97-26433. Announcement of the Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 52194-52219]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-26433]
    
    
    
    [[Page 52193]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part III
    
    
    
    
    
    Environmental Protection Agency
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Announcement of the Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List; 
    Notice
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 193 / October 6, 1997 / Notices
    
    [[Page 52194]]
    
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [FRL-5904-7]
    
    
    Announcement of the Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate 
    List
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1996, 
    requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to publish a list of 
    contaminants which, at the time of publication, are not subject to any 
    proposed or promulgated national primary drinking water regulation 
    (NPDWR), that are known or anticipated to occur in public water systems 
    and which may require regulations under the SDWA [section 1412(b)(1)]. 
    The SDWA, as amended, specifies EPA must publish the first list of 
    contaminants (Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List, or CCL) not 
    later than 18 months after the date of enactment, i.e., by February 
    1998, and every five years thereafter. The SDWA, as amended, also 
    specifies that the CCL must be published after consultation with the 
    scientific community, and after notice and opportunity for public 
    comment. Today's notice announces the draft CCL, provides background on 
    how it was developed, and seeks comment on various aspects of 
    developing the final CCL. The CCL will be the source of priority 
    contaminants for drinking water research, monitoring, guidance 
    development, and for selection of candidates for drinking water 
    regulation. The draft CCL includes 58 chemical and 13 microbiological 
    contaminants.
    
    DATES: Submit comments on or before December 5, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send written comments to the Comment Clerk, docket number W-
    97-11, Water Docket (MC4101), USEPA, 401 M. St., SW, Washington, DC 
    20460. Please submit an original and three copies of your comments and 
    enclosures (including references). Comments must be received or 
    postmarked by midnight December 5, 1997.
        Commenters who want EPA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    should enclose a self-addressed, stamped envelope. No facsimiles 
    (faxes) will be accepted. Comments may also be submitted electronically 
    to ow-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic comments must be submitted as 
    an ASCII file avoiding the use of special characters and any form of 
    encryption. Electronic comments must be identified by the docket number 
    W-97-11. Comments and data will also be accepted on disks in 
    WordPerfect in 5.1 format or ASCII file format. Electronic comments on 
    this notice may be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries.
        The full record for this notice has been established under docket 
    number W-97-11, and includes supporting documentation as well as 
    printed, paper versions of electronic comments. The full record is 
    available for inspection from 9 to 4 p.m. Monday through Friday, 
    excluding legal holidays at the Water Docket, Room M2616, Headquarters, 
    USEPA, 401 M. Street, SW, Washington, DC. For access to docket 
    materials, please call 202/260-3027 to schedule an appointment. 
    Additionally, a few critical pieces of the record have been made 
    available at each Regional Office.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information, please 
    contact the EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline. The toll-free number is 
    800-426-4791. For specific information on the CCL and the contaminant 
    identification process, please contact Ms. Evelyn Washington, at the 
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Ground Water and 
    Drinking Water, Mailcode 4607, Washington, DC 20460, phone: 202-260-
    3029, fax: 202-260-3762, email: washington.evelyn@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    EPA Regional Offices
    
    I. JFK Federal Bldg., Room 2203, Boston, MA 02203. Phone: 617-565-
    3602, Jerry Healey
    II. 290 Broadway, Room 2432, New York, NY 10007-1866. Phone: 212-
    637-3880, Walter Andrews
    III. 841 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Phone: 215-566-
    5775, Jeff Hass
    IV. 345 Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta GA 30365. Phone: 404-562-9480, 
    Janine Morris
    V. 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604-3507. Phone: 312-886-
    4239, Kim Harris
    VI. 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202. Phone: 214-665-7150, Larry 
    Wright
    VII. 726 Minnesota Ave., Kansas City, KS 66101. Phone: 913-551-7410, 
    Stan Calow
    VIII. One Denver Place, 999 18th Street, suite 500, Denver, CO 
    80202. Phone: 303-312-6627, Rod Glebe
    IX. 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Phone: 415-744-
    1884, Bruce Macler
    X. 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. Phone: 206-553-1893, Larry 
    Worley
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Table of Contents
    
    I. Background
    II. Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List
        Table 1. Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List
    III. Identification of Contaminants for the Draft Drinking Water 
    Contaminant Candidate List
        A. Role of NDWAC Working Group
        B. Microbiological Contaminants Identified for the Draft CCL
        Table 2. Initial List of Microorganisms Developed by EPA for 
    Consideration by the Workshop on Microbiology and Public Health
        1. Protozoa
        2. Viruses
        3. Bacteria
        4. Microbiological Indicators
        5. Future Activities Planned for Microbiological Contaminants 
    and the CCL
    6. Possible Impacts From Other Regulatory Activity
        C. Chemical Contaminants Identified for the Draft CCL
        1. The Initial List of Chemical Contaminants Considered
        Table 3. Initial List of Chemical Contaminants Considered during 
    Development of the Draft CCL
        a. 1991 Drinking Water Priority List
        b. Health Advisories
        c. Integrated Risk Information System
        d. Non-Target Analytes in Public Water Supply Samples
        e. CERCLA Priority List
        f. Stakeholder Responses
        g. Toxic Release Inventory
        h. Pesticides Identified by Office of Pesticide Programs
        Table 4. Pesticides Deferred
        i. Safe Drinking Water Hotline
        Table 5. Contaminants Identified by the Safe Drinking Water 
    Hotline
        j. Endocrine Disruptors
        Table 6. Contaminants Identified as Suspected of Endocrine 
    Disruption
        2. Development and Application of the Criteria
        a. Criteria for Occurrence
        b. Criteria for Health
        3. Additional Specific Contaminants Included
        a. Aldicarb, Aldicarb sulfoxide, and Aldicarb sulfone
        b. Nickel
        c. Sulfate
    IV. Contaminants on the CCL Which Are of Specific Interest
        A. Aluminum
        B. MTBE
        C. Organotins
        D. Rhodamine WT
        E. Sodium
        F. Zinc
        G. 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-benzoquinone (DTBB)
        H. Contaminants to be Considered as Groups
        I. Contaminants for Which Unregulated Contaminant Data are or 
    Will Be Available
        Table 7. Contaminants with Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring 
    Data
    V. Request for Comment
        A. Data and Research Needs
        Table 8. Data Needs for Chemical Contaminants Included on the 
    Draft CCL
        B. Perchlorate
    
    [[Page 52195]]
    
    VI. Development of the final Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate 
    List, the Contaminant Identification Method, and the Contaminant 
    Selection Process
    VII. Summary of Other Related Activity Required by the SDWA
        A. Contaminant Selection and Regulatory Determination
        B. The National Contaminant Occurrence Database
        C. Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation
    VIII. Summary of Concurrent Regulatory Activity Required by the SDWA
        A. Radon
        B. Other Radionuclides
        C. Arsenic
        D. Sulfate
        E. Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts
    IX. Other Requirements
    X. References
    
    Abbreviations Used in this Notice
    
        ACWA-Association of California Water Agencies
    ATSDR--Agency of Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
    AWWARF--American Water Works Association Research Foundation
    CASRN--Chemical Abstract Services Registry Number
    CCL--Contaminant Candidate List
    CDC-Center for Disease Control and Prevention
    CERCLA--Comprehensive Environmental Response, Comprehensive and 
    Liability Act
    CIM--Contaminant Identification Method
    D/DBP--Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts
    DWEL-Drinking Water Equivalent Level
    DWPL--Drinking Water Priority List
    EDSTAC--Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee
    EPA--Environmental Protection Agency
    ESWTR--Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
    FIFRA--Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
    FQPA--Food Quality Protection Act
    GW--Ground Water
    HA--Health Advisory
    HSDB--Hazardous Substances Data Base
    IARC--International Agency for Research on Cancer
    ICR--Information Collection Request
    IESWTR--Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
    IRIS--Integrated Risk Information System
    LTESWTR--Long-term Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
    MCL--Maximum Contaminant Level
    MCLG--Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
    NAS--National Academy of Sciences
    NCOD--National Contaminant Occurrence Database
    NDWAC--National Drinking Water Advisory Council
    NIPDWR--National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations
    NPDWR--National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
    NPL--National Priority List
    NRC--National Research Council
    OGWDW--EPA's Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
    OPP--EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs
    OPPTS--EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxic Substances
    PWS--Public Water Systems
    RDA--Recommended Daily Allowance
    RfD--Reference Dose
    RQ--Reportable Quantity
    SAB--EPA's Science Advisory Board
    SDWA--Safe Drinking Water Act
    STORET--Storage and Retrieval Database
    SWTR--Surface Water Treatment Rule
    TRI--Toxic Release Inventory
    WHO--World Health Organization
    
    I. Background
    
        The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1996, requires 
    the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to publish a list of 
    contaminants that are known or anticipated to occur in public water 
    systems, and which may require regulations under the SDWA (section 
    1412(b)(1)). The SDWA, as amended, specifies that EPA must publish this 
    first list of contaminants (Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List, 
    or CCL) not later than 18 months after the date of enactment (i.e., by 
    February 1998), and publish a CCL every five years thereafter. The SDWA 
    also requires that the list of contaminants include those which, at the 
    time of publication, are not subject to any proposed or promulgated 
    national primary drinking water regulation (NPDWR). The list must be 
    published after consultation with the scientific community, including 
    the Science Advisory Board, after notice and opportunity for public 
    comment, and after consideration of the occurrence database established 
    under section 1445(g). The unregulated contaminants considered for the 
    list must include, but not be limited to, substances referred to in 
    section 101(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
    Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), and substances 
    registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 
    Act (FIFRA).
        Prior to the 1996 Amendments, the SDWA required the EPA to publish 
    a drinking water priority list (DWPL) of contaminants every three years 
    which were known or anticipated to occur in drinking water and which 
    may have required regulation under the SDWA. In response to these 
    previous amendments, EPA published two DWPLs which served as candidates 
    for regulation. The first DWPL was published on January 22, 1988 (53 FR 
    1892), and the second was published on January 14, 1991 (56 FR 1470).
        The 1996 Amendments to the SDWA were developed and enacted during 
    the time of the Presidential initiative intended to substantially 
    improve the existing regulatory system to move the Nation toward a new 
    and better environmental management system for the 21st century. During 
    the two-year period prior to the 1996 Amendments, EPA developed a 
    National Drinking Water Program Redirection Strategy (EPA, 1996a) to 
    (1) establish priorities for setting safety standards based on health 
    risks and sound science; (2) support strong, flexible partnerships 
    among EPA, States, local governments and other stakeholders to protect 
    public health; and (3) promote effective community-based source water 
    protection. The Redirection Strategy provides an overall framework for 
    the development of the CCL, as well as for other drinking water program 
    activities.
        The Agency believes the draft CCL presented in today's notice is 
    the result of a commendable effort of screening a larger set of 
    contaminants to the subset of those of most concern. The draft CCL is a 
    first step toward improving risk assessment, strengthening science and 
    data, and achieving better decision-making and future priority setting. 
    Today's notice announces the draft CCL, provides background on how it 
    was developed, summarizes detailed material available in the docket and 
    used to develop the list, seeks comment on the methods used to develop 
    the draft CCL, and seeks comment on developing the final CCL. The draft 
    CCL is designed to be responsive to each of the requirements noted 
    above of the SDWA, as amended, and is consistent with the goals of the 
    redirection strategy.
        Today's notice is being published pursuant to the requirement in 
    section 1412(b)(1) that the CCL be subjected to prior notice and 
    opportunity for public comment. The contaminants included are not 
    subject to any proposed or promulgated national primary drinking water 
    regulation,1 are known or anticipated to occur in public 
    water systems, and may require regulations under the SDWA. During the 
    development of the draft CCL, the Agency consulted with stakeholders, 
    including the National Drinking Water Advisory Council's Working Group 
    on Occurrence & Contaminant Selection, which includes microbiologists, 
    toxicologists, public health scientists, and engineers, and with other 
    members of the scientific community including the Science Advisory 
    Board (SAB). The Agency plans for a more in-depth consultation with the 
    SAB during the
    
    [[Page 52196]]
    
    fall of 1997. The occurrence database, which is to be established under 
    section 1445(g) by August 1999, was not considered since it is 
    currently under development; however, occurrence data from other 
    sources was considered.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ With the exception of nickel, aldicarb and its degradates, 
    and sulfate, which are considered special cases. Refer to later 
    sections of this notice for rationale for inclusion.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The final CCL, after publication in February 1998, will be the 
    source of priority contaminants for the Agency's drinking water 
    program. Priorities for drinking water research, occurrence monitoring, 
    guidance development, including the development of health advisories, 
    will be drawn from the CCL. The CCL will also serve as the list of 
    contaminants from which the Agency will make determinations of whether 
    or not to regulate specific contaminants. This first CCL is largely 
    based on knowledge acquired over the last few years and other readily 
    available information, but an enhanced, more robust approach to data 
    collection and evaluation will be developed for future CCLs.
    
    II. Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List
    
        The following table includes the contaminants, microbiological and 
    chemical, presented as the draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate 
    List. The contaminants were identified as described by Section III of 
    today's notice. The contaminants in the table are identified by name 
    and Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number (CASRN). The draft CCL 
    includes 58 chemical contaminants/contaminant groups and 13 
    microbiological contaminants.
    
            Table 1.--Draft Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List       
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       Chemical contaminants                        CASRN   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1,1,2,2-tetra-chloroethane.................................      79-34-5
    1,2,4-trimethylbenzene.....................................      95-63-6
    1,1-dichloro-ethane........................................      75-34-3
    1,1-dichloro-propene.......................................     563-58-6
    1,2-diphenylhydrazine......................................     122-66-7
    1,3-dichloropropane........................................     142-28-9
    1,3-Dichloropropene (telone or 1,3-D)......................     542-75-6
    2,4,6-trichlorophenol......................................      88-06-2
    2,2-dichloro-propane.......................................     594-20-7
    2,4-dichlorophenol.........................................     120-83-2
    2,4-dinitrophenol..........................................      51-28-5
    2,4-dinitrotoluene.........................................     121-14-2
    2,6-dinitrotoluene.........................................     606-20-2
    2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-benzoquinone (DTBB)....................     719-22-2
    2-methyl-Phenol (o-cresol).................................      95-48-7
    Acetochlor.................................................   34256-82-1
    Acetone....................................................      67-64-1
    Alachlor ESA (a degradation product of alachlor)                        
    Aldicarbs*                                                              
    Aldrin.....................................................     309-00-2
    Aluminum...................................................    7429-90-5
    Atrazine-desethyl, a degradation product of triazines......    6190-65-4
    Boron......................................................    7440-42-8
    Bromobenzene...............................................     108-86-1
    Cyanazine..................................................   21725-46-2
    p-Cymene (p-isopropyltoluene)..............................      99-87-6
    DCPA mono-acid degradate...................................     887-54-7
    DCPA di-acid degradate.....................................    2136-79-0
    DDE........................................................      72-55-9
    Diazinon...................................................     333-41-5
    Dieldrin...................................................      60-57-1
    Dimethoate.................................................      60-51-5
    Disulfoton.................................................     298-04-4
    Diuron.....................................................     330-54-1
    EPTC (s-ethyl-dipropylthiocarbamate).......................     759-94-4
    Fonofos....................................................     944-22-9
    Hexachloro-butadiene.......................................      87-68-3
    Isopropylbenzene (cumene)..................................      98-82-8
    Linuron....................................................     330-55-2
    Manganese..................................................    7439-96-5
    Methyl bromide.............................................      74-83-9
    Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE)................................    1634-04-4
    Metolachlor................................................   51218-45-2
    Metribuzin.................................................   21087-64-9
    Molinate...................................................    2212-67-1
    Naphthalene................................................      91-20-3
    Nickel*                                                                 
    Nitrobenzene...............................................      98-95-3
    Organotins                                                              
    Prometon...................................................    1610-18-0
    RDX........................................................     121-82-4
    Rhodamine WT                                                            
    Sodium.....................................................    7440-23-5
    Sulfate*                                                                
    Terbacil...................................................    5902-51-2
    Terbufos...................................................   13071-79-9
    Vanadium...................................................    7440-62-2
    Zinc.......................................................    7440-66-6
    Microbiological Contaminants:                                           
      Acanthamoeba (guidance expected for contact lens wearers).............
      Adenoviruses..........................................................
      Aeromonas hydrophila..................................................
      Caliciviruses.........................................................
      Coxsackieviruses......................................................
      Cyclospora cayetanensis...............................................
      Echoviruses...........................................................
      Helicobacter pylori...................................................
      Hepatitis A virus.....................................................
      Legionella (in ground water)..........................................
      Microsporidia (Enterocytozoon & Septata)..............................
      Mycobacterium avium intracellulare (MAC)..............................
      Toxoplasma gondii.....................................................
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *Included on the CCL as special cases, not subject to the criteria used 
      to identify other contaminants.                                       
    
    III. Identification of Contaminants for the Draft Drinking Water 
    Contaminant Candidate List
    
        Drinking water contamination generally occurs from: (1) 
    Contaminants that find their way into drinking water sources from 
    industrial waste releases, agricultural runoff, atmospheric deposition, 
    and other pollution sources; (2) contaminants formed during the 
    treatment of water supplies (e.g., disinfection by-products); and (3) 
    materials used for treatment, storage, and distribution of water. EPA 
    has considered all of these sources in identifying microbiological and 
    chemical contaminants for this draft CCL. Figure 1 provides a graphical 
    representation of how today's draft CCL was developed.
    
