98-27258. Funds Availability for the Southeast Bering Sea Carrying Capacity (SEBSCC) Project  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 196 (Friday, October 9, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 54447-54450]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-27258]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    [Docket No. 980805207-8207-01]
    RIN: 0648-ZA47
    
    
    Funds Availability for the Southeast Bering Sea Carrying Capacity 
    (SEBSCC) Project
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    AGENCY: Coastal Ocean Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
    Administration, Commerce.
    ACTION: Supplemental Notice for Financial Assistance for Project 
    Grants.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The NOAA Coastal Ocean Program (COP) announces an opportunity 
    for ecosystem dynamics studies on the southeast Bering Sea shelf as 
    part of the Southeast Bering Sea Carrying Capacity (SEBSCC) project. 
    This announcement solicits two-year proposals for analysis, monitoring 
    and process studies to begin in early fiscal year 1999, contingent on 
    the availability of funds and facilities. This Phase II announcement 
    addresses Years Three and Four of the SEBSCC program, described in 
    detail at http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/sebscc. Phase II will be followed by 
    two years of synthesis. Further information is described below and at 
    SEBSCC's home page site: http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/sebscc. This 
    supplemental notice shall
    
    [[Page 54448]]
    
    be made available at COP's home page site: http://www.cop.noaa.gov/cop-
    home.html. Any previous submissions to this announcement on the above 
    web pages need not be resubmitted.
    
    DATES: The deadline for proposals is November 9, 1998. It is 
    anticipated that final selections for funding will be made during early 
    FY l999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit the original and one copy of your proposal to Allen 
    Macklin, NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, 7600 Sand Point 
    Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115-0070.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions or require 
    further technical information, contact either Allen Macklin at above-
    listed e-mail address and phone number; or Beth Turner, SEBSCC 
    Coordinator, Coastal Ocean Program Office, 301-713-3338/ext 135, 
    Internet: elizabeth.turner@noaa.gov. For Business Management 
    Information:: Leslie McDonald, COP Grants Office, (301) 713-3338/ext 
    137.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background:
    
        The Bering Sea ecosystem is influenced by climate variability. 
    Summer of 1997 brought +3 deg.C temperature anomalies, unusually strong 
    stratification, a coccolithophorid bloom, and reduced numbers of 
    foraging sea birds and returning salmon. On longer time scales, there 
    was an almost exponential increase in jellyfish populations since 1989. 
    Such trends and one-year events may be related to prolonged weather 
    patterns in the North Pacific and observed shifts in Arctic climate. A 
    key challenge for SEBSCC is to understand how such changes affect the 
    food web and food supply to higher trophic level animals. Thus, the 
    focus of Phase II for SEBSCC in fiscal years 1999 and 2000 is on how 
    such physical changes affect: (1) the availability of nutrients on the 
    Bering Sea shelf and (2) the relation of juvenile walleye pollock to 
    top predators.
        The Bering Sea ecosystem is among the most productive of high-
    latitude seas and supports large populations of marine fish, birds and 
    mammals. This productivity is important to the U.S. economy in that 
    fish and shellfish from the region constitute almost 5% of the world 
    and 40% of the U.S. fisheries harvest. Pollock, salmon, halibut and 
    crab generate over two billion dollars a year in fisheries revenue and 
    provide a major source of protein. The overwhelming dominance of 
    pollock in the Bering Sea suggests that this species currently plays a 
    singularly important role in this ecosystem.
        We do not understand the factors controlling the stability of the 
    Bering Sea ecosystem, and there are several indications of ongoing 
    change that cause concern. Quantifying the relative importance of 
    natural variations and human-induced variations in plaining upper 
    trophic level ecosystem changes is a key management issue for the 
    Bering Sea. Differentiating trends in stock abundance attributable to 
    human exploitation from trends due to natural variations is difficult 
    because the fisheries and environmental time series are often short or 
    incomplete. Trends are seldom stable and can be subject to regional 
    variation. Important lower trophic layer changes include those natural 
    and anthropogenic variations that cause shifts in the production of new 
    organic matter and its vertical distribution.
        SEBSCC postulates that a large fraction of the Bering Sea ecosystem 
    energy passes through the pollock population. Juvenile pollock respond 
    to and potentially impact primary and secondary production through 
    grazing, and influence the availability of food for upper trophic level 
    species, including adult pollock, seabirds and marine mammals. Pollock 
    provide an important measure of the condition of the present ecosystem, 
    and may be an indicator of changes in the Bering Sea over the last 
    three decades and in the future. The SEBSCC program is designed to 
    improve our understanding of the Bering Sea ecosystem; the results of 
    this endeavor will directly assist fishery and resource managers.
    
