[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52452-52469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26938]
[[Page 52451]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part IV
Office of Management and Budget
_______________________________________________________________________
Cancellation Pursuant to Line Item Veto Act; Military Construction
Appropriations Act, 1998; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 1997 /
Notices
[[Page 52452]]
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Cancellation Pursuant to Line Item Veto Act; Military
Construction Appropriations Act, 1998
October 6, 1997.
One Special Message from the President under the Line Item Veto Act
is published below. The President signed this message on October 6,
1997. Under the Act, the message is required to be printed in the
Federal Register (2 U.S.C. 691a(c)(2)).
Clarence C. Crawford,
Associate Director for Administration.
To the Congress of the United States:
In accordance with the Line Item Veto Act, I hereby cancel the
dollar amounts of discretionary budget authority, as specified in
the attached reports, contained in the ``Military Construction
Appropriations Act, 1998'' (Public Law 105-45; H.R. 2016). I have
determined that the cancellation of these amounts will reduce the
Federal budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government
functions, and will not harm the national interest.
William J. Clinton.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
October 6, 1997.
Cancellation No. 97-4
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $2,650
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Live Fire Command
and Control Facility, Fort Irwin, California'' on page 17 of House
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct a command and control facility to execute
the tactical, administrative, and safety functions in brigade-level
live fire operations. The project includes a helicopter landing pad,
radio relay rooms, and supporting infrastructure. The project is being
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, Fort Irwin will be able to continue to operate and train
using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal years:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -0
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -3
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$2,650 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Live Fire Command
and Control Facility, Fort Irwin (Military Construction, Army).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: California, 40th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: California: one; 40th
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-5
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $8,500
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Rotational Wash
Point, Fort Irwin, California'' on page 17 of House Report 105-247
dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would provide a central, 24 bay wash facility for wheeled
and tracked vehicles to supplement existing wash facilities. The
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, Fort Irwin will be able to continue to
operate using existing wash facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a
[[Page 52453]]
result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not increase, as
specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on the Federal
budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial effect on
the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -3
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -9
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$8,500 thousand in FY 1998
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Irwin
Rotational Wash Point (Military Construction, Army).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: California, 40th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: California: two; 40th
District: two.
Cancellation No. 97-6
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1 (A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $10,100
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project, ``Waterfront
Operations Building, Coronado Naval Amphibious Base, California'' on
page 17 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C), (E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct facilities for Explosive Ordnance Disposal
Mobile Unit Three (EODMU THREE), including two buildings and a harbor
area to provide protection for the Marine Mammal Program. The project
is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's
FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of
life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, EODMU THREE will be able to continue to
operate and train using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -4
2000........................................................ -3
2001........................................................ -2
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -10
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$10,100 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Coronado Naval
Amphibious Base Waterfront Operations Building (Military Construction,
Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: California, 49th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: California: three; 49th
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-7
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,690
thousand for Military Construction, Naval Reserve project ``Marine
Corps Reserve Center, Pasadena, California'' on page 17 of House Report
105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct a new Marine Corps Reserve Center for the
4th Light Anti-Air Defense (LAAD) Battalion and demolish existing
facilities. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, the 4th
LAAD Battalion will be able to continue to operate using existing
facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -7
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$6,690 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
[[Page 52454]]
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Pasadena Marine
Corps Reserve Center (Military Construction, Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: California, 27th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: California: four; 27th
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-8
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $16,000
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Railyard Expansion
(Phase I) Fort Carson, Colorado'' on page 17 of House Report 105-247
dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would remove existing rail, turnouts and crossings and
construct 26,400 feet of new track, including turnouts and crossings.