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    [[Page 52197]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06OC97.000
    
    
    
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-C
    
    [[Page 52198]]
    
        The National Drinking Water Advisory Council's (NDWAC) Working 
    Group on Occurrence & Contaminant Selection played an integral part in 
    the development of the CCL by providing recommendations for the 
    criteria, and the contaminants for initial consideration. Also, during 
    the development of the CCL, the Agency sought the expertise of 
    microbiologists for input on microorganisms to include on the CCL. The 
    following sections describe the role of the NDWAC Working Group and 
    describe the approach used to develop the CCL for microorganisms and 
    chemical contaminants.
    
    A. Role of NDWAC Working Group
    
        After enactment of the recent SDWA amendments, and in keeping with 
    the redirection strategy, EPA held its first stakeholder meeting on 
    approaches to developing CCLs on December 2 and 3, 1996 in Washington, 
    D.C. Participants, including public water system professionals, state 
    regulatory officials, public health officials, environmental groups and 
    other stakeholders, with a range of interests, explored issues 
    concerning the identification of potential drinking water contaminants 
    for consideration for the first CCL as well as the factors to consider 
    for future CCL development. One result of the meeting was the 
    recommendation that the February 1998 CCL be the first topic addressed 
    by the NDWAC Working Group on Occurrence & Contaminant Selection.
        In 1975, pursuant to the SDWA [Section 1446(a)], NDWAC was 
    established under the Federal Advisory Committee Act to provide 
    practical and independent advice, consultation, and recommendations to 
    EPA on the activities, functions and policies related to the SDWA. At 
    its meeting held on November 13 and 14, 1996, NDWAC decided that 
    working groups should be formed on the following subjects: Small 
    Systems Capacity Building; Operator Certification; Source Water 
    Protection; Consumer Confidence Reports; Drinking Water State Revolving 
    Fund; and Occurrence & Contaminant Selection. The NDWAC Occurrence & 
    Contaminant Selection Working Group has been integral to developing the 
    criteria and identifying contaminants for the draft CCL published 
    today.
        At the recommendation of the Working Group, the Agency sought 
    expertise on microbiological contaminants and convened a workshop of 
    microbiologists. The input from the workshop was adopted by the Working 
    Group for use in developing the draft CCL. The approach used to 
    identify microorganisms for the CCL is explained in more detail in 
    section III.B.
        In addition to microorganisms, the Working Group developed 
    recommendations on chemical contaminants. The recommendations addressed 
    which contaminants to include for initial consideration, and the 
    criteria for use in determining which contaminants should be included 
    on the draft CCL. The recommendations were developed over a series of 
    meetings with the Working Group followed by the endorsement by the full 
    NDWAC. The details concerning the contaminants included for initial 
    consideration, and development and use the identification criteria are 
    contained in section III.C.
    
    B. Microbiological Contaminants Identified for the Draft CCL
    
        On May 20-21, 1997, EPA utilized a workshop on microbiology and 
    public health to develop a list of pathogens for possible inclusion on 
    the first CCL. Taking part in this workshop were invited experts 
    representing academia, EPA and other federal agencies, and the water 
    industry. In preparation, EPA scientists prepared and distributed a 
    list of microorganisms for initial consideration by workshop members 
    (see Table 2.). Inclusion of organisms on this initial list was based 
    on disease outbreak data, published literature documenting the 
    occurrence of known or suspected pathogens in water, and other 
    information. A summary of the workshop proceedings is in the docket.
    Table 2. Initial List of Microorganisms Developed by EPA for 
    Consideration by the Workshop on Microbiology and Public Health
    
    Protozoa
    
    Microsporidia
    Toxoplasma
    Cyclospora
    Acanthamoeba
    Naegleria
    Isospora
    
    Viruses
    
    Hepatitis E
    Astroviruses
    Coxsackie/Echo viruses
    Adenovirus 40/41
    Norwalk virus and other caliciviruses
    Rotavirus
    
    Bacteria
    
    Helicobacter pylori
    Mycobacterium (MAC)
    E. coli O157:H7
    Aeromonas hydrophila
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Acrobacter
    Campylobacter
    
    Algal Toxins
    
    Anaebaena flos-aquae
    Aphanizomenon flos-aque
    Microcystis aeruginosa
    Schizothrix calcicola
        Workshop participants established a set of baseline criteria for 
    deciding whether an organism should appear on the CCL. These criteria 
    were (1) public health significance, (2) known waterborne transmission, 
    (3) occurrence in source water, (4) effectiveness of current water 
    treatment, and (5) adequacy of analytical methods. Organisms on the EPA 
    list mentioned above, as well as other organisms that arose during the 
    discussions, were evaluated against these criteria.
        The CCL published today includes the list of pathogens identified 
    by the workshop and subsequently adopted by the NDWAC as 
    recommendations for the CCL. Algal toxins were considered to be of 
    minimal public health significance, and therefore were not included on 
    the draft CCL. The following sections identify the organisms selected, 
    the rationale for why a pathogen was included on the CCL, and the 
    rationale why certain pathogens were not included.
    1. Protozoa
        The following protozoa are included on the CCL: Cyclospora 
    cayetanensis, Toxoplasma gondii, the two microsporida--Enterocytozoon 
    and Septata, and Acanthamoeba. It is recommended that EPA develop 
    guidance for controlling Acanthamoeba, for individuals who wear contact 
    lenses. The rationale for their selection follows.
        C. cayetanensis has caused waterborne outbreaks in other countries 
    and one documented outbreak in the U.S. Thus, it may be a significant 
    public health risk. Disease symptoms include watery diarrhea, abdominal 
    cramping, decreased appetite, and low-grade fever (Huang et al., 1995). 
    In HIV-infected persons, the disease may be chronic and constant (Soave 
    and Johnson, 1995). The occurrence of this organism in natural waters 
    and its animal host range are unknown. However, C. cayetanensis is 
    transmitted by the fecal-oral route, and so its presence in water is 
    likely. The morphology of C. cayetanensis suggests that the organism is 
    relatively resistant to disinfectants, but due to its large size (7-
    10m in diameter) it may be removed satisfactorily by 
    filtration. Cyclospora is included on the CCL because it has caused 
    waterborne disease outbreaks in the U.S. and other countries.
        Toxoplasma gondii causes a common infection of mammals and birds, 
    but the complete life cycle only occurs in wild
    
    [[Page 52199]]
    
    and domestic cats. The organism infects a high percentage of the human 
    population (50 percent in some areas of the U.S.) but, while 
    subclinical infections are prevalent, illness is rare (Fishback, 1992). 
    However, illness may be severe in fetuses and AIDS patients. Symptoms 
    include fever, swelling of lymph glands in the neck, blindness and 
    mental retardation in fetuses, and encephalitis in AIDS patients 
    (Fishback, 1992). There have been two documented outbreaks of 
    toxoplasmosis--in Panama and British Columbia--both linked 
    epidemiologically to drinking water. Chlorination of unfiltered surface 
    waters is not effective against Toxoplasma (Benenson et al., 1982). 
    However, due to their large size (11x12m), filtration may be 
    effective in controlling this organism. Toxoplasma is included on the 
    CCL because it poses a significant public health risk, can be 
    transmitted via the waterborne route, and because a reasonable 
    potential exists for completing the needed research in the next few 
    years for controlling this organism.
        Microsporidia are a large group of protozoan parasites that are 
    common in the environment and multiply only inside cells (Cali, 1991). 
    Five species of microsporidia have been reported to cause disease in 
    humans, but only two are significant in water: Enterocytozoon bieneusi 
    and Septata intestinalis. Both are common in people with AIDS 
    (Goodgame, 1996) and occur chiefly in AIDS patients (Bryan, 1995), 
    although infections have been reported in otherwise healthy persons 
    (Weber et al., 1994). Symptoms may include diarrhea (sometimes severe 
    and chronic), and illness involving the respiratory tract, urogenital 
    tract, eyes, kidney, liver or muscles (Bryan, 1995; Goodgame, 1996; 
    Cali, 1991).
        Microsporidia that infect humans produce small (1-5m), 
    very resistant spores (Waller, 1979; Cali, 1991). They are shed in 
    bodily fluids, including urine and feces, and thus have a strong 
    potential to enter water sources. However, no waterborne outbreak has 
    yet been reported and there is no published evidence of waterborne 
    transmission. Chlorine is probably not effective against microsporidia, 
    given that other protozoan spores (cysts, oocysts) are resistant to 
    chlorine. Thus, effective filtration and watershed control may be 
    needed to control this organism in drinking water. E. bieneusi and S. 
    intestinalis are included on the CCL because they pose a significant 
    risk to immuno-compromised individuals and may not be removed 
    effectively by filtration because of their small size (the spores are 
    somewhat smaller than Cryptosporidium oocysts).
        Acanthamoeba are a group of free-living amoeba that are common in 
    soil and water, including drinking water (Sawyer, 1989; Gonzalez de la 
    Cuesta et al., 1987). Some Acanthamoeba species are pathogenic and can 
    cause inflammation of the eye's cornea (especially in individuals who 
    wear soft or disposable contact lenses (Seal et al., 1992)), and 
    chronic encephalitis in the immuno-compromised population (Kilvington, 
    1990). To date, no case of waterborne disease has been reported. 
    However, Acanthamoeba cysts are relatively resistant to chlorine (De 
    Jonkheere and Van der Voorde, 1976). Because drinking water is not a 
    suspected route of transmission, workshop members did not include 
    Acanthamoeba on their list. However, as stated above, the Workshop 
    participants and the NDWAC recommend that EPA issue guidance to educate 
    the public about the potential problem with contact lenses.
        Two protozoa that were on the initial list for consideration 
    developed by EPA (Naegleria fowleri, Isospara belli), and two that were 
    not (Entamoeba histolytica, Blastocystis hominis) were also considered 
    by the workshop, but were not included on the CCL. The reasons for 
    excluding them follow.
        N. fowleri is a free-living amoeba, about 8-15m in size, 
    found in soil, water, and decaying vegetation. Although it is common in 
    many surface waters, it rarely causes disease. All disease incidents 
    have been associated with swimming in natural or manmade, warm fresh 
    waters; drinking water is not a suspected route of transmission. The 
    route of infection is via inhalation rather than by ingestion. For this 
    reason, it was not included on the CCL.
    
    I. belli causes gastrointestinal illness, primarily in AIDS 
    patients and children. There have been no documented cases of 
    waterborne transmission. However, the organism is transmitted by 
    the fecal-oral route, so its presence in water is possible. 
    Filtration is probably effective in removing I. belli oocysts, 
    given their large size (30x12m). This organism was not 
    included on the CCL because of the lack of documentation on 
    waterborne transmission and the belief that not enough is known 
    about the organism for developing potential regulations within a 
    three-year time-frame.
    
        E. histolytica is not considered to be a significant health problem 
    in the U.S. In contrast to the situation for Giardia and 
    Cryptosporidium, animals are not host reservoirs for E. histolytica. 
    Thus, the potential for source water contamination is relatively low, 
    especially if sewage treatment practices are adequate. Moreover, the 
    organism has not caused a significant waterborne disease outbreak since 
    the early 1950s. Thirdly, the cyst is large (10-15m), slightly 
    larger than a Giardia cyst; thus, filtration should be effective for 
    removing this organism. For these reasons, this organism was not 
    included on the CCL.
        B. hominis was not included on the CCL because its clinical 
    significance has not been determined and very little is known about its 
    potential for waterborne transmission or its occurrence in water.
    2. Viruses
        The following viruses are included on the CCL: caliciviruses, 
    adenoviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, and the hepatitis A virus. 
    The rationale for their inclusion follows.
        The caliciviruses are a common cause of acute, but mild, 
    gastrointestinal illness in the U.S. Between 1980 and 1994, 14 
    waterborne disease outbreaks with more than 9,000 associated cases 
    caused by the Norwalk virus and other caliciviruses were reported. 
    Thus, their public health significance is high. However, because 
    adequate recovery and assay methods for the caliciviruses are not yet 
    available, information about the occurrence of these viruses in water 
    or the effectiveness of water treatment is lacking. It is believed that 
    current research programs might fill the research gap in the near-term 
    to allow development of regulations, if necessary, to control this 
    group of organisms.
        Most of the adenoviruses are respiratory pathogens. However, 
    serotypes 40 and 41 are important causes of gastrointestinal illness, 
    especially in children. However, all types may be shed in the feces, 
    and may be spread by the fecal-oral route. Although adenoviruses have 
    been detected in water, data on their occurrence in water are meager. 
    No drinking water outbreaks implicating these viruses have been 
    reported. Both the respiratory and gastrointestinal adenoviruses are 
    recommended for the CCL because of their high public health 
    significance and data which suggest that adenoviruses are relatively 
    resistant to disinfectants.
        The coxsackieviruses are readily found in wastewater and surface 
    water, and sometimes in drinking water (Hurst, 1991). Although they 
    have not caused a documented outbreak of waterborne disease, 
    coxsackieviruses produce a variety of illnesses in humans, including 
    the common cold, heart
    
    [[Page 52200]]
    
