriate chancery court pursuant to 
    Sec. 53-9-77.
    
    We find that the provision at section 6511(n)(9) is consistent with and 
    no less effective than the counterpart Federal regulation at 43 CFR 
    4.1187(f). Therefore, we are approving this revision and removing the 
    required program amendment at 30 CFR 924.16(n).
    
    C. Revisions to Mississippi's Regulations That the State Made at Its 
    Own Initiative
    
    1. Section 105. Definitions
        Mississippi proposed to revise the definition for performance bond 
    to read as follows:
    
        Performance Bond--a surety bond, collateral bond, letter or 
    letters of credit, or self-bond, or a combination thereof, by which 
    a permittee assures faithful performance of all the requirements of 
    the act, these regulations, this program and the requirements of the 
    permit and reclamation plan.
    
    In the above definition for performance bond, Mississippi added 
    ``letter or letters of credit.'' We are approving this revision because 
    a letter or letters of credit is a form of collateral bond in 
    accordance with the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 800.21(b). Therefore, 
    Mississippi's definition of performance bond is no less effective than 
    the Federal definition of performance bond at 30 CFR 701.5.
    2. Section 1105. Areas Where Mining Is Prohibited or Limited
        Mississippi proposed to revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
    
        (c) on any lands which will adversely affect any publicly owned 
    park or any place included on the National Register of Historic 
    Places, unless approved jointly by the Permit Board and the federal, 
    state or local agency with jurisdiction over the park or place;
    
    Mississippi is clarifying that the Mississippi Environmental Quality 
    Permit Board (Permit Board) and not the Mississippi Commission on 
    Environmental Quality (Commission) is the State entity which must along 
    with certain other government agencies jointly approve surface coal 
    mining operations on any lands which will adversely affect any publicly 
    owned park or any place included on the National Registry of Historic 
    Places. Therefore, we are approving this revision because it is 
    substantively the same as the counterpart Federal regulation at 30 CFR 
    761.11(c).
    3. Section 3119. Permit Approval and Denial Actions
        Mississippi proposed to add new paragraph (b)(2) to read as 
    follows:
    
        (2) Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this 
    Section, no time limit under the act or this Section requiring the 
    Permit Board to act shall be considered expired from the time the 
    Permit Board requests further information under Sec. 3113(d) until 
    the final decision of the Permit Board.
    
    Mississippi's proposed new regulation pertains to decisions regarding 
    permit issuance. Mississippi proposed that time limits imposed by its 
    Act or this section of its regulations will not expire during a certain 
    time period if the Permit Board requests, from permit applicants, 
    information on current violations by those permit applicants. The time 
    period runs from the time the Permit Board requests the information 
    until the time the Permit Board makes its final decision on the permit.
        If a current violation exists, section 3113(d) of the Mississippi 
    regulations mandates that the Permit Board require the applicant or the 
    person who owns or controls the applicant to submit certain information 
    to the Permit Board before it can issue a permit. This requirement is 
    substantively identical to the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 
    773.15(b)(1) (i)-(ii). Also, section 3113(b) states that the Permit 
    Board shall not issue a permit if any surface coal mining and 
    reclamation operation owned or controlled by the applicant or any 
    person who owns or controls the applicant is currently in violation of 
    the State Act, Federal Act, any corresponding State or Federal 
    regulations, a State program, or any Federal or State law, rule, or 
    regulation pertaining to air or water environmental protection. This 
    regulation is substantively the same as the counterpart Federal 
    regulation at 30 CFR 773.15(b)(1).
        Although, we do not have a counterpart Federal regulation or 
    statute to Mississippi's proposed new regulation and in light of the 
    provisions in the State regulations at sections 3113 (b) and (d) and 
    the Federal regulations at CFR 773.15 (b) and (b)(1) (i)-(ii), it makes 
    sense that any corresponding time frames imposed during the permit 
    approval process must be adjusted accordingly. The adjustments are 
    necessary because of the time that will be required for the State to 
    make the request to applicants for information on current violations 
    and because of the time that will be required for the applicant to 
    receive the request and to respond to it. Therefore, we are approving 
    the addition of this new proposed regulation because it is not 
    inconsistent with the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 773.15 (b) and 
    (b)(1) (i)-(ii).
    4. Section 4310. Form of the Performance Bond
        Mississippi proposed to add the language ``a letter or letters of 
    credit'' to the list of acceptable forms of performance bond at new 
    paragraph (4). Mississippi also redesignated old paragraph (4) as new 
    paragraph (5). We are approving the revision because a letter or 
    letters of credit is a form of collateral bond in accordance with the 
    Federal regulations at 30 CFR 800.21(b).
    5. Section 4303. Terms and Conditions of the Bond
        Paragraph (g) of this section pertains to letters of credit. 
    Mississippi proposed to revise paragraph (g)(6) by replacing the term 
    ``indemnity agreement'' with the term ``letter of credit.'' We are 
    approving this revision because Mississippi is merely identifying the 
    form of indemnity agreement which, in this particular regulation, is a 
    letter of credit.
    6. Section 4701. General
        Mississippi proposed to revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
    
        (a) Except as in compliance with Sec. 4701(b), the Commission 
    shall proceed to cause the forfeiture of all or part of a bond or 
    other collateral accepted pursuant to Chapter 43 for any permit 
    where required or authorized by Sec. 4705.
    
