97-26411. Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 52055-52057]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-26411]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-CE-45-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Models PC-12 and 
    PC-12/45 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) that would apply to certain Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Models 
    PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes. The proposed action would require 
    inspecting the aileron tie-rod jam nuts for looseness, tightening any 
    loose jam nuts, and installing a locking sleeve on both ends of the 
    aileron tie-rod in the chain-drive of the aileron system. The proposed 
    AD results from an incident where the aileron tie-rod jam nuts on the 
    chain-drive of the aileron system became loose. This caused a 
    differential of aileron control between the pilot's control wheel and 
    the co-pilot's control wheel. The actions specified by the proposed AD 
    are intended to prevent such aileron control differential caused by the 
    aileron tie-rod jam nuts becoming loose, which could result in loss of 
    aileron control and consequent loss of control of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 7, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-CE-45-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., CH-6370 Stans, Switzerland. This 
    information also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the address 
    above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Roman T. Gabrys, Aerospace 
    Engineer, Small Airplane Directorate, Airplane Certification Service, 
    FAA, 1201 Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone 
    (816) 426-6932; facsimile (816) 426-2169.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of
    
    [[Page 52056]]
    
    the proposed rule. All comments submitted will be available, both 
    before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for 
    examination by interested persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-
    public contact concerned with the substance of this proposal will be 
    filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 97-CE-45-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-CE-45-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Federal Office for Civil Aviation (FOCA), which is the 
    airworthiness authority for Switzerland, recently notified the FAA that 
    an unsafe condition may exist on Pilatus Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 
    airplanes. The FOCA of Switzerland reports an incident where the 
    aileron tie-rod jam nuts on the chain-drive of the aileron system 
    became loose. This caused a differential of aileron control between the 
    pilot's control wheel and the co-pilot's control wheel. This condition, 
    if not corrected in a timely manner, could result in loss of aileron 
    control and consequent loss of control of the airplane.
    
    Applicable Service Information
    
        Pilatus has issued Service Bulletin No. 27-001, dated March 25, 
    1997, which includes procedures for the following on Pilatus Models PC-
    12 and PC-12/45 airplanes:
    
    --inspecting the aileron tie-rod jam nuts for looseness and tightening 
    any loose jam nuts; and
    --installing a locking sleeve on both ends of the aileron tie-rod in 
    the chain-drive of the aileron system.
    
        The FOCA of Switzerland classified this service bulletin as 
    mandatory and issued Swiss FOCA AD HB 97-174, dated April 30, 1997, in 
    order to assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in 
    Switzerland.
    
    Evaluation of All Applicable Information
    
        This airplane model is manufactured in Switzerland and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the 
    applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the FOCA of Switzerland has kept the 
    FAA informed of the situation described above.
        The FAA has examined the findings of the FOCA of Switzerland; 
    reviewed all available information, including the service information 
    referenced above; and determined that AD action is necessary for 
    products of this type design that are certificated for operation in the 
    United States.
    
    Explanation of the Provisions of the Proposed AD
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other Pilatus Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes 
    of the same type design that are registered in the United States, the 
    FAA is proposing AD action. The proposed AD would require inspecting 
    the aileron tie-rod jam nuts for looseness, tightening any loose jam 
    nuts, and installing a locking sleeve on both ends of the aileron tie-
    rod in the chain-drive of the aileron system. Accomplishment of the 
    proposed actions would be in accordance with Pilatus Service Bulletin 
    No. 27-001, dated March 25, 1997.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 40 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be 
    affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 5 
    workhours per airplane to accomplish the proposed action, and that the 
    average labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Parts will be provided 
    by the manufacturer at no cost to the owner/operator of the affected 
    airplanes. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the 
    proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $12,000 or $300 per 
    airplane.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action: (1) Is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40101, 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. 97-CE-45-AD.
        Applicability: Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes, serial 
    numbers 101 through 169, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: The modification required by this AD is incorporated at 
    manufacture on Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes, beginning with 
    serial number 170. Airplanes with this modification are not affected 
    by this AD.
        Note 2: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
    
    [[Page 52057]]
    
    
        Compliance: Required within the next 100 hours time-in-service 
    after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished.
        To prevent a differential of aileron control between the pilot's 
    control wheel and the co-pilot's control wheel caused by the aileron 
    tie-rod jam nuts becoming loose, which could result in loss of 
    aileron control and consequent loss of control of the airplane, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Inspect the aileron tie-rod jam nuts for looseness in 
    accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions section of Pilatus 
    Service Bulletin No. 27-001, dated March 25, 1997. Prior to further 
    flight, tighten any loose jam nuts in accordance with this service 
    bulletin.
        (b) Install a locking sleeve on both ends of the aileron tie-rod 
    in the chain-drive of the aileron system in accordance with the 
    Accomplishment Instructions section of Pilatus Service Bulletin No. 
    27-001, dated March 25, 1997.
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 1201 Walnut, 
    suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. The request shall be 
    forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may 
    add comments and then send it to the Manager, Small Airplane 
    Directorate.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Small Airplane Directorate.
    
        (e) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of 
    the documents referred to herein upon request to Pilatus Aircraft 
    Ltd., CH-6370 Stans, Switzerland; or may examine these documents at 
    the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 
    1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
        Note 4: The subject of this AD addresses the actions specified 
    in Swiss AD FOCA AD HB 97-174, dated April 30, 1997.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 30, 1997.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-26411 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/06/1997
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
97-26411
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before November 7, 1997.
Pages:
52055-52057 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-CE-45-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
97-26411.pdf
CFR: (2)
14 CFR 21.29
14 CFR 39.13