The project would also construct a new remote loading facility, rail
engine maintenance facility, warehouse and associated facilities. The
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, Fort Carson will be able to continue to
operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -3
1999........................................................ -5
2000........................................................ -4
2001........................................................ -3
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -16
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$16,000 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Carson Railyard
Expansion (Phase I) (Military Construction, Army).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Colorado, 5th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Colorado: one; 5th
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-9
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $17,940
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Pier Improvements,
Mayport Naval Station, Florida'' on page 18 of House Report 105-247
dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would provide dredging and pier improvements to increase
the number of larger berths for homeported and visiting ships. The
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, Mayport Naval Station will be able to
continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -8
2000........................................................ -5
2001........................................................ -3
2002........................................................ -1
2003........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -18
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$17,940 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Mayport Naval
Station, Pier Improvements (Military Construction, Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Florida, 4th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Florida: one; 4th
District: one.
[[Page 52455]]
Cancellation No. 97-10
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $1,300
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Runway Upgrades,
Whiting Field, Florida'' on page 18 of House Report 105-247, dated
September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would extend one runway and acquire a clear zone for
another. A longer runway and clear zone are required for the new Beech
MKII training aircraft, scheduled to arrive in FY 2002. The project is
being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY
1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life
of military service members and their families; and (3) architectural
and engineering design of this project has not started, making it
unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998.
Without this project, Whiting Field will be able to continue to operate
using existing runways.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal Year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -0
2001........................................................ -0
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -1
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$1,300 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Runway Upgrades,
Whiting Field (Military Construction, Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Florida, 1st
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Florida: two; 1st
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-11
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,800
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``HH-60 Rescue
Operations Facility, Moody Air Force Base (AFB), Georgia'' on page 18
of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide a facility to support combat search and
rescue training and pararescue training operations when this mission
relocates from Patrick AFB. The project is being canceled because: (1)
it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would
not substantially improve the quality of life of military service
members and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering
design of this project has not started, making it unlikely that these
funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Since this new
mission has not yet relocated from Patrick AFB, cancellation of this
project will not affect ongoing operations at Moody AFB.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -7
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$6,800 thousand in FY1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): HH-60 Rescue
Operations Facility, Moody AFB (Military Construction, Air Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Georgia, 2nd
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Georgia: one; 2nd
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-12
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,500
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Asian Pacific
Center, Fort Derussey, Hawaii'' on page 19 of House Report 105-247,
dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide new space for the Asian-Pacific Center for
Security Studies. The
[[Page 52456]]
Center provides facilities and programs for national officials and
military officers to explore pressing issues regarding the security
environment of the Asian-Pacific region. The project is being canceled
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget;
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, the Navy will continue to be able to operate the Center
in existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -4
2000........................................................ -3
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -10
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$9,500 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Derussey Asian-
Pacific Center (Military Construction, Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Hawaii, 1st
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Hawaii: one; 1st District:
one.
Cancellation No. 97-13
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,200
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``B-1B Avionics
Building (Bldg), Mountain Home Air Force Base (AFB), Idaho'' on page 19
of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide a new facility for Air Expeditionary Wing's
avionics repair. The facility would be used for an electronic
countermeasure pod shop, low altitude navigation and targeting infrared
for night (LANTIRN) shop, and other avionics repair and test functions.
The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, avionics functions at Mountain Home AFB
will be able to continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -3
2000........................................................ -3
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -9
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$9,200 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): B-1B Avionics
Building Mountain Home AFB (Military Construction, Air Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Idaho, 2nd
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Idaho: one; 2nd District:
one.
Cancellation No. 97-14
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $3,750
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``F-15C Squadron
Operations Facility, Mountain Home Air Force Base (AFB), Idaho'' on
page 19 of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide a facility to plan, brief and critique
combat crews and to direct flight operations. The project also would
demolish the existing operations facility, built in 1970. The project
is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's
FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of
life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, F-15C squadrons at Mountain Home AFB
will be able to
[[Page 52457]]
continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -4
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$3,750 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): F-15C Squadron
Operations Facility Mountain Home AFB (Military Construction, Air
Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Idaho, 2nd
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Idaho: two; 2nd District:
two.
