99-25926. Availability of an Environmental Assessment and Receipt of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the A. Teichert and Son Esparto Mining Project, Yolo County, CA  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 54350-54351]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-25926]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    Availability of an Environmental Assessment and Receipt of an 
    Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the A. Teichert and Son 
    Esparto Mining Project, Yolo County, CA
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of availability and receipt of application.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: A. Teichert and Son, a subsidiary of Teichert, Inc. 
    (Applicant) has applied for an incidental take permit from the U.S. 
    Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of 
    the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The Service proposes to 
    approve the Applicant's Habitat Conservation Plan and issue an 
    incidental take permit for take of the valley elderberry longhorn 
    beetle (beetle), a federally listed threatened species, as a result of 
    aggregate mining activities on a 98-acre site in Yolo County, 
    California. Mitigation and minimization measures outlined in the 
    Habitat Conservation Plan would offset impacts to a small, isolated 
    stand of beetle habitat, four elderberry shrubs, by transplanting the 
    shrubs to an existing large habitat block that is specifically managed 
    and monitored for the species' long-term survival. This notice advises 
    the public that the Service has opened the comment period on the permit 
    application and the draft Environmental Assessment. The permit 
    application includes the Applicant's Habitat Conservation Plan. The 
    Service will evaluate the application, associated documents, and 
    comments submitted thereon to determine whether the application meets 
    the requirements of National Environmental Policy Act regulations and 
    section 10(a) of Endangered Species Act. If it is determined that the 
    requirements are met, the requested permit will be issued for the 
    incidental take of beetles subject to the provisions of the Applicant's 
    Habitat Conservation Plan. The final National Environmental Policy Act 
    and permit determinations will not be completed until after the end of 
    a 30-day comment period and will fully consider all comments received. 
    The Service will also evaluate whether the issuance of the requested 
    permit complies with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act by 
    conducting an intra-Service section 7 consultation. The resulting 
    section 7 biological opinion, in combination with the above types of 
    evaluation requirements, will be used in the final analysis to 
    determine whether or not to issue the requested permit.
    
    DATES: Written comments should be received on or before November 5, 
    1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Wayne White, Field 
    Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, 
    Sacramento, California 95821-6340. Comments may also be sent via 
    facsimile to (916) 414-6714.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Berryman, Fish and Wildlife 
    Biologist, at the above address; telephone (916) 414-6600.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Availability of Documents
    
        Individuals wishing to obtain copies of the application or 
    Environmental Assessment for review should immediately contact the 
    Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office at the address above. Documents 
    will also be available for public inspection, by appointment, during 
    normal hours at the above address.
    
    Background
    
        Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act and Federal regulations 
    prohibit the ``taking'' of a species listed as endangered or 
    threatened. However, the Service may, under limited circumstances, 
    issue permits to take listed species incidental to, and not the purpose 
    of, otherwise lawful activities. Regulations governing permits for 
    threatened species are promulgated in 50 CFR 17.32; regulations 
    governing permits for endangered species are promulgated in 50 CFR 
    17.22.
        As specified by the Endangered Species Act, permitted take must be 
    ``incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an 
    otherwise lawful activity.'' In order to obtain an incidental take 
    permit, the applicant must submit, in part, a conservation plan 
    specifying ``the impact which will likely result from such taking; what 
    steps the applicant will take to minimize and mitigate such impacts; 
    and the funding that will be available to implement such steps; what 
    alternative actions to such taking the applicant considered and reasons 
    why such alternatives are not being utilized; and such other measures 
    the Secretary (of the U.S. Department of the Interior) may require as 
    being necessary or appropriate for purposes of the plan.'' These 
    requirements are addressed in the Habitat Conservation Plan.
        The Applicant seeks coverage for take of the federally listed 
    valley elderberry longhorn beetle incidental to mining activity for the 
    Esparto Mining Project in Yolo County, California. The proposed 
    incidental taking would occur on a 98-acre site in Yolo County 
    California. The site supports four blue elderberry shrubs, which 
    constitute beetle habitat, that could potentially be occupied by this 
    species. The proposed take would be incidental to the lawful activities 
    of aggregate extraction and associated activities (e.g., material 
    conveyance, maintenance, and reclamation).
        To mitigate for impacts that would result from the removal of the 
    four valley elderberry shrubs, Teichert proposes to transplant the four 
    elderberry shrubs to an existing
    
    [[Page 54351]]
    
    mitigation site along Cache Creek in Yolo County. Additionally, 
    Teichert will achieve a 2:1 mitigation ratio, consistent with Service 
    mitigation guidelines, by designating, maintaining, and monitoring 22 
    elderberry replacement seedlings with associated native plants. The 
    habitat at the mitigation site is contiguous with a large habitat block 
    along Cache Creek that is known to support the beetle, and is likely to 
    be able to support this species on a long-term basis. Additional 
    information on the mitigation site is included in the Habitat 
    Conservation Plan.
        The proposed action addressed in the Environmental Assessment is 
    the issuance of a permit by the Service to allow the incidental take of 
    beetles incidental to the Esparto Mining Project. The Environmental 
    Assessment focuses on the potential impacts on the beetle that may 
    result from issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B) permit and implementation 
    of the Habitat Conservation Plan. Impacts on other resources (geology, 
    hydrology, cultural resources, land use and socioeconomics, traffic, 
    air quality, and noise) are discussed in detail in the Environmental 
    Impact Report for the Esparto Mining Project and are summarized in this 
    Environmental Assessment. The mining project would be able to proceed 
    and would have similar environmental impacts to resources other than 
    beetles regardless of whether the incidental take permit is issued. The 
    Proposed Action would result in cumulatively significant impacts to 
    beetles, but these impacts would be fully offset through the mitigation 
    measures described above.
        Two alternatives were considered in the Environmental Assessment: 
    the proposed action of issuance of an incidental take permit and a no 
    action alternative. In the no action alternative, no incidental take 
    permit would be issued and the elderberry shrubs would be avoided 
    during mining operations. No off-site alternatives were considered in 
    the Environmental Assessment because Yolo County has already approved 
    the Esparto Mining Project and Phase I mining has already commenced.
        All interested agencies, organizations, and individuals are urged 
    to provide comments on the permit application and Environmental 
    Assessment. All comments received by the closing date will be 
    considered in finalizing National Environmental Policy Act compliance 
    and permit issuance or denial. The Service will publish a record on its 
    final action in the Federal Register.
    
        Dated: September 27, 1999.
    Elizabeth H. Stevens,
    Deputy Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office, Sacramento, 
    California.
    [FR Doc. 99-25926 Filed 10-5-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/06/1999
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of availability and receipt of application.
Document Number:
99-25926
Dates:
Written comments should be received on or before November 5, 1999.
Pages:
54350-54351 (2 pages)
PDF File:
99-25926.pdf