94-24714. Koch Gateway Pipeline Company, et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 193 (Thursday, October 6, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-24714]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: October 6, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    [Docket No. CP94-791-000, et al.]
    
     
    
    Koch Gateway Pipeline Company, et al.; Natural Gas Certificate 
    Filings
    
    September 29, 1994.
        Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
    Commission:
    
    1. Koch Gateway Pipeline Co.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-791-000]
    
        Take notice that on September 22, 1994, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
    Company (Gateway), Post Office Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77251-1478, 
    filed in Docket No. CP94-791-000 an application pursuant to 
    Secs. 157.205(b) and 157.211(b) of the Commission's Regulations under 
    the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to install an eight-inch 
    delivery tap, meter and regulator station to be used to deliver natural 
    gas to Entex, Inc. (Entex), under the blanket certificate issued in 
    Docket No. CP82-430-000, all as more fully set forth in the request on 
    file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
        Gateway proposes to install an eight-inch tap, and construct and 
    operate the appurtenant meter and regulator station near Westlake, 
    Louisiana, to provide natural gas service to Olin Chemical on behalf of 
    Entex. The facilities would be used to deliver up to 12,000 per day 
    under a TF-1 transportation agreement between Entex and Gateway. 
    Gateway states that the total cost of the proposed project is estimated 
    to be $80,000.
        Comment date: November 14, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
    
    2. National Fuel Gas Supply Corp.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-802-000]
    
        Take notice that on September 26, 1994, National Fuel Gas Supply 
    Corporation (National), 10 Lafayette Square, Buffalo, New York 14203, 
    filed in Docket No. CP94-802-000, a request pursuant to Sections 
    157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
    Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.212) for authorization to perform 
    construction on two existing delivery taps that provide service to an 
    existing firm transportation customer, National Fuel Gas Distribution 
    Corporation (Distribution), under the blanket certificate issued in 
    Docket No. CP83-4-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, 
    all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file with the 
    Commission and open to public inspection.
        National proposes to replace the 2'' regulator and the 4'' relief 
    valve at the Arcade, Wyoming County, New York location with a 3'' 
    regulator and a 6'' relief valve, within the pipeline right-of-way of 
    National's Line PY. Additionally, National proposes to replace the \1/
    2\'' regulator and the 3'' relief valve at the Orchard Park, Erie 
    County, New York location with a \1/2\'' regulator and a 4'' relief 
    valve, within the pipeline right-of-way of National's Line K. National 
    indicates the cost of construction for the two taps is estimated to be 
    $27,000, for which National will be reimbursed by Distribution.
        National asserts the actual throughput at these delivery taps will 
    remain the same: 1,500 Mmcf/year for the Arcade, New York location and 
    385 Mmcf/year for the Orchard Park, New York location. National states 
    its FERC Gas Tariff does not prohibit the addition of new delivery 
    taps. National relates that it has sufficient capacity to accomplish 
    the proposed deliveries without detriment or disadvantage to its other 
    customers.
        Comment date: November 14, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
    
    3. Texas Gas Transmission Corp.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-805-000]
    
        Take notice that on September 26, 1994, Texas Gas Transmission 
    Corporation (Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street, Owensboro, Kentucky 
    42301, filed in Docket No. CP94-805-000, a request pursuant to 
    Secs. 157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the 
    Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.212) for authorization to add a 
    new delivery point in Carroll County, Kentucky to serve an existing 
    customer, Carrollton Utilities (Carrollton), under Texas Gas's blanket 
    certificate issued to Texas Gas in Docket No. CP82-407-000 pursuant to 
    Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
    request that is on file with the Commission and open to public 
    inspection.
        Texas Gas states that the new delivery point will enable Carrollton 
    to provide natural gas service to a new industrial customer, Gallatin 
    Steel, as well as accommodate additional load growth in the area. The 
    proposed delivery point, to be known as the Carrollton #2 Delivery 
    Point, will be located on Texas Gas's No. 1 and No. 2 main lines near 
    Wright's Ridge Road in Carroll County, Kentucky. The estimated maximum 
    annual quantity of natural gas to be delivered to Carrollton at the new 
    point will be 7,000,000 MMBtu, with a proposed maximum daily quantity 
    of 28,800 MMBtu. Texas Gas states that service to this new delivery 
    point will be accomplished within Carrollton's existing contract 
    quantities and without detriment to Texas Gas's other customers.
        Comment date: November 14, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
    
