98-28851. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Relating to Exercise Price Intervals for FLEX Equity Options  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 209 (Thursday, October 29, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 58080-58081]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-28851]
    
    
    
    [[Page 58080]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-40584; File No. SR-CBOE-98-39]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Relating to Exercise 
    Price Intervals for FLEX Equity Options
    
    October 21, 1998.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on September 23, 1998, the 
    Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
    proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
    Items have been prepared by the CBOE. The Commission is publishing this 
    notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
    persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Exchange proposes to delete Interpretation .01 of CBOE Rule 
    24A.4(c)(2).\2\ This interpretation limits exercise price intervals and 
    exercise prices for FLEX Equity call options to those that apply to 
    Non-FLEX Equity call options.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ This Interpretation was approved by the Commission in 1996. 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 37726 (September 25, 1996), 61 
    FR 51474 (October 2, 1996).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Office of 
    the Secretary, CBOE and at the Commission.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of and 
    Statutory Basis for the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the CBOE included statements 
    concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
    discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
    text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in 
    Item IV below. The CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth in sections 
    A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        The purpose of the proposed rule change is to delete Interpretation 
    .01 under CBOE Rule 24A.4(c)(2). This interpretation limits the 
    exercise price intervals and exercise prices available for FLEX Equity 
    call options to those intervals and prices that are available for Non-
    FLEX Equity call options pursuant to Interpretation and Policy .01 
    under CBOE Rule 5.5. This policy was intended to eliminate uncertainty 
    concerning what constitutes a ``qualified'' covered call for certain 
    purposes under the Internal Revenue Code pending clarification of this 
    tax issue.
        Currently, under Section 1092(c)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue 
    Code, certain covered short positions in call options qualify for 
    advantageous tax treatment if the options are not in the money by more 
    than a specified amount at the time they are written. One measure used 
    to determine whether a call option is qualified is whether its exercise 
    of ``strike'' price is no lower than the ``lowest qualified benchmark 
    price,'' which is generally the highest strike price available for 
    trading that is less than the current price of the underlying stock. 
    Since the exercise prices of FLEX \3\ Equity Options are not subject to 
    the same intervals that apply to Non-FLEX Equity Options, this has 
    raised the question whether the existence of a series of FLEX Equity 
    Options with a strike price of, say, 58 when the price of the 
    underlying stock is 59 would disqualify a Non-FLEX call option with a 
    strike price of 55, which would otherwise be the highest strike price 
    available that is less than the price of the stock.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service REG-
    104641-97, 63 FR 34616 (June 25, 1998).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Internal Revenue Service (``IRS'') has reviewed this issue and 
    has a proposed regulation that would not require that strike prices 
    established by equity options with flexible terms be taken into account 
    in determining whether standard term equity options are too deep in the 
    money to receive qualified covered call treatment.\3\ The public 
    comment period for the proposed rule change closed on September 23, 
    1998 \4\ and the Exchange expects final regulations on this topic to be 
    adopted some time after that date. The Exchange intends for the 
    deletion of Interpretation .01 to coincide with the effective date of 
    final regulations by the Internal Revenue Service. The effect of the 
    IRS proposed rulemaking and the Exchange's proposed withdrawal of the 
    limitation of the exercise price of Equity FLEX call options is that 
    certain taxpayers, particularly institutional and other large 
    investors, can engage in transactions in Equity FLEX call options with 
    a wider range of exercise prices (as was originally intended) without 
    affecting the applicability of Section 1092 of the Internal Revenue 
    Code for qualified covered call options involving equity options with 
    standard terms.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ The IRS is holding a hearing on November 4, 1998 on the 
    proposed rulemaking.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2. Statutory Basis
        The proposed rule change, by eliminating a restriction on Equity 
    FLEX call options which has restricted their usefulness as a risk 
    managing mechanism, will remove impediments to and perfect the 
    mechanism of a free and open market in FLEX Equity Options, and thus is 
    consistent with the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose 
    any burden on competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
    
        No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
    proposed rule change.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing 
    for Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
    Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        (A) by order approve such rule change, or
        (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the filing is 
    consistent with the Act. Persons making
    
    [[Page 58081]]
    
    written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, 
    Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, 
    DC 20549. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
    written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
    filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
    the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
    than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
    provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and 
    copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing 
    will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal 
    office of the CBOE. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-
    98-39 and should be submitted by November 19, 1998.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-28851 Filed 10-28-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/29/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-28851
Pages:
58080-58081 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-40584, File No. SR-CBOE-98-39
PDF File:
98-28851.pdf