Cancellation No. 97-15
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,120
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Chemical-Biological
Warfare Detection Center, Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indiana''
on page 20 of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide a new maintenance, overhaul and engineering
support facility for shipboard chemical/biological warfare detection
devices, to replace a smaller, existing facility. The project is being
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center will be able to
continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -4
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$4,120 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Chemical-Biological
Warfare Detection Center, Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center (Military
Construction, Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Indiana, 8th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Indiana: one; 8th
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-16
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $8,913
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force Reserve project ``Base
Civil Engineer Complex, Grissom Air Reserve Base, Indiana'' on page 20
of House Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide a new base civil engineer complex to include
maintenance shops, warehouse storage, and a roads and grounds facility.
The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, Grissom Air Reserve Base will be able to
continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -3
2000........................................................ -3
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -9
[[Page 52458]]
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$8,913 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Grissom Air Reserve
Base Civil Engineer Complex (Military Construction, Air Force Reserve).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Indiana, 5th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Indiana: two; 5th
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-17
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $2,850
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``Transportation
Complex, McConnell Air Force Base (AFB), Kansas'' on page 20 of House
Report 105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide a new transportation complex, including a
vehicle operations administration facility and vehicle parking
facility. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project,
McConnell AFB will be able to continue to perform transportation
functions using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -0
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -3
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$2,850 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): McConnell AFB
Transportation Complex (Military Construction, Air Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Kansas, 4th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Kansas: one; 4th District:
one.
Cancellation No. 97-18
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,900
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Tactical Equipment
Shop (Phase II), Fort Campbell, Kentucky'' on page 20 of House Report
105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide a vehicle maintenance shop and storage for a
forward support battalion and combat support hospital. The project also
would demolish facilities currently used for vehicle maintenance. The
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, Fort Campbell will be able to continue
to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -2
1999........................................................ -3
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -2
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -10
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits Budget
Authority: -$9,900 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Campbell
Tactical Equipment Shop (Phase II) (Military Construction, Army).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Kentucky, 1st
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Kentucky: one; 1st
District: one.
[[Page 52459]]
Cancellation No. 97-19
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $7,200
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Qualification
Training Range (QTR), Fort Knox, Kentucky'' on page 20 of House Report
105-247, dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would modernize Heins Rifle Range to a new standard
Qualification Training Range with a total of 28 firing lanes. The
project would construct three control towers, a headquarters building,
two general instruction buildings, and other supporting facilities. The
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, Fort Knox will be able to continue to
operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -7
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$7,200 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Knox
Qualification Training Range (Military Construction, Army).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Kentucky, 2nd
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Kentucky: two; 2nd
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-20
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $2,610
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Maintenance Hangar,
St. Inigoes Naval Electronic Systems Engineering Activity, Maryland''
on page 21 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would provide additional hangar space to support
maintenance operations on unmanned air vehicles. The project is being
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, the St. Inigoes Naval Electronic Systems Engineering
Activity will be able to continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -0
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -3
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$2,610 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Maintenance Hangar,
St. Inigoes Naval Electronic Systems Engineering Activity, Maryland
(Military Construction, Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Maryland, 5th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Maryland: Maryland one;
5th District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-21
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,500
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project, ``Add/Alter
Airmen Dining Facility, Malmstrom Air Force Base (AFB), Montana,'' on
page 22 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any
[[Page 52460]]
essential Government functions, and will not harm the national
interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would add dry and cold storage and alter the equipment and
food preparation areas of the current facility. The project is being
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, Malmstrom AFB will be able to continue to operate using
existing dining facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -5
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$4,500 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Addition/Alterations
to the Airmen Dining Facility, Malmstrom AFB (Military Construction,
Air Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Montana, 1st
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Montana: one; 1st
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-22
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $1,950
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``Munitions
Maintenance Facility, Nellis Air Force Base (AFB), Nevada'' on page 22
of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct a larger, replacement facility to support
the inspection, assembly and testing of explosive munitions used by
training aircraft. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was
not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Nellis
AFB will be able to continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[in millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -0
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -2
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$1,950 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Nellis AFB Munitions
Maintenance Facility (Military Construction, Air Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Nevada, 2nd
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Nevada: one; 2nd District:
one.
