99-27892. Self-Regulatory Organization; Noticed of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to Cross-Only Contingency Orders  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 57684-57685]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-27892]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    Release No. 34-42041; File No. SR-PCX-99-31]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organization; Noticed of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to Cross-Only Contingency 
    Orders
    
    October 20, 1999.
        Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act'')\1\ and rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
    on August 25, 1999, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'') or 
    ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II 
    and III below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange. the 
    Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
    proposed rule change from interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    1. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The PCX is proposing to amend its rules to permit Floor Brokers to 
    represent orders with a ``cross-only'' contingency. The text of the 
    proposed rule change is set forth below. Addition are italicized.
    * * * * *
    PACIFIC EXCHANGE, INC. RULES TRADING PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES
    para.4987  ``Crossing'' Orders
        Rule 6.47
        (a)-(c)--No change.
    Cross-Only Contingency Orders
        (d) A Floor Broker who holds cross-only orders a defined in rule 
    6.62(c)(3) may cross those orders by proceeding in the following 
    manner: Prior to representing the orders in the trading crowd, the 
    floor Broker must make the crowd award of the total number of contracts 
    the Floor Brokers wishes to cross, the order are to executed on a 
    cross-only basis, the price at which the Floor Broker wishes to cross 
    the orders, and the name of the clearing member or members through whom 
    the transaction will clear. The price must be or within the bid or 
    offer.
    * * * * *
    para.5061  Certain Types of Orders Defined
        Rule 6.62
        (a)-(b)-No change.
        (c) Contingency Orders.--No change.
        (12)-(2)--No change.
        (3) Cross-Only Orders. A cross-only order is a contingency order 
    that is to be executed in whole in equity options only, the amount 
    determined by the Member Organization Placing the order, in a cross 
    transaction with an order for another customer or the Member 
    Organization itself. If the trading crowd does not allow the cross to 
    take place, the Member Organization placing the order may withdraw it 
    from consideration by the trading crowd.
    * * * * *
    para.5127  Manner of Bidding and Offering
        Rule 6.73
        No change.
        Commentary:
        .01 Notwithstanding the above provision that all bids and offers 
    must be general ones, a Floor Broker may represent orders with a cross-
    only contingency as defined in Rule 6.62.
    * * * * *
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements 
    concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
    discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
    text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
    Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
    sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
    statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        The PCX proposes to amend certain Exchange Rules to permit a Member 
    Organization to enter and a Floor Broker to represent orders with a 
    cross-only contingency. The purpose of the proposed rule change is to 
    allow a Floor Broker to disclose to the trading crowd, prior to 
    execution, that the Floor Broker wishes to cross two orders for a 
    certain number of contracts, at a certain price within or at the quoted 
    bid or offer. The Floor Broker must also disclose, prior to execution, 
    the name of the clearing member or members through whom the transaction 
    will clear. If the crowd does not permit the Floor Broker to do this, 
    then the cross-only contingency provides that the Member Organization 
    placing the orders may withdraw the orders, as if they never existed in 
    the trading crowd. The two orders the Floor Broker holds to cross under 
    this contingency may be two customer orders or orders between a 
    customer and the firm itself. There are no restrictions on who the 
    customer may be, e.g., a customer could be a Market Maker, broker-
    dealer, or a public customer. The cross would be effected at or between 
    the bid and offer. A cross-only order is defined to include only equity 
    options orders that are to be executed in whole.
        The Exchange believes that by allowing for the cross-only 
    contingency, the Exchange will help to develop customer business and 
    will expedite crosses yielding a similar result to what occurs on the 
    floor currently, although currently it is done in a much more 
    circuitous route. With the current competition in the marketplace, the 
    Exchange believes that by providing the cross-only contingency more 
    firms will want to bring business to the PCX, since the firm will have 
    the ability to take the order elsewhere if the crowd does not allow the 
    cross.
        Although Exchange Rules currently allow a similar result as the 
    cross-only contingency, it is much more cumbersome. The proposed rule 
    change provides that the Floor Broker may make the crowd aware in 
    advance of the number of contracts the Floor Broker wishes to cross; 
    the price at which the cross would take place, at or between the quoted 
    prices; the customer ``give up'' information;\3\ and if the crowd bars 
    the cross from taking place, the Member Organization may withdraw the 
    orders. As the rules stand currently, a Floor Broker does not disclose 
    in advance that he or she is holding two orders to cross; the Floor 
    Broker must bid above the highest bid or offer below the lowest offer 
    in the open market; if the bid or offer is not taken by the crowd, then 
    the Floor Broker may cross at the higher bid or lower offer.\4\ The 
    difference in result between the proposed Rule and the current Rule is 
    not substantial; however it is a much quicker result since the Floor 
    Broker will know immediately
    
    [[Page 57685]]
    
    whether the trading crowd will allow the cross to take place, and the 
    Member Organization placing the order may withdraw it if the cross is 
    not allowed by the crowd.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ See PCX Rule 6.66(a).
        \4\ See PCX Rule 6.47(a).
        \5\ The Exchange notes that a substantially similar proposal of 
    the Chicago Board Options Exchange (``CBOE'') has been noticed for 
    public comment in the Federal Register. See Securities Exchange Act 
    Release No. 41610 (July 8, 1999), 64 FR 38495 (July 16, 1999). The 
    PCX proposal differs from the CBOE proposal in two procedural 
    respects: First, unlike the CBOE proposal, the PCX rule change will 
    require that the floor broker disclose, prior to the transaction, 
    the name of the clearing member or members through whom the 
    transaction will clear. This is the same information that floor 
    brokers must currently ``give up'' pursuant to PCX Rule 6.66(a). See 
    proposed PCX Rule 6.47(d). Second, the PCX proposal covers orders 
    that are to be executed in whole, while the CBOE proposal covers 
    orders that are to be executed in whole or in part. See proposed PCX 
    Rule 6.62(c)(3).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2. Statutory Basis
        The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with Section 6(b) \6\ of the Act, in general, and further the 
    objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\7\ in particular, in that they are 
    designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to enhance 
    competition and to protect investors and the public interest.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
        \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The PCX does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose 
    any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
    furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
    proposed rule change.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing 
    for Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
    Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
        (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
        (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with the Act. In particular, the Commission seeks 
    comment on whether the proposed rule change will result in fair 
    executions for the various orders and parties represented in the 
    crossing transaction. Also, commenters are requested to provide their 
    views on this rule revision in light of the proposed rule change 
    contained in SR-PCX-99-18, relating to facilitation crosses.\8\ Persons 
    making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the 
    Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, 
    Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent 
    amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule 
    change that are filed with the Commission, and all written 
    communications relating to the proposed rule change between the 
    Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from 
    the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 
    available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public 
    Reference Room. Copies of the filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-PCX-99-31 and should be 
    submitted by November 16, 1999.
    
        \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41867 (September 13, 
    1999), 64 FR 51171 (September 21, 1999).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-27892 Filed 10-25-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/26/1999
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-27892
Pages:
57684-57685 (2 pages)
PDF File:
99-27892.pdf