    disease, fever, aseptic meningitis, gastrointestinal problems, and many 
    more, some of which can be serious (Melnick, 1992). Coxsackieviruses 
    are included on the CCL because they are found more frequently in water 
    than other viruses and are associated with a number of illnesses.
        The echoviruses, like the coxsackieviruses, are readily detected in 
    water, including treated drinking water. They are associated with 
    milder illnesses than the coxsackieviruses, and have not caused a 
    documented outbreak. Echoviruses are included on the CCL because, like 
    the coxsackieviruses, they are found more frequently in water than 
    other viruses and are associated with a number of illnesses.
        The hepatitis A virus has caused at least 11 waterborne disease 
    outbreaks of infectious hepatitis since 1980. Therefore, it has a high 
    public health significance. The virus has been found in contaminated 
    drinking water, and is somewhat resistant to chlorination (Peterson et 
    al., 1983). For these reasons, it is also included on the CCL.
        Three viruses that were on the initial list for consideration 
    developed by EPA (rotaviruses, hepatitis E virus, and astroviruses) and 
    two that were not (picobivirna and picotrivirna) were also considered 
    by the workshop participants, but were not included on the CCL. The 
    reasons for not including them follow.
        Rotaviruses cause acute gastroenteritis, primarily in children. 
    Almost all children have been infected at least once by the age of five 
    years (Parsonnet, 1992), and in developing countries, rotavirus 
    infections are a major cause of infant mortality. Rotaviruses are 
    spread by fecal-oral transmission and have been found in ambient water, 
    ground water, and tap water (Gerba et al., 1985; Gerba, 1996). However, 
    only a single waterborne disease outbreak has been reported in the U.S. 
    and only several have been documented outside the U.S. (Gerba et al., 
    1985). Rotaviruses are readily inactivated by chlorine, chlorine 
    dioxide, and ozone, but apparently not by monochloramine (Berman and 
    Hoff, 1984; Chen and Vaughn, 1990, Vaughn et al., 1986; 1987). 
    Rotaviruses were not included on the CCL because they are not regarded 
    as an important public health problem in the U.S., and because of their 
    vulnerability to disinfectants.
        Hepatitis E virus is an important agent of hepatitis in 
    underdeveloped countries, but apparently not in the U.S. The virus is 
    transmitted by the fecal-oral route (Dreesman and Reyes, 1992) and 
    probably a majority of cases are waterborne. Even though the disease is 
    apparently not a health concern in the U.S., one investigation found 
    that 21.3% of blood donors in Baltimore were sero-positive (Thomas et 
    al., 1997), suggesting previous exposure to the organism. Infections 
    are mild and self-limiting except for pregnant women, who have a 
    fatality rate of up to 39%. No data from disinfection studies have been 
    published. Hepatitis E virus was not included on the CCL because it is 
    not regarded as a significant public health threat in the U.S., and 
    because current sewage treatment practices are judged sufficient to 
    eliminate risk of waterborne transmission.
        Astroviruses are found throughout the world and cause illness in 1-
    3 year old children and in AIDS patients, but rarely in healthy adults 
    (Kurtz and Lee, 1987; Grohmann et al., 1993). Symptoms are mild and 
    typical of gastrointestinal illness, but the disease is more severe and 
    persistent in the severely immuno-compromised. Astroviruses are 
    transmitted by the fecal-oral route and have been detected in water and 
    have been associated anecdotally with waterborne disease outbreaks 
    (Cubitt, 1991; Pinto et al., 1996). The astroviruses were not included 
    on the CCL because of the mildness of the illness and the lack of 
    adequate documentation about the occurrence in water and potential as a 
    waterborne disease agent.
        The picobivirna and picotrivirna viruses are of public health 
    significance outside the U.S., and are not regarded as being a 
    waterborne problem in the U.S. and are adequately removed from effluent 
    water by current sewage treatment practices. Picobivirna and 
    picotrivirna viruses were not included on the CCL for these reasons.
    3. Bacteria
        The following bacteria are included on the CCL: Helicobacter 
    pylori, Legionella, Mycobacterium avium complex, and Aeromonas 
    hydrophila. The rationale for their identification follows.
        H. pylori has been closely associated with peptic ulcers, gastric 
    carcinoma, and gastritis (Peterson, 1991; Nomura et al., 1991; 
    Parsonnet et al., 1991, Cover and Blaser, 1995). Data about its 
    distribution in the environment are scarce, but the organism has been 
    found in sewage (Sutton et al., 1995) and has been linked to ambient 
    water and drinking water by epidemiological tests and other means 
    (Klein et al., 1991; Shahamat et al., 1992; Shahamat et al., 1993; 
    Hulten et al., 1996). The number of people in the U.S. that have 
    antibodies against H. pylori, and thus have been exposed to the 
    organism, is high. Helicobacter is thought to be vulnerable to 
    disinfectants. H. pylori is included on the CCL because of its public 
    health significance in the U.S. and the possibility of waterborne 
    transmission.
        Legionella pneumophila and other Legionella species cause 
    Legionnaires Disease (a type of pneumonia) and Pontiac Fever (a mild, 
    nonpneumonic illness). Legionnaires Disease, which has a 15% mortality 
    rate, typically results from the inhalation of aerosols of water 
    containing the organism. Legionella are abundant and naturally 
    occurring in surface water; thus they are not necessarily associated 
    with fecal contamination. They have also been detected in ground water. 
    Small numbers can occur in the finished waters of systems employing 
    full treatment (U.S. EPA, 1989b) and can colonize plumbing systems, 
    especially warm ones. Aerosols from fixtures, such as showerheads, may 
    cause the disease via inhalation. Aerosols from cooling towers, hot 
    tubs, and pools have also caused a number of outbreaks. Direct person-
    to-person spread has not been documented (Yu et al., 1983). Ozone, 
    chlorine dioxide, and ultraviolet light are effective in controlling 
    Legionella, but data for chlorine are inconsistent (States et al., 
    1990). Legionella in surface water are already regulated under EPA's 
    Surface Water Treatment Regulations (40 CFR part 141, subpart H). 
    Legionella in ground water is included on the CCL because of their 
    public health significance in the U.S. and the possibility of 
    waterborne transmission via ground water.
        Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC; also known as the Mycobacterium 
    avium intracellulare complex) is common in the environment and can 
    colonize water systems and plumbing systems (du Moulin and Stottmeier, 
    1986; du Moulin et al., 1988). It is known to cause pulmonary disease 
    and other diseases, especially in individuals with a weakened immune 
    system (e.g., AIDS patients). Drinking water has been epidemiologically 
    linked to infections in hospital patients (du Moulin and Stottmeier, 
    1986). MAC is relatively resistant to chlorine disinfection (Pelletier 
    et al., 1988). MAC is included on the CCL because of its high public 
    health significance, its ability to colonize on pipes, and its relative 
    resistance to chlorine.
        Aeromonas hydrophila can cause wound infections and septicemia in 
    people with a weakened immune system, and some evidence suggests that 
    it causes gastrointestinal disease in
    
    [[Page 52201]]
    
    healthy people. The organism is common in water and is not necessarily 
    associated with fecal contamination. It is vulnerable to disinfectants. 
    A. hydrophila is included on the CCL primarily because it is common in 
    source water.
        Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a free-living bacterium that is common in 
    water. People at risk include patients with profound neutropenia, 
    cystic fibrosis, severe burns, and those with foreign devices installed 
    (Hardalo and Edberg, 1997). The organism has also caused numerous 
    outbreaks of dermatitis in recreational waters, e.g., pools, 
    whirlpools, and hot tubs (Kramer et al., 1996). Because of differing 
    opinions among the microbiologists who participated in the workshop 
    about its public health significance and its potential health risk via 
    the waterborne route, a decision could not reach on whether to include 
    P. aeruginosa on their list. Rather, it was recommended that EPA 
    conduct a complete literature search on the topic before the Agency 
    decides whether to include this organism on the final list. The 
    literature search will be conducted prior to publishing the final CCL.
        Four bacteria that were on the initial list for consideration 
    developed by EPA (Escherichia coli O157:H7, Campylobacter, Arcobacter, 
    and the cyanobacteria) and four that were not (Salmonella, Shigella, 
    Vibrio cholerae and other Vibrio species, and Yersinia enterocolitica) 
    were also considered by the workshop, but were not included on the CCL. 
    The reasons for excluding them follow.
        E. coli O157:H7, Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, V. cholerae, 
    and Y. enterocolitica have all caused waterborne disease in the U.S. 
    and are regarded as significant health risks. They were not included on 
    the CCL because current treatment practices were deemed to be adequate 
    in controlling these organisms. Arcobacter was not included on the CCL 
    because its health significance and the possibility of waterborne 
    transmission are unknown, and because current treatment practices were 
    judged likely in controlling this organism.
        Cyanobacteria (also known as blue-green algae) are generally not 
    considered an important health risk. However, certain species may 
    produce neurotoxins (which affects the nervous system), hepatotoxins 
    (which affects the liver), and other types of toxins which, if ingested 
    at high enough concentrations, may be harmful. High concentrations of 
    toxins associated with a bloom of Schizothrix calcicola may have been 
    responsible for an outbreak of gastroenteritis in 1975 (Lippy and Erb, 
    1976). However, little evidence exists that ambient levels found in 
    most water supplies pose a health risk to the normal population. The 
    cyanobacteria was not included on the CCL because the problem is 
    thought to be best handled through good watershed management practices 
    to prevent algal growth in source waters.
    4. Microbiological Indicators
        Indicators of fecal contamination or of pathogens were not 
    addressed at the workshop. EPA is involved, however, in a project with 
    the International Life Sciences Institute to begin an evaluation of 
    which microbiological indicators are most appropriate for various types 
    of environmental waters. Currently, the Agency uses total coliform 
    bacteria as the sole indicator of microbiological drinking water 
    quality.
    5. Future Activities Planned for Microbiological Contaminants and the 
    CCL
        EPA is attempting to develop a more formal framework for 
    identifying, selecting and prioritizing pathogens (and their 
    indicators) for research and possible regulation, and for future CCLs. 
    To date, the identification of pathogens for the CCL has been 
    relatively informal. In contrast, a more objective approach for 
    contaminant identification and selection in the future may be based on 
    a numerical scoring procedure such that contaminants with higher scores 
    would have greater priority for regulation, research and guidance 
    development than those that have lower scores.
    6. Possible Impacts From Other Regulatory Activity
        Pathogens that are included on the final CCL, will be candidates 
    for regulatory control, guidance development, and additional research 
    over the next five years. These organisms may be controlled, however, 
    by regulations currently under development such as the Enhanced Surface 
    Water Treatment Rule, the Ground Water Disinfection Rule. If pathogens 
    on the CCL are determined to be controlled by these regulations, they 
    will be withdrawn from the CCL.
    
    C. Chemical Contaminants Identified for the Draft CCL
    
        As stated earlier, the NDWAC Working Group on Occurrence & 
    Contaminant Selection played an integral part in developing the draft 
    CCL presented in today's notice. At the initial Working Group meeting 
    held on April 3-4, 1997, the Agency proposed a number of lists of 
    contaminants as a logical starting point for developing the draft CCL. 
    Some lists originate from other Agency programs, while others were 
    developed in anticipation of future DWPLs. The Agency also proposed 
    that the initial list would need to be reduced to a smaller list of 
    priority contaminants that would become the CCL.
        In April, the Working Group identified 32 contaminants thought to 
    be those most important for inclusion on the first CCL, other 
    contaminants for initial consideration, and criteria to be used to 
    evaluate and screen all contaminants initially considered. During this 
    April meeting, and two subsequent meetings, held on June 23 and July 
    17, 1997, the Working Group developed these recommendations which were 
    approved by the full NDWAC, and subsequently adopted by the Agency, to 
    use in screening the initial list to the contaminants to today's draft 
    CCL. Summaries of the meetings are provided in the docket. The 
    following sections provide the rationale for the initial list of 
    contaminants considered and a summary of the development and 
    application of the criteria used to evaluate the contaminants on the 
    initial list to develop the draft CCL.
    1. The Initial List of Chemical Contaminants Considered
        Ten lists of chemical contaminants were considered to be logical 
    starting points for developing the first CCL. Of the ten, eight lists 
    were ultimately combined to serve as the initial list of contaminants 
    to be considered for the CCL. Some contaminants appear on more than one 
    of the eight lists. The initial list of contaminants considered, as 
    well as those eliminated or deferred from consideration, are in Table 
    3. The following sections provide a description of each of the lists 
    and the rationale behind including it with, or excluding it from, the 
    initial list of contaminants considered.
    
    [[Page 52202]]
    
    
    
                                 Table 3.--Initial List of Chemical Contaminants Considered During Development of the Draft CCL                             
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                Contaminant lists considered                                
                                                              ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Contaminant                    CAS No.                 Health                                       Stakeholder                        
                                                               1991 DWPL  advisories  IRIS  (3)   PWS (4)    CERCLA (5)    summary     TRI list  OPP ranking
                                                                  (1)         (2)                                          list (6)      (7)          (8)   
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Contaminants Identified as Initial Candidates for the CCL during April 3-4, 1997 Working Group Meeting                         
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Inorganics:                                                                                                                                             
      Aluminum..................................    7429-90-5           .........  .........  ...........            ...........
      Zinc......................................    7440-66-6           .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
    Pesticides:                                                                                                                                             
      Acetochlor................................   34256-82-1  .........       .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Alachlor ESA..............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Butylate..................................    2008-41-5  .........           .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Chlorpyrifos..............................    2921-88-2  .........           .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      DCPA (Dacthal)............................    1861-32-1           .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      DCPA di-acid degradate....................    2136-79-0      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      DCPA mono-acid degradate..................     887-54-7      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      DDE.......................................      72-55-9  .........  ..........      .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      Diazinon..................................     333-41-5  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Diuron....................................     330-54-1  .........       .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Endosulfan................................     115-29-7  .........  ..........      .........  ...........        .........      
      EPTC (s-ethyl-dipropylthio-carbamate).....     759-94-4  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Malathion.................................     121-75-5  .........       D   .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Methyl parathion..........................     298-00-0  .........           .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Metolachlor...............................   51218-45-2               .........  ...........        .........      
      Metribuzin................................   21087-64-9               .........  ...........        .........      
      Prometon..................................    1610-18-0           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Propanil..................................     709-98-8  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Tebuthiuron...............................   34014-18-1  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Terbacil..................................    5902-51-2  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Triazines (total) (9).....................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Triazine degradation products (9),                                                                                                                    
       atrazine-desethyl........................    6190-65-4  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Triazines (unregulated) (9)...............  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
       Trifluralin..............................    1582-09-8               .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
    Organics:                                                                                                                                               
      2-methyl-Phenol (o-cresol)................      95-48-7  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Acetone...................................      67-64-1  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Ethylene glycol...........................     107-21-1  .........           .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK).................      78-93-3           .........  .........  ...........            ...........
       Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE)..............    1634-04-4           .........  .........  ...........            ...........
      Nitrobenzene..............................      98-95-3      ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Phenol....................................     108-95-2  .........           .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Additional Contaminants Considered for the CCL                                                     
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Inorganics:                                                                                                                                             
      Ammonia...................................    7664-41-7  .........       .........  .........  ...........            ...........
      Ammonium nitrate..........................    6484-52-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Ammonium sulfamate........................    7773-06-0  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Ammonium sulfate..........................    7783-20-2  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Boron.....................................    7440-42-8           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Carbon disulfide..........................      75-15-0  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Carbonyl sulfide..........................     463-58-1  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Cobalt....................................    7440-48-4  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Hydrochloric acid.........................    7647-01-0  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Hydrogen fluoride.........................    7664-39-3  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Manganese.................................    7439-96-5      ..........  .........  .........                  ...........
      Metam-sodium..............................     137-42-8  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Molybdenum................................    7439-98-7           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Phosphoric acid...........................    7664-38-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Phosphorous...............................    7723-14-0  .........       .........  .........        ...........      ...........
      Sodium....................................    7440-23-5  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Strontium.................................    7440-24-6           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Vanadium..................................    7440-62-2           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
    Pesticides:                                                                                                                                             
      1,3-Dichloropropene (telone or 1,3-D).....     542-75-6               .........  ...........        .........      
      2,4,5-T...................................      93-76-5           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      2,4-DB....................................      94-82-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      2,4-DP....................................     120-36-5  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
    
    [[Page 52203]]
    
                                                                                                                                                            
      4-Nitrophenol (p-Nitrophenol).............     100-02-7           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Acephate..................................   30560-19-1  .........       .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Acifluofen................................   50594-66-6           .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Aldrin....................................     309-00-2  .........       .........  .........        ...........  .........             
      Ametryn...................................     834-12-8  .........       .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Amitraz...................................   33089-61-1  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Asulam....................................    3337-71-1      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Bensulfuron methyl........................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Bentazon..................................   25057-89-0           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Benzidine.................................      92-87-5  .........  ..........  .........  .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      Bromacil..................................     314-40-9           .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Bromoxynil................................    1689-84-5  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Cadre.....................................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Caprolactum...............................     105-60-2  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Captan....................................     133-06-2  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Carbaryl..................................      63-25-2  .........           .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Carboxin..................................    5234-68-4  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Chloramben................................     133-90-4  .........       .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Chlorimuron ethyl.........................   90982-32-4  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Chlorothalonil............................    1897-45-6  .........           .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Chlorsulfuron.............................   64902-72-3  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Clopyralid................................    1702-17-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Cyanazine.................................   21725-46-2               .........  ...........        .........      
      Cyromazine................................   66215-27-8      ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      DDD.......................................      72-54-8  .........  ..........  .........  .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      DDT.......................................      50-29-3  .........  ..........      .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      Diazinon--oxypyrimidine...................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Dicamba...................................    1918-00-9           .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Dichlobenil...............................    1194-65-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Dieldrin..................................      60-57-1  .........       .........  .........              .........  ...........
      Dimethoate................................      60-51-5  .........  ..........      .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Dimethrin.................................      70-38-2  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Diphenamid................................     957-51-7  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Disulfoton................................     298-04-4  .........       .........  .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      Endosulfan sulfate........................    1031-07-8  .........  ..........  .........  .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      Ethalfluralin.............................   55283-68-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Ethofumesate..............................   26225-79-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Ethoprop..................................   13194-48-4  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Ethylenethiourea (ETU)....................      96-45-7           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Fenamiphos................................   22224-92-6  .........       .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Fluazifop-p-butyl.........................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Fluometuron...............................    2164-17-2  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Fomesafen.................................   72178-02-0      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Fonofos...................................     944-22-9  .........           .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Halofenozide..............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Halosulfuron..............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Hexazinone................................   51235-04-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Imazamethabenz............................   81405-85-8  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Imazapyr..................................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Imazaquin.................................   81335-37-7  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Imazethapyr...............................   81335-77-5  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Imidacloprid..............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Lactofen..................................   77501-63-4      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Linuron...................................     330-55-2  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Maneb (ETU precursor).....................   12427-38-2  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      MCPA......................................      94-74-6  .........       .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      MCPP......................................      93-65-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Metalaxyl.................................   57837-19-1      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Methazole.................................   20354-26-1  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Methomyl..................................   16752-77-5      ..........      .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Metsulfuron methyl........................   74223-64-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Molinate..................................    2212-67-1  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      MSMA......................................    2163-80-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Napropamide...............................   15299-99-7  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Nicosulfuron..............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Norflurazon...............................   27314-13-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........      
    
