97-29029. Medicare Program; Delay in Implementing the Adjustments to the Practice Expense Relative Value Units Under the Physician Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 1998  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 59267-59269]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-29029]
    
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 211 / Friday, October 31, 1997 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 59267]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Health Care Financing Administration
    
    42 CFR Part 414
    
    [BPD-901-NC]
    RIN 0938-AI33
    
    
    Medicare Program; Delay in Implementing the Adjustments to the 
    Practice Expense Relative Value Units Under the Physician Fee Schedule 
    for Calendar Year 1998
    
    AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to regulate.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice identifies provisions in the Medicare physician 
    fee schedule regulations that are affected by enactment of the Balanced 
    Budget Act of 1997 (BBA 1997). Section 4505 of the BBA 1997 postpones 
    implementation of a resource-based practice expense relative value unit 
    system until January 1, 1999 and provides for a 4-year transition. In 
    addition, it provides for an adjustment for practice expense relative 
    value units for 1998. It also requires publication of a new proposed 
    rule for practice expense by May 1, 1998, thus requiring significant 
    revision of our proposal contained in the proposed rule published June 
    18, 1997 (62 FR 33158).
    
    DATES: Comment Date: Comments will be considered if we receive them at 
    the appropriate address, as provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on 
    December 30, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Mail written comments (1 original and 3 copies) to the 
    following address: Health Care Financing Administration, Department of 
    Health and Human Services, Attention: BPD-901-NC, P.O. Box 26688, 
    Baltimore, MD 21207-0488.
        If you prefer, you may deliver your written comments (1 original 
    and 3 copies) to one of the following addresses:
    
    Room 309-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., 
    Washington, DC 20201, or
    Room C5-09-26, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
        Because of staffing and resource limitations, we cannot accept 
    comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission. In commenting, please refer 
    to file code BPD-901-NC. Comments received timely will be available for 
    public inspection as they are received, beginning approximately 3 weeks 
    after publication of the document, in Room 309-G of the Department's 
    offices at 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, on Monday 
    through Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. (phone: (202) 690-
    7890).
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Weintraub, (410) 786-4498.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Legislative History
    
        Since January 1, 1992, Medicare has paid for physician services 
    under section 1848 of the Social Security Act (the Act), ``Payment for 
    Physicians' Services.'' This section contains three major elements: (1) 
    A fee schedule for the payment of physician services; (2) a method to 
    control the rates of increase in Medicare expenditures for physician 
    services; and (3) limits on the amounts that nonparticipating 
    physicians can charge beneficiaries. Title XVIII of the Act requires 
    that payments under the fee schedule be based on national uniform 
    relative value units (RVUs) based on the resources used in furnishing a 
    service. Section 1848(c) of the Act requires that national RVUs be 
    established for physician work, practice expense, and malpractice 
    expense.
        Section 1848(c)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Act provides that adjustments 
    in RVUs because of changes resulting from a review of those RVUs may 
    not cause total physician fee schedule payments to differ by more than 
    $20 million from what they would have been had the adjustments not been 
    made. If this tolerance is exceeded, we must make adjustments to the 
    conversion factor to preserve budget neutrality.
    
    II. Published Changes to the Fee Schedule
    
        We published a final rule on November 25, 1991 (56 FR 59502) to 
    implement section 1848 of the Act by establishing a fee schedule for 
    physician services furnished on or after January 1, 1992. In the 
    November 1991 final rule (56 FR 59511), we stated our intention to 
    update RVUs for new and revised codes in the American Medical 
    Association's (AMA's) Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 
    through an ``interim RVU'' process every year. The latest update to the 
    RVUs and fee schedule was published on November 22, 1996, as a final 
    rule with comment period (61 FR 59490).
        In addition, on June 18, 1997, we issued a proposed rule (62 FR 
    33158) to revise various policies relating to physician services and 
    included in that proposal a chronology of all regulations that updated 
    the fee schedule and related policies.
    
