[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 208 (Wednesday, October 28, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57605-57608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-28870]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[FRL-6178-3]
Arizona: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of Arizona has applied for final authorization of
revisions to its hazardous waste program under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has completed its review of Arizona's
application and has made a decision, subject to public review and
comment, that Arizona's hazardous waste program revisions satisfy all
of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. Thus,
EPA intends to approve Arizona's hazardous waste program revisions.
Arizona's application for program revision is available for public
review and comment.
DATES: Final authorization for Arizona is effective December 28, 1998
unless EPA publishes a prior Federal Register action withdrawing this
immediate final rule. All comments on Arizona's program revision
application must be received by the close of business November 27,
1998.
ADDRESSES: Copies of Arizona's program revision application are
available during the business hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the
following addresses for inspection and copying:
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 3033 N. Central Avenue,
Phoenix, AZ 85012, Contact: Russell F. Rhoades, Director, Phone: 602/
207-4211 or 1-800-234-5677.
U.S. EPA Region IX Library-Information Center, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105, Phone: 415/744-1510.
Written comments should be sent to: Jean Killpack, U.S. EPA Region
IX (WST-3), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, Phone: 415/
744-2033.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Killpack , U.S. EPA Region IX
(WST-3), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-744-
2033.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
States with final authorization under section 3006(b) of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (``RCRA'' or ``the Act''), 42
U.S.C. 6926(b), have a continuing obligation to maintain a hazardous
waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the Federal hazardous waste program. Revisions to State
hazardous waste programs are necessary when Federal or State statutory
or regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, State program revisions are necessitated by
changes to EPA's regulations in 40 CFR parts 260-266, 268, 124, 270 and
279.
B. Arizona
Arizona received final authorization for the base program on
November 20, 1985. Arizona has since received final authorization for
revisions to its hazardous waste program on August 6, 1991, July 13,
1992, and November 23, 1992, October 27, 1993, June 12, 1995, and May
6, 1997. These revisions include substantially all the Federal RCRA
implementing regulations published in the Federal Register through July
1, 1995. On April 20, 1998, Arizona submitted an application for
additional revision approvals. Today, Arizona is seeking approval of
its program revisions in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21(b)(3).
EPA has reviewed Arizona's application, and has made an immediate
final decision that Arizona's hazardous waste program revisions satisfy
all of the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization.
Consequently, EPA intends to approve final authorization for Arizona's
hazardous waste program revisions. The public may submit written
comments on EPA's immediate final decision up until November 27, 1998.
Copies of Arizona's applications for program revision are available for
inspection and copying at the locations indicated in the ``Addresses''
section of this notice.
Approval of Arizona's program revisions is effective in 60 days
unless an adverse comment pertaining to the State's revisions discussed
in this notice is received by the end of the comment period. If an
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish either (1) a withdrawal
of the immediate final decision or (2) a notice containing a response
to the comment which either affirms that the immediate final decision
takes effect or reverses the decision.
Arizona is applying for authorization for changes and additions to
the Federal RCRA implementing regulations that occurred between July 1,
1995 and July 1, 1996 and three that were promulgated after July 1,
1996, consisting of the following Federal hazardous waste regulations:
[[Page 57606]]
Federal Requirements:
Criteria for Classification of Solid
Waste Disposal Facilities and
Practices; Identification and Listing
of Hazardous Waste; Requirements for
(HSWA) Authorization of state
Hazardous Waste Programs (61 FR
34252, July 1, 1996)
Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste; Amendments to
Definition of Solid Waste (Non-HSWA)
(61 FR 13103, March 26, 1996)
State Analog:
Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) 49- ARS 49-922.A&B; AAC R18-8-
922.A&B; Arizona Administrative Code 261.A&B
(AAC)R18-8-261.A,B, G & H..
Hazardous Waste Management; Liquids in ARS 49-922.A&B; AAC R18-8-
Landfills (HSWA)(60 FR 35703, July 264.A, R18-8-265.A
11, 1995).
Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, ARS 49-922.A&B; AAC R18-8-
and Disposal Facilities and Hazardous 261.A&B, R-18-8-262.A&B,
Waste Generators; Organic Air R18-8-264.A, R18-8-265.A
Emission Standards for Tanks, Surface
Impoundments, and Containers (HSWA)
(61 FR 59932, November 25, 1996).
RCRA Expanded Public Participation ARS 49-922.A&B; AAC R-18-8-
(Non-HSWA) (60 FR 63417, July 11, 271.A, R18-8-271.A
1996).
Land Disposal Restrictions Phase III- ARS 49-922.A&B; AAC R18-8-
Decharacterized Wastewaters, 268
Carbamate Waste, and Spent Potliners
(HSWA) (61 FR 15566, April 8, 1996;
61 FR 15660, April 8, 1996; 61 FR
19177, April 30, 1996; 61 FR 33680,
June 28, 1996; 61 FR 36419, July 10,
1996; 61 FR43924, August 26, 1996; 62
FR 7502, February 19, 1997.
