96-28001. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Participants Trust Company; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Elimination of Prefunding Requirements for Intraday Free Retransfers  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 213 (Friday, November 1, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 56598-56599]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-28001]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-37869; File No. SR-PTC-96-04]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Participants Trust Company; Order 
    Approving a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Elimination of 
    Prefunding Requirements for Intraday Free Retransfers
    
    October 25, 1996.
        On July 2, 1996, the Participants Trust Company (``PTC'') filed 
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed 
    rule change (File No. SR-PTC-96-04) pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ to eliminate prefunding 
    requirements for intraday free retransfers. Notice of the proposal was 
    published in the Federal Register on August 12, 1996.\2\ No comment 
    letters were received. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission 
    is approving the proposed rule change.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 37523 (August 5, 1996), 
    61 FR 41816.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Description
    
        The rule change amends PTC's rules to eliminate the requirement 
    that participants must have cash on deposit (``optional deposits'') 
    with PTC equal to the original contract value for securities that are 
    received the same day versus payment prior to making an intraday free 
    redelivery of such securities. These optional deposits are commonly 
    referred to as ``prefundings.''
        The requirement that participants prefund intraday free 
    redeliveries was added to PTC's rules by PTC's predecessor, MBS 
    Clearing Corporation (``MBSCC'').\3\ The purpose of the prefunding 
    requirement was to support the original deliverer's security interest 
    (``DSI'') and the default provisions which permitted PTC to reverse 
    (i.e., unwind) securities deliveries to achieve settlement, both of 
    which were added to PTC's rules at the same time.\4\ Both the DSI and 
    the unwind procedures subsequently have been eliminated from PTC's 
    rules and have been replaced with the participant's intraday collateral 
    lien (``PICL'').\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ In 1988, MBSCC proposed a rule change to require its 
    participants to prefund intraday free transfers. Securities Exchange 
    Act Release No. 26101 (September 22, 1988), 53 FR 37895 [File No. 
    SR-MBS-88-14] (notice of filing of proposed rule change). 
    Subsequently, the order granting PTC's registration as a clearing 
    agency incorporated the proposed rule change stating that PTC's 
    rules were essentially identical to MBSCC's rules including the most 
    recently proposed rule changes. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
    26671 (March 31, 1989), 54 FR 13266, [File No. 600-25] (order 
    granting registration as a clearing agency and statement of 
    reasons).
        \4\ PTC's rules originally provided that securities delivered 
    versus payment (i.e., held in a participant's transfer account) were 
    held by PTC pending settlement subject to the DSI granted to the 
    original delivering participant. If securities were thereafter 
    redelivered free from a transfer account, the secured party would 
    lose its collateral unless prefunding served as proceeds of that 
    collateral. Accordingly, participants that made a free delivery of 
    securities subject to a DSI were required to have cash at least 
    equal to the original contract value of the securities in the form 
    of an optional deposit to the participants fund.
        \5\ For a more complete discussion of PTC's reasons for removing 
    the DSI and the unwind procedures, refer to Securities Exchange Act 
    Release No. 34701 (September 22, 1994), 59 FR 49730 [File No. SR-
    PTC-94-03] (order approving proposed rule change).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The PICL, which can be exercised only if PTC is insolvent and fails 
    to achieve settlement, is granted to those participants with a net 
    credit balance owed to them by PTC. Participants with a net credit 
    balance have a pro rata interest in a common pool of collateral that 
    consists of securities held in transfer accounts (i.e., intraday 
    deliveries versus payment) for which settlement has not yet occurred, 
    payments made by participants to satisfy net debit balances owed to 
    PTC, and prefunding payments made to support intraday free redeliveries 
    of securities from transfer accounts.
        Prefunding intraday free redeliveries can impose a substantial 
    burden on participants. For example, if a participant receives a 
    security in a transaction versus payment through PTC and thereafter 
    redelivers it free, such participant usually will be receiving payment 
    for the free redelivery outside of PTC. Although the participant must 
    have sufficient Net Free Equity (``NFE'') \6\ for PTC to process the 
    transaction, the participant may not have the cash available until 
    after the funds are received from the party receiving the free 
    redelivery outside of PTC. In addition, the participant may be in a net 
    credit position at PTC when cash prefunding is required as a result of 
    other transactions which are processed through its account.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ NFE for a participant's account consists of, among other 
    things, the cash balances in the participant's account, the market 
    value of securities, net of applicable margin in the participant's 
    account or associated transfer account, a portion of the 
    participant's mandatory deposit to the participants fund, and the 
    participant's optional deposits to the participants fund including 
    prefunding. Additional components of NFE not relevant to this 
    analysis include reserve on gain, which operates to reduce NFE in 
    certain transactions, and excess proprietary NFE, a component of 
    supplemental processing collateral.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Discussion
    
        Section 17A(b)(3)(F) \7\ of the Act requires that the rules of a 
    clearing
    
    [[Page 56599]]
    
    agency be designed to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds 
    which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which 
    it is responsible. The Commission believes that PTC's proposed rule 
    change is consistent with PTC's obligations under the Section 17A of 
    the Act. Each transaction processed through the PTC system, including 
    both deliveries versus payment and free redeliveries, is tested to 
    ensure that both the delivering and receiving participant's accounts 
    will not have negative NFE after giving effect to the transaction. 
    PTC's NFE controls will block any free redelivery where the deduction 
    of the securities from the account of the delivering participant will 
    cause its NFE to be negative thereby reducing the risk that the amount 
    of collateral available with respect to a participant's account is not 
    sufficient to cover the participant's debit balance. The elimination of 
    cash prefunding will not diminish PTC's NFE controls. In addition, the 
    elimination of cash prefunding will release collateral previously 
    required by PTC which should increase participants' liquidity while PTC 
    should not incur any additional risks by such release.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78q-1(b)(3)(F) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Conclusion
    
        On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
    proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in 
    particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the 
    rules and regulations thereunder.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-PTC-96-04) be and hereby is 
    approved.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority. \8\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1996).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-28001 Filed 10-31-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/01/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-28001
Pages:
56598-56599 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-37869, File No. SR-PTC-96-04
PDF File:
96-28001.pdf