    [[Page 52204]]
    
                                                                                                                                                            
      Paraquat..................................    4685-14-7  .........           .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Pendimethalin.............................   40487-42-1  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Primisulfuron methyl......................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Prometryn.................................    7287-19-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Pronamide.................................   23950-58-5  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Propachlor................................    1918-16-7  .........       .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Propargite................................    2312-35-8  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Propazine.................................     139-40-2  .........           .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Propham...................................     122-42-9  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Propiconazole.............................   60207-90-1  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Propoxur (Baygon).........................     114-26-1  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Prosulfuron...............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Pyrazon...................................    1698-60-8  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Pyrithiobac-Na............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Rimsulfuron...............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Sethoxydim................................   74051-80-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Sulfentrazone.............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Sulfometuron methyl.......................   74222-97-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Tebufenozide..............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Terbufos..................................   13071-79-9  .........           .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Terbufos sulfone..........................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Thiazopyr.................................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Thifensulfuron methyl.....................   79277-27-3  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Thiodicarb................................   59669-26-0      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Triallate.................................    2303-17-5  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Triasulfuron..............................   82097-50-5  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........      
      Triberuron methyl.........................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
      Vernolate.................................    1929-77-7  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........      
    Organics:                                                                                                                                               
      1,1,1,2-tetra-chloroethane................     630-20-6           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,1,1-trichloropropane....................  ...........  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,1,2,2-tetra-chloroethane................      79-34-5           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,1-dichloro-ethane.......................      75-34-3      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,1-dichloro-propene......................     563-58-6           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,2,3-trichloro-propane...................      96-18-4           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,2,4-trimethylbenzene....................      95-63-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      1,2-diphenyl-hydrazine....................     122-66-7      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,3,5-trichlorobenzene....................     108-70-3  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,3-butadiene.............................     106-99-0  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      1,3-dichloro-benzene......................     541-73-1      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,3-dichloropropane.......................     142-28-9           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,3-dichloropetan-3-OL,...................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,3-dinitrobenzene........................      99-65-0  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1,4-dioxane...............................     123-91-1  .........           .........  ...........            ...........
      1,4-dithiane..............................     505-29-3  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      1-methyl -2-Pyrrolidinone.................     872-50-4  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      2,2-dichloro-propane......................     594-20-7           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      2,4,6-trichlorophenol.....................      88-06-2  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      2,4-dichlorophenol........................     120-83-2  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      2,4-dinitrophenol.........................      51-28-5      ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      2,4-dinitrotoluene........................     121-14-2           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      2,6-dinitrotoluene........................     606-20-2           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-benzoquinone (DTBB),                                                                                                              
       (2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)2,5-                                                                                                                      
       cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione)................     719-22-2  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      2-methanoxy ethanol.......................     109-86-4  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      3-chloro-1-propene........................     107-05-1  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      4,4'-isopropylidenediphenol (bisphenol A).      80-05-7  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      4-methyl-Phenol (p-cresol)................     106-44-5  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Acetaldehyde..............................      75-07-0  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Acetamide.................................      60-35-5  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Acetonitrile..............................      75-05-8  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Acrylic acid..............................      79-10-7  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Acrylonitrile.............................     107-13-1           .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
    
    [[Page 52205]]
    
                                                                                                                                                            
      Aniline...................................      62-53-3  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Azulene...................................     275-51-4  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Benzaldehyde..............................     100-52-7  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Benzaldehyde, 3-hydroxy-..................     100-83-4  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Benzamide, N-acetyl-......................    1575-95-7  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Benzamide,N-ethyl-........................     614-17-5  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Benzeneacetamide, N,N-dimethyl-a-phenyl-..  ...........  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Benzeneacetonitrile.......................     140-29-4  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Benzofluoranthene.........................   56832-73-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      Bis-2-chloroisopropyl ether...............   39638-32-9  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Bornyl acetate............................      76-49-3  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Bromobenzene..............................     108-86-1           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Catechol..................................     120-80-9  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Chlorodifluoromethane HCFC-22.............      75-45-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Chlorophenol 2-...........................      95-57-8  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Creosote..................................    8001-58-9  .........  ..........  .........  .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      Cresol mixed isomers......................    1319-77-3  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Cymene p-(p-isopropyltolunene)............      99-87-6  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Decabromodiphenyl oxide...................    1163-19-5  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene....................      53-70-3  .........  ..........  .........  .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      Dichloro CFC-114..........................      76-14-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Dichloro-difluoromethane..................      75-71-8           .........  .........  ...........            ...........
      DichloroHCFC141-b.........................     171-00-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Diethanolamine............................     111-42-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Diisoamylene..............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Diisopropyl methylphosphonate.............    1445-75-6  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Dimethyl methylphosphonate................     756-79-6  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Diphenylamine.............................     122-39-4  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Ethanone, 1-[4-(hydroxy-1-methylethyl)                                                                                                                
       phenyl]-.................................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Ethyl ether...............................      60-29-7  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Ethylene..................................      74-85-1  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Fog oil...................................  ...........  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Formaldehyde..............................      50-00-0  .........           .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Formic acid...............................      64-18-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Freon 113.................................      76-13-1  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Glufosinate ammonium......................   77182-82-2  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Glycol ethers.............................     111-46-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      HCFC-11142-b..............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Hexachloro-butadiene......................      87-68-3           .........  .........        ...........  .........  ...........
      Hexachloroethane..........................      67-72-1           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Hexanoic acid.............................     142-62-1  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Hexazinone................................   51235-04-2  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      HMX (cyclotetramethylene tetranitramine)..    2691-41-0  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Hydroperoxide, 1,1-dimethylethy...........     l75-91-2  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Iron,tricarbonyl-[n-(phenyl-2-                                                                                                                        
       pyridinylmethylene)-benze namide-N,N.....  ...........  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Isophorone................................      78-59-1           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Isopropylbenzene (cumene).................      98-82-8  .........           .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Isopropyl methyl-phosphonic acid..........    1832-54-8  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Maleic hydrazide..........................     123-33-1  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Merphos oxide.............................      78-48-8  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Methane, tert-butoxyisopropoxy-...........  ...........  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Methanol..................................      67-56-1  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Methyl bromide............................      74-83-9  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK).............     108-10-1      ..........  .........  .........  ...........            ...........
      Methyl methacrylate.......................      80-62-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Methylene bis phenylisocyanate............     101-68-8  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
    
    [[Page 52206]]
    
                                                                                                                                                            
      Other fuel oxygenates (TAME, DIPE, ETBE)..           na  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      n-Butanol.................................      71-36-3  .........  ..........      .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      n-Hexane..................................     110-54-3  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Naphthalene...............................      91-20-3           .........  .........  ...........            ...........
      nitro-Cyclopentane........................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........             
      Nitrocellulose............................    9004-70-0  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Nitroglycerine............................      55-63-0  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Nitroquanidine............................  ...........  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      o-Chlorotoluene...........................      95-49-8           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Octatriene, 3,7-dimethyl-1,3,6-...........   13877-91-3  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Organotins (tributyl, methyl tin, etc.)...  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      P-Chlorotoluene...........................     106-43-4           .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Pentachloroethane.........................      76-01-7  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Propylbenzene n-..........................     103-65-1  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Propylene glycol..........................      57-55-6  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Propylene oxide...........................      75-56-9  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
      Rhodamine WT..............................  ...........  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      RDX (cyclo trimethylene trinitramine).....     121-82-4  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Terbuthylazine............................    5915-41-3  .........  ..........  .........      ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Tetrahydrofuran...........................     109-99-9      ..........  .........  .........  ...........        .........  ...........
      Tetranitromethane (TNM)...................     509-14-8  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Trichlorofluoromethane....................      75-69-4  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Triethylbenzene...........................   25340-18-5  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Trinitrotoluene (TNT).....................     118-96-7  .........       .........  .........  ...........  ...........  .........  ...........
      Vinyl acetate.............................     108-05-4  .........  ..........  .........  .........  ...........  ...........      ...........
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1. 1991 Drinking water Priority List, but does not include disinfection by-products or crytosporidium for which regulations are being under the M/DBP   
      rules.                                                                                                                                                
    2. Health Advisories developed under EPA's Health Advisory Program. Does not include contaminants regulated under the SDWA.                             
    3. Contaminants from IRIS based on a risked-based screen developed by EPA.                                                                              
    4. Contaminants identified in public water systems samples as non-targets.                                                                              
    5. First 50 contaminants of the 1995 ATSDR Ranked CERCLA priority chemicals list.                                                                       
    6. Stakeholder Summary List consists of specific contaminants proposed as candidates by participants of EPA's December 2-3, 1997 Stakeholder Meeting on 
      the Contaminant Identification Method.                                                                                                                
    7. The TRI List was derived from chemicals with significant health effects as found in IRIS.                                                            
    8. The OPP Ranking is a ranking of pesticides from highest to lowest potential to leach to ground water.                                                
    9. Stakeholders requested that the Agency address tirazines as a class of contaminants including their degradates, as opposed to addressing them as     
      individual contaminants.                                                                                                                              
    
        a. 1991 Drinking Water Priority List. The SDWA, as amended in 1986, 
    required EPA to publish a triennial list of priority contaminants, the 
    DWPL, which may require regulation. The first list containing 53 
    contaminants/contaminant group was published on January 2, 1988 (53 FR 
    1892). Since none of the contaminants had been selected for regulation, 
    EPA revised and updated the 1988 list three years later. The revised 
    and updated list, published on January 14, 1991 (56 FR 1470), contained 
    50 substances carried over from the 1988 list and 27 new substances, 
    bringing the total number of contaminants/contaminant groups to 77, 
    including one microorganism.
        In consideration of the statutory requirements and the time frame 
    for rulemaking in the SDWA at the time, EPA used the following criteria 
    to select contaminants for the DWPL: (1) occurrence or the potential 
    occurrence of the substance in public water systems; (2) documented or 
    suspected adverse health effects; and (3) the availability of 
    sufficient information on the substance so that a regulation could be 
    developed within the statutory time frame. The contaminants were 
    selected from the following groups: disinfectants and their byproducts, 
    the first group of 100 contaminants on the 1987 CERCLA priority list of 
    hazardous substances (52 FR 12866), design analytes of the EPA National 
    Pesticide Survey conducted between 1987-1990, pesticides with high 
    potential for leaching in groundwater, substances recommended by the 
    States and EPA regions, unregulated contaminants monitored under 
    Section 1445 of the SDWA, and certain substances reported frequently 
    and at high concentrations in drinking water. The selection of 
    contaminants was made with the assistance of the DWPL workgroup which 
    consisted of representatives from various programs within the Agency, 
    the National Toxicology Program, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the 
    Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
        For development of the draft CCL, the Agency selected contaminants 
    from the 1991 DWPL that were not specifically addressed by other 
    regulations under development. Thus, all contaminants specifically 
    addressed by the disinfectants and disinfection byproducts regulation 
    were eliminated from consideration.
        b. Health advisories. The Health Advisories (HAs) are prepared for 
    contaminants that have the potential to cause adverse human health 
    effects and
    
    [[Page 52207]]
    
    which are known or anticipated to occur in drinking water, but for 
    which no national regulations currently exist. Each HA contains 
    information on the nature of the adverse health effects of the 
    contaminant and the concentrations that would not be anticipated to 
    cause an adverse effect following various periods of exposure. HAs also 
    summarize available data on occurrence, pharmacokinetics, environmental 
    fate, health effects, available analytical methods, and treatment 
    techniques for the contaminant. HA concentration levels include a 
    margin of safety to protect sensitive members of the population (e.g., 
    children, the elderly, pregnant women).
        The Office of Water Health Advisory Program was initiated to 
    provide information and guidance to individuals and agencies concerned 
    with potential risk from drinking water contaminants. HAs are used only 
    for guidance and are not legally enforceable, and are subject to change 
    as new information becomes available. For purposes of developing the 
    draft CCL, all contaminants with HAs, or HAs under development, were 
    considered.
        c. Integrated Risk Information System. The Integrated Risk 
    Information System (IRIS) is an EPA on-line database containing health 
    risk and EPA regulatory information. IRIS lists chemicals of interest 
    or concern for which the Agency has reached consensus regarding adverse 
    health effects. When available, a reference dose (RfD) for non-cancer 
    health effect resulting from oral exposure is reported with information 
    about how the RfD was derived and any uncertainty regarding the source 
    studies. An RfD is an estimate of a daily exposure to the human 
    population that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse 
    effect over a lifetime of exposure. For carcinogens, a carcinogenic 
    assessment, or cancer potency factor, is reported for both oral and 
    inhalation exposure. The cancer potency factor is the estimated risk to 
    the human population of cancer effects over a lifetime of exposure.
        In 1992, in anticipation of the next DWPL, the Agency developed a 
    list of chemicals based on a risk-based screen of chemicals in IRIS. 
    There were approximately 600 chemicals in the IRIS database in 1992, 
    and 312 were selected for further screening. The 312 were chosen 
    because they had defined toxicity via the oral route of exposure and 
    did not have NPDWRs. The 312 chemicals were screened using the 
    following categories: (1) using Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data, 
    chemicals were identified with concentration in water that exceeded the 
    drinking water equivalent level (DWEL) which was derived from the 
    reference dose or cancer potency; (2) chemicals were identified that 
    were produced in quantities exceeding one billion pounds per year; (3) 
    pesticides were identified with use exceeding 1000 tons per year; and 
    (4) chemicals were identified that were reported in the Toxic Release 
    Inventory (TRI) database as discharged to surface water in excess of 
    100 tons per year. Sixteen chemicals met the STORET criteria; nine, the 
    production criteria; 31, the pesticides criteria; and 6, the TRI 
    criteria. A total of 48 individual chemicals were identified, and some 
    were identified by more than one screen. All 48 contaminants were 
    included on the initial list for consideration.
        d. Non-Target Analytes in Public Water Supply Samples. In 
    anticipation of the 1994 DWPL, the Agency consulted with analytical 
    laboratories that routinely analyze samples for public water systems to 
    determine what contaminants were occurring that were not currently 
    regulated. A list of contaminants tentatively identified in 1991 from 
    drinking water samples collected for compliance monitoring was 
    developed. These contaminants, also referred to as non-targets 
    analytes, are compounds identified by the spikes found on the 
    chromatograph. The concentrations for these compounds were not 
    measured. These non-target analytes represent the monitoring experience 
    of several water systems with operations in various states. The 
    contaminants included on the initial list for consideration are a 
    subset of 23 contaminants chosen from the larger list of non-targets 
    analytes. The 23 contaminants were chosen because they were considered 
    to be related to possible anthropogenic sources.
        e. CERCLA Priority List. In developing the CCL, the SDWA requires 
    EPA to consider substances referred to in section 101(14) of the 
    CERCLA. CERCLA requires the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease 
    Registry (ATSDR) to prepare a list in the order of priority of 
    hazardous substances which are most commonly found at facilities on the 
    CERCLA National Priority List (NPL).
        In 1995, ATSDR developed a list of 275 hazardous substances ranked 
    by the order of priority. (ATSDR, 1996) To develop this list, ATSDR 
    considered 750 of 2800 substances present at NPL sites and ranked them 
    based on the following three criteria, which were combined to result in 
    a total score. These criteria were: (1) Frequency of occurrence at NPL 
    sites, (2) toxicity, and (3) potential for human exposure. The number 
    of NPL sites at which a substance was identified in any medium was used 
    to indicate the frequency of occurrence. EPA's Reportable Quantity (RQ) 
    was used to assess the toxicity of candidate substance. If a RQ was not 
    available, the RQ methodology was applied to candidate substances to 
    establish a Toxicity/Environmental Score. The human exposure component 
    was based on two parts: the concentration of the substance in the 
    environmental media and the exposure status of population. EPA included 
    the top 50 substances from the 1995 CERCLA prioritized list of 275 
    substances for consideration for the draft CCL.
        f. Stakeholder responses. In December 1996, the EPA convened its 
    first stakeholder meeting on the contaminant identification process. At 
    that meeting, EPA requested input on what contaminants to include on 
    its first CCL. At the December meeting, and following, participants 
    have provided input to the Agency on contaminants for inclusion on, or 
    exclusion from, the CCL. Some stakeholders provided information on 
    health effects or occurrence, or both, while others listed 
    contaminants. All contaminants suggested by stakeholders were included 
    for initial consideration except those which already had NPDWRs, or 
    which were included under other regulatory activity mentioned in 
    section VIII of this notice.
        g. Toxic Release Inventory. Another source of available information 
    which could serve as a predictor of anticipated occurrence in drinking 
    water, is the TRI. This data base, established under the Emergency 
    Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, contains information 
    from manufacturing facilities in the United States regarding transfers 
    and releases of toxic and hazardous materials to air, ground and water. 
    The most recent report analyzed data gathered for calendar year 1994 
    from 22 chemical categories and included 343 separate chemicals from 
    23,000 facilities which met certain thresholds requiring submission of 
    data. (U.S. EPA, 1997c).
        In order to assess the potential for a chemical to be a contaminant 
    in public water systems, EPA conducted an analysis of the release and 
    emissions data. Each of the four categories of emissions or discharges 
    were assigned a threshold value above which the contaminant was deemed 
    to fit within the criteria of the SDWA, as a contaminant anticipated to 
    occur in public water systems. The threshold did not attempt to 
    attribute differences in reactivity, solubility, mobility or
    