Cancellation No. 97-23
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,900
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Launch Complex
Revitalization, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico'' on page 23 of
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would repair launch facilities for the Patriot, Stinger,
Chaparral and HAWK missiles, as well as for the Multiple Launch Rocket
System (MLRS) and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS). The project
would also construct a new personnel support area and test support
facility. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, White
Sands will be able to continue to operate in existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal
[[Page 52461]]
outlays will not increase, as specified below. This will have a
commensurate effect on the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent,
will have a beneficial effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -7
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$6,900 thousand in fiscal year: 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): White Sands Missile
Range Launch Complex Revitalization (Military Construction, Army).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: New Mexico, 2nd
District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: New Mexico: one; 2nd
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-24
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $14,000
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``Flight
Simulation Training Facility, Kirtland Air Force Base (AFB), New
Mexico'' on page 23 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct a new theater air simulation facility to
support command and control; weapons system research, development,
testing and evaluation; and training. The project is being canceled
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget;
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, Kirtland AFB will be able to continue to operate and
train using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[in millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -2
1999........................................................ -5
2000........................................................ -4
2001........................................................ -2
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -14
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$14,000 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Kirtland AFB Flight
Simulation Training Facility (Military Construction, Air Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: New Mexico, 1st
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: New Mexico: two; 1st
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-25
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,000
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Aerial Gunnery Range
(Phase I), Fort Drum, New York'' on page 23 of House Report 105-247
dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would provide a target range for joint rotary and fixed
wing operations, replacing the two existing ranges at Fort Drum. The
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, units at Fort Drum will be able to
continue to operate using the existing ranges.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -3
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -2
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -9
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$9,000 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
[[Page 52462]]
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Drum Aerial
Gunnery Range. (Phase I) (Military Construction, Army).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: New York, 24th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: New York: two; 24th
District: two.
Cancellation No. 97-26
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $2,100
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force Reserve project
``Consolidated Training Facility, Niagara Falls IAP, New York'' on page
23 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct one building to house the readiness office
and combat arms training space. The facility would replace two older
buildings. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Niagara
Falls units will be able to continue to operate and train using
existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -0
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -2
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$2,100 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Niagara Falls IAP
Consolidated Training Facility (Military Construction, Air Force
Reserve).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: New York, 27th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: New York: three; 27th
District: two.
Cancellation No. 97-27
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $7,900
thousand for Military Construction, Army project ``Military Operations
on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT) Training Complex (Phase I) Fort Bragg,
North Carolina,'' on page 23 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9,
1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct part of an MOUT training complex,
consisting of 32 buildings with streets, parking, a bridge, and
associated support facilities. The project is being canceled because:
(1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it
would not substantially improve the quality of life of military service
members and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering
design of this project has not started, making it unlikely that these
funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this
project, forces at Fort Bragg will be able to continue to train using
existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[in millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:....................................................
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -8
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$7,900 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Bragg, MOUT
Training Complex (Phase I) (Military Construction, Army).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: North Carolina,
7th Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: North Carolina: one; 7th
District: one.
[[Page 52463]]
Cancellation No. 97-28
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,000
thousand for Military Construction, Army Reserve project ``U.S. Army
Reserve Center/Organizational Maintenance Shop (OMS)/Area Maintenance
Support Activity (AMSA) (Phase I) Oakdale, Pennsylvania'' on page 24 of
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct a new Army Reserve training facility to
house multiple training missions, including communications security and
deployable medical systems. The project is being canceled because: (1)
it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would
not substantially improve the quality of life of military service
members and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering
design of this project has not started, making it unlikely that these
funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this
project, Oakdale Army Reserve units will be able to continue to operate
and train using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -3
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -6
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits Budget
Authority: -$6,000 thousand in FY 1998 .