    Mississippi is clarifying that it can proceed to forfeit in whole or in 
    part, not just bonds, but other collateral accepted according to 
    Chapter 43. Form, Condition and Terms of Performance Bonds and 
    Liability Insurance. Mississippi is also clarifying that the forfeiture 
    will occur unless it decides to
    
    [[Page 57570]]
    
    withhold forfeiture according to section 4701(b). We are approving this 
    revision because it is consistent with and no less effective than the 
    Federal regulations at 30 CFR 800.50 (a), (a)(1) and (2).
    
    IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
    
    Public Comments
    
        We asked for public comments on the amendment, but did not receive 
    any.
    
    Federal Agency Comments
    
        Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments on the 
    amendment from various Federal agencies with an actual or potential 
    interest in the Mississippi program (Administrative Record No. MS-
    0376). We received comments from two agencies.
        Comment 1: In a letter dated July 30, 1999, the Mine Safety and 
    Health Administration stated that it had no comments regarding the 
    amendment (Administrative Record No. MS-0377).
        Response: No response is necessary.
        Comment 2: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in a letter dated 
    August 18, 1999, stated that the proposed amendment should specify all 
    measures in the International System of Units (SI) in lieu of the inch-
    pound (IP) system (Administrative Record No. MS-0379).
        Response: The appropriateness of Mississippi's use of the IP system 
    is not at issue in this rulemaking because the State did not propose 
    any changes pertaining to measures. In addition, the Federal 
    regulations at 30 CFR Part 700 to end do not require states to specify 
    measures in the SI.
    
    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
    
        Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we are required to get a written 
    agreement from the EPA for those provisions of the program amendment 
    that relate to air or water quality standards issued under the 
    authority of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean 
    Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the revisions that 
    Mississippi proposed to make in this amendment pertain to air or water 
    quality standards. Therefore, we did not ask the EPA to agree on the 
    amendment.
        Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments on the 
    amendment from the EPA (Administrative Record No. MS-0377). The EPA did 
    not respond to our request.
    
    State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council 
    on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
    
        Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are required to request comments from 
    the SHPO and ACHP on amendments that may have an effect on historic 
    properties. On July 19, 1999, we requested comments on Mississippi's 
    amendment (Administrative Record No. MS-0377), but neither responded to 
    our request.
    
    V. Director's Decision
    
        Based on the above findings, we approve the amendment as sent to us 
    by Mississippi on July 1, 1999. We approve the regulations that 
    Mississippi proposed with the provision that they be published in 
    identical form to the regulations sent to and reviewed by OSM and the 
    public.
        To implement this decision, we are amending the Federal regulations 
    at 30 CFR Part 924, which codify decisions concerning the Mississippi 
    program. We are making this final rule effective immediately to 
    expedite the State program amendment process and to encourage 
    Mississippi to bring its program into conformity with the Federal 
    standards. SMCRA requires consistency of State and Federal standards.
    
    VI. Procedural Determinations
    
    Executive Office 12866
    
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempts this rule from 
    review under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review).
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required 
    by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has 
    determined that, to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the 
    applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section. 
    However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of 
    State regulatory programs and program amendments since each such 
    program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM. 
    Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30 
    CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on State regulatory 
    programs and program amendments must be based solely on a determination 
    of whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing 
    Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 
    730, 731, and 732 have been met.
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        This rule does not require an environmental impact statement since 
    section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency 
    decisions on State regulatory program provisions do not constitute 
    major Federal actions within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the 
    National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule does not contain information collection requirements that 
    require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
    3507 et seq.).
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
    The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon 
    corresponding Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was 
    prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a 
    significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small 
    entities. Therefore, this rule will ensure that existing requirements 
    previously published by OSM will be implemented by the State. In making 
    the determination as to whether this rule would have a significant 
    economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and assumptions 
    for the corresponding Federal regulations.
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        OSM has determined and certifies under the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
    Act (2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq.) that this rule will not impose a cost of 
    $100 million or more in any given year on local, state, or tribal 
    governments or private entities.
    
    List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 924
    
        Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
    
        Dated: October 4, 1999.
    Brent Wahlquist,
    Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR Part 924 is amended 
    as set forth below:
    
    PART 924--MISSISSIPPI
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 924 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
    
        2. Section 924.15 is amended in the table by adding a new entry in 
    chronological order by ``Date of final publication'' to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 924.15  Approval of Mississippi regulatory program amendments.
    
    * * * * *
    
    [[Page 57571]]
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Original amendment submission date   Date of final publication                Citation/description
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     
    *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *
                                                            *
    July 1, 1999.......................  October 26, 1999...........  Sections 105; 407; 413; 1105 (c)-(d); 2103;
                                                                       2105; 2313; 3113; 3119; 3121; 3301(b); 3509;
                                                                       3713; 4301; 4303(g)(6); 4501(c); 4701(a);
                                                                       5333(b)(3)(A); 5349; 5359; 5377; 5391; 5393;
                                                                       53111; 5703; 5903; 6501(c)(4); 6511 (a),
                                                                       (l)(1), & (n)(9).
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Sec. 924.16  [Amended]
    
        3. Section 924.16 is amended by removing and reserving paragraphs 
    (f), (g), (h), (j), (k), (m) and (n).
    
    [FR Doc. 99-27845 Filed 10-25-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/26/1999
Published:
10/26/1999
Department:
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; approval of amendment.
Document Number:
99-27845
Dates:
October 26, 1999.
Pages:
57567-57571 (5 pages)
Docket Numbers:
SPATS No. MS-015-FOR
PDF File:
99-27845.pdf
CFR: (2)
30 CFR 924.15
30 CFR 924.16