99-25936. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200 and -200PF Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 54227-54228]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-25936]
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 193 / Wednesday, October 6, 1999 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 54227]]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-NM-57-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757-200 and -200PF Series 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 757-200 and -
    200PF series airplanes. This proposal would require repetitive detailed 
    visual inspections to detect loose fuse pins in the outboard beam 
    attachment and forward trunnion support on the main landing gear (MLG) 
    and to detect corrosion on the structure adjacent to the fuse pin; and 
    corrective actions, if necessary. This proposal also would require 
    eventual replacement of the fuse pins with new corrosion resistant 
    steel (CRES) fuse pins, which would constitute terminating action for 
    the repetitive inspections. This proposal is prompted by a report of 
    damaged fuse pins caused by corrosion. The actions specified by the 
    proposed AD are intended to prevent corroded fuse pins, which could 
    result in the MLG separating from the wing, and consequent damage to 
    the airplane and possible rupture of the wing fuel tank.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by November 22, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-NM-57-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
    holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Kawaguchi, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle 
    Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1153; fax (425) 227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 99-NM-57-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 99-NM-57-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has received a report indicating that, during heavy 
    maintenance of several Boeing Model 757-200 series airplanes, 28 fuse 
    pins were found damaged due to corrosion. Fuse pins made from 4330M and 
    4340 alloy with cracks in the chrome plating can be damaged by 
    corrosion. Such corrosion or cracking, if not corrected, could result 
    in the main landing gear (MLG) separating from the wing, and consequent 
    damage to the airplane and possible rupture of the wing fuel tank.
        The subject fuse pins on Boeing Model 757-200PF series airplanes 
    are identical to those on the affected Boeing Model 757-200 series 
    airplanes. Therefore, both of these airplanes may be subjected to the 
    same unsafe condition.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
    757-57A0054, dated November 5, 1998, which describes procedures for 
    repetitive detailed visual inspections to detect loose fuse pins in the 
    outboard beam attachment and forward trunnion support on the MLG and 
    corrosion on the structure adjacent to the fuse pin; and corrective 
    actions, if necessary. The corrective actions involve performing a 
    detailed visual inspection to detect corrosion on the fuse pin's mating 
    parts, and repairing the parts, if necessary; performing a detailed 
    visual inspection to detect cracks on the outer surface of the fuse pin 
    chrome plating; and replacing the alloy steel fuse pins with new 
    corrosion resistant steel (CRES) fuse pins, which would eliminate the 
    need for the repetitive inspections. The service bulletin also 
    describes procedures for a terminating action for the repetitive 
    inspections. Accomplishment of the action specified in the service 
    bulletin is intended to adequately address the identified unsafe 
    condition.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions
    
    [[Page 54228]]
    
    specified in the service bulletin described previously.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 805 airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 350 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    would be affected by this proposed AD.
        It would take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish 
    the proposed inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. 
    Based on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection proposed by 
    this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $21,000, or $60 per 
    airplane, per inspection cycle.
        It would take approximately 440 work hours per airplane to 
    accomplish the proposed replacement, at an average labor rate of $60 
    per work hour. The manufacturer has committed previously to its 
    customers that it will bear the cost of replacement parts. As a result, 
    the cost of those parts are not attributable to this proposed AD. Based 
    on these figures, the cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators 
    is estimated to be $9,240,000, or $26,400 per airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements 
    of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions 
    in the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Boeing: Docket 99-NM-57-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 757-200 and -200PF series airplanes, line 
    numbers 1 through 806 inclusive; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent corroded fuse pins, which could result in the main 
    landing gear (MLG) separating from the wing, and consequent damage 
    to the airplane and possible rupture of the wing fuel tank, 
    accomplish the following:
    
    Repetitive Inspections
    
        (a) Perform a detailed visual inspection to detect loose fuse 
    pins in the outboard beam attachment and forward trunnion support on 
    the MLG and to detect corrosion on the structure adjacent to the 
    fuse pin, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-
    57A0054, dated November 5, 1998; at the later of the times specified 
    in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD. Thereafter, repeat the 
    inspection at intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles or 24 
    months, whichever occurs first, until accomplishment of paragraph 
    (c) of this AD.
        (1) Prior to 4 years since date of manufacture of the airplane; 
    or
        (2) Within 3,000 flight cycles or 24 months after the effective 
    date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    
        Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual 
    inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a 
    specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to 
    detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is 
    normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at 
    intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such 
    as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning 
    and elaborate access procedures may be required.''
    
    Corrective Action
    
        (b) If any loose fuse pin or corrosion on the structure adjacent 
    to the fuse pin is detected during any inspection required by 
    paragraph (a) of this AD, prior to further flight, perform the 
    applicable corrective action [i.e., detailed visual inspections for 
    cracks or corrosion, repair of discrepant parts, and replacement of 
    fuse pin] in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-
    57A0054, dated November 5, 1998. Replacement of an alloy steel fuse 
    pin with a new corrosion resistant steel (CRES) fuse pin constitutes 
    terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements of 
    paragraph (a) of this AD for that fuse pin only.
    
    Terminating Action
    
        (c) At the next scheduled MLG overhaul, or within 12 years after 
    the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace all 
    alloy steel fuse pins with new CRES fuse pins in the outboard beam 
    attachment and forward trunnion support on the MLG in accordance 
    with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-57A0054, dated November 5, 
    1998. Accomplishment of the action specified in this paragraph 
    constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection 
    requirements of this AD.
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 29, 1999.
    D.L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-25936 Filed 10-5-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/06/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
99-25936
Dates:
Comments must be received by November 22, 1999.
Pages:
54227-54228 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-NM-57-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-25936.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13