    [[Page 52208]]
    
    toxicity of the pollutants at this stage of the contaminant evaluation 
    process, but involved simply determining a gross anticipation factor. 
    If a contaminant was released via an on-site discharge to the 
    environment, EPA judged that it was reasonable to anticipate it as a 
    contaminant in public water systems to varying degrees, depending upon 
    the media receiving the discharge.
        The overall analysis of the above TRI criteria resulted in 58 
    chemicals from the various discharges meeting the criteria. Where a 
    release was close to the threshold, it was included in the tally. 
    Several chemicals met the criteria but were excluded because there is 
    an existing standard (e.g., hydrofluoric acid--fluoride is regulated) 
    or a standard under consideration (sulfuric acid--there is regulatory 
    activity currently underway regarding sulfate). Other contaminants such 
    as ammonia, hydrochloric acid, or methanol were not believed to 
    represent a significant threat to drinking water due to limited 
    persistence, leaving 51 contaminants. Of the 51 contaminants, 49 met 
    the criteria for air release, 21 from stack emissions, 38 for fugitive 
    emissions, 11 via underground injection, 13 from land release, and 30 
    for surface water releases. All 51 were included for initial 
    consideration in Table 3.
        h. Pesticides identified by Office of Pesticide Programs. In 
    developing the CCL, the SDWA requires EPA the consider substances 
    referred to in the FIFRA. During the development of the draft CCL, the 
    Agency's Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water sought assistance 
    from the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) in determining what 
    pesticides should be priorities for the drinking water program. In 
    response to the request, OPP provided recommendations for a number of 
    pesticides. (U.S. EPA, 1997b) The list of pesticides, based on 
    physical-chemical properties, occurrence and extent of use, was ranked 
    using the Ground Water (GW) Risk score, a calculated potential to leach 
    to ground water. Pesticides with a GW Risk of 2.0 or greater were 
    included for initial consideration in developing the CCL (see Table 3).
        However, later during the data evaluation and screening phase of 
    the draft CCL development, the decision was made to defer some of the 
    pesticides identified by the OPP GW Risk of 2.0 or greater. The 
    pesticides in Table 4 include those where the GW Risk value of 2.0 or 
    greater was the only factor for inclusion on the CCL. The decision was 
    made, that for these cases, inclusion on the CCL would be deferred 
    pending further evaluation of the potential of these pesticides to 
    occur at levels of health concern. Many new pesticides for which no 
    other data exists are included in Table 4.
    Table 4. Pesticides Deferred
    Asulam
    bensulfuron methyl
    bentazon
    bromacil
    Cadre
    chlorimuron ethyl
    chlorsulfuron
    Diazinon--oxypyrimidine
    Dicamba
    Ethylenethiourea (ETU)
    Fenamiphos
    Fluometuron
    Halofenozide
    Halosulfuron
    Hexazinone
    Imazamethabenz
    Imazapyr
    Imazaquin
    Imazethapyr
    MCPA (Methoxone)
    Methsulfuron methyl
    Nicosulfuron
    Norflurazon
    Primisulfuron methyl
    Prometryn
    Propazine
    Prosulfuron
    Pyrithiobac-Na
    Rimsulfuron
    Sulfentrazone
    Sulfometuron methyl
    Tebufenozide
    Terbufos sulfone
    Thiazopyr
    Triasulfuron
    
        The Agency is working to develop a tool to estimate concentrations 
    in ground and surface waters based on physical-chemical properties and 
    pesticide use volumes, and then compare the estimated concentrations 
    with health advisory levels or calculated health levels based on 
    reference doses or cancer potency. The model is expected to be 
    completed and available for use at the end of 1997, and at that time 
    the Agency will reevaluate the inclusion for the additional pesticides 
    on Table 4 on the CCL.
        On August 4, 1997, EPA announced its schedule for reassessing 
    tolerances for pesticide residues on raw and processed foods (62 FR 
    42020). Publication of this schedule was pursuant to the requirements, 
    as established by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA). Under 
    this new law, EPA is required to reassess all existing tolerances and 
    exemptions from tolerances for both active and inert ingredients. EPA 
    is directed to give priority review to pesticides that appear to 
    present risk concerns based on current data. Many of the pesticides 
    included in today's notice are included among the first group of 
    reassessments.
        In reassessing tolerances, EPA must consider the aggregate exposure 
    to the pesticide, including drinking water; cumulative effects from 
    other pesticides with a common mode of toxicity; whether there is an 
    increased susceptibility from exposure to the pesticide to infants and 
    children; and whether the pesticide produces an effect in humans 
    similar to an effect produced by a naturally occurring estrogen or 
    other endocrine effects.
        i. Safe Drinking Water Hotline. The Hotline provides information 
    about EPA's drinking water regulations and other related drinking water 
    and ground water topics to the public, the regulated community, and 
    State and local officials. The Hotline assists callers with questions 
    on the regulations and programs developed in response to the Safe 
    Drinking Water Act, and inquiries about the levels and health effects 
    of specific contaminants found in or suspected to be in drinking water 
    from public water systems and private wells, and handles requests for 
    drinking water publications (fact sheets, pamphlets, health advisories, 
    etc.). The Safe Drinking Water Hotline receives hundreds of calls each 
    week, and a large percentage of the calls come from private citizens, 
    consultants, educators, researchers, and health care professionals from 
    across the country. The Hotline provided a list of contaminants that 
    were not currently regulated or proposed for regulation for which 
    callers had expressed concern or interest (see Table 5).
    Table 5. Contaminants Identified by the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
    Calcium
    Phosphates
    1,1,1-dichloroethane
    Gasoline
    Perchlorate
    Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
        The Hotline did not ascertain if the calls were due to a general 
    question or inquiry, or if they were related to a contamination 
    incident. At the April 3-4, 1997 Working Group meeting, the decision 
    was made not to include the Hotline list for initial consideration, and 
    that a list from the Hotline would only be useful if it captured 
    concerns or reports of contamination.
        The Agency will attempt to capture Hotline inquiries concerning 
    contamination incidents for future CCL development. Perchlorate, a 
    contaminant discussed later in this notice, probably should have been
    
    [[Page 52209]]
    
    included for initial consideration. The fact that perchlorate was on 
    the Hotline list, and no other, may indicate that such a list from the 
    Hotline could be useful if the nature of the inquiry can be recorded.
        j. Endocrine disruptors. A list of contaminants was developed which 
    included those suspected of having adverse effects on endocrine 
    function (see Table 6). For several years, the Agency has been 
    concerned that chemicals may be disrupting the endocrine (i.e., 
    hormonal) systems of humans and wildlife. It has also been hypothesized 
    that endocrine disruption might result in cancer, harm to male and 
    female reproductive systems, thyroid damage, or other adverse 
    consequences. In February 1997, EPA issued an assessment and analysis 
    of this concern (U.S. EPA, 1997a). The report represents an interim 
    assessment pending a more extensive review expected to be issued by the 
    National Academy of Sciences (NAS) later this year.
    Table 6. Contaminants Identified as Suspected of Endocrine Disruption
    Amitrole
    Benomyl
    Dicofol (Kelthane)
    Esfenvalerate
    Ethylparathion
    Fenvalerate
    Kepone
    Mancozeb
    Metiram
    Mirex
    Nitrofen
    Oxychlordane
    Parathion
    Permethrin
    Synthetic pyrethroids
    Transnonachlor
    Tributyltin oxide
    Vinclozolin
    Zineb
    Ziram
    Octachlorostyrene
    PBBs
    Penta- to nonyl-phenols
    
        In brief, the report found that while effects have been found in 
    laboratory animal studies, a causal relationship between exposure to a 
    specific environmental agent and an adverse health effect in humans 
    operating via endocrine disruption has not been established, with a few 
    exceptions. The exceptions include incidents of chemical exposure in 
    the workplace and exposure to the drug DES. Further research is needed 
    before such effects can be demonstrated.
        Under the SDWA, as amended, the Agency is also required to 
    establish a program to screen endocrine disrupting contaminants. 
    Additional authority to assess endocrine disruptors is also provided 
    through the recently enacted FQPA. EPA's Office of Prevention, 
    Pesticides, and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) has the Agency lead on 
    endocrine disruptor screening and testing issues. OPPTS is actively 
    engaged in research and regulatory initiatives to respond to the 
    growing scientific and public concern over endocrine disruptors.
        The Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee 
    (EDSTAC) has been established to provide advice and counsel to the 
    agency in implementing a screening and testing strategy required under 
    the FQPA and SDWA. EDSTAC is composed of a balanced representation from 
    industry, government, environmental and public health groups, labor, 
    academia, and other interested stakeholders. During its deliberations, 
    the Committee will consider human health, ecological, estrogenic, 
    androgenic, anti-estrogenic, anti-androgenic, and thyroid effects of 
    pesticides, industrial chemicals, and important mixtures. EDSTAC will 
    complete its recommendations for a screening and testing strategy by 
    March, 1998. The recommendations will be peer reviewed jointly by the 
    SAB and the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel.
        EPA is also involved in concurrent effort to coordinate activities 
    with the European Union, the Organization of Economic and Community 
    Development, and the United Nations Environmental Program concerning 
    global research programs, and international harmonization of endocrine 
    disruptor screening and testing methods for chemicals and pesticides.
        As a result, pending completion of the EDSTAC's recommendations and 
    the additional review of endocrine disruptors by the NAS, EPA has not 
    included contaminants for initial consideration for the draft CCL based 
    solely on the possibility of endocrine disruption (although several 
    contaminants implicated as endocrine disruptors were considered for 
    other reasons). The Agency will continue to follow this issue closely 
    and reconsider this category of potential contaminants in the 
    development of future CCLs.
    2. Development and Application of the Criteria
        Criteria were developed by the NDWAC Working Group for use in 
    screening and evaluating chemical contaminants for the draft CCL, with 
    the exception of aldicarbs, nickel, and sulfate which are discussed in 
    section III.C.3. The general premises of the criteria were: (1) The 
    contaminants included for initial consideration be those on EPA's 
    initial list, without NPDWRs, and (2) that occurrence, or anticipated 
    occurrence, of the contaminant be evaluated first, before evaluating 
    its health effects information. The criteria, presented below, were 
    used to screen and evaluate chemical contaminants for the purpose of 
    developing today's draft CCL. Data used to evaluate and screen 
    contaminants were obtained from STORET, the Hazardous Substances 
    Database (HSDB), IRIS, published literature, and various EPA reports 
    and documents. The data used in the evaluation and screening are 
    included in the docket for today's notice.
        These criteria, as well as the conceptual approach to the 
    Contaminant Identification Method (CIM) presented in the December 2-3, 
    1996 Stakeholders meeting, will serve as the basis for developing a 
    more robust contaminant identification method for future CCL 
    development. The search results on each element of the criteria for 
    contaminants considered during the development of the CCL can be found 
    by using the Occurrence Table, the Health Table, and the Comments Table 
    included in the docket for today's notice.
        a. Criteria for occurrence. For the occurrence portion of the 
    criteria, an affirmative response to any of the following elements 
    would result in moving to the health portion of the criteria for 
    further consideration. If all of the occurrence elements had a negative 
    response, the contaminant was eliminated from further consideration. 
    The two main elements to the occurrence portion of the criteria were as 
    follows: (1) Was the contaminant looked for and found in drinking 
    water, or in a major drinking water source, or in ambient water at 
    levels that would trigger concern about human health? (2) if the 
    contaminant was not looked for, is it likely to be found in water based 
    on surrogates for occurrence?
        To judge whether a contaminant was looked for and found in drinking 
    water, according to the criteria, it would need to be included in a 
    major survey which was defined as one which included a population of 
    100,000 or more, 2 or more states, or 10 or more small public water 
    systems, or a data set such as EPA's Unregulated Contaminants Database. 
    To judge whether a contaminant was looked for and found in a major 
    drinking water source, or in ambient water, any source of occurrence 
    data could be used. A source of drinking water was considered to be 
    major if it supplied a population of 100,000 or
    
    [[Page 52210]]
    
    more, or 2 or more states. Levels that would trigger concern about 
    human health were defined as concentrations in samples within an order 
    of magnitude of the level that is likely to cause health effects, or at 
    least \1/2\ of samples at 50% of level that is likely to cause health 
    effects. Contaminants were considered to have met the criteria if the 
    data available indicated occurrence at a population of 100,000 or more; 
    or in 2 or more states; or in 10 or more small public water systems at 
    levels that would trigger concern about human health.
        If the contaminant was not looked for using the data available, it 
    was evaluated to determine if it was likely to be found in water based 
    on surrogates for occurrence. The elements considered as surrogates for 
    occurrence included: TRI releases, or production volumes, coupled with 
    physical-chemical properties, or the OPP GW Risk value. In order for a 
    contaminant to meet this criterion as likely to be found in water using 
    TRI, the release to surface water was in excess of 400,000 pounds per 
    year, and the physical-chemical properties indicated persistence & 
    mobility of the contaminant. The quantity of 400,000 pound per year was 
    based on the top 15 TRI chemicals with the largest discharges to 
    surface water as reported in 1995. In order for a contaminant to meet 
    this criterion as likely to be found in water using production, the 
    volume was in excess of 10 billion pounds per year, and physical-
    chemical properties indicated persistence and mobility.
        For a contaminant to meet this criteria as likely to be found in 
    water using OPP GW Risk, the value was 2.0 or greater. However, late 
    during the data evaluation and screening phase of the CCL development, 
    the decision was made to defer contaminants identified under this 
    element until a more in-depth analysis could be performed that would 
    include risk to both surface and ground water, and a component to 
    address health.
        b. Criteria for health. For the health portion of the criteria, an 
    affirmative response to any of the following elements resulted in 
    including the contaminant on the first CCL, if it also met the 
    occurrence criteria. A negative response to every question resulted in 
    the contaminant being eliminated from consideration for the CCL. The 
    health portion of the criteria had one major component; was there 
    evidence, or suspicion, that the contaminant causes adverse human 
    health effects? This portion of the criteria was met if a contaminant 
    had one or more of the following elements: (1) Listed by California 
    Proposition 65, (2) an EPA Health Advisory, (3) a likely (based on 
    animal data) or known (based on human data) carcinogen by EPA or 
    International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), (4) more than one 
    human epidemiological study (indicating adverse effects), (5) an oral 
    value in IRIS, (6) regulated in drinking water by another industrial 
    country, (7) a member of a chemical family of known toxicity, or (8) 
    structural activity relationship indicating toxicity.
        As the contaminants were being screened and evaluated, the factors 
    for health which proved to be the most useful were those that provided 
    a health level of concern as a concentration that could be compared to 
    the levels of occurrence found in water, such as an EPA Health 
    Advisory, an oral value in IRIS, or a regulatory level from another 
    industrial country. Being listed by California Proposition 65, or a 
    member of a chemical family of known toxicity had limited utility in 
    determining which contaminants to include on the CCL.
    3. Additional Specific Contaminants Included
        Aldicarbs, nickel, and sulfate are also on the draft CCL. The SDWA, 
    as amended, did not specifically mention aldicarbs and nickel, but 
    since the Agency has existing obligations for completing regulatory 
    action on these contaminants pursuant to the SDWA, as amended 1986, it 
    was thought to be prudent to include them on the CCL to make clear the 
    intention to address these responsibilities. Sulfate is included on the 
    CCL, since the Agency must make a determination to regulate or not by 
    August 2001, along with at least four more contaminants. The following 
    sections provide the rationale for the inclusion of aldicarbs, nickel, 
    and sulfate on the draft CCL.
        a. Aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide, and aldicarb sulfone. EPA 
    promulgated a final NPDWR for aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb 
    sulfone on July 1, 1991 (56 FR 30266). EPA set the maximum contaminant 
    level goal (MCLG) at 0.001 mg/l and maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) 
    of 0.003 mg/l for aldicarb, 0.004 mg/l for aldicarb sulfoxide, and 
    0.002 mg/l for aldicarb sulfone. In response to an administrative 
    petition from the manufacturer Rhone-Poulenc, the Agency issued an 
    administrative stay of the effective date of the MCLs, i.e., the MCLs 
    never became effective, but monitoring is required. Rhone-Poulenc also 
    filed a petition for judicial review, and the court stayed its 
    proceedings while EPA proceeded administratively, but required 
    quarterly reports. On agreement of the parties, the judicial 
    proceedings have been dismissed. An updated health advisory was issued 
    in 1995 incorporating data from a human study conducted in 1992 by 
    Rhone Poulenc. The aldicarbs were not subject to the criteria used to 
    identify other chemical contaminants and are being included on the CCL 
    to signify the Agency's intention to complete the regulatory activity 
    for these contaminants. At this point, however, the time frame of 
    completing action relative to aldicarbs has not been determined.
        b. Nickel. NPDWRs for nickel including an MCLG and an MCL of 0.1 
    mg/l were proposed on July 25, 1990 (55 FR 30370) and finalized on July 
    17, 1992 (57 FR 31776). In September, 1992, the Nickel Development 
    Institute and other industry parties filed a petition for review in the 
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit challenging the MCLG and MCL 
    for nickel. The petitioners raised objections over EPA's methodology 
    for determining the MCLG for nickel. Specifically, they raised 
    questions concerning the derivation of the relative source contribution 
    factor and the need for a 3-fold uncertainty factor that EPA applied 
    due to the lack of adequate data on the effects of nickel ingestion on 
    reproductive systems. Because the MCL for nickel was based directly on 
    the MCLG, the petitioners also challenged the nickel MCL.
        EPA and the petitioners entered into discussions in an attempt to 
    settle this litigation but could not agree on the merits of the 
    petitioners' challenges. Nevertheless, EPA agreed that it did not fully 
    address in the public record the petitioner's comments on the proposed 
    methodology for deriving the MCLG for nickel, and agreed to take a 
    remand of the MCLG and MCL for nickel. Accordingly, on February 9, 
    1995, EPA and the nickel industry petitioners filed a joint motion for 
    a voluntary remand of the nickel MCL and MCLG. By orders of February 
    23, 1995 and March 6, 1995, the court granted this motion and vacated 
    and remanded the nickel MCLG and MCL (and dismissed the lawsuit). No 
    other aspects of the NPDWRs for nickel were vacated, including 
    monitoring requirements and identification of best available 
    technologies for nickel. A notice of this action was published in June 
    1995 (60 FR 33929).
        To provide guidance for the period prior to new regulations for 
    nickel, the EPA updated and issued a health advisory for nickel. Nickel 
    was not subject to the criteria used to identify other chemical 
    contaminants and is
    
    [[Page 52211]]
    
    being included on the CCL to signify the Agency's intention to complete 
    regulatory action for this contaminant. The time frame of completing 
    action on nickel has not yet been determined.
        c. Sulfate. As noted above, by August, 2001 the Agency must decide 
    whether or not to regulate sulfate. The date for making a determination 
    about sulfate coincides with the date by when determinations must be 
    made for 5 or more contaminants from the first CCL. Sulfate was not 
    subject to the criteria used to identify other contaminants; however, 
    it has been included, given these special circumstances.
    