The State is responsible for issuing, denying, modifying, reissuing
and terminating permits for all hazardous waste treatment, storage and
disposal facilities in a manner consistent with all Federal
requirements for which Arizona is authorized. Arizona is not being
authorized to operate any portion of the hazardous waste program on
Indian lands.
C. Decision
I conclude that Arizona's application for program revision meets
all of the statutory and regulatory requirements established by RCRA.
Accordingly, Arizona is granted final authorization to operate its
hazardous waste program as revised.
Arizona is now responsible for permitting treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities within its borders and carrying out the aspects of
the RCRA program described in its revised program application, subject
to the limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(Public Law 98-616, November 8, 1984) (``HSWA''). Arizona also has
primary enforcement responsibilities, although EPA retains the right to
conduct inspections under section 3007 of RCRA and to take enforcement
actions under sections 3008, 3013 and 7003 of RCRA.
D. Administrative Requirements
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), P.L.
104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
one year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement
is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt
the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205
do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover,
section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other than the least
costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that
alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely
input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant
Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and
advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory
requirements.
EPA has determined that section 202 and 205 requirements do not
apply to today's action because this rule does not contain a Federal
mandate that may result in annual expenditures of $100 million or more
for State, local, and/or tribal governments in the aggregate, or the
private sector. Costs to State, local and/or tribal governments already
exist under the Arizona program, and today's action does not impose any
additional obligations on regulated entities. In fact, EPA's approval
of State programs generally may reduce, not increase, compliance costs
for the private sector. Further, as it applies to the State, this
action does not impose a Federal intergovernmental mandate because UMRA
does not include duties arising from participation in a voluntary
federal program.
The requirements of section 203 of UMRA also do not apply to
today's action because this rule contains no regulatory requirements
that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Although
small governments may be hazardous waste generators, transporters, or
own and/or operate TSDFs, they are already subject to the regulatory
requirements under the existing State laws that are being authorized by
EPA, and, thus, are not subject to any additional significant or unique
requirements by virtue of this program approval.
Certification Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996), whenever an agency is required to publish a notice of rulemaking
for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for
public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the
effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions). This analysis is
unnecessary, however, if the agency's administrator certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact
[[Page 57607]]
on a substantial number of small entities.
The EPA has determined that this authorization will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Such small entities which are hazardous waste generators, transporters,
or which own and/or operate TSDFs are already subject to the regulatory
requirements under the existing State laws that are now being
authorized by EPA. The EPA's authorization does not impose any
significant additional burdens on these small entities. This is because
EPA's authorization would simply result in an administrative change,
rather than a change in the substantive requirements imposed on these
small entities.
Pursuant to the provision at 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Agency hereby
certifies that this authorization will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. This authorization
approves regulatory requirements under existing State law to which
small entities are already subject. It does not impose any new burdens
on small entities. This rule, therefore, does not require a regulatory
flexibility analysis.
Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in today's Federal Register. This rule is
not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Compliance With Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this rule from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
Compliance with Executive Order 12875
Under Executive Order 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is
not required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a State, local
or tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those
governments, or EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies
with consulting, Executive Order 12875 requires EPA to provide to the
Office of Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's
prior consultation with representatives of affected State, local and
tribal governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of any written
communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the
need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 12875
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected
officials and other representatives of State, local and tribal
governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development
of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.''
This rule does not create a mandate on State, local or tribal
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these
entities. The State administers its hazardous waste program
voluntarily, and any duties on other State, local or tribal
governmental entities arise from that program, not from today's action.
Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 12875 do not apply to
this rule.
Compliance With Executive Order 13045
Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks,'' applies to any rule that: (1) the
Office of Management and Budget determines is ``economically
significant'' as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns
an environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe
may have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory
action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental
health or safety effects of the planned rule on children and explain
why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective
and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it is not an
economically significant rule as defined by E.O. 12866, and because it
does not involve decisions based on environmental health or safety
risks.
Compliance With Executive Order 13084
Under Executive Order 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is
not required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by the tribal governments, or EPA consults with those
governments. If EPA complies with consulting, Executive Order 13084
requires EPA to provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a
separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a
description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with
representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature
of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the
regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to develop
an effective process permitting elected officials and other
representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful
and timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters
that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.''
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13084 because it does not
significantly or uniquely affects the communities of Indian tribal
governments. Arizona is not authorized to implement the RCRA hazardous
waste program in Indian country. This action has no effect on the
hazardous waste program that EPA implements in the Indian country
within the State.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., Federal
agencies must consider the paperwork burden imposed by any information
request contained in a proposed rule or a final rule. This rule will
not impose any information requirements upon the regulated community.
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Pub L. No. 104-113, Sec. 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA
to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
This action does not involved technical standards. Therefore, EPA
did
[[Page 57608]]
not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous materials transportation,
Hazardous waste, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and record keeping requirements, Water pollution control,
Water supply.
Authority: This notice is issued under the authority of Sections
2002(a), 3006 and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and 6974(b).
Dated: August 30, 1998.
Felicia Marcus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-28870 Filed 10-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