    SEBSCC Goals and Objectives
    
        The goal of SEBSCC is to increase understanding of the southeastern 
    Bering Sea pelagic ecosystem. New information will be used to develop 
    and test annual indices of pre-recruit (age-1) pollock abundance, which 
    will support management of pollock stocks and help determine the food 
    availability to other species. The overall science goals for SEBSCC are 
    to:
        (a) Investigate influences of climate variability on the Bering Sea 
    ecosystem; and determine what limits population growth on the Bering 
    Sea shelf; and
        (b) Identify effects of oceanographic conditions on biological 
    distributions; and
        (c) Understand environmental influences on primary and secondary 
    production regimes.
    
    Structure of the Research Program
    
        SEBSCC is a NOAA COP regional ecosystem project begun in 1996. This 
    continuing Phase II effort is managed by the University of Alaska 
    Fairbanks, NOAA's Alaska Fisheries Science Center, and NOAA's Pacific 
    Marine Environmental Laboratory. SEBSCC research comprises three 
    components: monitoring, synthesis (analysis) and process-oriented field 
    studies.
        (a) Monitoring: Broad-scale studies include shipboard surveys, 
    multi-disciplinary mooring observations, drifters and analysis of 
    regional satellite data. Shipboard studies help to determine the 
    distribution and abundance of target organisms in relation to their 
    physical environment. There is a particular need for a drifter program 
    in the outer domain of the shelf. The aim of the broad-scale studies is 
    to provide the basis for interannual comparison of the population 
    processes and their coupling to the physical structure and variability 
    of the environment.
        (b) Synthesis (Analysis): Synthesis begins to pull together results 
    generated by the program and historical data to investigate the 
    biological, physical, and geographical structure of food webs and the 
    influence of climatic variation. Synthesis includes development of 
    theoretical, statistical, and numerical models. In addition to modeling 
    of geographical variability, there is an ongoing need for modeling that 
    emphasizes trophic level interaction. Thus, proposals that develop 
    coupled energetics, life history, and age structured models with 
    simplified spatial dependence are strongly encouraged. A critical 
    element of SEBSCC is the ability to evaluate models over a 
    comprehensive time period, e.g., the suite of years from 1970 to the 
    present.
        (c) Process Studies: Process studies are nested within the broad-
    scale observations to investigate specific biological and physical 
    processes. Such studies provide information necessary to develop and 
    parameterize biophysical models. Close cooperation and interaction 
    between process studies and the monitoring and synthesis components of 
    the program are essential.
    
    Phase I:
    
        Proposals for Phase l studies were requested in 1996, and funded in 
    FY97 and FY98. Summaries and results of all projects funded under Phase 
    l of SEBSCC are available at their referenced web site. Central 
    Scientific issues for Phase 1 included the following:
        (1) Influence of climate variability on the Bering Sea ecosystem: 
    Was there historical evidence for a biophysical regime shift on the 
    Bering Sea shelf? How was this reflected in ecological relationships 
    and species mix? Are there
    
    [[Page 54449]]
    
    ``top-down'' ecosystem effects associated with climate variations as 
    well as ``bottom-up'' effects?
        (2) Limited population growth on the Bering Sea shelf: Was there 
    evidence of a single species carrying capacity, e.g. for pollock, or a 
    more complex structure? What is the ecological role of pollock on the 
    Bering Sea shelf, i.e. how are pollock, forage fish, and apex species 
    linked through energetics and life history? How important is 
    cannibalism?
        (3) Influence of oceanographic conditions of biological 
    distribution on the shelf: How do the separate mixing domains, sea ice, 
    and the cold pool influence the overlap or separation between predators 
    and prey?
        (4) Possible Influences on primary and secondary production 
    regimes: What were the sources of nutrients to the southeastern Bering 
    Sea shelf, and what processes affected their availability? Has the 
    variability in sea ice extent and timing been the primary factor 
    influencing productivity? What has determined the relative allocation 
    of organic carbon going to benthos versus that remaining in the pelagic 
    system? What are the lower trophic level structure and energetics on 
    the shelf in summer and winter, especially regarding euphausiids? What 
    is the role of gelatinous organisms? Additional information about the 
    overall SEBSCC programs supported in Phase 1 is available at http://
    pmel.noaa.gov/sebscc.
    
