99-28176. Italjet S.p.A.; Grant of Application for Temporary Exemption From Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 123  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 58127-58128]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-28176]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    [Docket No. NHTSA 99-6093; Notice 2]
    
    
    Italjet S.p.A.; Grant of Application for Temporary Exemption From 
    Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 123
    
        This notice grants the application by Italjet S.p.A., an Italian 
    corporation, through Italjet USA (``Italjet'') of New York City, NY, 
    for a temporary exemption of two years from a requirement of S5.2.1 
    (Table 1) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 123 Motorcycle 
    Controls and Displays. The basis of the request was that ``compliance 
    with the standard would prevent the manufacturer from selling a motor 
    vehicle with an overall safety level at least equal to the overall 
    safety level of nonexempt vehicles,'' 49 U.S.C. Sec. 
    30113(b)(3)(B)(iv).
        We published a notice of receipt of the application on August 24, 
    1999 (64 FR 46225) asking for comments, but received none.
        Italjet has applied on behalf of its Torpedo 125, Formula 125, 
    Millenium 125, and Millenium 150 motor scooters (``scooters''). The 
    scooters are defined as ``motorcycles'' for purposes of compliance with 
    the Federal motor vehicle safety standards. According to Italjet, its 
    scooters have a peak motor output of 26 hp and a top speed of 60 miles 
    per hour.
        If a motorcycle is produced with rear wheel brakes, S5.2.1 of 
    Standard No. 123 requires that the brakes be operable through the right 
    foot control, though the left handlebar is permissible for motor driven 
    cycles (Item 11, Table 1). Italjet would like to use the left handlebar 
    as the control for the rear brakes of the scooters, whose peak motor 
    output of 26 hp produces more than the 5 hp maximum that separates 
    motor driven cycles from motorcycles. The gear ratio of the vehicle is 
    fixed, and ``there is no need for the rider to shift gears, as on a 
    standard motorcycle.'' Because of this, the scooters are ``equipped 
    with neither a
    
    [[Page 58128]]
    
