97-26280. Acquisition Regulation, Classification, Security and Counterintelligence  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 51800-51804]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-26280]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    48 CFR Parts 952 and 970
    
    
    Acquisition Regulation, Classification, Security and 
    Counterintelligence
    
    AGENCY: Department of Energy.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is amending the Department of 
    Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) to revise its classification 
    contract clause, revise its access authorization (security clearance) 
    procedures for contractor personnel, and add new counterintelligence 
    provisions. Specific material being revised or added is summarized in 
    the ``Section-by-Section Analysis'' appearing later in this document.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule will be effective December 2, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard B. Langston, Office of 
    Procurement and Assistance Policy (HR-51), Office of the Deputy 
    Assistant Secretary for Procurement and Assistance Management, 
    Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 
    20585-0705, (202) 586-8247.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    II. Disposition of Comments
    III. Section-by-Section Analysis
    IV. Procedural Requirements
        A. Review Under Executive Order 12612
        B. Review Under Executive Order 12866
        C. Review Under Executive Order 12988
        D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act
        E. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
        F. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
        G. Review Under Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 
    Act of 1996
        H. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    
    I. Background
    
        This final rule results from a notice of proposed Rulemaking 
    published in the Federal Register on November 20, 1996, 61 FR 59072. 
    This rule will accomplish three objectives.
        First, it will revise the classification contract clause to provide 
    that only Federal Government employees may serve as ``original 
    classifiers'' and that both Federal Government employees and contractor 
    employees may serve as ``derivative classifiers.'' The clause is also 
    changed to recognize that a balance is required between the 
    Department's mission to protect the national security and prevent 
    nuclear proliferation and its commitment to maximize the amount of 
    information available to the public. As revised, the clause requires 
    that information, documents or material originated or generated in 
    classified or potentially classified subject areas be reviewed for 
    classification by the appropriate officials using proper classification 
    guidance provided by the Department. The clause also requires that 
    documents containing information which is no longer classified by 
    current classification guidance be systematically reviewed for 
    declassification by a Derivative Declassifier. Only when both 
    classification and declassification reviews are performed can the 
    Department achieve its goal of protecting the national security while 
    providing the public with access to as much Government information as 
    possible. Definitions of certain terms are added. These changes are at 
    item 2 of the final rule, subsection 952.204-70, the clause itself, and 
    item 5 of the final rule, subsection 970.0404-4, paragraph (a)(1), a 
    reference to the clause and its revised title.
        Second, it will provide a definition of ``counterintelligence'' 
    consistent with E.O. 12333, a policy statement regarding DOE's 
    counterintelligence program, and a new contract clause on 
    counterintelligence applicable to certain DOE management and operating 
    contractors and other contractors managing DOE-owned facilities. These 
    changes appear at item 3 of the final rule, subsection 970.0404-1, a 
    definition, item 4 of the final rule, subsection 970.0404-2, paragraph 
    (e), a policy statement, item 5, subsection 970.0404-4, paragraph 
    (a)(2), an instruction for use of the clause, and item 7, subsection 
    970.5204-1, paragraph (b), the text of the clause.
        Third, it will revise the DEAR to be consistent with the 
    recommendations of the General Accounting Office Report on Nuclear 
    Security, RCED-93-183, as implemented by DOE Order 472.1B entitled 
    ``Personnel Security Activities.'' The GAO report stressed contractor 
    responsibility for certifying preemployment checks conducted on 
    prospective employees. Where DOE access authorization is required, the 
    contractor must perform normal and prudent preemployment checks and the 
    applicant's job qualifications and suitability must be established 
    before a request is made to the Department for a security clearance. 
    This revision is applicable to DOE management and operating contractors 
    and other contractors managing DOE-owned facilities. Such contractors 
    may, at their discretion, include this procedure in their subcontracts 
    where subcontractor employees are required to hold a DOE access 
    authorization in order to perform on-site duties, such as protective 
    force operations. This change appears at item 6 of the final rule, 
    section 970.2201, paragraph (b)(1)(ii).
    