    Phase II:
    
        The specific objectives for Phase lI are to:
        (1) Determine how changes in on-shelf transport of nutrients impact 
    pelagic food webs. This includes determination of how timing, duration, 
    magnitude and species composition of primary, secondary and forage fish 
    production affect food availability for higher trophic levels.
        (2) Determine how climate variability influences the spatial 
    overlap of pollock of different life stages, and how the availability 
    of juvenile pollock to predators affects pollock survival rate.
    
    Schedule and Proposal Submission
    
        This opportunity is open to all interested, qualified, non-federal 
    and federal researchers. Foreign researchers must subcontract with U.S. 
    proposers. This announcement, and additional background information are 
    available on the SEBSCC home page on the World Wide Web. If you are 
    unable to access this information, either call Allen Macklin at (206) 
    526-6798; or send an e-mail to macklin@pmel.noaa.gov).
        Full Proposals should cover a two-year project period, i.e. from 
    date of award for twenty-four (24) consecutive months. Project is 
    anticipated to be funded in early FY1999. Prospective investigators 
    should provide a full scientific justification for their research and 
    not simply reiterate justifications laid out in this Announcement or 
    previous documents. Proposals should be written to allow adequate 
    review of the details of such things as goals and objectives, 
    conceptual framework, methodological approaches, integration with other 
    likely projects and synthesis. In addition, it would be helpful if a 
    statement is included as to how your proposed efforts are related to 
    efforts of other potential investigators; interdisciplinary and multi-
    trophic level coordination are particularly encouraged. Because of an 
    eight-page limitation for the project description, individual proposals 
    with overly complex structure and large numbers of investigators are 
    discouraged.
        Non-federal researchers should comply with their institutional 
    requirements for proposal submission. Non-federal researchers 
    affiliated with NOAA-university Joint Institutes (e.g., JISAO, CIFAR) 
    should comply with joint institutional requirements. Proposals deemed 
    acceptable from federal researchers will be funded through their 
    agencies; non-federal awardees will be funded through their joint 
    institutes, as appropriate, or through a NOAA grant. Facsimile 
    transmissions and electronic mail submission of full proposals will not 
    be accepted.
    
    Required Elements:
    