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Oakdale, Army
Reserve Center/ OMS/AMSA (Phase I) (Military Construction, Army
Reserve).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Pennsylvania,
20th Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Pennsylvania: one; 20th
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-29
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $13,980
thousand for Military Construction, Naval Reserve project ``Reserve
Hangar and Training Center, Johnstown, Pennsylvania'' on page 24 of
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct a Marine Corps Reserve Training Center and
an aircraft maintenance hangar to upgrade the current facilities. The
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, units at the Johnstown Joint Reserve
Facility will be able to continue to operate and train using existing
facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -5
2000........................................................ -4
2001........................................................ -3
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -14
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$13,980 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Marine Corps Reserve
Center and Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, Johnstown (Military
Construction, Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Pennsylvania,
12th Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Pennsylvania: two; 12th
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-30
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $3,823
thousand for Military Construction, Army National Guard project
``Regional Simulation Center, Leesburg Training Site (Eastover), South
Carolina'' on page 25 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any
[[Page 52464]]
essential Government functions, and will not harm the national
interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct a 48,000 sq. ft. battle simulation center
to replace a 4,200 sq. ft. facility. The project is being canceled
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget;
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, area Army National Guard units will be able to continue
to train using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -4
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$3,823 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments Upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Leesburg Regional
Simulation Center (Military Construction, Army National Guard).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: South Carolina,
2nd Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: South Carolina: one; 2nd
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-31
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016)
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $5,200
thousand for Military Construction, Army National Guard project,
``Aviation Support Facility, Rapid City, South Dakota,'' on page 25 of
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would provide new hangar, administrative, maintenance,
classroom, and other space to support UH-1 and C-12 aircraft used by
the 1085th Medical Air Ambulance Company. The project is being canceled
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget;
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, the Rapid City Army National Guard will be able to
continue to operate and train using existing maintenance facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[in millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -5
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$5,200 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Military Aviation
Support Facility, Rapid City (Military Construction, Army National
Guard).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: South Dakota,
1st Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: South Dakota: one; 1st
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-32
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $9,900
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project ``Atmospheric Air
Dryer Facility, Arnold Air Force Base (AFB), Tennessee,'' on page 25 of
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct an air dryer facility to replace the
existing facility. The new facility would support the mission of the
Propulsion Wind Tunnel (PWT) facility for the F-22 and Joint Strike
Fighter (JSF) next generation aircraft. The PWT performs aerodynamic
testing which requires dry air for simulating flight conditions. The
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, Arnold AFB will be able to continue to
operate and test using existing dryer facilities.
[[Page 52465]]
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -3
2000........................................................ -3
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -10
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$9,900 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Atmospheric Air
Dryer Facility, Arnold AFB (Military Construction, Air Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Tennessee, 4th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Tennessee: one; 4th
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-33
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $7,700
thousand for Military Construction, Army project, ``Ammunition Supply
Point Expansion (Phase II), Fort Bliss, Texas,'' on page 25 of House
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide 11 ammunition magazines, a surveillance
workshop, inert storage facilities, an equipment storage and
maintenance facility, and an above ground petroleum, oils and
lubricants (POL) dispensing facility. This is phase two of a relocation
of this function from the main post to McGregor Range. The project is
being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY
1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life
of military service members and their families; and (3) architectural
and engineering design of this project has not started, making it
unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998.
Without this project, Fort Bliss will be able to continue to operate
using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -8
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$7,700 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Ammunition Supply
Point Expansion (Phase II), Fort Bliss (Military Construction, Army).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Texas, 16th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Texas: one; 16th District:
one.
