98-30008. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Soy Protein and Coronary Heart Disease  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 217 (Tuesday, November 10, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 62977-63015]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-30008]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 101
    
    [Docket No. 98P-0683]
    
    
    Food Labeling: Health Claims; Soy Protein and Coronary Heart 
    Disease
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to 
    authorize the use, on food labels and in food labeling, of health 
    claims on the association between soy protein and reduced risk of 
    coronary heart disease (CHD). FDA is proposing this action in response 
    to a petition filed by Protein Technologies International, Inc. (the 
    petitioner). The agency has tentatively concluded that, based on the 
    totality of publicly available scientific evidence, soy protein 
    included in a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol may reduce the 
    risk of CHD.
    
    DATES: Written comments by January 25, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Branch 
    (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, 
    Rockville, MD 20852.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan M. Pilch, Center for Food Safety 
    and Applied Nutrition (HFS-465), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
    St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-4500.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On November 8, 1990, the President signed into law the Nutrition 
    Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (the 1990 amendments) (Pub. L. 101-
    535). This new law amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
    (the act) in a number of important ways. One of the most notable 
    aspects of the 1990 amendments was that they provided procedures 
    whereby FDA is to regulate health claims on food labels and in food 
    labeling.
        In the Federal Register of January 6, 1993 (58 FR 2478), FDA issued 
    a final rule that implemented the health claim provisions of the act 
    (hereinafter referred to as the 1993 health claims final rule). In that 
    final rule, FDA adopted Sec. 101.14 (21 CFR 101.14), which sets out the 
    rules for the authorization and use of health claims. Additionally, 
    Sec. 101.70 (21 CFR 101.70) establishes a process for petitioning the 
    agency to authorize health claims about a substance-disease 
    relationship (Sec. 101.70(a)) and sets out the types of information 
    that any such petition must include (Sec. 101.70(d)). These regulations 
    became effective on May 8, 1993.
        In response to the 1990 amendments, FDA also conducted an extensive 
    review of the evidence on the 10 substance-disease relationships listed 
    in the 1990 amendments. As a result of its review, FDA has authorized 
    claims for 8 of these 10 relationships, one of which focused on the 
    relationship between dietary saturated fat and cholesterol and reduced 
    risk of CHD. CHD is the most common, most frequently reported, and most 
    serious form of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (58 FR 2739, January 6, 
    1993). Further, while the agency denied the use on food labeling of 
    health claims relating dietary fiber to reduced risk of CVD (58 FR 
    2552), it authorized a health claim relating diets low in saturated fat 
    and cholesterol and high in fruits, vegetables, and grain products that 
    contain dietary fiber (particularly soluble fiber) to a reduced risk of 
    CHD.
        In the proposed rule entitled ``Health Claims and Label Statements; 
    Lipids and Cardiovascular Disease'' (56 FR 60727, November 27, 1991), 
    FDA set out the criteria for evaluating evidence on diet and CVD 
    relationships. The agency focused on those aspects of the dietary lipid 
    and CVD relationship for which the strongest scientific evidence and 
    agreement existed. FDA noted that, because of the public health 
    importance of CHD, identification of ``modifiable'' risk factors for 
    CHD had been the subject of considerable research and public policy 
    attention. The agency also noted that there is general agreement that 
    elevated blood cholesterol levels are one of the major ``modifiable'' 
    risk factors in the development of CHD. FDA cited Federal Government 
    and other reviews that concluded that there is substantial 
    epidemiologic and clinical evidence that high blood levels of total and 
    low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol are a cause of 
    atherosclerosis and represent major contributors to CHD. Further, 
    factors that decrease total blood cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol will 
    also decrease the risk of CHD. FDA concluded that it is generally 
    accepted that blood total and LDL-cholesterol levels are major risk 
    factors for CHD, and that dietary factors affecting blood cholesterol 
    levels affect the risk of CHD. High intakes of dietary saturated fat 
    and, to a lesser degree, of dietary cholesterol are consistently 
    associated with elevated blood cholesterol levels. FDA concluded that 
    the publicly available data supported an association between diets low 
    in saturated fat and cholesterol and reduced risk of CHD (58 FR 2739 at 
    2751).
        Based on its review using the stated criteria, and on its 
    consideration of comments received in response to the proposed rule 
    entitled ``Health Claims; Dietary Fiber and Cardiovascular Disease'' 
    (56 FR 60582), FDA concluded that the publicly available scientific 
    information supported an association between diets low in saturated fat 
    and cholesterol and high in fruits, vegetables, and grain products 
    (i.e., foods that are low in saturated fat and cholesterol and that are 
    good sources of dietary fiber) and reduced risk of heart disease (58 FR 
    2552 at 2572). In the 1993 dietary fiber and CVD final rule, in 
    response to a comment regarding the apparent hypocholesterolemic 
    properties of specific food fibers, FDA again articulated its criteria 
    for evaluating diet and CHD relationships (58 FR 2552 at 2567). FDA 
    agreed that
    