    [[Page 51801]]
    
    II. Disposition of Comments
    
        Comments were received from 2 reviewers.
        The first reviewer registered general support for the amendment. 
    The reviewer supported the Department's efforts to maximize information 
    available to the public while ensuring the proper protection of 
    sensitive national security and atomic energy information. The addition 
    of the declassification reviews to DOE's security program was supported 
    by this reviewer.
        The second reviewer offered four comments.
        First Comment. The reviewer notes that the rulemaking emphasizes 
    the importance of a contractor's declassification activities. The 
    reviewer suggests that the declassification activities of the 
    contractor be formally recognized in the contract and states the 
    opinion that such declassification activities may be substantially 
    under funded until such action is taken.
        First Response. Including the Classification/Declassification 
    clause in a contract constitutes formal recognition of these 
    activities. Contracts do not specify the individual tasks involved in 
    the work to such a specific level of work as classifying or 
    declassifying a document. DOE policy emphasizes the importance of 
    conducting declassification reviews. This policy has led, during each 
    of the past three years, to the declassification of greater numbers of 
    documents than have been classified. This suggests that our policy 
    emphasis has been effective.
        Second Comment. The reviewer notes a statement in the ``Review 
    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (item IV.F. of the preamble of 
    the notice) which says that the security and counterintelligence 
    requirements apply only to management and operating contractors and do 
    not flow down to subcontractors. The reviewer asks for clarification 
    regarding whether the requirements apply to subcontractors.
        Second Response. The statement has been revised to more 
    specifically define what is meant by ``security requirements.'' The 
    security requirements being revised, in this context, are those of 
    970.2201 which discuss completion of preemployment background checks in 
    relation to access authorizations. This specific section (i.e. 
    970.2201(b)(1)(ii)) applies to DOE management and operating contractors 
    and other contractors operating DOE facilities which require access 
    authorizations. Section 970.2201 is a guiding principle, not a contract 
    clause. It does not flow down to subcontracts. Management and operating 
    contractors and other contractors operating DOE facilities may, at 
    their discretion, include this guiding principle in their solicitations 
    and subcontracts wherein subcontractor employees are required to hold a 
    DOE access authorization in order to perform on-site duties, such as 
    protective force operations. Possible applicability to subcontractors, 
    in specific circumstances, was added based on our analysis of the 
    comment. The Classification/Declassification clause does flow down to 
    subcontracts if they require access to classified information. The 
    counterintelligence requirements do not flowdown to subcontracts. 
    Section IV.F. of the preamble has been revised to avoid any 
    misunderstanding.
        Third Comment. The reviewer notes section IV.E. ``Review Under the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act,'' of the preamble of the notice. The reviewer 
    suggests that the declassification activity under the revised 
    Classification/Declassification clause of the notice represents a 
    tremendous record keeping and information burden.
        Third Response. The rulemaking makes no change in the amount of 
    records or information. It is intended to move more records and 
    information from the classified category to the declassified category.
        Fourth Comment. The reviewer expressed concern that the clause 
    would require most classification decisions to be made by Federal 
    classifiers even in situations where a major contractor operated 
    security program was involved. The reviewer suggested that the lack of 
    definition of the terms ``document,'' ``equipment,'' and 
    ``information'' made the intent of the clause unclear.
        Fourth Response. We agree with the comment and have added 
    definitions of terms and revised the text of the clause for clarity.
    
    III. Section-by-Section Analysis
    
        1. The authority citations for Parts 952 and 970 are restated.
        2. The classification clause at 952.204-70 is renamed 
    classification/declassification. It is revised to emphasize 
    declassification, add definitions, and differentiate the duties of 
    original versus derivative classifiers.
        3. A definition of counterintelligence is added to subsection 
    970.0404-1.
        4. A new paragraph is added to 970.0404-2 to describe DOE policy on 
    counterintelligence.
        5. New instructions are added to 970.0404-4 to detail the security 
    clause requirements for management and operating contractors and other 
    contractors managing DOE-owned facilities which require access 
    authorizations.
        6. Section 970.2201 is amended to describe the procedures for 
    confirming to DOE the conduct and outcome of preemployment checks 
    performed by management and operating contractors and other contractors 
    managing DOE-owned facilities, when such contractors request that the 
    DOE process an applicant for access authorization. Such contractors 
    may, at their discretion, include this procedure in subcontracts 
    wherein subcontractor employees are required to possess DOE access 
    authorization in order to perform on-site duties, such as protective 
    force operations.
        7. Section 970.5204-1 is amended to add a new clause entitled 
    counterintelligence.
    
    IV. Procedural Requirements
    
    A. Review Under Executive Order 12612
    
        Executive Order 12612, entitled ``Federalism,'' 52 FR 41685 
    (October 30, 1987), requires that regulations, rules, legislation, and 
    any other policy actions be reviewed for any substantial direct effects 
    on states, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the 
    states, or in the distribution of power and responsibilities among 
    various levels of government. If there are sufficient substantial 
    direct effects, then the Executive Order requires preparation of a 
    federalism assessment to be used in all decisions involved in 
    promulgating and implementing a policy action. DOE has determined that 
    this rulemaking will not have a substantial direct effect on the 
    institutional interests or traditional functions of states.
    
