2014-25903. Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas  

  • Start Preamble Start Printed Page 64684

    AGENCY:

    U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

    ACTION:

    Proposed rule with request for comments.

    SUMMARY:

    The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed rule that would redefine the geographic boundaries of several appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas for pay-setting purposes. Based on recent reviews of Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) boundaries in a number of wage areas, OPM proposes redefinitions affecting the following wage areas: Washington, DC; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN; Charlotte, NC; Columbia, SC, and Southwestern Wisconsin. In addition, this proposed rule would make three minor corrections to the Miami, FL; Columbus, GA, and Kansas City, MO, wage areas.

    DATES:

    We must receive comments on or before December 1, 2014.

    ADDRESSES:

    You may submit comments, identified by “RIN 3206-AN10,” using any of the following methods:

    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

    Mail: Brenda L. Roberts, Acting Deputy Associate Director for Pay and Leave, Employee Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200.

    Email: pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at (202) 606-2838 or by email at pay-leave-policy@opm.gov.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    OPM is issuing a proposed rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of several appropriated fund FWS wage areas. These changes are based on recommendations of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the statutory national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters affecting the pay of FWS employees. From time to time, FPRAC reviews the boundaries of wage areas and provides OPM with recommendations for changes if the Committee finds that changes are warranted.

    OPM considers the following regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.211 when defining FWS wage area boundaries:

    (i) Distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features;

    (ii) Commuting patterns; and

    (iii) Similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments.

    In addition, OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit splitting MSAs for the purpose of defining a wage area, except in very unusual circumstances.

    The Office of Management and Budget defines MSAs and maintains and updates the definitions of MSA boundaries following each decennial census. MSAs are composed of counties and are defined on the basis of a central urbanized area—a contiguous area of relatively high population density. Additional surrounding counties are included in MSAs if they have strong social and economic ties to central counties.

    When the boundaries of wage areas were first established in the 1960s, there were fewer MSAs than there are today and the boundaries of the then existing MSAs were much smaller. Most MSAs were contained within the boundaries of a wage area. MSAs have expanded each decade and in some cases now extend beyond the boundaries of the wage area.

    FPRAC recently reviewed several wage areas where boundaries subdivide certain MSAs and concurred by consensus with the changes described in this proposed rule. These changes would be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations.

    Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA

    Washington, DC; Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's Counties, MD; Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Fredericksburg, Manassas, and Manassas Park Cities, VA; Arlington, Clarke, Culpeper, Fairfax, Fauquier, Loudoun, Prince William, Rappahannock, Spotsylvania, Stafford, and Warren Counties, VA; and Jefferson County, WV, comprise the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA. The Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA is split between the Washington, DC, wage area and the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD, wage area. Washington, DC; Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's Counties, MD; Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas, and Manassas Park Cities, VA; and Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William Counties, VA, are part of the Washington, DC, survey area. Calvert and St. Mary's Counties, MD; Fredericksburg City, VA; Clarke, Fauquier, King George, Spotsylvania, Stafford, and Warren Counties, VA; and Jefferson County, WV, are part of the Washington, DC, area of application. Culpeper and Rappahannock Counties, VA, are part of the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg area of application.

    OPM proposes to redefine Culpeper and Rappahannock Counties to the Washington, DC, area of application so that the entire Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA is in one wage area. There are seven FWS employees working in Culpeper County and one FWS employee working in Rappahannock County.

    Rochester, MN MSA

    Dodge, Fillmore, Olmsted, and Wabasha Counties, MN, comprise the Rochester, MN MSA. The Rochester, MN MSA is split between the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, wage area and the Southwestern Wisconsin wage area. Dodge, Olmsted, and Wabasha Counties are part of the Minneapolis-St. Paul area of application and Fillmore County is part of the Southwestern Wisconsin area of application.

    OPM proposes to redefine Fillmore County to the Minneapolis-St. Paul area of application so that the entire Rochester, MN MSA is in one wage area. Start Printed Page 64685There are currently no FWS employees working in Fillmore County.

    Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC MSA

    Cabarrus, Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Rowan, and Union Counties, NC, and Chester, Lancaster, and York Counties, SC; comprise the Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC MSA. The Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia MSA is split between the Charlotte, NC, wage area and the Columbia, SC, wage area. Cabarrus, Gaston, Mecklenburg, Rowan, and Union Counties, NC, are part of the Charlotte survey area; Iredell and Lincoln Counties, NC, and Lancaster and York Counties, SC, are part of the Charlotte area of application; and Chester County, SC, is part of the Columbia area of application.