        Use the following instructions when preparing your proposal. Each 
    proposal shall include six elements:
        (a) Cover page--Provide a title, a short title (<50 characters)="" if="" needed,="" principal="" investigator(s)="" name(s)="" and="" affiliation(s),="" complete="" address,="" phone,="" fax="" and="" e-mail="" information,="" and="" a="" budget="" summary="" broken="" out="" by="" year="" and="" institution.="" (b)="" half-page="" abstract--state="" the="" hypothesis="" to="" be="" tested,="" the="" relationship="" of="" the="" research="" to="" the="" program="" goal,="" and="" a="" summary="" of="" the="" key="" approach.="" (c)="" statement="" of="" work:="" project="" description="" limited="" to="" eight="" pages="" and="" four="" figures--supply="" a="" clear="" statement="" of="" the="" work="" to="" be="" undertaken.="" outline="" the="" broad="" design="" of="" activities,="" provide="" an="" adequate="" description="" of="" methods,="" and="" confirm="" adherence="" to="" the="" data="" policy="" that="" is="" posted="" on="" sebscc's="" home="" page.="" include:="" (1)="" the="" objective="" for="" the="" period="" of="" proposed="" work="" and="" its="" expected="" significance,="" (2)="" the="" relation="" to="" the="" present="" state="" of="" knowledge="" in="" the="" field="" and="" relation="" to="" previous="" work="" and="" work="" in="" progress="" by="" the="" proposing="" principal="" investigator(s),="" and="" (3)="" a="" discussion="" of="" how="" the="" proposed="" project="" lends="" value="" to="" the="" program="" goal.="" provide="" a="" full="" scientific="" justification="" for="" the="" research;="" do="" not="" simply="" reiterate="" justifications="" laid="" out="" in="" this="" availability="" of="" funds="" document,="" or="" other="" summary="" documents.="" (d)="" milestone="" chart="" -="" covering="" twenty-four="" consecutive="" months.="" (e)="" budget--present="" the="" budget="" in="" fiscal="" year="" increments="" (1999,="" 2000).="" include="" the="" following="" categories:="" salary="" and="" wages,="" fringe="" benefits,="" equipment,="" travel,="" materials="" and="" supplies="" (expendables),="" publication="" costs,="" computer="" services,="" sub-awards,="" total="" cost="" of="" this="" proposal,="" and="" cost="" sharing="" with="" other="" programs.="" please="" include="" a="" budget="" narrative/justification="" to="" support="" all="" proposed="" categories.="" (f)="" biographical="" sketch--focus="" on="" information="" directly="" relevant="" to="" undertaking="" the="" proposed="" research.="" use="" no="" more="" than="" two="" pages.="" (g)="" proposal="" format="" and="" assembly:="" staple="" the="" proposal="" in="" the="" upper="" left-hand="" corner,="" but="" otherwise="" leave="" it="" unbound.="" use="" 1="" inch="" (2.5="" cm)="" margins="" at="" the="" top,="" bottom,="" left="" and="" right="" of="" each="" page.="" use="" a="" clear="" and="" easily="" legible="" type="" face="" in="" standard="" size="" of="" 12="" points.="" print="" on="" one="" side="" of="" the="" page="" only.="" further="" supplementary="" information="" (a)="" program="" authority="" (s):="" 33="" u.s.c.="" 1121;="" 33="" u.s.c.="" 883a="" et="" seq.="" 33="" u.s.c.="" 1442;="" l6="" u.s.c.="" 1456c="" (b)="" catalog="" of="" federal="" domestic="" assistance="" (cfda):="" 11.="" 478="" coastal="" ocean="" program="" (c)="" program="" description:="" see="" initial="" cop="" general="" notice--63="" fr44237,="" dated="" august="" l8,="" 1998.="" (d)="" funding="" availability:="" funding="" is="" contingent="" upon="" receipt="" of="" fiscal="" years="" 1999="" and="" 2000="" federal="" appropriations.="" the="" program="" is="" expected="" to="" be="" funded="" at="" $1.0m="" per="" fiscal="" year="" for="" fy="" 1999="" and="" fy="" 2000,="" with="" final="" synthesis="" at="" $0.7m="" in="" 2001="" and="" $0.3m="" in="" 2002.="" in="" fy="" 1999="" and="" fy="" 2000,="" typically="" we="" anticipate="" one="" month="" of="" ship="" time="" in="" the="" winter/spring="" and="" one="" month="" in="" the="" summer.="" cop="" is="" also="" working="" on="" having="" a="" fall="" cruise="" in="" 1999.="" joint="" work="" with="" other="" research="" institutions="" on="" their="" vessels="" is="" a="" possibility.="" cop="" recognizes="" that="" resources="" are="" limited;="" and="" therefore="" encourages="" potential="" investigators="" to="" consider="" leveraging="" their="" proposals="" with="" support="" from="" other="" sources,="" although="" there="" are="" no="" matching="" requirements.="" investigators="" interested="" in="" the="" bering="" sea="" may="" also="" consider="" becoming="" no-cost="" [[page="" 54450]]="" collaborators;="" ship="" time="" and="" modest="" travel="" support="" would="" be="" available.="" if="" an="" application="" for="" a="" financial="" assistance="" award="" is="" selected="" for="" funding,="" cop="" has="" no="" obligation="" to="" provide="" any="" additional="" prospective="" funding="" in="" connection="" with="" that="" award="" in="" subsequent="" years.="" renewal="" of="" an="" award="" to="" increase="" funding="" or="" extend="" the="" period="" of="" performance="" is="" at="" the="" total="" discretion="" of="" the="" department="" of="" commerce.="" publication="" of="" this="" notice="" does="" not="" obligate="" commerce="" to="" any="" specific="" award="" or="" to="" obligate="" any="" part="" of="" the="" entire="" amount="" of="" funds="" available.="" (e)="" matching="" requirements:="" none="" (f)="" type="" of="" funding="" instrument:="" project="" grants="" (g)="" eligibility="" criteria:="" opportunity="" is="" extended="" to="" academic,="" private,="" and="" federal="" researchers.