    4. Shell Gas Pipeline Company and BP Exploration & Oil, Inc.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-808-000]
    
        Take notice that on September 27, 1994, Shell Gas Pipeline Company, 
    P.O. Box 576, Houston, Texas 77001, and BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. 
    (BP), P.O. Box 4527, Houston, Texas 77210-4587, referred to together as 
    Petitioners, jointly filed a petition for declaratory order in Docket 
    No. CP94-808-000, requesting that the Commission declare that 
    facilities to be constructed on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) would 
    have the primary function of gathering natural gas and would thereby be 
    exempt from the Commission's jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
    the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the petition which 
    is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
        Petitioners state that they propose to construct the MARS Gas 
    Gathering System to attach natural gas produced from the Mississippi 
    Canyon 807 Unit (MARS), produced by Shell Offshore, Inc. (SOI) and BP, 
    to a point on interconnection with the existing offshore jurisdictional 
    natural gas transmission infrastructure. Petitioners state that the 
    MARS project would be located about 130 miles southeast of New Orleans 
    in a water depth of 2,940 feet and is estimated to have approximately 
    700 million barrel equivalent of oil and natural gas reserves. 
    Petitioners indicate that the MARS prospect was discovered in 1989 and 
    is reported to be the largest discovery in the Gulf of Mexico in the 
    past 20 years. It is stated that SOI and BP have committed $1.2 billion 
    for the initial development of the MARS prospect.
        It is stated that phase 1 of the MARS prospect would be developed 
    by installing a tension leg platform (TLP) which would be secured to 
    the ocean floor by vertical tendons. It is also indicated that up to 24 
    oil and gas production wells would be drilled and completed from the 
    TLP via sub-sea flowlines. Petitioners state that initial production 
    from the TLP is expected to commence in the second half of 1996 and 
    production is forecasted to eventually reach peak daily rates of 
    approximately 100,000 barrels of oil and 110,000 Mcf on natural gas.
        Petitioners state that the system would consist of a 14-inch 
    pipeline extending approximately 45 to 60 miles from the TLP to a shelf 
    interconnection platform in the OCS area, Offshore Louisiana. It is 
    also indicated that the project would also include certain related 
    facilities, that may include one or more gas sales meter stations, a 
    pig launcher and receivers, risers, slug catcher, sumps, drains, over-
    pressure protection facilities, gas and condensate meters and 
    condensate pumps.
        Petitioners state that the exact terminus of the MARS Gas Gathering 
    Pipeline at which the TLP would be located is still under evaluation 
    and negotiation, with the petitioners intending to select an 
    interconnection platform or platforms allowing connection to one or 
    more pipelines in the South Pass and Mississippi Canyon Areas. 
    Petitioners indicates that the design capacity of the pipeline would be 
    160,000 Mcf per day at an operating pressure of 1,650 psig. It is 
    stated that the production would be separated and dehydrated on the TLP 
    as this is necessary to prevent the formation of hydrates in the line, 
    and compressed on the platform to a pressure which is sufficient to 
    overcome the pressure drop in the proposed MARS pipeline as well as to 
    allow the gas to flow into the downstream interstate pipeline. It is 
    also stated that the gas may be processed onshore for the removal of 
    liquids.
        Petitioners seek a declaratory order holding that the proposed 
    facilities would have the primary function of gathering natural gas and 
    would thereby be exempt from the Commission's jurisdiction pursuant to 
    Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act. In support of its claim that the 
    primary function of the proposed facility is gathering, Petitioners 
    point out the following: (1) The length (45 to 60 miles) and diameter 
    (14 inches) are comparable to other OCS facilities previously 
    determined to be gathering, (2) the geographic configuration of the 
    facility (a, straight line, relatively small diameter gathering line 
    feeding production into an interstate pipeline) is consistent with 
    other OCS gathering facilities, (3) preliminary separation, 
    dehydration, and compression will be done on the MARS TLP, (4) the 
    facility will be located entirely behind onshore processing plants, and 
    (5) the facility would be owned and operated by companies engaging 
    primarily in exploration, production and non-jurisdictional gas 
    gathering activities.
        Comment date: November 1, 1994, in accordance with the first 
    paragraph of Standard Paragraph F at the end of this notice.
    