    IV. Contaminants on the CCL Which Are of Specific Interest
    
        A number of contaminants included on the draft CCL may be of 
    particular interest. The following sections attempt to provide 
    additional information for a few of the contaminants that seem to be of 
    most interest. Data obtained and evaluated for developing the draft CCL 
    and referred to in the following discussion can be found in the docket 
    for this notice.
    
    A. Aluminum
    
        There is intense interest from some for development of drinking 
    water regulations for aluminum. Aluminum currently has a secondary MCL 
    of 50 to 200 ``g/l based on organoleptic properties. There 
    have been a few epidemiological studies in Canada that emphasize the 
    need to determine if regulations for this contaminant should be 
    developed based on health effects. At present, based on the work in 
    Canada, it appears that the most sensitive population is the elderly. 
    To determine if aluminum is of health concern to the elderly and to 
    other possible sensitive groups like children, the EPA collaborated 
    with Health Canada on a workshop on aluminum held September 3 and 4, 
    1997. This workshop was planned to help define the need for chronic 
    animal studies and the use of appropriate animal models to better 
    characterize the risk of this contaminant in drinking water. The Agency 
    will continue to work to determine if aluminum is of health concern, 
    and the appropriate action to address this concern.
    
    B. MTBE
    
        MTBE (methyl-t-butyl ether) is a fuel additive used in many 
    locations throughout the United States to reduce carbon monoxide and 
    ozone forming precursors associated with the combustion of fossil 
    fuels. There is evidence of contamination of drinking water; however 
    the extent of contamination of drinking water supplies on a national 
    scale is unclear at this time (IAOF, 1997). The Agency is in the 
    process of revising the HA for MTBE that will incorporate updated 
    health effects information, and has completed a research strategy to 
    guide efforts at improving the understanding of the occurrence and 
    health effects of MTBE (U.S. EPA, 1997e). As more PWSs across the 
    country voluntarily monitor for MTBE, and if it is found at levels of 
    concern nationally, the Agency does have the capacity to make a 
    determination to develop regulations to monitor and/or control MTBE 
    prior to the 2001, SDWA deadline for selecting at least 5 contaminants 
    for determination.
    
    C. Organotins
    
        Organotins represent a class of contaminants which include, methyl 
    tin, tributyltin, and others. The organotins of concern are those that 
    result from use in heat stabilizing PVC piping for the in-home 
    distribution of water. There are a few cases of tributyltin 
    contamination of drinking water in the U.S. (Sadiki, 1996). It has been 
    reported that the Canadian government is concerned about organotin 
    contamination and has planned a national survey of drinking water in 
    Canada to assess the danger to human health.
        The concentrations of concern for human health are not known at 
    this time, however tributly tin and other organotins are known to be 
    toxic to aquatic life. On August 7, 1997, the Agency published a notice 
    of ambient water quality criteria document for tributyltin (TBT) and a 
    request for comments (62 FR 42554). Ambient water quality criteria are 
    for the protection of aquatic organisms and guidance to States and 
    others, and may form the basis for enforceable State water quality 
    standards developed pursuant to Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean Water 
    Act.
    
    D. Rhodamine WT
    
        Rhodamine WT is a fluorescent dye widely used as a tracer to 
    measure ground water flow. Rhodamine WT has been certified by the 
    National Sanitation Foundation for use in tracing water under the 
    conditions that it not exceed concentrations in drinking water of 0.1 
    g/l and that exposure be infrequent. Rhodamine WT was detected 
    in ground water above the 0.1 g/l value; however the 
    conditions under which the detections occurred are unclear. Rhodamine 
    WT appears to be a contaminant that the Agency may need to observe more 
    closely in terms of its health effects, and possible occurrence in 
    drinking water.
    
    E. Sodium
    
        At present, the Agency has no NPDWR or HA value for sodium. All 
    that is currently available is a guidance DWEL of 20 mg/l. DWELs are 
    unenforceable guidance levels describing a lifetime exposure 
    concentration of a contaminant that is considered protective of adverse 
    non-cancer health effects, and it also assumes that all of the exposure 
    to a contaminant is from a drinking water source. In addition, EPA has 
    a non-enforceable criterion for dissolved solids and salinity for 
    ambient waters of 250 mg/l.
        The DWEL is based on a 1965 American Heart Association 
    recommendation of a 20 mg/l sodium level to protect genetically 
    susceptible people on low sodium diets, assuming a total dietary intake 
    of 500 mg/day. Naturally occurring sodium in food with no salt added 
    averages about 440 mg/day. The additional 60 mg that would increase the 
    intake to the typical level for a restricted diet of 500 mg/day must 
    take into account all other non-food sources, such as drugs, water, 
    etc. A concentration in drinking water of up to 20 mg/l of sodium is 
    compatible with this diet.
        Since a significant percentage of the U.S. population is attempting 
    to reduce their sodium intake, the Agency believes that sodium levels 
    in drinking water could be an important issue. This is particularly 
    true for locations where many of the residents using the water may be 
    susceptible to adverse health effects from exposure to this 
    contaminant. The Agency believes that all consumers are able to use 
    water for drinking if the sodium concentration is maintained at or 
    below 20 mg/l, but nearly half of the nation's water supplies have 
    natural or added sodium above these levels.
        The inclusion of sodium on the CCL is controversial, but it is 
    expected that guidance will be developed for those who need it, and 
    that including it on the CCL will be a mechanism to develop an Agency 
    position on the issue of sodium in drinking water.
    
    F. Zinc
    
        Zinc is used as a dietary supplement, main ingredient in lozenges, 
    and corrosion inhibitor. There is intense interest over including zinc 
    on the CCL, but there are also indications of health effects associated 
    with increased levels of zinc consumption.
        The Agency is aware that zinc is an essential element for which the 
    Food
    
    [[Page 52212]]
    
    and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council has established a 
    Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA). Zinc can also cause adverse health 
    effects at high doses and the zinc RfD (0.3 mg/kg/day) is higher than 
    the RDA for adult men and women. While deriving RfDs, EPA must also 
    keep in mind the fact that excess exposure to an essential trace 
    element, such as zinc, can also cause adverse health effects. The 
    present RfD for zinc represents a balance between the essential 
    requirement for zinc and the toxic effects of too much zinc; however, 
    the Agency is currently working on revising the risk assessment 
    procedures for essential elements. The World Health Organization (WHO) 
    is also in the process of developing a document on the risk assessment 
    of essential trace elements, and EPA will consider the WHO document 
    when it is available.
    
    G. 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-benzoquinone (DTBB)
    
        DTBB is a contaminant that appears to be associated with sewage 
    contamination of ground water. A ground water study concluded that DTBB 
    was a good indicator of such contamination because, among other 
    reasons, it does not biodegrade readily (Barber, 1988). DTBB was 
    determined not to meet the criteria for the draft CCL per se, but was 
    included nevertheless, because of the recalcitrant nature of the 
    contaminant, its association with sewage contamination, its potential 
    health impacts, and its potential to serve as an indicator of other 
    contamination.
    
    H. Contaminants to be Considered as Groups
    
        Stakeholders, through the regulatory reassessment process and the 
    development of this draft CCL, have requested that the Agency, address 
    triazine pesticides as a group which includes all parent and degradates 
    compounds as opposed to each triazine as an individual contaminant. The 
    triazine pesticides include; cyanazine, propazine, etc., and atrazine 
    and simazine (which are both currently regulated), and are often 
    substituted for one another for similar agricultural use.
        The USEPA regulated atrazine in 1991 and simazine in 1992. 
    Cyanazine and atrazine-desethyl, a degradation product of triazines, 
    were identified for the draft CCL using the criteria discussed earlier, 
    and because of the common effect of triazine pesticides and degradates, 
    Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water (OGWDW) and OPP are 
    coordinating to have atrazine and simazine, and possibly other 
    triazines, if warranted, addressed as a group. A triazine special 
    review was initiated by OPP which will culminate in a proposed decision 
    on the labeling and agricultural use triazine. The proposal is expected 
    during the summer of 1998. The triazines are also included in the 
    Priority Group 1 of pesticide tolerances that will be examined first 
    under the FQPA tolerance reassessment (62 FR 42020).
        The Agency is concerned about triazines in water and the exposure 
    of sensitive populations, including children, and OGWDW will work 
    closely with OPP to characterize the risk of triazines in food and 
    water. EPA has been studying the mechanism of carcinogenicity of this 
    group of analogues along with their degradation products, and will 
    continue to study these chemicals as a group to characterize their risk 
    in drinking water. The Agency may ultimately develop regulations for 
    the mixtures of triazines either through the revision of existing 
    regulations or the development of new ones. The same may occur for 
    other families of pesticides, such as the acetanilide pesticides, which 
    include acetochlor, metolachor, alachlor (which is currently 
    regulated), given their common effects and agricultural uses.
    
    I. Contaminants for Which Unregulated Contaminant Data Are or Will Be 
    Available
    
        Unregulated contaminant monitoring data which have been collected a 
    number of contaminants during 1988-1991, and additional monitoring data 
    collected during 1993-1995 (see Table 7). These monitoring data can 
    serve in evaluating whether these contaminants should be included on 
    the CCL. The data collected during 1988-1991 have been preliminarily 
    evaluated by the Agency; however, further analysis is necessary to 
    determine if a contaminant in fact meets the criteria used to develop 
    the draft CCL. The data collected during 1993-1995, are not yet 
    available; however, during the comment period, and prior to publishing 
    the CCL by February 1998, the Agency will attempt to obtain and 
    evaluate this data to determine if the contaminant should remain on the 
    CCL. Contaminants that do not meet the criteria as presented in today's 
    notice, or as modified subsequent to the comment period of the notice, 
    will not be included on the final CCL to be published by February 1998.
    Table 7. Contaminants with Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Data
    1,3-dichloro-benzene
    1,2,4-trimethyl-benzene
    1,3-dichloropropene
    1,3-dichloro-propane
    1,1,2,2-tetrachloro-ethane
    1,1-di-chloro-ethane
    1,1-dichloro-propene
    1,2,3-trichloro-propane
    2,2-dichloro-propane
    bromobenzene
    bromomethane
    carbaryl
    o-chorotoluene
    p-chlorotoluene
    cumene
    cymene
    dichloro-difluoromethane
    hexachlorobutadiene
    metolachlor
    metribuzan
    naphthalene
    n-propylbenzene
    trichlorofluoro-methane
    
    V. Request for Comment
    
        The purpose of today's notice is to present the draft CCL and seek 
    comment on various aspects of its development. The Agency requests 
    comment on the approach used to develop the CCL, and on the 
    contaminants included. The Agency also requests comment on the data and 
    research needs categories the contaminants have been divided into, in 
    Table 8. Any data supporting comments or that can be used by the Agency 
    in developing the final CCL are also requested. In addition to comments 
    on contaminants considered for the draft CCL, the Agency seeks comment 
    on the inclusion of perchlorate on the final CCL. The following 
    sections provide more detail on the data and research needs and the 
    issue of perchlorate.
    
    A. Data and Research Needs
    
        The microbiological contaminants included on the CCL all have 
    research needs of one sort or another in the area of analytical 
    methods. The meeting summary of the Workshop on Microbiology and Public 
    Health, held May 20-21, 1997, provided more detail of the research 
    needed for microorganisms.
        For the chemical contaminants on the draft CCL, Table 8 divides 
    them into categories to represent the data needs for each contaminant. 
    Sufficient data are needed to conduct analyses on extent of exposure 
    and risk to populations via drinking water in order to determine 
    appropriate Agency action (development of health advisories, or 
    regulations, or no action) for a given contaminant. If sufficient data 
    are not available, they must be obtained before such an assessment can 
    be made. The data and information required will be gathered by research 
    or monitoring programs, and are not likely to be available for analyses 
    to be completed
    
    [[Page 52213]]
    
    prior to 2001. Thus, the contaminants for which sufficient data exists 
    at the time of publishing the CCL, are likely to the those from which 
    the determinations will be made by 2001.
    
                        Table 8.--Data Needs for Chemical Contaminants Included on the Draft CCL                    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Need additional health      Need additional          Need both health   
        Sufficient health effects and       effects data, but not     occurrence data, but    effects and occurrence
            occurrence data exist              occurrence data      not health effects data            data         
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane; 79-34-5...  Aluminum; 7429-90-5....  1,2-diphenylhydrazine;   2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-   
                                                                     122-66-7.                benzoquinone (DTBB);  
                                                                                              719-22-2              
    1,2,4-trimethylbenzene; 95-63-6......  Vanadium; 7440-62-2....  2,4,6-trichlorophenol;   .......................
                                                                     88-06-2.                                       
    1,1-dichloro-ethane; 75-34-3                                    2,2-dichloro-propane;    DCPA mono-acid         
                                                                     594-20-7.                degradate; 887-54-7   
    1,1-dichloro-propene; 563-58-6                                  2,4-dichlorophenol; 120- DCPA di-acid degradate;
                                                                     83-2.                    2136-79-0             
    1,3-dichloropropane; 142-28-9                                   2,4-dinitrophenol; 51-   Organotins             
                                                                     28-5.                                          
    1,3-Dichloropropene; 542-75-6                                   2,4-dinitrotoluene; 121- .......................
                                                                     14-2                                           
    Boron; 7440-42-8                                                2,6-dinitrotoluene; 606- .......................
                                                                     20-2                                           
    Bromobenzene; 108-86-1                                          2-methyl-phenol; 95-48-  .......................
                                                                     7                                              
    Cyanazine; 21725-46-2                                           Acetochlor; 34256-82-1   .......................
    atrazine-desethyl (a triazine                                   Acetone 67-64-1          .......................
     degradation product); 6190-65-4.                                                                               
    p-Cymene; 99-87-6                                               Alachlor ESA (an         .......................
                                                                     alachlor degradation                           
                                                                     product).                                      
    Hexachloro-butadiene; 87-68-3                                   Aldrin; 309-00-2         .......................
    cumene; 98-82-8                                                 DDE; 72-55-9             .......................
    Manganese; 7439-96-5                                            Diazinon; 333-41-5       .......................
    Methyl bromide; 74-83-9                                         Dieldrin; 60-57-1        .......................
    Metolachlor; 51218-45-2                                         Dimethoate; 60-51-5      .......................
    Metribuzin; 21087-64-9                                          Disulfoton, 298-04-4     .......................
    Naphthalene; 91-20-3                                            Diuron; 330-54-1         .......................
    Sodium; 7440-23-5                                               Fonofos; 944-22-9                               
    Zinc; 7440-66-6                                                 Linuron; 330-55-2        .......................
                                                                    MTBE; 1634-04-4........                         
                                                                    Molinate; 2212-67-1....                         
                                                                    Nitrobenzene; 98-95-3..                         
                                                                    Prometon; 1610-18-0....                         
                                                                    RDX; 121-82-4..........                         
                                                                    Rhodamine WT...........                         
                                                                    Terbacil; 5902-51-2....                         
                                                                    Terbufos; 13071-79-9...                         
                                                                    EPTC; 759-94-4.........                         
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        B. Perchlorate
        Additional information and comment is sought on the inclusion of 
    perchlorate on the final CCL. Perchlorate is being mentioned in this 
    notice because EPA received information that it had been detected in 
    water in the Colorado River and in wells in California, but the 
    information came too late in the process of developing the draft CCL to 
    evaluate it as had been done for the other contaminants. The 
    information the Agency has received regarding perchlorate's occurrence, 
    health effects, source of contamination and treatment that has been 
    included in the docket. This information, and any other submitted in 
    response to comments, as well as additional data that the Agency may 
    obtain, will be considered to determine whether perchlorate should be 
    included on the final CCL.
    