    B. Review Under Executive Order 12866
    
        Today's regulatory action has been determined not to be a 
    ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, 
    ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). 
    Accordingly, this action was not subject to review, under that 
    Executive Order, by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of 
    the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    
    C. Review Under Executive Order 12988
    
        With respect to the review of existing regulations and the 
    promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988, 
    ``Civil Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on 
    Executive agencies the general duty to adhere to the following 
    requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
    
    [[Page 51802]]
    
    regulations to minimize litigation; and (3) provide a clear legal 
    standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard and 
    promote simplification and burden reduction. With regard to the review 
    required by section 3(a), section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988 
    specifically requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable 
    effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) clearly specifies the 
    preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing 
    Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for 
    affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden reduction; 
    (4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines 
    key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting clarity 
    and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney 
    General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires Executive 
    agencies to review regulations in light of applicable standards in 
    section 3(a) and section 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it 
    is unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the 
    required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by law, 
    the final regulations meet the relevant standards of Executive Order 
    12988.
    
    D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act
    
        Pursuant to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (40 
    CFR 1500-1508), the Department has established guidelines for its 
    compliance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act 
    (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Pursuant to Appendix A of 
    Subpart D of 10 CFR Part 1021, National Environmental Policy Act 
    Implementing Procedures (Categorical Exclusion A), DOE has determined 
    that this rulemaking is categorically excluded from the need to prepare 
    an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment.
    
    E. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rulemaking imposes no new information collection or record 
    keeping requirements. Accordingly, they require no OMB clearance under 
    the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    F. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This rulemaking was reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    of 1980, Public Law 96-354, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., which requires 
    preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule that is 
    likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. This rulemaking revises established classification and 
    security requirements and adds counterintelligence requirements. The 
    changes to the security requirements being made by this final rule 
    (i.e., 970.2201 dealing with completion of preemployment background 
    checks prior to requests for access authorizations) are applicable to 
    management and operating contractors and other contractors managing 
    DOE-owned facilities. Such contractors may, at their discretion, 
    include this procedure in subcontracts wherein subcontractor employees 
    will require DOE access authorization in order to perform on-site 
    duties, such as protective force operations. The prime contractors 
    operating DOE facilities are large businesses, large universities, or 
    large not for profit entities. This part of the rulemaking could affect 
    small entities only if they become subcontractors performing on-site 
    services that require DOE access authorizations such as protective 
    force operations. Even under such circumstances, there will not be a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
    as the rulemaking does not require any unusual effort on the part of 
    the small entity. The procedure merely provides that, before requesting 
    that DOE undertake a review for employee access authorization, the 
    employer complete normal preemployment background checks, i.e. police 
    and credit checks, which are normal to the employment of personnel in 
    sensitive type positions such as protective force operations. Moreover, 
    the cost of the background checks are reimbursable.
        The new counterintelligence requirements are only applicable to 
    management and operating contractors and other contractors managing DOE 
    facilities. As noted above, such contractors are large businesses or 
    universities, therefore, this rulemaking will have no significant 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. The change to the 
    classification/declassification clause (i.e. 952.204-70) applies to all 
    contracts and subcontracts but has no significant economic impact. The 
    associated costs are estimated to be relatively small, and in any 
    event, the contracts are likely to be of the cost reimbursement type.
        Based on the foregoing review, DOE certifies that this rulemaking 
    will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities and, therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis has 
    been prepared.
    
    G. Review Under Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 
    1966
    
        As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will report to Congress 
    promulgation of the rule prior to its effective date. The report will 
    state that it has been determined that the rule is not a ``major rule'' 
    as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(3).
    
    H. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    
        The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) generally 
    requires a Federal agency to perform a detailed assessment of costs and 
    benefits of any rule imposing a Federal mandate with costs to State, 
    local or tribal governments, or to the private sector, of $100 million 
    or more. This rulemaking imposes no Federal mandates and does not have 
    an impact of $100 million or more.
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 952 and 970
    
        Government Procurement.
    
        Issued in Washington, D.C., on September 29, 1997.
    Richard H. Hopf,
    Deputy Assistant Secretary for Procurement and Assistance Management.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, Chapter 9 of Title 48 of 
    the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth below:
        1. The authority citation for Part 952 continues to read:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7254; 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 42 U.S.C. 13524.
    