Cancellation No. 97-34
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $10,000
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project, ``B-1 Squadron
Operations(Ops)/Aircraft Maintenance Unit, Dyess Air Force Base (AFB),
Texas,'' on page 25 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide a consolidated B-1B squadron operations
facility, including space for flight operations, maintenance, storage
and training functions. The 13th Bombardment Squadron(BS) is standing
up at Dyess and will operate out of temporary facilities until a new
facility is constructed. The 9th BS currently operates out of six
buildings. The consolidated facility would house both squadrons. The
project is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the
President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the
quality of life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, squadrons at Dyess AFB will be able to
continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -4
[[Page 52466]]
2000........................................................ -3
2001........................................................ -2
2002........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -10
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$10,000 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Consolidated B-1B
Squadron Operations and Aircraft Maintenance Facility, Dyess AFB
(Military Construction, Air Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Texas, 17th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Texas: two; 17th District:
one.
Cancellation No. 97-35
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,800
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force project, ``Corrosion
Control Facility, Laughlin Air Force Base (AFB), Texas,'' on page 25 of
House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide a new facility for painting T-1A, T-37 and
T-38 aircraft. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Laughlin
AFB will be able to continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -5
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$4,800 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Corrosion Control
Facility, Laughlin AFB (Military Construction, Air Force).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Texas, 23rd
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Texas: three; 23rd
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-36
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $12,714
thousand for Military Construction, Army Reserve project ``U.S. Army
Reserve Center (USARC), Organizational Maintenance Shop (OMS), Camp
Williams, Utah,'' on page 26 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9,
1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct a new Reserve Center, Organizational
Maintenance Shop (OMS), and a warehouse to replace facilities that
would be lost if a proposed 11 acre transfer of property to the
University of Utah occurred. A new site for relocation has not yet been
identified. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was not
requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Fort
Douglas (Camp Williams) Army Reserve Units will be able to continue to
operate and train using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -5
2000........................................................ -3
2001........................................................ -2
2002........................................................ -2
-------
Total..................................................... -13
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$12,714 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Fort Douglas, U.S.
Army
[[Page 52467]]
Reserve Center and OMS Relocation (Military Construction, Army
Reserve).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Utah, 2nd
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Utah: one; 2nd District:
one.
Cancellation No. 97-37
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,000
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Air Operations
Building, Norfolk Naval Air Station, Virginia'' on page 26 of House
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would provide a new air operations facility, including an
air traffic control facility, radar tower and supporting
infrastructure. The existing facility would be demolished. The project
is being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's
FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of
life of military service members and their families; and (3)
architectural and engineering design of this project has not started,
making it unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during
FY 1998. Without this project, Norfolk Naval Air Station will be able
to continue to operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -4
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$4,000 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Norfolk Naval Air
Station, Air Operations Facility (Military Construction, Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Virginia, 2nd
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Virginia: one; 2nd
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-38
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $19,910
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project ``Waterfront
Improvements, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Virginia'' on page 26 of House
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would provide a new wharf for ship repair and demolish two
abandoned shipbuilding ways and two buildings. The project is being
canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998
Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of
military service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, the Norfolk Naval Shipyard will be able to continue to
operate using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -1
1999........................................................ -8
2000........................................................ -6
2001........................................................ -3
2002........................................................ -1
2003........................................................ -1
-------
Total..................................................... -20
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$19,910 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Waterfront
Improvements, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Virginia (Military Construction,
Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Virginia, 2nd
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Virginia: two; 2nd
District: two.
Cancellation No. 97-39
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $3,290
thousand for Military Construction, Navy project, ``Tomahawk Magazine,
Yorktown Naval Weapons Station, Virginia,'' on page 26
[[Page 52468]]
of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs.