    VI. Development of the Final Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List, 
    the Contaminant Identification Method, and the Contaminant Selection 
    Process
    
        Between now and the publication of the final CCL, the Agency will 
    evaluate comments received during the comment period for this notice 
    and re-evaluate the criteria used to develop the draft CCL and revise 
    the CCL, as appropriate. The final CCL will be published by February 
    1998.
        In addition to publishing the final CCL, the Agency will also 
    resume work on the CIM and the contaminant selection process. The 
    development of the CIM and the selection process will be completed in 
    consultation with the NDWAC Working Group on Occurrence & Contaminant 
    Selection. The next meeting of the Working Group will likely be later 
    this fall. The CCL, CIM and the selection process will serve as the 
    cornerstones of the Agency's regulatory development process. In 
    addition to developing the CCL, CIM and the selection process with the 
    Adminstration policy in mind, the Agency intends to obtain resources to 
    improve the screening process in order to acquire better information, 
    improve analytical capability, and seek additional stakeholder 
    involvement. The CCL is a critical input to shaping the future 
    direction of the drinking water program, and improvements will be made 
    with each successive cycle of publishing the list.
    
    VII. Summary of Other Related Activity Required by the SDWA
    
        After the CCL is developed and in accordance with the SDWA, as 
    amended, the Agency will determine whether or not regulation is needed 
    for at least five contaminants. This step of contaminant selection is 
    then followed by proposal and ultimate promulgation of regulations for 
    those contaminants for which a determination has been made to regulate. 
    Two tools provided for in the SDWA, as amended, that relate to 
    development of the CCL, are the
    
    [[Page 52214]]
    
    occurrence database and unregulated contaminant monitoring. In 
    identifying contaminants for inclusion on the CCL, and selecting 
    contaminants for determination, the National Drinking Water Contaminant 
    Occurrence Database must be considered. The primary mechanism for 
    obtaining the occurrence data for the database is the Unregulated 
    Contaminant Monitoring Requirements provision. Figure 2 provides a 
    representation of the relationship among these various elements. The 
    SDWA requirements for contaminant selection, the occurrence database 
    and unregulated contaminant monitoring are presented below to give the 
    reader a sense of what these requirements entail and how they relate to 
    the CCL and to each other.
    
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    [[Page 52215]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06OC97.001
    
    
    
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-C
    
    [[Page 52216]]
    
    A. Contaminant Selection and Regulatory Determination
    
        The SDWA, as amended in 1996, requires EPA to make determinations 
    of whether or not to regulate no fewer than five contaminants from the 
    CCL five years after enactment (i.e., by August 2001), and every five 
    years thereafter (section 1412(b)(1)); which is also three and a half 
    years following each CCL. Any of the contaminants from the CCL that the 
    Agency decides to regulate are subject to proposed NPDWRs within 24 
    months of this decision to regulate, and final NPDWRs within 18 months 
    of the proposal. The SDWA also requires that EPA give priority to 
    selecting contaminants for regulation that present the greatest public 
    health concern, including vulnerable populations such as infants, the 
    elderly, and those with serious illness. Three criteria must be 
    considered when deciding whether or not to regulate a contaminant: (1) 
    Could the contaminant adversely affect public health, (2) is it known 
    or substantially likely to occur in public water systems with a 
    frequency and at levels posing a threat to public health, and (3) will 
    regulation of the contaminant present a meaningful opportunity for 
    health risk reduction.
        The Agency will be developing a contaminant selection process that 
    will address the criteria mentioned above in concert with the 
    contaminant identification method. The contaminant selection process 
    will be used to select contaminants from the CCL for which 
    determinations will be made, while the CIM will be used to develop the 
    CCL. A conceptual approach for the CIM was presented on December 2-3, 
    1996, at an EPA sponsored stakeholders meeting (U.S. EPA, 1996b) 
    However, in order to meet the February 1998 deadline for finalizing the 
    CCL, further work on the CIM was delayed in favor of developing the 
    draft CCL presented in today's notice. The Agency, in collaboration 
    with the NDWAC Working Group on Occurrence & Contaminant Selection, 
    will resume work on the CIM and the contaminant selection process 
    during the fall of 1997. Knowledge gained during the development of 
    this draft CCL, as well as the feedback received since the December 
    1996 stakeholders meeting, will be factored into the development.
    
    B. The National Contaminant Occurrence Database
    
        The SDWA, as amended in 1996, requires EPA to establish a national 
    drinking water contaminant occurrence database (NCOD) to be assembled 
    by August 1999 [section 1445(g)]. The database is to include the 
    occurrence of both regulated and unregulated contaminants, and, once 
    established, is to be used to support the Administrator's 
    determinations for future regulations. The requirements for developing 
    the CCL also include consulting the occurrence database. Since the 
    database is currently under development, and will not be available for 
    the development of this first CCL, the Agency consulted other sources 
    of occurrence data. Once available, however, the NCOD will be used not 
    only to develop future CCLs and support future determinations of the 
    need for regulations, but to develop future regulations.
        A Stakeholder meeting was held on May 21-22, 1997, in Washington, 
    D.C., on the NCOD to discuss and obtain input from the public, states, 
    and the scientific community on database design and structure, input 
    parameters and requirements, and the uses and interpretation of the 
    data. This meeting was the first of several expected to take place in 
    the near future regarding the NCOD development.
    
    C. Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation
    
        The SDWA, as amended, requires EPA to list and develop regulations 
    for monitoring of certain unregulated contaminants by August 1999, and 
    every 5 years thereafter (section 1445(a)(2)). This provision was first 
    introduced with the 1986 amendments to the SDWA and has been 
    substantially modified by the 1996 amendments. The SDWA requires that 
    the list of unregulated contaminants not exceed 30, and that the 
    monitoring data be collected and maintained in the NCOD. Criteria for 
    determining which contaminants on the CCL will be chosen for the 
    unregulated contaminant monitoring list will be developed as part of 
    this regulation.
        Contaminants on the CCL that need additional occurrence data will 
    be used as the principal source of contaminants for the list of 
    unregulated contaminants. The unregulated contaminant monitoring 
    provision of the SDWA will be used as a tool to gather the contaminant 
    occurrence data necessary for determining the need for drinking water 
    regulations.
    
    VIII. Summary of Concurrent Regulatory Activity Required by the 
    SDWA
    
        In addition to the requirements for the CCL and contaminant 
    selection, the SDWA, as amended 1996, also contain specific provisions 
    with regard to radon, arsenic, sulfate, and disinfectants and 
    disinfection byproducts. The SDWA, as amended, did not specify a new 
    time frame for finalizing rulemaking for other radionuclides, however, 
    EPA and the Bull Run Coalition have entered into a consent decree with 
    the court establishing timetables to finalize this rulemaking. 
    Regulatory activity for radon, other radionuclides, arsenic, sulfate, 
    and disinfectants and disinfection byproducts are not affected by 
    today's notice, but are summarized below to provide the reader with an 
    update on the status these specific activities.
    
    A. Radon
    
        The SDWA, as amended in 1996, contains specific provisions for 
    regulating radon in drinking water (section 1412(b) (13)). First, EPA 
    is required to withdraw the proposed rule for radon which was published 
    in 1991 and to re-propose a drinking water regulation for radon by 
    August 6, 1999, and issue final regulations by August 6, 2000. The 
    SDWA, as amended, also requires EPA to: (1) Arrange for the NAS to 
    prepare a peer reviewed risk assessment for radon that evaluates the 
    health effects of radon in drinking water under conditions likely to be 
    experienced through residential exposure and to assess the risk 
    reduction benefits from various mitigation measures to reduce radon 
    levels in indoor air; (2) make available for public comment a health 
    risk reduction and cost analysis comparing costs and benefits of 
    various possible MCL in advance of proposing a radon regulation; and 
    (3) establish an alternative-MCL, if the MCL is set at a level that is 
    more stringent than necessary to reduce the contribution of radon in 
    indoor air originating from drinking water to a level equal to the 
    national average concentration of radon in outdoor air. States will 
    have the option to comply with the less stringent alternative-MCL if 
    they implement a multi-media radon risk reduction program that 
    accomplishes greater health protection than would be achieved by 
    complying with the more stringent MCL alone.
        A notice was published in the Federal Register on August 6, 1997, 
    to withdraw the radon proposed rule. (62 FR 42221) The NAS risk 
    assessment is scheduled to be complete by July 1998, and the HRRCA is 
    due by February 1998. In addition, EPA held stakeholder meetings on 
    June 26, 1997, in Washington, D.C., and on September 2, 1997, in San 
    Francisco, and has scheduled an additional stakeholder meeting in 
    Boston later this fall to obtain input from the public.
    
    [[Page 52217]]
    
    B. Other Radionuclides
    
        On July 18, 1991, EPA proposed NPDWRs for radionuclides in public 
    water supplies (56 FR 33050). EPA proposed MCLs for Radium-228 at 20 
    pCi/l, Radium-226 at 20 pCi/l, Uranium at 30 pCi/l (20 g/l), 
    adjusted gross alpha at 15 pCi/l (excluding Ra-226, U, and Rn-222), and 
    beta and photon emitters (excluding Ra-228) at 4 mrem ede/yr; MCLGs 
    were proposed at zero.
        Comments on the proposed rule were received from approximately 600 
    individuals and organizations. Due to concerns by commenters and 
    Congress over the most effective way to regulate radon and other 
    radionuclides together, the proposed rule was put on hold, pending 
    passage of amendments to the SDWA, so that EPA could gain further 
    clarification of Congress' intent.
        The SDWA, as amended in 1996, did not specify a new time frame for 
    finalizing rulemaking for radionuclides, as it did for radon. However, 
    an existing consent decree providing deadlines for regulating 
    radionuclides was amended in 1996 to provide that EPA would, by 
    November 2000, finalize a rule for Uranium; and finalize a rule for Ra-
    226, Ra-228, alpha and beta/photon emitters, or publish its reasons for 
    not taking final action as to these contaminants. An Agency Workgroup 
    has been formed and is process of evaluating all current data and 
    information, which will lead to finalizing elements of the proposed 
    rule or to re-proposing NPDWRs for radionuclides.
    
    C. Arsenic
    
        In 1975, EPA established National Interim Primary Drinking Water 
    Regulations (NIPDWR), setting an MCL for Arsenic at 50 g/l. In 
    1985, EPA proposed an MCLG of 50 g/l, requesting comment on 
    alternate MCLGs of 100 g/l and 0 g/l. However, the 
    SDWA, as amended in 1986, converted the interim standard into a NPDWR, 
    subject to revision by 1989. When the Agency failed to meet the 
    statutory deadline for promulgating an arsenic regulation, a citizen's 
    group filed suit to compel EPA to do so. EPA entered into a consent 
    decree to, in part, issue the arsenic regulation. The consent decree 
    was amended several times to extend the deadlines and with passage of 
    the 1996 Amendments was dismissed as to arsenic.
        The SDWA, as amended, requires EPA to conduct additional research 
    on arsenic in order to reduce the uncertainty in assessing the health 
    effects of low exposure levels; to propose a NPDWR for arsenic by 
    January 1, 2000; and to issue a final regulation by January 1, 2001. 
    (Sec. 1412(b)(12)) EPA developed a research plan, made it available for 
    public comment, and had it peer reviewed in January 1997. The revised 
    research plan will be available this fall. In addition, EPA issued a 
    joint request for research proposals with the American Water Works 
    Association Research Foundation (AWWARF) and the Association of 
    California Water Agencies (ACWA). EPA, AWWARF and ACWA awarded almost 
    $3 million in grants and contracts this summer, for up to three years. 
    This spring, EPA also funded an Interagency Agreement, with the 
    National Research Council (NRC) of the NAS to review EPA's risk 
    assessment, determine the adequacy of EPA's current MCL for protecting 
    human health and surface water quality criteria, and identify 
    priorities for research to fill data gaps. The NRC report will be 
    submitted to EPA in mid-to-late 1998. In May, 1997, EPA convened an 
    expert panel to evaluate the scientific literature on the genetic and 
    carcinogenic effects of arsenic in order to comment on arsenic's mode 
    of action and the data supporting models extrapolating to low dose 
    arsenic exposures. The final report is now being considered by EPA's 
    IRIS Update Group.
    
    D. Sulfate
    
        A December 20, 1994 proposed sulfate regulation contained both MCLG 
    and MCL levels for sulfate of 500 mg/l and included 4 alternative 
    compliance options designed to allow flexible implementation. 
    Thereafter, the Agency's drinking water redirection effort concluded 
    that sulfate was a relatively low risk contaminant, and further 
    regulatory activity was suspended. The SDWA, as amended, requires 
    completion of a study to resolve risk questions and requires the Agency 
    to make a determination within 5 years of enactment of the Amendments, 
    by August 6, 2001, of whether or not to regulate sulfate. Any of the 
    contaminants from the CCL that the Agency decides to regulate are 
    subject to proposed NPDWRs within 24 months of this decision to 
    regulate, and final NPDWRs within 18 months of the proposal. In 1997 
    the Agency entered into an Interagency Agreement with the Center for 
    Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). EPA and CDC are currently waiting 
    for completion of the peer review of the jointly planned health risk 
    study for sulfate. The study results, due in February 1999, will serve 
    as input for EPA's contaminant identification and selection protocol to 
    decide whether or not to regulate sulfate, and will be publicly 
    available. In addition, prior to deciding on the need to regulate 
    sulfate, the Agency would need to make a determination on the adequacy 
    of existing occurrence data for sulfate and, if inadequate, consider 
    approaches for filling data gaps.
    
    E. Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts
    
        Microorganisms identified for the CCL are not specifically targeted 
    by the following regulations, however they may be indirectly 
    controlled. Any microorganism identified for the CCL which is 
    determined later to be adequately, although indirectly, controlled by 
    the following regulations, will be subsequently withdrawn from the CCL.
        Under the Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR) promulgated on June 
    29, 1989, (54 FR 27486), EPA set MCLGs of zero for Giardia lamblia, 
    viruses and Legionella; and promulgated NPDWRs for all public water 
    systems (PWSs) using surface water sources or groundwater sources under 
    the direct influence of surface water. The SWTR includes treatment 
    technique requirements for filtered and unfiltered systems that are 
    intended to protect against the adverse health effects of exposure to 
    Giardia lamblia, viruses, and Legionella, as well as many other 
    pathogenic organisms.
        In 1992, EPA initiated a negotiated rulemaking to develop 
    disinfectant and disinfection byproducts regulations. The Regulatory 
    Negotiating Committee met from November 1992 through June 1993 and 
    included representatives of State and local health and regulatory 
    agencies, public water systems, elected officials, consumer groups and 
    environmental groups. One of the major goals addressed by the Committee 
    was to develop an approach that would reduce the level of exposure from 
    disinfectants and disinfection byproducts without undermining the 
    control of microbiological pathogens. To accomplish this, the Committee 
    agreed to the development of three sets of regulations: a two-staged 
    Disinfectant/Disinfection Byproducts Rule (D/DBP), an Enhanced Surface 
    Water Treatment Rule (ESWTR), and an Information Collection Rule (ICR). 
    The purpose of the ICR is to collect occurrence and treatment 
    information to evaluate the need for possible changes to the current 
    SWTR, existing microbial treatment practices, and also evaluate the 
    need for future regulation for disinfectants and disinfection 
    byproducts.
        EPA would first develop an Interim-ESWTR (IESWTR) that would only 
    apply to systems serving 10,000 people or more, the committee agreed 
    that a
    
    [[Page 52218]]
    
    Long-Term-ESWTR (LTESWTR) may be needed for systems serving fewer than 
    10,000 people when the results of more research and water quality 
    monitoring became available. The LTESWTR could include additional 
    refinements for larger systems.
        The ICR was proposed on February 10, 1994 (59 FR 6332) and 
    promulgated on May 14, 1996 (61 FR 24354). The D/DBP regulations and 
    the IESWTR were proposed on July 29, 1994 (59 FR 38668, 59 FR 38832). 
    The SDWA, as amended, requires EPA to promulgate an IESWTR and a Stage 
    I D/DBP Rule by November 1998. In addition, the SDWA requires EPA to 
    promulgate a final ESWTR and a Stage II D/DBP rule by November 2000 and 
    May 2002, respectively [section 1412(b)(2)(C)].
        In light of new information that has become available in several 
    key areas related to issues put forth in the D/DBP Stage 1 proposal, 
    the Agency initiated a series of public meetings in May 1996. These 
    meetings were designed to exchange information on issues related to the 
    development of the IESWTR and the Stage 1 D/DBP rule and the impact of 
    the ICR data not being available. In order to facilitate moving in an 
    expedited fashion to meet the deadlines in the 1996 Amendments, and to 
    maximize stakeholder participation, the Agency subsequently established 
    an advisory committee to collect, share, and analyze new information 
    and data as well as to build consensus on the regulatory implications 
    of this new information. After evaluation of the new data and 
    information, the committee made recommendations on a number of major 
    issues. These recommendations and a discussion of the pertinent issues 
    will be published in a Federal Register Notice planned for later this 
    fall.
    