    clutch nor a clutch lever, and the left hand of the rider is free to 
    operate a brake lever.'' Italjet states that it prefers this design, 
    given its focus on European and Asian markets ``where rear brake 
    controls for scooters of all horsepower ratings are typically mounted 
    on the left handlebar.''
        Italjet argues that the overall level of safety of the scooters 
    equals or exceeds that of a motorcycle that complies with the brake 
    control location requirement of Standard No. 123. It believes that 
    ``the prevalence of the left hand operated design in Europe and Asia is 
    one strong indicator that a vehicle designed in this way can be 
    operated safely.'' It believes that ``vehicle safety might be somewhat 
    enhanced with the left hand brake lever, as the hand (bare or gloved) 
    is generally more capable of sensitive modulation of the braking force 
    than the foot.''
        Italjet intends to field test a small number of the scooters in the 
    American market in Fall 1999 to assess the design, and without an 
    exemption it would be unable to do so. It wishes to consider whether 
    the United States' scooter market offers sufficient sales potential to 
    justify the creation of a design specifically for the United States 
    that incorporates the right foot brake pedal. Alternatively, it may 
    petition for rulemaking to amend Standard No. 123 to allow the hand-
    operated brake control on motorcycles with more than 5 hp.
        Italjet anticipates sales of not more than 2500 scooters a year 
    while an exemption is in effect. It believes that an exemption would be 
    in the public interest and consistent with the objectives of traffic 
    safety ``because it would maintain an acceptable level of safety while 
    accelerating the advancement of an important new class of vehicles for 
    use by consumers and businesses.''
        The application by Italjet is substantially similar to that by 
    Aprilia, S.p.A. which we granted on August 13, 1999 (64 FR 44264). 
    Aprilia also requested an exemption from the rear brake location 
    requirement of S5.2.1 (Table 1) of Standard No. 123 pursuant to 49 
    U.S.C. 30113(b)(3)(B)(iv). On August 20, 1999, we also granted an 
    exemption from this requirement to Vectrix Corporation for its electric 
    scooter pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30113(b)(3)(B)(iii), on the basis that it 
    would make the development or field evaluation of a low-emission 
    vehicle easier (64 FR 45585).
        As we observed in granting Aprilia's application, we must find that 
    an exemption is consistent with the public interest and motor vehicle 
    safety (49 U.S.C. Sec. 30113(b)(3)(A)), and that compliance with the 
    brake control location requirement of Standard No. 123 would prevent 
    Aprilia from selling a motorcycle with an overall safety level at least 
    equal to the safety level of a nonexempt motorcycle (49 U.S.C. Sec. 
    30113(b)(3)(B)(iv)).
        Aprilia correctly identified our principal area of concern: the 
    standardization of motorcycle controls. In adopting Standard No. 123 in 
    April 1972, effective September 1, 1974, we justified standardization 
    of motorcycle controls as a means of minimizing operator error in 
    responding to the motoring environment, saying that ``a cyclist, 
    especially the novice and the cyclist who has changed from one make of 
    machine to another, must not hesitate when confronted with an 
    emergency'' (37 FR 7207).
        We asked Aprilia to comment on our concern that a left hand lever-
    operated rear brake may contribute to unfamiliarity and thus degrade a 
    rider's overall braking reaction beyond what would exist on a 
    motorcycle with conventionally configured controls. At the request of 
    Aprilia's U.S. sales subsidiary, Aprilia U.S.A. Inc. of Woodstock, 
    Georgia, Carter Engineering of Franklin, Tennessee, prepared a report 
    on ``Motorscooter Braking Control Study'' (Report No. CE-99-APR-05, May 
    1999) comparing braking response times of riders using the left hand 
    control of the Leonardo 150 and the right foot control of the Yamaha 
    XC-125 Riva. We have placed a copy of this report in the Aprilia 
    docket, Docket No. NHTSA-98-4357. Aprilia U.S.A. commented that 
    ``[o]verall, the test subjects'' reaction times on the Leonardo were 
    approximately 20% quicker than their reaction times on the conventional 
    motorcycle.'' Aprilia believed that ``a less complex braking 
    arrangement like that of the [vehicle for which it sought exemption] 
    will improve rider reaction in an emergency situation.'' We interpreted 
    the report as indicating that a rider's braking response was not likely 
    to be degraded by the different placement of the brake controls, thus 
    directly addressing and meeting our safety concern.
        With respect to the public interest and consistency with objectives 
    of motor vehicle safety, the available information suggests that 
    Italjet's request to operate the rear brake with the left hand instead 
    of the right foot may not degrade the rider's braking response. By 
    allowing exempted vehicles to be sold on a temporary basis for two 
    years, it will be possible for us to gather data on operators' 
    experience with this alternative rear brake control. This information 
    would allow us to make a more informed decision about locations for 
    motorcycle brake controls.
        In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby found that to 
    require compliance with Standard No. 123 would prevent the manufacturer 
    from selling a motor vehicle with an overall level of safety at least 
    equal to the overall safety level of nonexempt vehicles. It is further 
    found that a temporary exemption is in the public interest and 
    consistent with the objectives of motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, 
    Italjet, S.p.A. is hereby granted NHTSA Temporary Exemption No. EX99-11 
    from the requirement of Item 11, Column 2, Table 1 of 49 CFR 571.123 
    Standard No. 123, Motorcycle Controls and Displays, that the rear wheel 
    brakes be operable through the right foot control. This exemption 
    applies only to models Torpedo 125, Formula 125, Millenium 125, and 
    Millenium 150, and will expire on October 1, 2001. 49 U.S.C. 30113; 
    delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50).
    
        Issued on October 22, 1999.
    Rosalyn G. Millman,
    Acting Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 99-28176 Filed 10-27-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/28/1999
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-28176
Pages:
58127-58128 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. NHTSA 99-6093, Notice 2
PDF File:
99-28176.pdf