95-26718. Enforcement of ITC Exclusion Orders  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 208 (Friday, October 27, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 54939-54941]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-26718]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    19 CFR Part 12
    
    [T.D. 95-87]
    RIN 1515-AB44
    
    
    Enforcement of ITC Exclusion Orders
    
    AGENCY: Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document amends the Customs Regulations regarding unfair 
    competition to reflect Customs authority to enforce seizure and 
    forfeiture orders issued by the United States International Trade 
    Commission (ITC). These orders would be issued for articles which had 
    previously been denied entry pursuant to an ITC exclusion order. Such 
    seizure and forfeiture orders may be issued only when the owner, 
    importer or consignee of such articles has previously attempted to 
    import articles subject to an exclusion order into the U.S.; the 
    articles have previously been denied entry; and the owner, importer or 
    consignee has been notified in writing of the previous denial of entry. 
    The amendment sets forth the procedures Customs will follow when 
    seizures are made for violations of the ITC exclusion orders. It also 
    describes the appeal rights and procedures available to parties who 
    have an interest in the seized property.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: November 27, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicki Allums, Intellectual Property 
    Rights Branch, U.S. Customs Service, (202) 482-6960. 
    
    [[Page 54940]]
    
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337), the 
    International Trade Commission applies U.S. statutory law and the 
    common law of unfair competition to the importation of products into 
    the United States and their subsequent sale in the United States. 
    Section 337 declares unlawful unfair methods of competition and unfair 
    acts in the importation and sale of products in the United States, the 
    threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure a 
    domestic industry, prevent establishment of such an industry, or 
    restrain or monopolize trade and commerce in the United States. Section 
    337 also declares as unlawful per se infringement of a valid and 
    enforceable U.S. patent, copyright, registered trademark, or mask work; 
    no resulting injury need be found. To obtain relief under section 337, 
    the affected U.S. industry must file a complaint with the United States 
    International Trade Commission (ITC). A formal hearing before an 
    administrative law judge will then be conducted in order to determine 
    whether a violation under section 337 exists. The administrative law 
    judge then issues an initial determination. The initial determination 
    is subject to discretionary review by the ITC, which may affirm, 
    reverse, modify, set aside, or remand the initial determination to the 
    administrative law judge for further proceedings. If it is determined 
    that a violation exists, the ITC may order that any articles found to 
    be in violation of the Act be excluded from entry into the U.S.
        Section 1342(a)(5)(B) of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act 
    of 1988 amended section 337 of the Tariff Act by inserting a new 
    subsection (I). That subsection authorizes the ITC to issue an order 
    providing that any article determined to be imported in violation of 
    the provisions of the law relating to unfair methods of competition and 
    unfair acts in the importation of articles into the United States 
    should be seized and forfeited when certain conditions stated in the 
    law have been met. Any such order issued is to be enforced by the 
    Secretary of the Treasury.
        For such an order to be valid, the law provides that the following 
    conditions must be met:
        (a) The owner, importer, or consignee of the article must have 
    previously attempted to import the article into the United States;
        (b) The article must have been denied entry into the United States 
    by reason of an order issued under 19 U.S.C. 1337(d); and
        (c) Upon such previous denial of entry, the Secretary of the 
    Treasury must have provided the owner, importer, or consignee of the 
    article with written notice of--
        (i) Such order, and
        (ii) That seizure and forfeiture would result from any further 
    attempt to import the article into the United States.
        Section 12.39, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 12.39) currently 
    describes the role of the ITC in determining whether an importer has 
    engaged in unfair methods of competition or practices, and the actions 
    the ITC can order in response to the finding of such practices. Among 
    those actions are exclusion from entry and entry under bond of articles 
    imported in violation of fair trade provisions, both of which are cited 
    in Sec. 12.39(b). The authority of the ITC to exclude articles from 
    entry into the United States under section 337 is described in 
    Sec. 12.39(b)(1). Section 12.39(b)(2) permits excluded articles to be 
    entered under a single entry bond pending the finalization of the ITC 
    determination. Finally, Sec. 12.39(b)(3) requires, among other things, 
    that district directors notify each importer or consignee of articles 
    entered under bond pursuant to Sec. 12.39(b)(2) when the determination 
    becomes final, and indicate that the entry of articles is refused.
    
    Customs Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
    
        On May 19, 1994, Customs published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    in the Federal Register (59 FR 26151), which solicited comments on a 
    proposal to amend the Customs Regulations so that they would reflect 
    Customs authority to enforce seizure and forfeiture orders issued by 
    the International Trade Commission. No comments were received in 
    response to the NPRM.
        However, in its internal review of the proposed rule, Customs 
    identified an inconsistency between the proposal and the statute's 
    legislative history. The legislative history indicates that Congress 
    intended to include ``like goods'' within the scope of section 337 
    seizure orders. The addition of this phrase to the final regulation 
    does not expand the final rule because Customs seizure and forfeiture 
    authority only extends to articles and like articles which fall within 
    the scope of the ITC order. The phrase merely serves to clarify the 
    extent of that authority.
    
