99-25962. Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 6, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 54345-54346]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-25962]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
    
    
    Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
    Comment Request
    
        In compliance with section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction 
    Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on
    
    [[Page 54346]]
    
    proposed collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental 
    Health Service Administration will publish periodic summaries of 
    proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects 
    or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the 
    SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301) 443-7978.
        Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of 
    information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions 
    of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
    utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
    proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
    utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
    to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
    including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
    forms of information technology.
    
    Proposed Project
    
        State Incentive Grant (SIG) Cross-Site Evaluation--SAMHSA's Center 
    for Substance Abuse prevention (CSAP) is charged with evaluating the 
    State Incentive Cooperative Agreements for Community-Based Action, or 
    State Incentive Grant (SIG) Program. States receiving SIG funds are: 
    (1) To coordinate, leverage and/or redirect, as appropriate, all 
    substance abuse prevention resources within the State that are directed 
    at communities, families, schools, and workplaces, and (2) to develop a 
    revitalized, comprehensive State-wide prevention strategy aimed at 
    reducing drug use by youth. The ultimate aim of the SIG Program is to 
    prevent substance abuse among youths ages 12 to 17. The District of 
    Columbia and the 20 States that have received SIG grants thus far are 
    required to implement at the community level a range of substance 
    abuse, community-based prevention efforts, at least half of which are 
    derived from sound scientific research findings. CSAP awarded about $3 
    million per year for three years to each of five States in FY 1997, to 
    each of fourteen States in FY 1998, and to one State and the District 
    of Columbia in FY 1999.
        CSAP is planning a national, cross-site evaluation of the SIG 
    Program, consisting of a process and an outcome evaluation. The outcome 
    evaluation will address two questions: (1) ``Has the SIG Program had an 
    impact on youth substance abuse?,'' and (2) ``How do SIG States differ 
    in their impact on youth substance abuse?'' These questions will be 
    addressed by using data already being collected by SAMHSA's National 
    Household Survey of Drug Abuse (NHSDA). The process evaluation will 
    focus on three questions: (1) ``Did States attain the SIG Program's two 
    main goals of coordinated funding streams and revitalized comprehensive 
    prevention strategies and how were these goals attained?,'' (2) ``What 
    other substance abuse prevention programming has the State 
    implemented?,'' and (3) ``Did SIGs meet the criterion of supporting 
    science-based programs fifty percent of the time, and what array of 
    prevention activities were supported?''
        In addition to the NHSDA data, three instruments are needed to 
    collect process information about SIG activities at the State, 
    community, and program levels: (1) A State Case Study Protocol; (2) a 
    Comparison State Protocol and (3) a Program Intervention Protocol. The 
    State Case Study Protocol will collect data on the following topics at 
    the State level: contextual conditions, SIG mobilization, system 
    characteristics and dynamics, collaborative strategies or activities, 
    immediate outcomes, systems change, sub-recipient characteristics and 
    dynamics, sub-recipient planning and science-based prevention 
    interventions, sub-recipient immediate local outcomes, long-term 
    outcomes, possible rival explanations, and learned lessons. The State 
    Case Study Protocol also will provide data for one of the two 
    Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures for the SIG 
    program. The Comparison State Protocol will collect data from non-SIG 
    States to identify any SIG-like interventions and to record State-level 
    contextual conditions and the characteristics of prevention systems. 
    The Program Intervention Protocol will collect data at the subrecipient 
    and program levels on the following topics: contextual conditions, 
    program or action definition, and immediate and intermediate outcomes.
        The State Case Study Protocol will be used once for every State-
    level SIG award. The Comparison State Protocol will be administered 
    once to all States and U.S. territories not participating in the SIG 
    Program. The Program Intervention Protocol will be used for a sample of 
    sub-recipient communities and programs in the SIG States.
        Estimated annual burden is as follows:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                   Responses
                               Instrument                             Number of       per      Hours per    Annual
                                                                     respondents  respondent   response     burden
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    State Case Study Protocol......................................           56           1           2         112
    Comparison State Protocol......................................           25           1           2          50
    Program Intervention Protocol..................................          240           1           1         240
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------
          Total....................................................          321  ..........  ..........         402
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Send comments to Nancy Pearce, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, 
    Room 16-105, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. 
    Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice.
    
        Dated: September 29, 1999.
    Richard Kopanda,
    Executive Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
    Administration.
    [FR Doc. 99-25962 Filed 10-5-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4162-20-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/06/1999
Department:
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-25962
Pages:
54345-54346 (2 pages)
PDF File:
99-25962.pdf