94-24420. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Carbon Monoxide; Oxygenated Gasoline Program; Minnesota  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-24420]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: October 4, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [MN17-3-6325; [FRL-5077-2]
    
     
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Carbon 
    Monoxide; Oxygenated Gasoline Program; Minnesota
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The USEPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
    revision submitted by the State of Minnesota. This revision requires an 
    oxygenated gasoline program in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan 
    Statistical Area (MSA). Two areas were originally required to implement 
    an oxygenated gasoline program because of past violations of the carbon 
    monoxide standard, but on April 14, 1994, the Duluth area was 
    redesignated to attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality 
    Standards for carbon monoxide (CO). This SIP revision was submitted to 
    satisfy the requirement for Minnesota of section 211(m) of the Clean 
    Air Act as amended by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (the Act), 
    which requires all CO nonattainment areas with a design value of 9.5 
    parts per million (ppm) or above based on 1988 and 1989 air quality 
    monitoring data to implement an oxygenated gasoline program. USEPA is 
    approving the oxygenated gasoline program.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule becomes effective on November 3, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the SIP revision, public comments, and other 
    materials relating to this rulemaking are available for inspection at 
    the following address: (It is recommended that you telephone Maggie 
    Greene, at (312) 886-6088 before visiting the Region 5 Office.) United 
    States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation 
    Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (AE-17J), Chicago, Illinois 60604.
        A copy of this revision to the Minnesota Oxygenated Gasoline SIP is 
    available at the following address: Office of Air and Radiation (OAR), 
    Docket and Information Center, (Air Docket 6102), room M1500, U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street SW., Washington DC 20460, 
    (202) 260-7548, and Program Development Section, Air Quality Division, 
    Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, 
    Minnesota 55155-3898.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maggie Greene, Air Enforcement Branch 
    (AE-17J), U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Chicago, 
    Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6088.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Summary of State Submittal
    
        The Minneapolis-St. Paul area and St. Louis County (Duluth) in the 
    State of Minnesota (the control area) were designated nonattainment for 
    CO and classified as moderate with a design value of 11.4 and 9.9 parts 
    per million respectively, based on 1988 and 1989 data. USEPA 
    redesignated the Duluth area to attainment on April 14, 1994 (59 FR 
    17706) in the Federal Register. Under section 211(m) of the Act, 
    Minnesota was required to submit a revised SIP under section 110 and 
    part D of the Act which includes an oxygenated gasoline program for 
    Minneapolis-St. Paul and Duluth-Superior by November 15, 1992. On 
    November 9, 1992, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) 
    submitted to USEPA a revised SIP including the oxygenated gasoline 
    program containing legislation that was signed by the Governor on April 
    29, 1992, and became effective on August 1, 1992. The USEPA issued a 
    completeness letter to the State on January 20, 1993. The notice of 
    proposed rulemaking was published in the January 20, 1994 (59 FR 3047) 
    Federal Register.
    
    II. Public Comment/USEPA Response
    
        A thirty-day public comment period was provided to allow interested 
    parties the opportunity to comment on USEPA's proposed action. USEPA 
    received three comments from the American Institute of Certified Public 
    Accountants (CPAs), the Koch Refining Company, and the MPCA. The 
    comments and USEPA's responses are addressed below.
        Comment: The American Institute of CPAs objected to the use of the 
    word ``Account'' when the word should be ``Accountant'' which is used 
    to denote a CPA. This appeared in the section entitled ``Registration 
    Requirements.''
        Response: USEPA agrees that the sentence should have read, ``The 
    USEPA guidelines also require that CARs commission an annual attest 
    engagement, performed by either an internal auditor or independent 
    Certified Public Accountant (CPA).''
        Comment: The Koch Refining Company supported the oxygenated 
    gasoline program in Minnesota, but only within the control area and 
    during the control period. On November 12, 1993, the MPCA submitted a 
    contingency plan to require year-round oxygenated fuel beginning in 
    1995. Koch opposed this contingency plan. While Koch understood that 
    the USEPA's proposed rule did not address the contingency plan and 
    addressed only the oxygenated gasoline program within the control area 
    and during the control period, Koch opposed any use of oxygenated 
    gasoline outside of the control period. Koch will submit additional 
    comments on the contingency plan when that plan is proposed for Federal 
    rulemaking.
        Response: USEPA will propose rulemaking on the contingency plan in 
    another Federal Register notice. This final action only deals with the 
    oxygenated gasoline program.
        Comment: The MPCA noted that the officially designated 
    nonattainment area for CO does not include Superior, Wisconsin, or St. 
    Louis County, but only the City of Duluth, Minnesota. At this time, the 
    State does not plan to enforce the oxygenated gasoline program in 
    Duluth, which has been meeting standards since 1989. Also, it does not 
    plan to enforce in the remaining portion of St. Louis County, which is 
    largely a wilderness area and has never had a modeled or monitored 
    ``CO'' problem.
        Response: This issue is moot. The State of Minnesota requested that 
    USEPA redesignate Duluth to attainment for CO. Minnesota submitted a 
    draft request to USEPA on October 2, 1992, and a final request before 
    November 1, 1992. USEPA requested additional information several months 
    later, and the State responded to this request by sending the 
    information in early December 1993. The USEPA redesignated the Duluth 
    area to attainment for CO on April 14, 1994 (59 FR 17706) in the 
    Federal Register.
        Additional Information: During the public comment period, USEPA 
    contacted the MPCA and requested that it withdraw from the Oxygenated 
    SIP, the MPCA Board resolution of October 27, 1992, which was a part of 
    the program plan. The resolution allowed the State to unilaterally take 
    action to eliminate the oxygenated gasoline program upon submission by 
    the State of a request for redesignation. This concept goes against 
    USEPA redesignation procedures and cannot be approved as part of the 
    State's plan. In a letter dated August 12, 1994, the State withdrew the 
    October 27, 1992, MPCA Board Resolution from the requested SIP 
    revision.
    
