96-27694. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Relating to Permitting a Subject of an Exchange Investigation To Submit a Videotaped Response in Lieu of or in Addition ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 29, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 55833]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-27694]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-37852; File No. SR-CBOE-96-47]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Relating to 
    Permitting a Subject of an Exchange Investigation To Submit a 
    Videotaped Response in Lieu of or in Addition to a Written Response
    
    October 22, 1996.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        On July 10, 1996, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated 
    (``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
    Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a proposed rule change pursuant 
    to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') 
    \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The rule change amends CBOE Rules to 
    permit the subject of an Exchange investigation to submit a videotaped 
    presentation to the Exchange's Business Conduct Committee in response 
    to Exchange staff's notice given pursuant to Rule 17.2(d).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Notice of the proposed rule change, together with the substance of 
    the proposal, was provided by issuance of a release (Securities 
    Exchange Act Release No. 37646, September 5, 1996) and by publication 
    in the Federal Register (61 FR 48181, September 12, 1996). No comments 
    were received. This order approves the proposed rule change.
    
    II. Description of the Proposal
    
        The rule change approved today permits the subject of an Exchange 
    investigation to submit a videotaped presentation to the Business 
    Conduct Committee (``BCC'') in response to Exchange staff's notice 
    given pursuant to Rule 17.2(d). That notice describes the general 
    nature of allegations against a Subject of the Exchange investigation 
    (``Subject''), and the specific rules that appear to have been 
    violated. This videotaped presentation may be submitted to the BCC in 
    lieu of or in addition to submitting a written statement as permitted 
    by Rule 17.2(d).
        Under existing Rule 17.2, if, after conducting an investigation, 
    Exchange staff finds that there are reasonable grounds to believe that 
    a rule violation has been committed, the Exchange staff submits a 
    written report to the BCC.\3\ Prior to submitting the report to the 
    BCC, the Exchange staff notifies the Subject of the general nature of 
    the allegations and the specific provisions of the rules or regulations 
    that appear to have been violated.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ Exchange staff may draft and submit a report to the BCC if 
    it finds that there are not reasonable grounds to believe a 
    violation has been committed; however, such a report is not required 
    under Exchange rules.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Pursuant to Rule 17.2(d), except when the BCC determines that 
    expeditious action is required, the Subject then has fifteen (15) days 
    from the date of the Exchange staff's notice to submit a written 
    statement to the BCC explaining why no disciplinary action should be 
    taken. The rule change permits the Subject's statement to be made in a 
    videotaped format instead of or in addition to submitting a written 
    response.
        The Exchange stated that it decided to propose this change because 
    a number of members have indicated that they would be more comfortable 
    presenting their positions orally, rather than attempting to draft 
    persuasive response letters. The Exchange also stated that it believes 
    that permitting a Subject of an investigation to respond on videotape, 
    which could then be viewed by BCC members at their convenience, would 
    be beneficial to the BCC and the Subject.
    
    III. Conclusion
    
        The Commission finds that the rule change is consistent with the 
    provisions of Section 6(b)(7) of the Act. The rule change is designed 
    to improve the speed, fairness, and efficiency of disciplinary hearings 
    by providing Subjects added flexibility to determine the format of 
    statements permitted under Rule 17.2(d) that they believe will best 
    serve their interests, thereby promoting a fair procedure for the 
    disciplining of members and persons associated with members.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that the proposed rule change SR-CBOE-96-47 be, and hereby is, 
    approved.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-27694 Filed 10-28-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/29/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-27694
Pages:
55833-55833 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-37852, File No. SR-CBOE-96-47
PDF File:
96-27694.pdf