    III. Implementation of Section 4505 of the Balanced Budget Act of 
    1997
    
        Under the law in effect at the time that the June 18, 1997 
    physician fee schedule proposed rule was published, we were required to 
    develop a resource-based system for determining practice expense RVUs 
    effective January 1, 1998. The BBA 1997 (Pub. L. 105-33), enacted on 
    August 5, 1997, provides for several revisions in the requirement to 
    change from charge-based practice expense RVUs to a resource-based 
    method.
        Specifically, the BBA 1997 provides for the following:
         One-year delay.
        Section 4505(a) of the BBA 1997 provides that the implementation of 
    the requirement to move from the current charge-based practice expense 
    RVUs to resource-based practice expense RVUs be delayed from January 1, 
    1998 to January 1, 1999.
         Phased-in implementation.
        Instead of paying for all services entirely under a resource-based 
    system in 1999, section 4505(b) of the BBA 1997 provides for a 4-year 
    transition period. Practice expense RVUs for 1998 will be based on the 
    adjustments described below. The practice expense RVUs for the year 
    1999 will be determined as the product of 75 percent of the previous 
    year's RVUs (1998) and 25 percent of the resource-based RVUs. For the 
    year 2000, the percentages will be 50 percent charge-based and 50 
    percent resource-based. For the year 2001, the percentages will be 25 
    percent charge-based and 75 percent resource-based. For subsequent 
    years, the RVUs will be totally resource-based.
         Review by Comptroller General. Section 4505(c) of the BBA 
    1997 requires the Comptroller General to review and evaluate our 
    proposed rule and report to the Congress within 6 months of the date of 
    enactment of the BBA 1997 (that is, by February 5, 1998). The review is 
    to include an analysis of (1) the adequacy of the data used in 
    preparing the rule, (2) categories of allowable costs, (3) methods for 
    allocating direct and indirect expenses, (4) the potential impact of 
    the rule on beneficiary access to services, and (5) any other matters 
    related to the appropriateness of resource-based methodology for 
    practice expenses. The Comptroller General is to consult with 
    representatives of physicians' organizations with respect to matters of 
    both data and methodology.
         Adjustment for practice expense RVUs for 1998.
        Section 4505(e) of the BBA 1997 provides that, for 1998, the 
    practice expense RVUs will be adjusted for
    
    [[Page 59268]]
    