    [[Page 62978]]
    
    the effectiveness of naturally occurring fibers in foods in reducing 
    the risk of CHD may be documented for specific food products. Further, 
    the agency indicated that if manufacturers could document, through 
    appropriate studies, that dietary consumption of the soluble fiber in a 
    particular food has a beneficial effect on blood lipids predictive of 
    CHD risk, they should petition for a health claim for that particular 
    product. In response to two petitions that documented such evidence, 
    FDA has authorized health claims for soluble fiber from certain foods 
    and reduced risk of CHD in Sec. 101.81 (21 CFR 101.81) (62 FR 3584 at 
    3600, January 23, 1997, and amended at 62 FR 15343 at 15344, March 31, 
    1997, and 62 FR 8119, February 18, 1998).
        The present rulemaking is in response to a manufacturer's health 
    claim petition on the relationship between soy protein and the risk of 
    CHD.
    
    II.  Petition for Soy Protein and Reduced Risk of CHD
    
    A. Background
    
        On May 4, 1998, Protein Technologies International, Inc., submitted 
    a health claim petition to FDA requesting that the agency authorize a 
    health claim on the relationship between consumption of soy protein and 
    the risk of CHD (Refs. 1 and 2). On August 12, 1998, the agency sent 
    the petitioner a letter stating that it had completed its initial 
    review of the petition, and that the petition would be filed in 
    accordance with section 403(r)(4) of the act (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(4)) 
    (Ref. 3). In this proposed rule, the agency presents the rationale for 
    a health claim on this food-disease relationship as provided for under 
    the standard in section 403(r)(3)(B)(i) of the act and Sec. 101.14(c) 
    of FDA's regulations.
    