    5. Southern Natural Gas Co.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-809-000]
    
        Take notice that on September 27, 1994, Southern Natural Gas 
    Company (Southern), P.O. Box 2563, Birmingham, Alabama 35202-2563, 
    filed in Docket No. CP94-809-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
    157.205, 157.212, and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the 
    Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212, and 157.216) for 
    authorization to abandon certain regulating and measurement facilities 
    and change the operation of an existing delivery point for Alabama Gas 
    Corporation (Alagasco), under the blanket certificate issued in Docket 
    No. CP82-406-000, pursuant to Sections 7(b) and 7(c) of the Natural Gas 
    Act, all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file with 
    the Commission and open to public inspection.
        Southern states that it is currently authorized to sell and deliver 
    natural gas to the Chilton County Gas District (Chilton) at the Chilton 
    County Delivery Point (Chilton County), in Shelby County, Alabama, and 
    to transport and sell natural gas to Alagasco at the Montevallo Point 
    of Delivery, also in Shelby County. Southern states that, in October 
    1993, Alagasco acquired the distribution facilities of Chilton. It is 
    indicated that the two above-mentioned delivery points lie adjacent to 
    each other. Southern states that, since Alagasco now serves the 
    distribution facilities behind both of these delivery points, Alagasco 
    has requested and Southern has agreed to consolidate deliveries at 
    these two delivery points so that all gas that is now delivered to 
    Alagasco at Chilton County would be delivered to Alagasco at 
    Montevallo. Accordingly, Southern proposes to abandon the measurement 
    facilities at Chilton County.
        Southern states that, in order to accommodate the combined stream 
    of volumes at Montevallo, Southern requests authorization under 
    Sec. 157.212(a) of the Commission's Regulations to deliver gas to 
    Montevallo at a contract delivery pressure of mainline pressure not 
    less than 150 psig and to install a 3-inch rotary meter to have the 
    ability to measure accurately the additional level of flow at the 
    higher pressure. Southern also indicates that, to implement the change 
    in contract delivery pressure, it requests authorization to abandon two 
    3-inch regulators at Montevallo which had been used to reduce pressure 
    from Southern's mainline to the present contract delivery pressure of 
    75 psig. In addition, Southern proposes to abandon the meter station at 
    Chilton County.
        Southern states that the modification of the Montevallo Station 
    would eliminate the need to continue the Chilton County Station. In 
    addition, Southern states that the abandonment of the Chilton County 
    Station would decrease Southern's maintenance costs.
        Southern advises that the total volumes to be delivered to Alagasco 
    after the request do not exceed the total volumes authorized prior to 
    the request. Also, Southern indicates that the proposed activity is not 
    prohibited by its existing tariff and that it has sufficient capacity 
    to accommodate the changes proposed herein without detriment or 
    disadvantage to Southern's other customers. In addition, Southern 
    indicates that the changes in operations at Montevallo would have no 
    impact on Southern's ability to serve its peak day and annual 
    requirements.
        Comment date: November 14, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
    
    Standard Paragraphs:
    
        F. Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said application should on or before the comment date, 
    file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 
    20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the 
    requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
    CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
    (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be 
    considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
    will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
    person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a 
    party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in 
    accordance with the Commission's Rules.
        Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
    and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
    held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
    this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
    required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
    finds that a grant of the certificate and/or permission and approval 
    for the proposed abandonment are required by the public convenience and 
    necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if 
    the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is 
    required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
    it will be unnecessary for applicant to appear or be represented at the 
    hearing.
        G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
    issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
    214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
    intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
    the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
    the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
    the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
    day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
    and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
    protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
    authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
    Lois D. Cashell
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-24714 Filed 10-5-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/06/1994
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-24714
Dates:
November 14, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: October 6, 1994, Docket No. CP94-791-000, et al.