96-28054. Indiana Michigan Power Company (D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2); Exemption  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 213 (Friday, November 1, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 56572-56573]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-28054]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316]
    
    
    Indiana Michigan Power Company (D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 
    and 2); Exemption
    
    I
    
        Indiana Michigan Power Company (IMPCo, the licensee) is the holder 
    of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 which authorize 
    operation of the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, 
    respectively. The Cook facilities are pressurized water reactors 
    located at the licensee's site in Berrien County, Michigan. The license 
    provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to all 
    rules, regulations, and
    
    [[Page 56573]]
    
    orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect.
    
    II
    
        Subsection (a) of 10 CFR 70.24, ``Criticality accident 
    requirements,'' requires that each licensee authorized to possess 
    special nuclear material (SNM) shall maintain in each area where such 
    material is handled, used, or stored, an appropriate criticality 
    monitoring system.
        In accordance with the Technical Specifications for D. C. Cook, 
    Units 1 and 2, the monitoring requirements of 10 CFR 70.24(a)(2) are 
    applicable. Subsection (a) of 10 CFR 70.24 also requires that emergency 
    procedures be maintained for each area in which licensed SNM is 
    handled, used, or stored to ensure that all personnel withdraw to an 
    area of safety upon the sounding of the alarm. These procedures must 
    include the conduct of drills to familiarize personnel with the 
    evacuation plan, designation of responsible individuals for determining 
    the cause of the alarm, and placement of radiation survey instruments 
    in accessible locations for use in such an emergency. However, 
    exemptions may be requested pursuant to 10 CFR 70.24(d), provided that 
    the licensee believes that good cause exists for the exemption.
        By letter dated April 8, 1996, the licensee requested an exemption 
    from the requirements of 10 CFR 70.24. A previous exemption from the 
    provisions of 10 CFR Part 70.24 for the storage of SNM, including 
    reactor fuel assemblies [maximum amount of 2313 kg of U-235 in uranium 
    enriched to no more than 3.15 weight percent (w/o)], was granted to 
    Indiana and Michigan Power Company for D.C. Cook Unit 2 in NRC 
    Materials License No. SNM-1753. The materials license was issued on 
    August 18, 1977. No similar exemption was issued for the Unit 1 
    materials license; however, the fuel storage facilities were common to 
    both units. The previously issued exemption expired when the materials 
    license expired upon conversion of the construction permit to an 
    operating license on December 23, 1977, for Unit 2. The basis for the 
    current exemption request is the same as for the original request. 
    Specifically, the licensee proposes to handle and store unirradiated 
    fuel without having a criticality monitoring system or emergency 
    procedures as required by 10 CFR 70.24.
        The basis for the exemption is that inadvertent or accidental 
    criticality will be precluded through compliance with the Cook 
    Technical Specifications, the geometric spacing of fuel assemblies in 
    the new fuel storage facility and spent fuel storage pool, and 
    administrative controls imposed on fuel handling procedures.
        Inadvertent or accidental criticality of SNM while in use in the 
    reactor vessel is precluded through compliance with the Cook Technical 
    Specifications, including reactivity requirements (e.g., shutdown 
    margins, limits on control rod movement), instrumentation requirements 
    (e.g., reactor power and radiation monitors), and controls on refueling 
    operations (e.g., refueling boron concentration and source range 
    monitor requirements). In addition, the operators' attention directed 
    toward instruments monitoring behavior of the nuclear fuel in the 
    reactor assures that the facility is operated in such a manner as to 
    preclude inadvertent criticality. Finally, since access to the fuel in 
    the reactor vessel is not physically possible while in use and is 
    procedurally controlled during refueling, there are no concerns 
    associated with loss or diversion of the fuel.
        SNM as nuclear fuel is stored in one of two locations, the spent 
    fuel pool or the new fuel vault. The spent fuel pool is used to store 
    irradiated fuel under water after its discharge from the reactor. The 
    pool is designed to store the fuel in a geometric array that precludes 
    criticality. In addition, existing Technical Specification limits on 
    keff are maintained less than or equal to 0.95, even in the event 
    of a fuel handling accident. The new fuel vault design precludes 
    criticality by maintaining an effective multiplication factor less than 
    or equal to 0.95 when the racks are fully loaded and in the normal dry 
    condition or under full water density flooded conditions. The effective 
    multiplication factor is also less than or equal to 0.98 under optimum 
    moderation conditions. The new fuel vault is used to receive and store 
    new fuel in a dry condition upon arrival on site and prior to loading 
    in the reactor. Administrative controls encompass placing the 
    assemblies in the fuel inspection stand, performing inspection 
    activities, and lifting and placement of the assemblies into specified 
    locations in the new fuel vault.
        The new fuel vault is protected from the effects of natural 
    phenomena, including earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, and 
    external missiles. The auxiliary building which houses the new fuel 
    vault is designed to Seismic Class I by a dynamic analysis using 
    Response Spectrum and Modal Analysis Procedure to maintain structural 
    integrity after a safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) or following a 
    postulated hazard, such as fire, internal missiles, or pipe break. The 
    new fuel racks are designed to Seismic Class III by an analysis using 
    the procedures of the Uniform Building Code.
        Both irradiated and unirradiated fuel is moved to and from the 
    reactor vessel and the spent fuel pool to accommodate refueling 
    operations. Also, unirradiated fuel can be moved to and from the new 
    fuel storage area. In addition, movements of fuel into the facility and 
    within the reactor vessel or within the spent fuel pool occur. Fuel 
    movements are procedurally controlled and designed to preclude 
    conditions involving criticality concerns. In addition, the Technical 
    Specifications specifically address the refueling operations and limit 
    the handling of fuel to ensure against an accidental criticality and to 
    preclude certain movements over the spent fuel pool and the reactor 
    vessel.
        Based upon the information provided, there is reasonable assurance 
    that irradiated and unirradiated fuel will remain subcritical. The 
    circumstances for granting an exemption to 10 CFR 70.24 are met because 
    criticality is precluded with the present design configuration, 
    Technical Specifications requirements, administrative controls, and the 
    fuel handling equipment and procedures. Therefore, the staff concludes 
    that the licensee's request for an exemption from the requirements of 
    10 CFR 70.24 is acceptable and should be granted.
    
    III.
    
        Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 
    70.14, this exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or 
    property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the 
    public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Indiana 
    Michigan Power Company an exemption as described in Section II above 
    from 10 CFR 70.24, ``Criticality accident requirements,'' for D.C. 
    Cook, Units 1 and 2.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the 
    granting of this exemption will have no significant impact on the 
    quality of the human environment (61 FR 39672).
        This exemption is effective upon issuance.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of October 1996.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Frank J. Miraglia,
    Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 96-28054 Filed 10-31-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/01/1996
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-28054
Pages:
56572-56573 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316
PDF File:
96-28054.pdf