    B. Review of Preliminary Requirements for a Health Claim
    
    1. The Substance Is Associated With a Disease for Which the U.S. 
    Population Is at Risk
        Several previous rules establish that CHD is a disease for which 
    the U.S. population is at risk, specifically claims for dietary 
    saturated fat and cholesterol and risk of CHD (Sec. 101.75 (21 CFR 
    101.75)); fruits, vegetables, and grain products and risk of CHD 
    (Sec. 101.77 (21 CFR 101.77)); and soluble fiber from certain foods and 
    risk of CHD (Sec. 101.81). FDA stated in these rules that CHD remains a 
    major public health problem and the number one cause of death in the 
    United States. Despite the decline in deaths from CHD over the past 30 
    years, this disease is still exacting a tremendous toll in morbidity 
    and mortality (Refs. 4 through 6). There are more than 500,000 deaths 
    each year for which CHD is an underlying cause, and another 250,000 
    deaths for which CHD is a contributing cause. About 20 percent of 
    adults (male and female; black and white) ages 20 to 74 years have 
    blood total cholesterol (or serum cholesterol) levels in the ``high 
    risk'' category (total cholesterol greater than (>) 240 milligrams (mg) 
    per (/) deciliter (dL) and LDL-cholesterol greater than 160 mg/dL) 
    (Ref. 7). Another 31 percent have ``borderline high'' cholesterol 
    levels (total cholesterol between 200 and 239 mg/dL and LDL-cholesterol 
    between 130 and 159 mg/dL) in combination with two or more risk 
    factors.
        CHD has a significant effect on health-care costs. In 1985, total 
    direct costs related to CHD were estimated at $13 billion, and indirect 
    costs from loss of productivity due to illness, disability, and 
    premature deaths from this disease were an estimated $36 billion (Ref. 
    4). Based on these facts, FDA tentatively concludes that, as required 
    in Sec. 101.14(b)(1), CHD is a disease for which the U.S. population is 
    at risk.
    2. The Substance Is a Food
        The substance that is the subject of this rulemaking is soy protein 
    (Ref. 1). Soy protein is an edible component of the soybean, Glycine 
    max. Soybeans are a significant source of low-cost, high-quality 
    protein in the human diet.
        Soy protein is used as an ingredient in other foods. It is produced 
    from raw whole soybeans by a multistep process that removes the lipid 
    and indigestible components to concentrate the protein and increase its 
    availability. Depending upon the particular steps used during 
    processing, soy protein ingredients may take the form of isolated soy 
    protein (ISP), soy protein concentrate (SPC), or soy flour (SF). Each 
    of these ingredients may be further processed into texturized soy 
    protein or texturized vegetable protein (TVP), used in the manufacture 
    of meat and poultry analogs, by thermoplastic extrusion or steam 
    texturization to impart structure and shape. In addition to protein, 
    these soy protein ingredients contain other naturally occurring soy 
    constituents, such as isoflavones, fiber, and saponins. The specific 
    processing steps employed determine the extent of retention of such 
    naturally occurring constituents in the final product.
        Soy protein is also consumed in the diet as a component of 
    traditional fermented and nonfermented soy foods such as tofu, tempeh, 
    and miso, in addition to whole soybeans, soynuts, soy milk, soy yogurt, 
    and soy cheese. These products contain variable amounts of soy protein 
    and other naturally occurring soy constituents depending on the 
    specific technologies used in their production.
        Soy protein ingredients (ISP, SPC, and SF) and soy protein-
    containing foods may partially replace or be used in addition to animal 
    or other vegetable protein sources in the human diet. Therefore, FDA 
    has tentatively concluded that the substance satisfies the preliminary 
    requirement of Sec. 101.14(b)(3)(i).
    3. The Substance Is Safe and Lawful
        The petitioner stated that soy protein ingredients were in common 
    use in food before January 1, 1958, and that they are generally 
    recognized as safe (GRAS) by self-determination (Ref. 1). Because the 
    fractionation procedures used to convert vegetable flours to vegetable 
    protein isolates and concentrates were commonplace prior to 1958, the 
    petitioner asserted that ISP and SPC can be defined as soy flour 
    ``subject only to conventional processing as practiced prior to January 
    1, 1958.'' The petitioner alluded to statements that it attributed to 
    FDA about the GRAS status of soy protein products. (In point of fact, 
    however, in one document (35 FR 18530, December 5, 1970), FDA was 
    restating a petitioner's grounds for its petition, and in the other 
    document (43 FR 30472, July 14, 1978), FDA was stating a condition on 
    the vegetable protein products to which the proposed regulation 
    applied, and was not itself determining the safety or suitability of 
    any product (43 FR 30472 at 30474 to 30475 (comment 10).) The 
    petitioner also referred to unidentified statements by the U.S. 
    Department of Agriculture, the Association of American Feed Control 
    Officials, and the Codex Alimentarius that it asserted support for the 
    GRAS status of soy protein products (Ref. 1).
        The petition also addressed some concerns that have been raised 
    about the potential risk of consuming soy products: Allergenicity, 
    exposure to trypsin inhibitors, reduced bioavailability of minerals, 
    and hormonal disturbances.
        As is true for any protein entering the gastrointestinal tract, soy 
    protein has the potential to elicit an allergic reaction. Food 
    allergies most commonly develop in infants and young children. Although 
    the use of heat or hot aqueous ethanol in the processing of soybeans 
    destroys the immunochemical reactivity of most of the protein, a small 
    number of infants fed soy formula experience allergic reactions to soy 
    (Ref. 9). Such sensitization appears to be a manifestation of an 
    immature digestive tract and is rarely seen in children more
    