    Summary of Amendment
    
        This document amends Sec. 12.39(b), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 
    12.39(b)) to reflect both the authority of the ITC to issue seizure and 
    forfeiture orders against articles and like articles for which 
    exclusion orders have been issued under certain conditions and the 
    authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to enforce those orders.
        The amendment also sets forth the procedures that Customs, on 
    behalf of the Secretary of the Treasury, will follow when enforcing the 
    order. The procedures provide that when the three statutory conditions 
    are met that allow the ITC to issue a seizure and forfeiture order, and 
    the ITC notifies the Secretary of the Treasury of the issuance of such 
    order, Customs will notify all ports of entry of the order and identify 
    both the article subject to the order and the owners, importers or 
    consignees who are subject to the order.
        These seizure orders would be issued by the ITC against specific 
    importers, or their agents and consignees, and would apply only to 
    articles and like articles which have been denied entry by reason of an 
    exclusion order, and for which the importer has been notified in 
    writing.
        The amendment also contains procedures that are to be followed by 
    parties having an interest in articles which are seized pursuant to ITC 
    seizure orders and who wish to file a petition for relief.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, pursuant to the 
    provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), it 
    is certified that the amendment will not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, it is 
    not subject to the regulatory analysis or other requirements of 5 
    U.S.C. 603 and 604.
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        This amendment does not meet the criteria for a ``significant 
    regulatory action'' as specified in E.O. 12866.
    
    Drafting Information
    
        The principal author of this document was Peter T. Lynch, 
    Regulations Branch, Office of Regulations and Rulings, U.S. Customs 
    Service. However, personnel from other offices participated in its 
    development.
    
    List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 12
    
        Customs duties and inspection, Imports.
    
    Amendment to the Regulations
    
        Accordingly, part 12, Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 12), is 
    amended as set forth below: 
    
    [[Page 54941]]
    
    
    PART 12--SPECIAL CLASSES OF MERCHANDISE
    
        1. The general and relevant specific authority citations for part 
    12 continue to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 20, 
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)), 1624;
    * * * * *
        Section 12.39 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1337, 1623;
    * * * * *
        2. Section 12.39 is amended by revising the heading of paragraph 
    (b); by adding a new paragraph (b)(4); by redesignating paragraphs (c) 
    and (d) as paragraphs (d) and (e); and by adding a new paragraph (c) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 12.39  Imported articles involving unfair methods of competition 
    or practices.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) Exclusion from entry; entry under bond; notice of exclusion 
    order. * * *
        (4) In addition to the notice given to importers or consignees of 
    articles released under bond, port directors shall provide written 
    notice to all owners, importers or consignees of articles which are 
    denied entry into the United States pursuant to an exclusion order that 
    any future attempt to import such articles may result in the articles 
    being seized and forfeited. Copies of all such notices are to be 
    forwarded to the Commercial Enforcement, Trade Compliance Division, at 
    Customs Headquarters, and to the Office of The General Counsel, USITC, 
    500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436 by the district directors.
        (c) Seizure and Forfeiture Orders. (1) In addition to issuing an 
    exclusion order under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the Commission 
    may issue an order providing that any article determined to be in 
    violation of Sec. 337 be seized and forfeited to the United States. 
    Such order may be issued if:
        (i) The owner, importer, or consignee of the article previously 
    attempted to import the article or like articles into the United 
    States;
        (ii) The article or like articles were previously denied entry into 
    the United States by reason of an exclusion order issued under 
    paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
        (iii) Upon such previous denial of entry, the port director of the 
    port in which the entry was attempted had notified the owner, importer, 
    or consignee of the article in writing of both the exclusion order and 
    that seizure and forfeiture would result from any further attempt to 
    import the article or like articles into the United States.
        (2) Upon receipt of any seizure order issued by the Commission in 
    accordance with this paragraph, Customs shall immediately notify all 
    ports of entry of the property subject to the seizure order and 
    identify the persons notified under paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
        (3) The port director in the port in which the article was seized 
    shall issue a notice of seizure to parties known to have an interest in 
    the seized property. All interested parties to the property shall have 
    an opportunity to petition for relief under the provisions of 19 CFR 
    part 171. All petitions must be filed within 30 days of the date of 
    issuance of the notice of seizure, and failure of a claimant to 
    petition will result in the commencement of administrative forfeiture 
    proceedings. All petitions will be decided by the appropriate Customs 
    officer, based upon the value of the articles under seizure.
        (4) If seized articles are found to be not includable in an order 
    for seizure and forfeiture, then the seizure and the forfeiture shall 
    be remitted in accordance with standard Customs procedures.
        (5) Forfeited merchandise shall be disposed of in accordance with 
    the Customs laws.
    * * * * *
    George J. Weise,
    Commissioner of Customs.
    
        Approved: October 10, 1995.
    John P. Simpson,
    Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
    [FR Doc. 95-26718 Filed 10-26-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/27/1995
Published:
10/27/1995
Department:
Treasury Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-26718
Dates:
November 27, 1995.
Pages:
54939-54941 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
T.D. 95-87
RINs:
1515-AB44: Enforcement of ITC Exclusion Orders
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/1515-AB44/enforcement-of-itc-exclusion-orders
PDF File:
95-26718.pdf
CFR: (2)
19 CFR 12.39(b)(1)
19 CFR 12.39