="" phase="" li="" will="" be="" followed="" by="" two="" years="" of="" synthesis.="" all="" prospective="" investigators="" for="" phase="" li,="" including="" those="" currently="" funded="" under="" sebscc="" who="" propose="" to="" continue,="" will="" compete="" on="" an="" equal="" basis="" for="" support.="" (h)="" award="" period:="" multi-year="" funding="" will="" be="" funded="" incrementally="" on="" an="" annual="" basis.="" therefore,="" each="" annual="" award="" shall="" require="" a="" statement="" of="" work="" that="" is="" clearly="" severable="" and="" can="" be="" easily="" separated="" into="" annual="" increments="" of="" meaningful="" work="" which="" represent="" solid="" accomplishments="" if="" prospective="" funding="" is="" not="" made="" available.="" (i)="" indirect="" costs:="" if="" indirect="" costs="" are="" proposed,="" the="" following="" statement="" applies:="" the="" total="" dollar="" amount="" of="" the="" indirect="" costs="" proposed="" in="" an="" application="" under="" any="" announcement="" of="" opportunity="" must="" not="" exceed="" the="" indirect="" cost="" rate="" negotiated="" and="" approved="" by="" a="" cognizant="" federal="" agency="" prior="" to="" the="" proposed="" effective="" date="" of="" the="" award="" or="" 100="" percent="" of="" the="" total="" proposed="" direct="" costs="" dollar="" amount="" in="" the="" application,="" whichever="" is="" less.="" (j)="" application="" forms="" and="" kit:="" when="" applying="" for="" financial="" assistance="" under="" this="" announcement,="" applicants="" will="" be="" able="" to="" obtain="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" federal="" register="" notice="" and="" a="" standard="" noaa="" application="" kit="" from="" the="" cop="" home="" page="" on="" the="" following="" world="" wide="" web="" address:="">http://
    www.cop.noaa.gov/cop-home.html. If you are unable to access this 
    information, you may also call the Coastal Ocean Program (extension 
    116) at the address listed above to leave a mail request. The federal 
    register notice may be also be accessed at the following Wide Web 
    address: http://www.access.gpo.gov/su-docs/aces/aces140.html.
        At time of submission, the applicant shall follow the guidelines 
    presented in the funding announcement. Applications not adhering to 
    those stated guidelines may be returned to the applicant without 
    further review.
        (k) Project Funding Priorities: Priority consideration will be 
    given to proposals that promote balanced coverage of the overall SEBSCC 
    science goals, provide a programmatically balanced approach to Phase lI 
    goals, and avoid duplication of completed or ongoing work.
        (l) Evaluation Criteria: The proposal selection criteria and 
    weights are: (i.) scientific rationale, quality, and approach--50%; 
    (ii.) applicability to Phase lI objectives--30%; (iii) qualifications 
    of the investigators--10%; and (iv.). reasonableness of the budget--
    10%. Successful PIs may be asked to make minor revisions in their 
    proposals to fit into an overall program structure.
        (m) Selection Procedures: The proposal review process for SEBSCC 
    Phase lI will be coordinated by the Project Management Team and the COP 
    Office. Proposals received after the required thirty days for 
    publication deadline, or proposals that deviate from the prescribed 
    format, will be returned to the sender un-reviewed. Individual 
    proposals will be mailed to at least three (3) reviewers with expertise 
    in the proposal subject area. The entire set of proposals will also be 
    read by members of SEBSCC's Technical Advisory Committee. All proposals 
    submitted will be evaluated in accordance with the assigned weights of 
    evaluation criteria stated above.
        A panel, composed of the Technical Advisory Committee and the 
    Project Management Team (also a mix of Federal and non-federal 
    members), will rank all proposals based on mail and panel evaluations. 
    The NOAA SEBSCC Project Coordinator will make recommendations for 
    funding based on the panel rankings and the project funding priorities 
    discussed in section (k). Selections will be announced early in FY1999.
        (n) Other Requirements: See initial COP Notice--63 FR44237, dated 
    August l8, 1998.
        (o) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is 
    required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty 
    for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the 
    requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that collection 
    displays a current valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control 
    number. This notice involves collections of information subject to the 
    requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The requirements have been 
    approved by OMB under control numbers 0348-0043, 0348-0044, 0348-0040 
    and 0348-0046.
    
        Dated: October 6, 1998.
    Captain Evelyn J. Fields,
    Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal 
    Zone Managment.
    [FR Doc. 98-27258 Filed 10-8-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-JS-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/09/1998
Department:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Supplemental Notice for Financial Assistance for Project Grants.
Document Number:
98-27258
Dates:
The deadline for proposals is November 9, 1998. It is anticipated that final selections for funding will be made during early FY l999.
Pages:
54447-54450 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 980805207-8207-01
PDF File:
98-27258.pdf