    PART 952--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
    
    
    952.204-70   [Amended]
    
        2. Subsection 952.204-70 is amended by revising the section heading 
    and revising the clause to read:
    
    
    952.204-70   Classification/Declassification.
    
    * * * * *
    
    Classification/Declassification (Sep 1997)
    
        In the performance of work under this contract, the contractor 
    or subcontractor shall comply with all provisions of the Department 
    of Energy's regulations and mandatory DOE directives which apply to 
    work involving the classification and declassification of 
    information, documents, or material. In this section, 
    ``information'' means facts, data, or knowledge itself; ``document'' 
    means the physical medium on or in which information is recorded; 
    and ``material'' means a product or substance which contains or 
    reveals information, regardless of its physical form or 
    characteristics. Classified information is ``Restricted Data'' and 
    ``Formerly Restricted Data'' (classified under the Atomic Energy
    
    [[Page 51803]]
    
    Act of 1954, as amended) and ``National Security Information'' 
    (classified under Executive Order 12958 or prior Executive Orders).
        The original decision to classify or declassify information is 
    considered an inherently Governmental function. For this reason, 
    only Government personnel may serve as original classifiers, i.e., 
    Federal Government Original Classifiers. Other personnel (Government 
    or contractor) may serve as derivative classifiers which involves 
    making classification decisions based upon classification guidance 
    which reflect decisions made by Federal Government Original 
    Classifiers.
        The contractor or subcontractor shall ensure that any document 
    or material that may contain classified information is reviewed by 
    either a Federal Government or a Contractor Derivative Classifier in 
    accordance with classification regulations including mandatory DOE 
    directives and classification/declassification guidance furnished to 
    the contractor by the Department of Energy to determine whether it 
    contains classified information prior to dissemination. For 
    information which is not addressed in classification/
    declassification guidance, but whose sensitivity appears to warrant 
    classification, the contractor or subcontractor shall ensure that 
    such information is reviewed by a Federal Government Original 
    Classifier.
        In addition, the contractor or subcontractor shall ensure that 
    existing classified documents (containing either Restricted Data or 
    Formerly Restricted Data or National Security Information) which are 
    in its possession or under its control are periodically reviewed by 
    a Federal Government or Contractor Derivative Declassifier in 
    accordance with classification regulations, mandatory DOE directives 
    and classification/declassification guidance furnished to the 
    contractor by the Department of Energy to determine if the documents 
    are no longer appropriately classified. Priorities for 
    declassification review of classified documents shall be based on 
    the degree of public and researcher interest and the likelihood of 
    declassification upon review. Documents which no longer contain 
    classified information are to be declassified. Declassified 
    documents then shall be reviewed to determine if they are publicly 
    releasable. Documents which are declassified and determined to be 
    publicly releasable are to be made available to the public in order 
    to maximize the public's access to as much Government information as 
    possible while minimizing security costs.
        The contractor or subcontractor shall insert this clause in any 
    subcontract which involves or may involve access to classified 
    information.
    
    PART 970--DOE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS
    
        The authority citation for Part 970 continues to read:
    
        Authority: Sec. 161 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 
    2201), and Sec. 644 of the Department of Energy Organization Act, 
    Pub. L. 95-91 (42 U.S.C. 7254).
    
        3. Subsection 970.0404-1 is amended by adding in alphabetic order 
    ``counterintelligence'' as a new definition to read as follows:
    
    
    970.0404-1   Definitions.
    
    * * * * *
        Counterintelligence means information gathered and activities 
    conducted to protect against espionage, other intelligence activities, 
    sabotage, or assassinations conducted for or on behalf of foreign 
    powers, organizations or persons, or international terrorist 
    activities, but not including personnel, physical, document or 
    communication security programs.
    * * * * *
        4. Subsection 970.0404-2 is amended by adding paragraph (e) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    970.0404-2   General.
    
    * * * * *
        (e) Executive Order 12333, United States Intelligence Activities, 
    provides for the organization and control of United States foreign 
    intelligence and counterintelligence activities. In accordance with 
    this Executive Order, DOE has established a counterintelligence program 
    which is described in DOE Order 5670.3 (as amended). All DOE elements, 
    including management and operating contractors and other contractors 
    managing DOE-owned facilities which require access authorizations, 
    should undertake the necessary precautions to ensure that DOE and 
    covered contractor personnel, programs and resources are properly 
    protected from foreign intelligence threats and activities.
        5. Subsection 970.0404-4 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) 
    and by adding a new paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
    
    
    970.0404-4   Contract clauses.
    