    certain services in anticipation of the implementation of resource-
    based practice expenses beginning in 1999. Practice expense RVUs for 
    office visits will increase, while practice expense RVUs for certain 
    other services will be reduced according to a formula included in 
    section 4505(e) of the BBA 1997. The formula requires that services 
    that were proposed to be reduced in the June 18, 1997 proposed rule, 
    and were not performed at least 75 percent of the time in an office 
    setting, would get a uniform percentage reduction. The reduced RVUs for 
    practice expense would be calculated to be equivalent to 110 percent of 
    the work RVUs for the service. However, the total of the reductions 
    cannot exceed $390 million. The procedure codes affected and the final 
    RVUs for 1998 are being published in the physician fee schedule final 
    rule.
         Requirements for new resource-based practice expense RVUs.
        Section 4505(d)(3) of the BBA 1997 requires that the Secretary 
    transmit a Report to the Congress by March 1, 1998 including a 
    presentation of data to be used in developing the practice expense RVUs 
    and an explanation of the methodology. Section 4505(d)(3) requires that 
    a proposed rule be published by May 1, 1998, with a 90-day comment 
    period. In order for the transition to begin on January 1, 1999, a 
    final rule would need to be published by October 31, 1998.
        In the May 1, 1998 proposed rule, we are required to develop new 
    resource-based practice expense RVUs. In developing new practice 
    expense RVUs, section 4505(d)(3) requires us to: (1) utilize, to the 
    maximum extent practicable, generally accepted cost accounting 
    principles that recognize all staff, equipment, supplies, and expenses, 
    not solely those that can be linked to specific procedures, and use 
    actual data on equipment utilization and other key assumptions; (2) 
    consult with organizations representing physicians regarding 
    methodology and data to be used; and (3) develop a refinement process 
    to be used during each of the 4 years of the transition period.
        To assist us in developing the new RVUs using the data the BBA 1997 
    requires, we are requesting that any physicians, physician 
    organizations, or others provide us with the following information:
         Generally accepted cost accounting principles--We are 
    requesting comments on generally accepted cost accounting principles 
    that recognize all staff, equipment, supplies, and expenses, not just 
    those that can be tied to specific procedures. We particularly solicit 
    comments on aspects of the cost accounting methodology used in the June 
    18, 1997 proposed rule that were not consistent with the statutory 
    guidance.
        We understand from various representatives of physicians and 
    physician groups that special studies were conducted to develop or 
    validate resource-based RVUs for physicians' services. We believe that 
    the information collected from these studies could be helpful in 
    allowing us to evaluate the consistency of our methodology with 
    generally accepted cost accounting principles that recognize all 
    resources, not just those that can be tied to specific procedures. 
    Those studies would also provide a valuable source of information to 
    develop the new set of proposed RVUs. Therefore, we are requesting that 
    completed copies of studies of resource-based RVUs be submitted during 
    the comment period for this notice. We are requesting any underlying 
    surveys supporting those studies, including copies of the actual survey 
    instrument, sample design, general and item response rates, and 
    characteristics of non-response bias.
         Equipment utilization--We are requesting complete copies 
    of any studies or other data showing the actual utilization of 
    equipment by physician practices. The data should be related to 
    specific pieces of equipment used in medical, surgical, and diagnostic 
    (including radiology) services and should be identified as being used 
    in the provision of specific procedure codes. In providing the 
    information, the methodology used to determine the actual equipment 
    utilization should be provided. If a survey was used to obtain the 
    information, pertinent details about the survey (for example, the 
    number and type of surveyed entities and general and item response 
    rates, and assessment of the characteristics of non-response bias) 
    should be provided, as well as a complete copy of the report describing 
    the sampling design, methodology, directions, and definitions.
         Other assumptions--During the development of the proposed 
    practice expense RVUs published in our June 18, 1997 proposed rule, we 
    made a number of assumptions about pricing and other information 
    needed. We would like any actual data that would assist us in reviewing 
    or revising our assumptions for the following:
        + Useful life of equipment--We utilized manufacturer and other 
    estimates of the useful life of equipment. We would like information on 
    the actual useful life of equipment used in providing services. That 
    is, we would like information about the time equipment is in service 
    from the time it is purchased until it is disposed of. This information 
    should be for equipment used by physician practices in furnishing 
    specific procedures.
        + Direct and indirect costs--We would like actual data describing 
    the amount and percentage of direct practice costs versus the amount 
    and percentage of indirect practice costs by specialty. Indirect costs 
    are generally being defined as those costs not directly allocable to 
    individual services, such as rent, utilities, maintenance, phones, 
    general clerical staff, and office equipment. We would also like 
    summary information by specialty for these major types of indirect 
    costs. Costs attributable to billing, procedure-specific equipment 
    maintenance, and other direct expenses should not be included since 
    they were captured by the clinical practice expert panels or through 
    other means. The methodology commenters use to gather this information 
    should be provided. If a survey was used, the details of the survey 
    methodology, including the general and item response rates, and 
    characteristics of non-response bias, should be provided, as well as a 
    complete copy of the report describing the sampling design, 
    methodology, directions, and definitions.
        Site-of-service assumptions--In our June 18, 1997 proposed rule, we 
    did not publish a practice expense RVU for a site-of-service (in-office 
    or out-of-office) if the service, according to our data, was not 
    performed in that site. We indicated ``NA'' (not applicable) in the 
    column describing that site in Addendum C (Relative Value Units (RVUs) 
    and Related Information) of the June 1997 proposed rule. We invite 
    comments about whether services where an ``NA'' indicator was shown can 
    be done safely at that site. Conversely, we invite comments about the 
    safety of services furnished at a site where we show an RVU for a 
    practice expense for a service.
        (A copy of the entire June 1997 proposed rule, including the 
    addenda, is available through the Internet at the following address: 
    http://www.access.gpo.gov/su__docs/, by using local WAIS client 
    software, or by telnet to swais.access.gpo.gov, then login as guest (no 
    password required).)
         Use of physician-employed staff in hospitals and other 
    facility settings.
        We have been informed by physicians and others that it is a common 
    and widespread practice for a physician's employees, for example, 
    nurses, to accompany the physician to the hospital, ambulatory surgical 
    center, and other facilities. It has been
    
