97-28328. Federal Acquisition Regulation; Alternative Dispute Resolution 1996  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 55678-55679]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-28328]
    
    
    
    [[Page 55677]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part II
    
    Department of Defense
    _______________________________________________________________________
    General Services Administration
    _______________________________________________________________________
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    48 CFR Parts 6, 24, 33, and 52
    
    
    
    Federal Acquisition Regulation: Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1996; 
    Proposed Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 207 / Monday, October 27, 1997 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 55678]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
    
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
    
    48 CFR Parts 6, 24, 33, and 52
    
    [FAR Case 97-015]
    RIN 9000-AH72
    
    
    Federal Acquisition Regulation; Alternative Dispute Resolution--
    1996
    
    AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
    (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense 
    Acquisition Regulations Council are proposing to amend the Federal 
    Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement the Administrative Dispute 
    Resolution Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-320) and Section 4321(a)(7) of the 
    Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-106). This regulatory action was 
    not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under Executive 
    Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. This is not a major rule under 5 
    U.S.C. 804.
    
    DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before December 26, 1997 to 
    be considered in the formulation of a final rule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested parties should submit written comments to: 
    General Services Administration, FAR Secretariat (MVRS), 1800 F Street, 
    NW, Room 4035, Washington, DC 20405.
        E-mail comments submitted over Internet should be addressed to: 
    farcase.97-015@gsa.gov.
        Please cite FAR case 97-015 in all correspondence related to this 
    case.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS 
    Building, Washington, DC 20405 (202) 501-4755 for information 
    pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of 
    content, contact Mr. Jack O'Neill, Procurement Analyst, at (202) 501-
    3856. Please cite FAR case 97-015.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    A. Background
    
        The proposed rule amends FAR Parts 6, 24, 33, and 52 to implement 
    the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-320) and 
    Section 4321(a)(7) of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-106). 
    The rule makes clear the authority to contract with a neutral person as 
    an exception to requirements for full and open competition, revises 
    requirements for certification of a claim under the Administrative 
    Dispute Resolution Act to conform to the requirements under the 
    Contract Disputes Act, allows for binding arbitration in certain 
    circumstances, and specifies that certain dispute resolution 
    communications are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of 
    Information Act.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This proposed rule is not expected to have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of 
    the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule 
    adds guidance pertaining to, but does not significantly alter the 
    procedures for, alternative dispute resolution. Alternative dispute 
    resolution procedures allow voluntary resolution of issues in 
    controversy without the need to resort to litigation. An Initial 
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has, therefore, not been performed. 
    Comments from small entities concerning the affected FAR subpart will 
    be considered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610 of the Act. Such comments 
    must be submitted separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. (FAR 
    case 97-015), in correspondence.
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed 
    changes to the FAR do not impose recordkeeping or information 
    collection requirements, or collections of information from offerors, 
    contractors, or members of the public which require the approval of the 
    Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. However, 
    it does reduce the information collection requirements relating to 
    certification of claims (OMB Control Number 9000-0135).
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 6, 24, 33, and 52
    
        Government procurement.
    
        Dated: October 21, 1997.
    Edward C. Loeb,
    Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 48 CFR Parts 6, 24, 33, and 52 be 
    amended as set forth below:
        1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Parts 6, 24, 33, and 52 
    continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
    U.S.C. 2473(c).
    
    PART 6--COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
    
    
    6.302-3  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 6.302-3 is amended in paragraph (a)(2)(iii) by inserting 
    ``or neutral person'' after the word ``expert''.
    
    PART 24--PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION:
    
        3. Section 24.202 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    24.202  Prohibitions.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) A dispute resolution communication that is between a neutral 
    person and a party to alternative dispute resolution proceedings, and 
    that may not be disclosed under 5 U.S.C. 574, is exempt from disclosure 
    under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3)).
    
    PART 33--PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS
    
        4. Section 33.201 is amended by revising the definition 
    ``Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)'' to read as follows:
    
    
    33.201  Definitions.
    
    * * * * *
        Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) means any type of procedure or 
    combination of procedures voluntarily used to resolve issues in 
    controversy without the need to resort to litigation. These procedures 
    may include, but are not limited to, conciliation, facilitation, 
    mediation, fact-finding, minitrials, arbitration, and use of ombudsmen.
    * * * * *
    
    
    33.204  [Amended]
    
        5. Section 33.204 is amended in the fifth sentence by removing ``, 
    Public Law 100-522,'' and inserting in its place ``(5 U.S.C. 571, et 
    seq.),''.
        6. Section 33.207 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    33.207  Contractor certification.
    
        (a) Contractors shall provide the certification specified in 
    33.207(c) when submitting any claim exceeding $100,000.
    * * * * *
        7. Section 33.214 is amended in paragraph (a)(3) by inserting 
    ``and'' after ``litigation;'' in (a)(4) by removing ``; and'' and 
    inserting a period in its place; removing (a)(5); revising the first 
    sentence of paragraph (b); and adding paragraphs (f) and (g) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    33.214  Alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
    
    * * * * *
    
    [[Page 55679]]
    
        (b) If the contracting officer rejects a contractor's request for 
    ADR proceedings, the contracting officer shall provide the contractor a 
    written explanation citing one or more of the conditions in 5 U.S.C. 
    572(b) or such other specific reasons that ADR procedures are 
    inappropriate for the resolution of the dispute. * * *
    * * * * *
        (f)(1) A solicitation shall not require arbitration as a condition 
    of award, unless arbitration is otherwise required by law. Contracting 
    officers should have flexibility to select the appropriate ADR 
    procedure to resolve the issues in controversy as they arise.
        (2) An agreement to use arbitration shall be in writing and shall 
    specify a maximum award that may be issued by the arbitrator, as well 
    as any other conditions limiting the range of possible outcomes.
        (g) Binding arbitration, as an ADR procedure, may be agreed to only 
    as specified in agency guidelines. Such guidelines shall provide advice 
    on the appropriate use of binding arbitration and when an agency has 
    authority to settle an issue in controversy through binding 
    arbitration.
    
    PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
    
        8. Section 52.233-1 is amended by revising the date of the clause 
    and paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (g) to read as follows:
    
    
    52.233-1  Disputes.
    
    * * * * *
    
    DISPUTES (DATE)
    
    * * * * *
        (d)(2)(i) Contractors shall provide the certification specified 
    in subparagraph (d)(2)(iii) of this clause when submitting any claim 
    exceeding $100,000.
    * * * * *
        (g) If the claim by the Contractor is submitted to the 
    Contracting Officer or a claim by the Government is presented to the 
    Contractor, the parties, by mutual consent, may agree to use 
    alternative dispute resolution (ADR). If the Contractor refuses an 
    offer for ADR, the Contractor shall inform the Contracting Officer, 
    in writing, of the Contractor's specific reasons for rejecting the 
    offer.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 97-28328 Filed 10-24-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/27/1997
Department:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
97-28328
Dates:
Comments should be submitted on or before December 26, 1997 to be considered in the formulation of a final rule.
Pages:
55678-55679 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FAR Case 97-015
RINs:
9000-AH72
PDF File:
97-28328.pdf
CFR: (4)
48 CFR 6
48 CFR 24
48 CFR 33
48 CFR 52