        (a) * * *
        (1) Security and Classification/Declassification, 970.5204-1(a). 
    These clauses are required in all contracts which involve access to 
    classified information, nuclear material, or access authorizations.
        (2) Counterintelligence, 970.5204-1(b). This clause is required in 
    all management and operating contracts and other contracts for the 
    management of DOE-owned facilities which include the security and 
    classification/declassification clauses.
    * * * * *
        6. Section 970.2201 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    970.2201   Basic labor policies.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (1) * * *
        (ii) The job qualifications and suitability of prospective 
    employees should be established by the contractor prior to employment 
    by careful personnel investigations. Such personnel investigations 
    should include, as appropriate: a credit check; verification of high 
    school degree/diploma or degree/diploma granted by an institution of 
    higher learning within the last 5 years; contacts with listed personal 
    references; contacts with listed employers for the past 3 years 
    (excluding employment of less than 60 days duration, part-time 
    employments, and craft/union employments); and local law enforcement 
    checks when such checks are not prohibited by State or local law, 
    statute, or regulation, and when the individual had resided in the 
    jurisdiction where the contractor is located. When a DOE access 
    authorization (security clearance) will be required, the aforementioned 
    preemployment checks must be conducted and the applicant's job 
    qualifications and suitability must be established before a request is 
    made to the DOE to process the applicant for access authorization. 
    Evidence must be furnished to the DOE with the applicant's security 
    forms that specifies: the date each check was conducted, the entity 
    contacted that provided information concerning the applicant, a 
    synopsis of the information provided as a result of each contact, and a 
    statement that all information available has been reviewed and 
    favorably adjudicated in accordance with the contractor's personnel 
    policies. When an applicant is being hired specifically for a position 
    which requires a DOE access authorization, the applicant shall not be 
    placed in that position prior to the access authorization being granted 
    by the DOE unless an exception has been obtained from the Head of the 
    Contracting Activity or designee. If an applicant is placed in that 
    position prior to access authorization being granted by the DOE, the 
    applicant may not be afforded access to classified matter or special 
    nuclear materials (in categories requiring access authorization) until 
    the DOE notifies the employer that access authorization has been 
    granted. Management and operating contractors and other contractors 
    operating DOE facilities may, at their discretion, include this 
    language in solicitations and subcontracts (appropriately modified to 
    identify the parties) wherein subcontract employees will be required to 
    hold DOE access
    
    [[Page 51804]]
    
    authorization in order to perform on-site duties, such as protective 
    force operations.
    * * * * *
        7. Section 970.5204-1 is revised to read as follows:
    
    Subpart 970.52--Contract Clauses for Management and Operating 
    Contracts.
    
    
    970.5204-1   Security.
    
        (a) As prescribed in 970.0404-4(a)(1), insert the Security clause 
    found at 952.204-2 and the Classification/Declassification clause found 
    at 952.204-70.
        (b) As prescribed in 970.0404-4(a)(2), insert the following 
    Counterintelligence clause in contracts containing the security and 
    classification/declassification clauses:
    
    Counterintelligence (Sep 1997)
    
        (a) The contractor shall take all reasonable precautions in the 
    work under this contract to protect DOE programs, facilities, 
    technology, personnel, unclassified sensitive information and 
    classified matter from foreign intelligence threats and activities 
    conducted for governmental or industrial purposes, in accordance 
    with DOE Order 5670.3, Counterintelligence Program; Executive Order 
    12333, U.S. Intelligence Activities; and other pertinent national 
    and Departmental Counterintelligence requirements.
        (b) The contractor shall appoint a qualified employee(s) to 
    function as the Contractor Counterintelligence Officer. The 
    Contractor Counterintelligence Officer will be responsible for 
    conducting defensive Counterintelligence briefings and debriefings 
    of employees traveling to foreign countries or interacting with 
    foreign nationals; providing thoroughly documented written reports 
    relative to targeting, suspicious activity and other matters of 
    Counterintelligence interest; immediately reporting targeting, 
    suspicious activity and other Counterintelligence concerns to the 
    DOE Headquarters Counterintelligence Division; and providing 
    assistance to other elements of the U.S. Intelligence Community as 
    stated in the aforementioned Executive Order, the DOE 
    Counterintelligence Order, and other pertinent national and 
    Departmental Counterintelligence requirements.
    
    [FR Doc. 97-26280 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/2/1997
Published:
10/03/1997
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-26280
Dates:
This rule will be effective December 2, 1997.
Pages:
51800-51804 (5 pages)
PDF File:
97-26280.pdf
CFR: (2)
48 CFR 952
48 CFR 970