97-26335. Regulated Navigation Area; Egmont Channel, Tampa Bay, FL  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 51779-51780]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-26335]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Coast Guard
    
    33 CFR Part 165
    
    [[COTP] Tampa 97-046]
    RIN 2115-AE84
    
    
    Regulated Navigation Area; Egmont Channel, Tampa Bay, FL
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This final rule removes the regulated navigation area on the 
    Egmont Channel. The Channel has been dredged and the restriction of one 
    way vessel movement for vessels with drafts in excess of 36 feet are 
    no-longer required.
    
    DATES: This rule is effective on November 3, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Documents referred to in this preamble are available for 
    inspection and copying at U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Tampa, 
    155 Columbia Drive, Tampa, FL 33606 between 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. 
    Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    LT Murk, Project Manager, Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Tampa, at 
    (813) 228-2189.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    Background and Purpose
    
        This final rule cancels the Regulated Navigation Area on the Egmont 
    Channel. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, a notice of proposed rulemaking has 
    not been published for this regulation. This Regulated Navigation Area 
    was created because of shoaling in the channel that posed possible 
    impediments for vessels with drafts in excess of 36 feet when meeting 
    or passing in the channel. The channel has been dredged, and no-longer 
    poses a danger for vessels with drafts in excess of 36 feet. 
    Consequently, the regulated navigation area is no-longer required.
    
     Regulatory Evaluation
    
        This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
    of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
    potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that order. It 
    has been exempted from review
    
    [[Page 51780]]
    
    by the Office of Management and Budget under that order. It is not 
    significant under the regulatory policies and procedures of the 
    Department of Transportation (DOT) (44FR 11040; February 26, 1979). The 
    Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this proposal to be so 
    minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10(e) of the 
    regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary. This rule 
    reduces the regulatory burdens on shipping in the area by canceling a 
    regulated navigated area.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the 
    Coast Guard must consider whether this rule will have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``small 
    entities'' may include (1) small businesses and not-for-profit 
    organizations that are independently owned and operated are not 
    dominant in their fields and (2) governmental jurisdiction with 
    populations of less than 50,000. For the reasons stated above the Coast 
    Guard finds that this rule will not have a significant economic impact 
    on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This proposal contains no collection of information requirements 
    under the Paperwork Reductions Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    Federalism
    
        The Coast Guard has analyzed this proposal in accordance with the 
    principals and criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and has 
    determined that this proposal does not have sufficient federalism 
    implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
        The Coast Guard has considered the environmental impact of this 
    action, and has determined pursuant to section 2.B.2.e. (34)(g) of 
    Commandant Instruction M16475.1B, that this action is categorically 
    excluded from further environmental documentation. A Categorical 
    Exclusion Determination is available in the docket for inspection or 
    copying.
    
    Lists of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
    
        Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation, (water), Reports and record 
    keeping requirements, Security Measures, Waterways.
    
    Regulations
    
        For the reasons stated above, the Coast Guard amends Part 165 of 
    title 33, Code of Federal regulations, as follows:
    
    PART 165--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 
    6.04-1, 6.04-4, and 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.
    
    
    Sec. 165.709  [Removed]
    
        2. Remove section 165.709.
    
        Dated: September 23, 1997.
    R.C. Olsen, Jr.,
    Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Seventh Coast Guard 
    District.
    [FR Doc. 97-26335 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/3/1997
Published:
10/03/1997
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-26335
Dates:
This rule is effective on November 3, 1997.
Pages:
51779-51780 (2 pages)
RINs:
2115-AE84: Regulated Navigation Areas
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2115-AE84/regulated-navigation-areas
PDF File:
97-26335.pdf
CFR: (1)
33 CFR 165.709