    [[Page 59269]]
    
    suggested that the function of the staff is to assist the physician in 
    providing services by acting as assistants-at-surgery or serving as 
    scrub nurses.
        There seems to be some question whether this practice is in fact 
    common and widespread; therefore, we are requesting comments and 
    information about this practice. We seek precise information about the 
    extent to which it occurs, including but not limited to the specific 
    procedures involved, the specific functions performed by the staff, the 
    specific type of staff involved and their training and credentialling, 
    the particular types of facilities involved, and the type of diagnosis-
    related group to which the service is assigned. We seek comments from 
    physicians who are familiar with this practice as well as from 
    physicians who are not familiar with it.
        We particularly seek information and data from executives and 
    managers of hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, and other 
    facilities about the nature and extent of this practice. Where it 
    occurs, we are particularly interested in the specific functions 
    performed by the physician's employees and the extent to which they are 
    substitutes for hospital employees. This is particularly important 
    because action would have to be taken to reduce the Medicare facility 
    reimbursement rate since the rate currently covers payment for staff to 
    provide functions that are not provided directly by the facility.
        For physicians and others who are providing information about the 
    use of their own staff, and for others who are familiar with the 
    practice, we would like the details of the arrangements, including the 
    name and location of the hospital or facility; whether the facility is 
    a teaching or community hospital; whether the hospital is located in an 
    urban or rural area; the facility's requirements for credentialing of 
    the staff; the specific functions the physician's staff are performing, 
    including any limits on duties of the staff by the facility; and any 
    compensation arrangements from the facility. In addition, where surveys 
    have been conducted to document this practice, we would like to receive 
    complete copies of the survey and its results, including the details of 
    the survey methodology, the response rates, a description of the survey 
    universe and any analysis of non-response bias, the sampling design, 
    directions, definitions, survey forms, and correspondence with 
    respondents.
        We would like to contact some of these specific institutions in 
    order to provide us with a more complete understanding of the specific 
    types of staff involved and the specific types of functions provided by 
    the staff.
         Refinement process--We have concluded the first step in 
    the refinement process for resource-based practice expenses. From 
    October 6 through October 8, 1997, we conducted 17 validation panels to 
    review the raw input data previously accumulated by our contractor, Abt 
    Associates, during the clinical practice expert panel process. We 
    validated about 325 high-volume procedure codes. The information from 
    this validation process, subsequent processes under development, and 
    information obtained as a result of this notice will provide a basis 
    for the practice expense RVUs to be proposed in our proposed rule in 
    1998.
        We expect that refinement will be a continuing process for the 
    existing codes and for new codes that come into the system. Since 
    section 4505(d)(1)(C) of the BBA 1997 requires that we develop a 
    refinement process for each of the 4 years of the transition, we would 
    welcome comments on how such a refinement process would operate. In 
    particular, we would like comments about the process to refine the 
    current codes each year and specific comments about assigning practice 
    expense RVUs to new codes. The comments should describe not only the 
    process, but who should be involved and how all of the users of the 
    physician fee schedule would have access to the process. Commenters 
    should consider the amount of time for refinements in 1998 given when 
    the comment period will close (July 31, 1998) and when a final rule 
    needs to be published (October 31, 1998) allowing sufficient time to 
    compile and assemble comments. We will consider the public comments we 
    receive in response to this notice to develop our spring 1998 proposed 
    rule for resource-based practice expense RVUs.
    
    (Secs. 1102, 1848, and 1871 of the Social Security Act; 42 U.S.C. 
    1302, 1395w-4, and 1395hh)
    
    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.774, 
    Medicare--Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
    
        Dated: October 9, 1997.
    Nancy-Ann Min DeParle,
    Deputy Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration.
    
        Dated: October 28, 1997.
    Donna E. Shalala,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-29029 Filed 10-30-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/31/1997
Department:
Health Care Finance Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of intent to regulate.
Document Number:
97-29029
Pages:
59267-59269 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
BPD-901-NC
RINs:
0938-AI33
PDF File:
97-29029.pdf
CFR: (1)
42 CFR 414