94-27075. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 210 (Tuesday, November 1, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-27075]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: November 1, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [AZ 37-1-6592a; FRL-5086-9]
    
     
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona State 
    Implementation Plan Revision
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the Arizona 
    State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revised rule controls emissions of 
    volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the transfer of gasoline into 
    motor vehicle fuel tanks. The revision applies to the Phoenix 
    nonattainment area and this approval action will incorporate the 
    regulation into the Federally approved SIP. The intended effect of 
    approving this rule is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with 
    the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the 
    Act). In addition, the final action on this rule serves as a final 
    determination that the finding of nonsubmittal for this rule has been 
    corrected and that on the effective date of this action, any Federal 
    Implementation Plan (FIP) clock is stopped. Thus, EPA is finalizing the 
    approval of these revisions into the Arizona SIP under provisions of 
    the CAA regarding EPA action on SIP submittals, SIPs for national 
    primary and secondary ambient air quality standards and plan 
    requirements for nonattainment areas.
    
    DATES: This final rule is effective on January 3, 1995, unless adverse 
    or critical comments are received by December 1, 1994. If the effective 
    date is delayed, a timely notice will be published in the Federal 
    Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the regulation and EPA's evaluation report for the 
    rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office 
    during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted regulation are 
    available for inspection at the following locations:
    
    Rulemaking Section (A-5-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
    Francisco, CA 94105.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket 6102, 401 ``M'' Street, 
    SW., Washington, DC 20460.
    Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 3033 North Central 
    Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85012.
    Arizona Department of Weights and Measures, 1951 West North Lane, 
    Phoenix, AZ 85021.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mae Wang, Rulemaking Section (A-5-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
    Francisco, CA 94105, Telephone: (415) 744-1200.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were 
    enacted. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 
    7401-7671q. Under section 182(b)(3), EPA was required to issue guidance 
    as to the effectiveness of stage II systems. In November 1991, EPA 
    issued technical and enforcement guidance to meet this 
    requirement.1 In addition, on April 16, 1992, EPA published the 
    ``General Preamble for the Implementation of title I of the Clean Air 
    Act Amendments of 1990'' (General Preamble) (57 FR 13498). The guidance 
    documents and the General Preamble interpret the stage II statutory 
    requirement and indicate what EPA believes a State submittal needs to 
    include to meet that requirement.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ These two documents are entitled ``Technical Guidance--Stage 
    II Vapor Recovery Systems for Control of Vehicle Refueling Emissions 
    at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities'' (EPA-450/3-91-022) and 
    ``Enforcement Guidance for Stage II Vehicle Refueling Control 
    Programs.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Phoenix area is designated nonattainment for ozone and 
    classified as moderate. See 56 FR 56694 (Nov. 6, 1991) and 57 FR 56762 
    (Nov. 30, 1992), codified at 40 CFR 81.300 through 81.437. Under 
    section 182(b)(3) of the amended Act, Arizona was required to submit 
    stage II vapor recovery rules for this area by November 15, 1992. An 
    18-month sanctions clock under section 179(a) of the CAA began on 
    January 15, 1993 when EPA made a finding that the State failed to make 
    a complete submittal. In addition, section 110(c) of the Act provides 
    that EPA promulgate a FIP no later than two years after a finding under 
    section 179(a). On May 27, 1994, the Arizona Department of 
    Environmental Quality (ADEQ) submitted to EPA stage II vapor recovery 
    rules that were adopted by the State on August 27, 1993. The mandatory 
    sanctions clock was stopped on June 30, 1994 when EPA determined that 
    the State had made a complete submittal. By this document, EPA is 
    taking direct final action to approve this submittal. This final action 
    will incorporate this regulation into the Federally approved SIP and 
    stop the FIP clock. The EPA has reviewed the State submittal against 
    the statutory requirements and for consistency with EPA guidance. A 
    summary of EPA's analysis is provided below. In addition, a more 
    detailed analysis of the State submittal is contained in a technical 
    support document (TSD) which is available from the Region IX Office, 
    listed above.
    
    Applicability
    
        Under section 182(b)(3), States were required by November 15, 1992 
    to adopt regulations requiring owners or operators of gasoline 
    dispensing systems to install and operate vapor recovery equipment at 
    their facilities. The amended Act specifies that these State rules must 
    apply to any facility that dispenses more than 10,000 gallons of 
    gasoline per month or, in the case of an independent small business 
    marketer (ISBM), any facility that dispenses more than 50,000 gallons 
    of gasoline per month. Section 324 of the Act defines an ISBM. The 
    State has adopted a general applicability requirement of 10,000 gallons 
    of gasoline per month and has provided an applicability requirement of 
    50,000 gallons of gasoline per month for ISBM's.
        As more fully discussed in EPA's Enforcement Guidance and the 
    General Preamble (57 FR 13514), the State has provided that the gallons 
    of gasoline dispensed per month will be calculated as stringently as 
    the average volume dispensed per month for the 2-year period prior to 
    State adoption of the regulation. In addition, the State has specified 
    that the stage II requirement apply to all gasoline dispensing 
    facilities, including retail outlets and fleet fueling facilities.
    