    III. Rulemaking Action
    
        In this action, USEPA is approving in final the SIP revision 
    submitted by the State of Minnesota. The State of Minnesota has 
    submitted and implemented an oxygenated gasoline program for the 
    existing CO nonattainment area substantially in accordance with the 
    requirements of the Act. The USEPA is, therefore, approving this 
    submittal.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting, allowing 
    or establishing precedent for any future request for revision to any 
    SIP. USEPA shall consider each request for revision to the SIP in light 
    of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in 
    relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
        USEPA received no significant public comments on the proposed 
    action. As a direct result, the Regional Administrator reclassified 
    this action from Table 2 to a Table 3 action under the procedures 
    published in the Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-
    2225), as revised by an October 4, 1993, memorandum from Michael H. 
    Shapiro, Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation. A future 
    document will inform the general public of these tables. On January 6, 
    1989, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) waived Table 2 and 
    Table 3 SIP revisions (54 FR 2222) from the requirements of section 3 
    of Executive Order 12291 for 2 years. The USEPA submitted a request for 
    a permanent waiver for Table 2 and Table 3 SIP revisions. The OMB has 
    agreed to continue the temporary waiver until such time as it rules on 
    USEPA's request. This request continues in effect under Executive Order 
    12866 which superseded Executive Order 12291 on September 30, 1993. OMB 
    exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et. seq., USEPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities (U.S.C. 603 and 604). 
    Alternatively, USEPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small business, small not-for-profit enterprises, and 
    government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the CAA 
    do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements 
    that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP-
    approval does not impose any new requirements. I certify that it does 
    not have a significant impact on any small entities affected. Moreover, 
    due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the CAA, 
    preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute 
    Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State action. The 
    CAA forbids USEPA to base its actions concerning SIPS on such grounds. 
    Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S. Ct. 1976); 
    42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
        Under section 307 (b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
    of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
    the appropriate circuit by December 5, 1994. Filing a petition for 
    reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
    the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
    it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
    filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of each rule or action. 
    This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
    requirements (see section 307 (b)(2)).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmenal protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
    Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Note.--Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
    Plan for the State of Minnesota was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
    
        Dated: September 8, 1994.
    Valdas V. Adamkus,
    Regional Administrator.
    
        Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart Y--[Amended]
    
        2. Section 52.1220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(34) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.1220  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (34) On November 9, 1992, the State of Minnesota submitted the 
    Oxygenated Gasoline Program. This submittal satisfies the requirements 
    of section 211(m) of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) Minnesota Laws Chapter 2509, sections 1 through 31, except for 
    sections 29 (b) and (c), enacted by the Legislature and signed into Law 
    on April 29, 1992.
        (ii) Additional material.
        (A) Letter dated August 12, 1994, from the Minnesota Pollution 
    Control Agency (MPCA), to the United States Environmental Protection 
    Agency that withdraws the MPCA Board resolution dated October 27, 1992, 
    and any reference to it, from the oxygenated gasoline State 
    Implementation Plan revision request of 1992.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-24420 Filed 10-3-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/3/1994
Published:
10/04/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-24420
Dates:
This final rule becomes effective on November 3, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: October 4, 1994, MN17-3-6325, [FRL-5077-2
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.1220