96-25877. American Medical Systems, Inc.; Premarket Approval of UroLumeSUPTM Endourethral Prosthesis  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 9, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 52949]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-25877]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    Food and Drug Administration
    [Docket No. 96M-0356]
    
    
    American Medical Systems, Inc.; Premarket Approval of 
    UroLumeTM Endourethral Prosthesis
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing its 
    approval of the application by American Medical Systems, Inc., 
    Minnetonka, MN, for premarket approval, under the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act (the act), of the UroLumeTM Endourethral 
    Prosthesis. After reviewing the recommendation of the Gastroenterology 
    and Urology Devices Panel, FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological 
    Health (CDRH) notified the applicant, by letter of May 6, 1996, of the 
    approval of the application.
    
    DATES: Petitions for administrative review by November 8, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written requests for copies of the summary of safety and 
    effectiveness data and petitions for administrative review to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 
    12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James P. Seiler, Center for Devices 
    and Radiological Health (HFZ-470), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 
    Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-1195.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 14, 1993, American Medical Systems, 
    Inc., Minnetonka, MN 55343, submitted to CDRH an application for 
    premarket approval of the UroLumeTM Endourethral Prosthesis. The 
    device is intended for use in men to relieve urinary obstruction 
    secondary to recurrent benign bulbar urethral strictures less than 3 
    centimeters in length located distal to the external sphincter and 
    proximal to the bulbar scrotal junction. The UroLumeTM 
    Endourethral Prosthesis is not intended as an initial treatment for 
    bulbar urethral strictures nor for the treatment of strictures outside 
    the bulbar urethra. The UroLumeTM Endourethral Prosthesis is an 
    alternative treatment for the patient in whom previous treatment 
    methods (e.g., dilation, urethrotomy, or urethroplasty) have been 
    unsuccessful (i.e., treatment was not effective initially in relieving 
    stricture disease, or there has been recurrence of stricture formation 
    necessitating further treatment).
        On January 20, 1995, the Gastroenterology and Urology Devices Panel 
    of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee, an FDA advisory committee, 
    reviewed and recommended approval of the application. On May 6, 1996, 
    CDRH approved the application by a letter to the applicant from the 
    Director of the Office of Device Evaluation, CDRH.
        A summary of the safety and effectiveness data on which CDRH based 
    its approval is on file in the Dockets Management Branch (address 
    above) and is available from that office upon written request. Requests 
    should be identified with the name of the device and the docket number 
    found in brackets in the heading of this document.
    
    Opportunity for Administrative Review
    
        Section 515(d)(3) of the act (21 U.S.C. 360e(d)(3)) authorizes any 
    interested person to petition, under section 515(g) of the act, for 
    administrative review of CDRH's decision to approve this application. A 
    petitioner may request either a formal hearing under part 12 (21 CFR 
    part 12) of FDA's administrative practices and procedures regulations 
    or a review of the application and CDRH's action by an independent 
    advisory committee of experts. A petition is to be in the form of a 
    petition for reconsideration under Sec. 10.33(b) (21 CFR 10.33(b)). A 
    petitioner shall identify the form of review requested (hearing or 
    independent advisory committee) and shall submit with the petition 
    supporting data and information showing that there is a genuine and 
    substantial issue of material fact for resolution through 
    administrative review. After reviewing the petition, FDA will decide 
    whether to grant or deny the petition and will publish a notice of its 
    decision in the Federal Register. If FDA grants the petition, the 
    notice will state the issue to be reviewed, the form of the review to 
    be used, the persons who may participate in the review, the time and 
    place where the review will occur, and other details.
        Petitioners may, at any time on or before November 8, 1996, file 
    with the Dockets Management Branch (address above) two copies of each 
    petition and supporting data and information, identified with the name 
    of the device and the docket number found in brackets in the heading of 
    this document. Received petitions may be seen in the office above 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
        This notice is issued under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
    Act (secs. 515(d), 520(h) (21 U.S.C. 360e(d), 360j(h))) and under 
    authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (21 CFR 5.10) 
    and redelegated to the Director, Center for Devices and Radiological 
    Health (21 CFR 5.53).
    
        Dated: September 20, 1996.
    Joseph A. Levitt,
    Deputy Director for Regulations Policy, Center for Devices and 
    Radiological Health.
    [FR Doc. 96-25877 Filed 10-8-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/09/1996
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
96-25877
Dates:
Petitions for administrative review by November 8, 1996.
Pages:
52949-52949 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96M-0356
PDF File:
96-25877.pdf