    OPM proposes to redefine Chester County to the Charlotte area of application so that the entire Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC MSA is in one wage area. There are currently no FWS employees working in Chester County.

    Miscellaneous Corrections

    In addition, this proposed rule would make the following minor corrections:

    • Update the name of the Columbus Consolidated Government in the Columbus, GA, FWS wage area because Columbus is the official name of the entity resulting from the consolidation of the City of Columbus and Muscogee County in 1971.
    • Update the name of Dade County in the Miami, FL, FWS wage area because the name of Dade County was officially changed to Miami-Dade County in 1997.
    • Delete the name of the St. Louis, MO, wage area from the list of area of application counties in the Kansas City, MO, wage area because, due to a formatting error, the name of the St. Louis wage area was incorrectly printed as if it was an area of application county in the Kansas City wage area.

    Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify that these regulations would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they would affect only Federal agencies and employees.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    • Administrative practice and procedure
    • Freedom of information
    • Government employees
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Wages
    End List of Subjects Start Signature

    U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

    Katherine Archuleta,

    Director.

    End Signature

    Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.

    End Authority Start Amendment Part

    2. Appendix C to subpart B is amended by revising the wage area listings in paragraph (3), under the undesignated center heading Definitions of Wage and Wage Survey Areas, for the Washington, DC; Miami, FL; Columbus, GA; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN; Kansas City, MO; Charlotte, NC; Columbia, SC, and Southwestern Wisconsin wage areas to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part

    Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532—Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas

    *    *    *    *    *
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    Washington, DC
    Survey Area
    District of Columbia:
    Washington, DC
    Maryland:
    Charles
    Frederick
    Montgomery
    Prince George's
    Virginia (cities):
    Alexandria
    Fairfax
    Falls Church
    Manassas
    Manassas Park
    Virginia (counties):
    Arlington
    Fairfax
    Loudoun
    Prince William
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    Maryland:
    Calvert
    St. Mary's
    Virginia (city):
    Fredericksburg
    Virginia (counties):
    Clarke
    Culpeper
    Fauquier
    King George
    Rappahannock
    Spotsylvania
    Stafford
    Warren
    West Virginia
    Jefferson
    *    *    *    *    *
    FLORIDA
    *    *    *    *    *
    Miami
    Survey Area
    Florida:
    Miami-Dade
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    Florida:
    Broward
    Collier
    Glades
    Hendry
    Highlands
    Martín
    Monroe
    Okeechobee
    Palm Beach
    St. Lucie
    *    *    *    *    *
    GEORGIA
    *    *    *    *    *
    Columbus
    Survey Area
    Alabama:
    Autauga
    Elmore
    Lee
    Macon
    Montgomery
    Russell
    Georgia:
    Chattahoochee
    Columbus
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    Alabama:
    Bullock
    Butler
    Chambers
    Coosa
    Crenshaw
    Dallas
    Lowndes
    Pike
    Tallapoosa
    Wilcox
    Georgia:
    Harris
    Marion
    Quitman
    Schley
    Stewart
    Talbot
    Taylor
    Troup
    Webster
    *    *    *    *    *
    MARYLAND
    *    *    *    *    *
    Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg
    Survey Area
    Maryland:
    Washington
    Pennsylvania:
    Franklin
    West Virginia:
    Berkeley
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    Maryland:
    Allegany
    Garrett
    Pennsylvania:
    Fulton
    Virginia (cities):
    Harrisonburg
    Winchester
    Virginia (counties):
    Frederick
    Greene
    Madison
    Start Printed Page 64686
    Page
    Rockingham
    Shenandoah
    West Virginia:
    Hampshire
    Hardy
    Mineral
    Morgan
    *    *    *    *    *
    MINNESOTA
    *    *    *    *    *
    Minneapolis-St. Paul
    Survey Area
    Minnesota:
    Anoka
    Carver
    Chisago
    Dakota
    Hennepin
    Ramsey
    Scott
    Washington
    Wright
    Wisconsin:
    St. Croix
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    Minnesota:
    Benton
    Big Stone
    Blue Earth
    Brown
    Chippewa
    Cottonwood
    Dodge
    Douglas
    Faribault
    Fillmore
    Freeborn
    Goodhue
    Grant
    Isanti
    Kanabec
    Kandiyohi
    Lac Qui Parle
    Le Sueur
    McLeod
    Martin
    Meeker
    Mille Lacs
    Morrison
    Mower
    Nicollet
    Olmsted
    Pope
    Redwood
    Renville
    Rice
    Sherburne
    Sibley
    Stearns
    Steele
    Stevens
    Swift
    Todd
    Traverse
    Wabasha
    Wadena
    Waseca
    Watonwan
    Yellow Medicine
    Wisconsin:
    Pierce
    Polk
    *    *    *    *    *
    Missouri
    Kansas City
    Survey Area
    Kansas:
    Johnson
    Leavenworth
    Wyandotte
    Missouri:
    Cass
    Clay
    Jackson
    Platte
    Ray
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    Kansas:
    Allen
    Anderson
    Atchison
    Bourbon
    Doniphan
    Douglas
    Franklin
    Linn
    Miami
    Missouri:
    Adair
    Andrew
    Atchison
    Bates
    Buchanan
    Caldwell
    Carroll
    Chariton
    Clinton
    Cooper
    Daviess
    De Kalb
    Gentry
    Grundy
    Harrison
    Henry
    Holt
    Howard
    Johnson
    Lafayette
    Linn
    Livingston
    Macon
    Mercer
    Nodaway
    Pettis
    Putnam
    Saline
    Schuyler
    Sullivan
    Worth
    *    *    *    *    *
    NORTH CAROLINA
    *    *    *    *    *
    Charlotte
    Survey Area
    North Carolina:
    Cabarrus
    Gaston
    Mecklenburg
    Rowan
    Union
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    North Carolina:
    Alexander
    Anson
    Catawba
    Cleveland
    Iredell
    Lincoln
    Stanly
    Wilkes
    South Carolina:
    Chester
    Chesterfield
    Lancaster
    York
    *    *    *    *    *
    SOUTH CAROLINA
    *    *    *    *    *
    Columbia
    Survey Area
    South Carolina:
    Darlington
    Florence
    Kershaw
    Lee
    Lexington
    Richland
    Sumter
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    South Carolina:
    Abbeville
    Anderson
    Calhoun
    Cherokee
    Clarendon
    Fairfield
    Greenville
    Greenwood
    Laurens
    Newberry
    Oconee
    Orangeburg
    Pickens
    Saluda
    Spartanburg
    Union
    *    *    *    *    *
    WISCONSIN
    *    *    *    *    *
    Southwestern Wisconsin
    Survey Area
    Wisconsin:
    Chippewa
    Eau Claire
    La Crosse
    Monroe
    Trempealeau
    Area of Application. Survey area plus:
    Minnesota:
    Houston
    Winona
    Wisconsin:
    Barron
    Buffalo
    Clark
    Crawford
    Dunn
    Florence
    Forest
    Jackson
    Juneau
    Langlade
    Lincoln
    Marathon
    Marinette
    Menominee
    Start Printed Page 64687
    Oneida
    Pepin
    Portage
    Price
    Richland
    Rusk
    Shawano
    Taylor
    Vernon
    Vilas
    Waupaca
    Wood
    *    *    *    *    *
    End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2014-25903 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6325-39-P

Document Information

Published:
10/31/2014
Department:
Personnel Management Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
2014-25903
Dates:
We must receive comments on or before December 1, 2014.
Pages:
64684-64687 (4 pages)
RINs:
3206-AN10: Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/3206-AN10/prevailing-rate-systems-redefinition-of-certain-appropriated-fund-federal-wage-system-wage-areas-
Topics:
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages
PDF File:
2014-25903.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Excepted Service
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Federal Employees Health Benefits Open Season Express Interactive Voice Response System and Open Season Website
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: We Need Information About Your Missing Payment-OPM Form RI 38-31, OMB No. 3206-0187
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Representative Payee Survey
» Meetings: Hispanic Council on Federal Employment
» Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program Enrollee Decision Period for Current Enrollees
» Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Application for Deferred or Postponed Retirement- Federal Employees Retirement System
CFR: (1)
5 CFR 532