This project would provide an earth covered magazine for storage of
Tomahawk missiles. The project is being canceled because: (1) it was
not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget; (2) it would not
substantially improve the quality of life of military service members
and their families; and (3) architectural and engineering design of
this project has not started, making it unlikely that these funds can
be used for construction during FY 1998. Without this project, Yorktown
Naval Weapons Station will be able to continue to operate using
existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -1
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -0
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -3
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$3,290 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Tomahawk Magazine,
Yorktown Naval Weapons Station (Military Construction, Navy).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Virginia, 1st
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Virginia: three; 1st
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-40
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount of Discretionary Budget Authority: $6,828
thousand for Military Construction, Army National Guard project ``Armed
Forces Reserve Center, Camp Dawson, West Virginia'' on page 27 of House
Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would provide an expanded facility for several Army
National Guard units. The new, enlarged facility would provide
administrative, training, exercise and storage space. The project is
being canceled because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY
1998 Budget; (2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life
of military service members and their families; and (3) architectural
and engineering design of this project has not started, making it
unlikely that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998.
Without this project, Army National Guard units at Camp Dawson will be
able to continue to operate and train using existing facilities.
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -2
2001........................................................ -2
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -7
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$6,828 thousand in FY1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Armed Forces Reserve
Center, Camp Dawson, West Virginia (Military Construction, Army
National Guard).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: West Virginia,
1st Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: West Virginia: one; 1st
District: one.
Cancellation No. 97-41
CANCELLATION OF DOLLAR AMOUNT OF DISCRETIONARY BUDGET AUTHORITY
Report Pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130
Bill Citation: ``Military Construction Appropriations Act, 1998''
(H.R. 2016).
1(A). Dollar Amount Item of Discretionary Budget Authority: $4,200
thousand for Military Construction, Air Force Reserve, project ``Aerial
Port Training Facility, Mitchell Air Reserve Station (ARS)(Milwaukee),
Wisconsin'' on page 27 of House Report 105-247 dated September 9, 1997.
1(B). Determinations: This cancellation will reduce the Federal
budget deficit, will not impair any essential Government functions, and
will not harm the national interest.
1(C),(E). Reasons for Cancellation; Facts, Circumstances, and
Considerations Relating to or Bearing upon the Cancellation; and
Estimated Effect of Cancellation on Objects, Purposes, and Programs:
This project would construct an aerial port training facility to
replace existing, smaller facilities. The project is being canceled
because: (1) it was not requested in the President's FY 1998 Budget;
(2) it would not substantially improve the quality of life of military
service members and their families; and (3) architectural and
engineering design of this project has not started, making it unlikely
that these funds can be used for construction during FY 1998. Without
this project, Mitchell ARS will be able to continue to provide training
using existing facilities.
[[Page 52469]]
1(D). Estimated Fiscal, Economic, and Budgetary Effect of
Cancellation: As a result of the cancellation, Federal outlays will not
increase, as specified below. This will have a commensurate effect on
the Federal budget deficit and, to that extent, will have a beneficial
effect on the economy.
Outlay changes
[In millions of dollars]
Fiscal year:
1998........................................................ -0
1999........................................................ -2
2000........................................................ -1
2001........................................................ -1
2002........................................................ -0
-------
Total..................................................... -4
1(F). Adjustments to Defense Discretionary Spending Limits
Budget Authority: -$4,200 thousand in FY 1998.
Outlays: The estimated outlay effect for each year is shown above.
Evaluation of Effects of These Adjustments upon Sequestration
Procedures: If a sequestration were required, such sequestration would
occur at levels that are reduced by the amounts above.
2(A). Agency: Department of Defense.
2(A). Bureau: Military Construction.
2(A). Governmental Function/Project (Account): Aerial Port Training
Facility, Mitchell Air Reserve Station (Military Construction, Air
Force Reserve).
2(B). States and Congressional Districts Affected: Wisconsin, 4th
Congressional District.
2(C). Total Number of Cancellations (inclusive) in Current Session
in each State and District identified above: Wisconsin: one; 4th
District: one.
[FR Doc. 97-26938 Filed 10-6-97; 4:32pm]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