    IX. Other Requirements
    
        The CCL is a notice and not a regulatory action; therefore, the 
    following statutes and executive orders are not applicable at this 
    time: the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Small Business Regulatory 
    Enforcement Fairness Act, Paperwork Reduction Act, Unfunded Mandates 
    Reform Act; and Executive Order 12866. As contaminants are selected for 
    rulemaking, all necessary analysis will be conducted in accordance with 
    the rulemaking process.
        Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental 
    Health Risks and Safety Risks, requires that Federal Agencies identify 
    and assess health risks and safety risks that disproportionately affect 
    children, and ensure that its policies, programs, activities, and 
    standards address disproportionate health and safety risks to children. 
    The SDWA also requires the Agency to select priorities for regulation 
    while considering risk to sensitive subpopulations, such as infants and 
    children.
        The impact on sensitive populations will be addressed in the 
    contaminant selection process, and will be a component of the Agency's 
    determination of whether or not to regulate a given contaminant. In 
    preparation for addressing the issues of sensitive subpopulations, the 
    Agency is sponsoring several activities to determine water intake by 
    age group, by demographic distribution, and by innate or developed 
    sensitivity to potential drinking water contaminants. The Agency is 
    also collaborating with CDC on a study of six major cities to determine 
    the most sensitive populations for drinking water manifested during 
    major outbreaks of illness from incidents of water contamination. Other 
    research also is underway to determine the extent of vulnerable 
    populations including children and the immunologically impaired.
    
    X. References
    
        ATSDR, 1996. ``1995 CERCLA Priority List of Hazardous Substances 
    That will be The Subject of Toxicological Profiles and Support 
    Documents,'' Division of Toxicology, Agency for Toxic Substances and 
    Disease Registry (ATSDR), Department of Health and Human Services, 
    Atlanta, GA. April.
        Barber, Larry and Denis LeBlanc. 1988. Long-Term Fate of Organic 
    Micropollutants in Sewage-Contaminated Groundwater. Environ. Sci. 
    Technol. , 22:205-211.
        Benenson, M., E.T. Takafuji, S.M. Lemon, R.L. Greenup, and A.J. 
    Sulzer. 1982. Oocyst-transmitted toxoplasmosis associated with 
    ingestion of contaminated water. New Engl. J. Med., 307:666-669.
        Berman, D., and J.C. Hoff. 1984. Inactivation of simian 
    rotavirus SA11 by chlorine, chlorine dioxice, and monochloramine. 
    Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 48:317-323.
        Bryan, R.T. 1995. Microsporidiosis as an AIDS-related 
    opportunistic infection. Clin. Infect. Dis., 21(Suppl 1):62-65.
        Cali. A. 1991. General Microsporidium Features and Recent 
    Findings on AIDS Isolates. J. Protozool., 38:625-630.
        Chen, Y., and J.M. Vaughn. 1990. Inactivation of human and 
    simian rotaviruses by chlorine dioxide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 
    56:1363-1366.
        Cover, T.L., and M.J. Blaser. 1995. Helicobacter pylori: A 
    Bacterial Cause of Gastritis, Peptic Ulcer Disease, and Gastric 
    Cancer. ASM News, 61:21-26.
        Cubitt, W.D. 1991. A Review of the Epidemiology and Diagnosis of 
    Waterborne Viral Infections. Water Science and Tehnol., 24:197-203.
        de Jonckheere, J., and H. van de Voorde. 1976. Differences in 
    Destruction of Cysts of Pathogenic and Nonpathogenic Naegleria and 
    Acanthamoeba by chlorine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 31:294-297.
        Dreesman, G.R., and G.R. Reyes. 1992. Hepatitus. In Encyclopedia 
    of Microbiology, Vol. 2, Edited by J. Lederberg. pp. 371-380. San 
    Diego: Academic Press.
        Du Moulin, G.C. and K.D. Stottmeier. 1986. Waterborne 
    Mycobacteria: An Increasing Threat to Health. ASM News, 52:525-529.
        Du Moulin, G.C., K.D. Stottmeier, P.A. Pelletier, A.Y. Tsang, 
    and J. Hedley-Whyte. 1988. Concentration of Mycobacterium avium by 
    Hospital Hot Water Systems. J. Amer. Med. Assoc., 260:1599-1601.
        Fishback, J.L. 1992. Toxoplasmosis. In Encyclopedia of 
    Microbiology, Vol. 2, Edited by J. Lederberg. pp. 255-264. San 
    Diego: Academic Press.
        Gerba, C.P., J.B. Rose, CN Has, and K.D. Crabtree. 1996. 
    Waterborne rotavirus: a risk assessment. Water Res., 30(12):2929-
    2940.
        Gerba, C.P., J.B. Rose, S.N. Singh. 1985. Waterborne 
    gastroenteritis and viral hepatitis. CRC Critical Reviews in 
    Environmental Control, 15(3):213-236.
        Gonzalez-de-la-Cuesta, N., M. Arias-Fernandez, E. Paniagua-
    Crespo, and M. Marti-Mallen. 1987. Free-living Amoebae in Swimming 
    Pool Waters from Galicia (Spain). Rev. Iber. Parasitol., 47:207-210. 
    Abstract in English only; text in Spanish.
        Goodgame, R.W. 1996. Understanding Intestinal Spore-forming 
    Protozoa: Cryptosporidia, Microsporidia, Isospora, and Cyclospora. 
    Ann. Intern. Med., 1214:429-441.
        Grohmann, G.S. et al. 1993. Enteric Viruses and Diarrhea in HIV-
    Infected Patients. New Engl. J. Med., 329:14-20.
        Hardalo, C., and S.C. Edberg. 1997. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: 
    Assessment of Risk from Drinking Water. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 
    23(1):47-75.
        Huang, P., J.T. Weber, D.M. Sosin, E.G. Long, J.J. Murphy, 
    F.Kocka, C. Peters, and C. Kallick. 1995. The First Reported 
    Outbreak of Diarrheal Illness Associated with Cyclospora in the 
    United States. Ann. Internal Med., 123: 409-414.
        Hulten, K. et al. 1996. Helicobacter pylori in the Drinking 
    Water in Peru. Gastroenterology, 110:1031-1035.
        Hurst, C.J. 1991. Presence of enteric viruses in freshwater and 
    their removal by the conventional drinking water treatment process. 
    Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 69(1):113-119.
        Interagency Assessment of Oxygenated Fuels (IAOF). 1997. 
    Prepared by National Science and Technology Council and Committee on 
    Environment and Natural Resources.
        Kilvington, S. 1990. Activity of Water Biocide Chemicals and 
    Contact Lens Disinfectants on Pathogenic Free-living Amoebae. Intl. 
    Biodeterior., 26:127-138.
        Klein, P.D., D.Y. Graham, A., Gaillour, A.R. Opekun, and E.O. 
    Smith. 1991. Water source as risk factor for Helicobacter pylori 
    infection in Peruvian children. Lancet, 337:1503-1506.
        Kramer, M.H., B.L. Herwaldt, G.F. Craun, R.L.Calderon, and D.D. 
    Juranek. 1996. Surveillance for Waterborne-Disease Outbreaks--United 
    States, 1993-1994. CDC Surveillance Summaries, Morbidity and
    
    [[Page 52219]]
    
    Mortality Weekly Report, 45(SS-1):1-33 (April 12, 1996). Centers for 
    Disease Control.
        Kurtz, J.B., and T.W. Lee. 1987. Astroviruses: Human and Animal. 
    In Novel Diarrhoea Viruses. John New York: Wiley & Sons.
        Lippy, E.C. and J. Erb. 1976. Gastrointestinal illness at 
    Sewickly, Pa. Jour. American Water Works Assoc., 68:606-610.
        Melnick, J.L. 1992. Enteroviruses. In Encyclopedia of 
    Microbiology, Vol. 2. pp. 69-80. Edited by J. Lederberg. Academic 
    Press.
        Nomura, A., G.N. Stemmermann, P-H Chyou, I. Kato, G.I. Perez-
    Perez, and M.J. Blaser. 1991. Helicobacter pylori Infection and 
    Gastric Carcinoma Among Japanese Americans in Hawaii. New Engl. J. 
    Med., 325:1132-1136.
        Parsonnet, J. 1992. Gastrointestinal microbiology. In 
    Encyclopedia of Microbiology, Vol. 2. Edited by J. Lederberg. 
    Academic Press, New York. Pgs. 245-258.
        Parsonnet, J., G.D. Friedman, D.P. Vandersteen, Y. Chang, J.H. 
    Vogelman, N. Orentreich, and R.K. Sibley. 1991. Helicobacter pylori 
    Infection and the Risk of Gastric Carcinoma. N. Eng. J. Med., 
    325:1127-1131.
        Pelletier, PA, GC du Moulin, and KD Stottmeier. 1988. 
    Mycobacteria in public water supplies: comparative resistence to 
    chlorine. Microbiol Sciences, 5:147-148.
        Peterson, D.A., T.R. Hurley, J.C. Hoff, and L.G. Wolfe. 1983. 
    Effect of chlorine treatment on infectivity of hepatitis A virus. 
    Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 45:223-227.
        Peterson, W.L. 1991. Helicobacter pylori and Peptic Ulcer 
    Disease. N. Eng. J. Med., 324:1043-1048.
        Pinto, RM, FX Abad, R. Gajaardo, and A. Bosch. 1996. Detection 
    of infectious astroviruses in water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 
    62:1811-1813.
        Sadiki, Abdel-Ilah, David Williams, Richard Carrier, and Barry 
    Thomas. 1996. Pilot Study of the Contamination of Drinking Water by 
    organotin Compounds from PVC Materials. Chemosphere, 32:2389-2398.
        Sawyer, T.K. 1989. Free-living Pathogenic and Nonpathogenic 
    Amoebae in Maryland Soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 55:1074-1077.
        Seal, D., F. Stapleton, and J. Dart. 1992. Possible 
    Environmental Sources of Acanthamoeba spp. in Contact Lens Wearers. 
    Br. J. Ophthalmology, 76:424-427.
        Shahamat M., R.R. Colwell, and C. Paszko-Kolva. 1992. Letter to 
    Editor. Jour. AWWA, 84(10):4.
        Shahamat M., U. Mai, C. Paszko-Kolva, and R.R. Colwell. 1993. 
    Use of Autoradiography to Assess Viability of Helicobacter pylori in 
    Water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59:1231-1235.
        Soave, R. and W.D. Johnson, Jr. 1995. Cyclospora: Conquest of an 
    Emerging Pathogen (comment). Lancet, 345: 667-668.
        States, S.J., R.M. Wadowsky, J.M. Kuchta, R.S. Wolford, L.F. 
    Conley, and R.B. Yee. 1990. Legionella in Drinking Water. In: 
    Drinking Water Microbiology. G.A. McFeters (ed). pp 340-367. 
    Springer-Verlag, New York.
        Sutton, L.D., W.W. Wilke, N.A. Lynch, and R.N. Jones. 
    Helicobacter Pylori Containing Sewage Detected By the Polymerase 
    Chain Reaction. ASM Annual Meeting, 1995. Abstract C-395.
        Thomas, D.L., P.O.Yarbough, D. Vlahov, S.A. Tsarev, K.E. Nelson, 
    A.J. Saah, and R.H. Purcell. 1997. Seroreactivity to hepatitis E 
    virus in areas where the disease is not endemic. J. Clin. Microbiol, 
    35:1244-1247.
        U.S. EPA. 1987. ``Notice of the First Priority List of Hazardous 
    Substances That will be the Subject of Toxicological Profiles.'' 52 
    FR 12866, April 17.
        U.S. EPA. 1988. ``Drinking Water; Substitution of Contaminants 
    and Drinking Water Priority List of Additional Substances Which may 
    Require Regulation Under the Safe Drinking Water Act.'' 53 FR 1892, 
    January 22.
        U.S. EPA. 1989a. ``Drinking Water; National Primary Drinking 
    Water Regulations; Filtration, Disinfection; Turbidity, Glardia 
    lamblia, Viruses, Legionella, and Heterotrophic Bacteria; Final Rule 
    (Surface Water Treatment Rule).'' 54 FR 27486-27541, June 29.
        U.S. EPA. 1989b. ``Control of Legionella in Plumbing Systems,'' 
    In: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 107 
    pp. 79-92 (G.W. Ware, ed.). Springer-Verlag, New York.
        U.S. EPA. 1990. ``National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; 
    Synthetic Organic Chemicals and Inorganic Chemicals.'' Proposed 
    Rule; 55 FR 30370-30448--Part II, July 25.
        U.S. EPA. 1991a. `` Priority List of Substances Which May 
    Require Regulation Under the Safe Drinking Water Act; Notice.'' 56 
    FR 1470, January 14.
        U.S. EPA. 1991b. ``National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; 
    Monitoring for VOC; MCLGs and MCLs for Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, 
    Aldicarb Sulfone, Pentachlorophenol, and Barium.'' 56 FR 30266-
    30281, July 1.
        EPA. 1991c. ``Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: National Primary 
    Drinking Water Regulations; Radionuclides,'' 56 FR 33050, July 18.
        U.S. EPA. 1992. ``National Primary and Secondary Drinking Water 
    Regulations; Synthetic Organic Chemicals and Inorganic Chemicals.'' 
    57 FR 31776-31849--Part III, July 17.
        U.S. EPA. 1995. ``National Pollutant Discharge Elimination 
    System and Pretreatment Programs; State and Local Assistance 
    Programs; Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards; Public 
    Water Supply and Underground Injection Control Programs: Removal of 
    Legally Obsolete or Redundant Rules.'' 60 FR 33926-33972, June 29.
        U.S. EPA. 1996a. ``Drinking Water Program Redirection 
    Strategy,'' Office of Water. EPA 810-R-96-003, June.
        U.S. EPA. 1996b. ``The Conceptual Approach for Contaminant 
    Identification (working draft). EPA 812-D-96-001, November.
        U.S. EPA. 1997a. ``Special Report on Environmental Endocrine 
    Disruption: On Effects Assessment and Analysis, EPA 630-R-96-012, 
    February.
        U.S. EPA. 1997b. ``EFED Selection of Pesticide Candidates for 
    MCL and HAL Development,'' Internal Memorandum with attachments from 
    Michael Barrett and Estella Waldman, Office of Pesticide Programs to 
    Amal Mahfouz, Office of Water, March 27.
        U.S. EPA. 1997c. ``1995 Toxics Release Inventory,'' EPA 745-R-
    97-005, April.
        U.S. EPA. 1997d. ``Raw and Processed Food Schedule for Pesticide 
    Tolerance Reassessment,'' 62 FR 42020-42027, August 4.
        U.S. EPA. 1997e. ``Research Strategy for Oxygenates in Water,'' 
    Workshop Review Draft, Office of Research and Development, September 
    5.
        U.S. EPA. 1997f. ``Water Quality Criteria; Ambient Water Quality 
    Criteria,'' 62 FR No. 152 42554. August 7.
        Vaughn, J.M., Y. Chen, K. Lindburg, and D. Morales. 1987. 
    Inactivation of human and simian rotaviruses by ozone. Appl. 
    Environ. Microbiol., 53:2218-2221
        Vaughn, J.M., Y. Chen, and M.Z. Thomas. 1986. Inactivation of 
    human and simian rotaviruses by chlorine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 
    51:391-394.
        Waller, T. 1979. Sensitivity of Encephalitozoon cuniculi to 
    Various Temperatures, disinfectants and drugs. Lab. Anim., 13:227-
    230.
        Weber, R., R. Bryan, D. Schwartz, and R. Owen 1994. Human 
    Microsporidial Infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 7:426-461.
        Yu, V.L., J.J. Zuravleff, L. Gavlik, M.H. Magnussen. 1983. Lack 
    of Evidence for Person-to-person Transmission of Legionnaires' 
    Disease. J. Infect. Dis., 147:362.
    
        (Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300f-300j-25)
    
        Dated: September 29, 1997.
    Robert Perciasepe,
    Assistant Administrator, Office Water, Environmental Protection Agency.
    [FR Doc. 97-26433 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/06/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
97-26433
Dates:
Submit comments on or before December 5, 1997.
Pages:
52194-52219 (26 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5904-7
PDF File:
97-26433.pdf