    Implementation of Stage II
    
        The Act specifies the time by which certain facilities must comply 
    with the State regulation. For facilities that are not owned or 
    operated by an ISBM, these times, calculated from the time of State 
    adoption of the regulation, are: (1) 6 months for facilities for which 
    construction began after November 15, 1990; (2) 1 year for facilities 
    that dispense greater than 100,000 gallons of gasoline per month; and 
    (3) 2 years for all other facilities. Although the submitted regulation 
    was not adopted until August 27, 1993, the State regulations meet the 
    express timetables in the Act since emergency rules were in effect 
    prior to this submittal and the State compliance dates were set with 
    respect to the November 15, 1992 statutory deadline for adoption of 
    stage II regulations.
    
    Additional Program Requirements
    
        Consistent with EPA's guidance, the State requires that stage II 
    systems be tested and certified to meet a 95 percent emission reduction 
    efficiency by using only systems approved by the California Air 
    Resources Board (CARB). The State requires sources to verify proper 
    installation and function of stage II equipment through use of a liquid 
    blockage test and a leak test prior to system operation and every year 
    or upon major modification of a facility (i.e., 75 percent or more 
    equipment change).
        With respect to recordkeeping, the State has adopted those items 
    recommended in EPA's guidance and specifies that sources subject to 
    Stage II must make these documents available upon request: (1) A 
    license or permit to install and operate a stage II system, (2) results 
    of verification tests, (3) equipment maintenance and compliance file 
    logs indicating compliance with manufacturer's specifications and 
    requirements, (4) training certification files, and (5) inspection and 
    compliance records issued by the State. In addition, the State requires 
    facilities that are not subject to stage II to maintain files 
    containing the gasoline throughput of the facility. The State has also 
    established an inspection function consistent with that described in 
    EPA's guidance. The State plans to conduct inspections of facilities 
    including a visual inspection of the stage II equipment and of the 
    required records and a functional test of the stage II equipment.
    
    EPA Action
    
        Because EPA believes that the State has adopted a stage II 
    regulation in accordance with section 182(b)(3) of the Act, as 
    interpreted in EPA's guidance, Arizona Administrative Code title 4, 
    Chapter 31, Article 9 (R4-31-901 through R4-31-910) is being approved 
    under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting the requirements of 
    section 182(b)(3) and 110(a) and part D. Therefore, if this direct 
    final action is not withdrawn, on January 3, 1995, any FIP clock is 
    stopped.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future implementation 
    plan. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be considered 
    separately in light of specific technical, economic, and environmental 
    factors and in relation to relevant statutory and regulatory 
    requirements.
        EPA is publishing this document without prior proposal because the 
    Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal 
    Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision 
    should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be 
    effective January 3, 1995, unless, by December 1, 1994, adverse or 
    critical comments are received.
        If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn 
    before the effective date by publishing a subsequent notice that will 
    withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be 
    addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a 
    proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on 
    this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should 
    do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is 
    advised that this action will be effective January 3, 1995.
    
    Regulatory Process
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises and 
    government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under sections 110 and 301(a) and subchapter I, part 
    D of the CAA do not create any new requirements, but simply approve 
    requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the 
    Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify 
    that it does not have a significant impact on any small entities 
    affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-state relationship 
    under the CAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would 
    constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state 
    action. The CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such 
    grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S. 
    Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
        The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this regulatory 
    action from Executive Order 12866 review.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
    Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
    
        Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
    Plan for the Arizona was approved by the Director of the Federal 
    Register on July 1, 1982.
    
        Date: September 23, 1994.
    Felicia Marcus,
    Regional Administrator.
    
        Subpart D of Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal 
    Regulations is amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
    Subpart D--Arizona
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
        2. Section 52.120 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(69)(i)(A) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.120  Identification of Plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (69) The following amendment to the plan was submitted by the 
    Governor's designee on May 27, 1994.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) Maricopa County Bureau of Air Pollution Control stage II vapor 
    recovery program, adopted on August 27, 1993.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 94-27075 Filed 10-31-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/3/1995
Published:
11/01/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
94-27075
Dates:
This final rule is effective on January 3, 1995, unless adverse or critical comments are received by December 1, 1994. If the effective date is delayed, a timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: November 1, 1994, AZ 37-1-6592a, FRL-5086-9
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.120