94-24461. Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Offset Administrative Costs  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 4, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-24461]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: October 4, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    48 CFR Part 225
    
     
    
    Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Offset 
    Administrative Costs
    
    AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Director of Defense Procurement has issued a final rule 
    amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 
    to change the criteria for contractor recovery of offset administrative 
    costs under foreign military sales.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 28, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    LTC Ed King, (703) 604-5929.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    A. Background
    
        This revision originated based on a Defense Security Assistance 
    Agency (DSAA) procedural change on offset administrative costs. A 
    proposed rule was published at 59 FR 17756 on April 14, 1994. The 
    proposed rule is adopted as final without change. DSAA will issue a 
    corresponding revision to the Security Assistance Manual.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of Defense certifies that this final rule will not 
    have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., 
    because it is unlikely that a substantial number of small entities have 
    foreign military sales contracts. No comments were received on the 
    impact of this rule on small entities during the public comment period.
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The final rule does not impose any reporting or recordkeeping 
    requirements which require the approval of OMB under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et 
    seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 225
    
        Government procurement.
    Claudia L. Naugle,
    Deputy Director, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.
        Accordingly, 48 CFR Part 225 is amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 225 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.
    
    PART 225--FOREIGN ACQUISITION
    
        2. Section 225.7303-2(a) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 225.7303-2  Cost of doing business with a foreign government or an 
    international organization.
    
        (a) In pricing FMS contracts where non-U.S. Government prices as 
    described in Sec. 225.7303-1 do not exist, recognize the reasonable and 
    allocable costs of doing business with a foreign government or 
    international organization, even though such costs might not be 
    recognized in the same amounts in pricing other defense contracts. 
    Examples of such costs include, but are not limited to--
        (1) Selling expenses (not otherwise limited by FAR part 31), e.g.--
        (i) Maintaining international sales and service organizations;
        (ii) Sales commissions and fees in accordance with FAR subpart 3.4;
        (iii) Sales promotions, demonstrations, and related travel for 
    sales to foreign governments. Paragraph 126.8 of the International 
    Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR part 121) may require 
    Government approval for these costs to be allowable. If Government 
    approval is required for promotion or demonstration costs to be 
    allowable, the approval must be obtained.
        (iv) Configuration studies and related technical services 
    undertaken as a direct selling effort to a foreign country.
        (2) Product support and post-delivery service expenses, such as--
        (i) Operations or maintenance training, training or tactics films, 
    manuals, or other related data; and
        (ii) Technical field services provided in a foreign country related 
    to accident investigations, weapon system problems, operations/tactics 
    enhancement, and related travel to foreign countries.
        (3) Offset administrative costs.
        (i) A U.S. defense contractor may recover costs incurred to 
    administer specific requirements of its offset agreement with a foreign 
    government or international organization if the foreign military sale 
    Letter of Offer and Acceptance is financed wholly with customer cash or 
    repayable foreign military finance credits.
        (ii) The U.S. Government assumes no obligation to satisfy or 
    administer the offset requirement or to bear any of the associated 
    costs.
        (iii) Some examples of offset administrative costs are--
        ((A) In-house and/or purchased: organizational, administrative and 
    technical support, including offset staffing; quality assurance, 
    manufacturing, purchasing support; data acquisition; proposal, 
    transaction and report preparation; broker/trading services; legal 
    support; and similar support activities;
        (B) Off-shore operations for technical representative and 
    consultant activities, office operations, customer and industry 
    interface, capability surveys;
        (C) Marketing assistance and related technical assistance, transfer 
    of technical information and related training;
        (D) Employee travel and subsistence costs; and
        (E) Taxes and duties.
        (4) Costs that are the subject of advance agreement under the 
    appropriate provisions of FAR part 31; or where the advance 
    understanding places a limit on the amounts of cost that will be 
    recognized as allowable in defense contract pricing, and the agreement 
    contemplated that it will apply only to DoD contracts for the U.S. 
    Government's own requirement (as distinguished from contracts for FMS).
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 94-24461 Filed 10-3-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/04/1994
Department:
Defense Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-24461
Dates:
September 28, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: October 4, 1994
CFR: (1)
48 CFR 225.7303-2