    [[Page 62979]]
    
    than 4 years old or adults. Many children outgrow food allergies (Ref. 
    10) and soy and seafood allergies are among those likely to be 
    outgrown, in contrast to allergies to milk, egg white, or peanuts.
        Concerns have been raised in the past about exposure to trypsin 
    inhibitors contained in soybeans because these compounds had been found 
    to stimulate pancreatic hyperplasia and hypertrophy in animals (Ref. 
    11). These concerns have been allayed because heat treatment removes 
    most of the activity of these proteases (Ref. 12). In addition, recent 
    studies have questioned the applicability of the animal models, which 
    differ from humans in the type of diet, sensitivity of the pancreas to 
    trypsin inhibitors, and the anatomic sites of pancreatic cell 
    proliferation (Refs. 12 through 15) and have found low rates of cancer 
    in populations with dietary patterns that include soy foods (Ref. 16).
        Soybeans contain phytic acid and dietary fiber, which have well 
    documented effects on reducing the bioavailability of divalent 
    minerals, and these components are retained in the protein fraction in 
    variable amounts depending upon processing. In general, the 
    bioavailability of minerals is lower from plant sources than animal 
    sources, but soy has not been found to reduce the availability of 
    minerals from other dietary sources consumed concurrently (Ref. 17). 
    Data on the possible deleterious effects of soy, and particularly its 
    phytate content, on mineral balance have been obtained mainly from 
    studies of animal models; findings in humans are less consistent and 
    suggest that although absorption may be impaired, overall mineral 
    balance is not adversely affected (Refs. 13, 18, 19, 20).
        Finally, the possibility of hormonal disturbances from the weakly 
    estrogenic-antiestrogenic effects of soy isoflavones has been raised. 
    For example, infertility was found in sheep that had consumed clover 
    containing isoflavones (Ref. 21); however, studies of soy isoflavones 
    in primates showed no effects on male or female reproductive tissue or 
    ability (Refs. 22 through 24). Soy isoflavones have been hypothesized 
    as a protective factor against breast cancer in populations that 
    consume large amounts of soy protein (Ref. 25), and in one controlled 
    human trial, a 45-mg/day dose of isoflavones lead to favorable changes 
    in menstrual cycle length and hormone levels similar to those seen in 
    women treated with tamoxifen (Ref. 26).
        Based on the totality of the evidence and, in particular, its 
    common use in food, the agency is not prepared, at this time, to take 
    issue with the petitioner's view that the use of soy protein is safe 
    and lawful as required in Sec. 101.14(b)(3)(ii). Thus, FDA tentatively 
    concludes that the petitioner has provided evidence that satisfies the 
    requirement in Sec. 101.14(b)(3)(ii) that use of soy protein at the 
    levels necessary to justify a claim is safe and lawful.
    
    III.  Review of Scientific Evidence
    
    A. Basis for Evaluating the Relationship Between Soy Protein and CHD
    
        The review examined the relationship between soy protein and CHD by 
    focusing on the effects of dietary intake of this substance on blood 
    lipid levels and on the risk of developing CHD. In the 1991 lipids-CVD 
    and dietary fiber-CVD health claim proposals, the agency set forth the 
    basis for the relationship between dietary substances and CVD (56 FR 
    60727 at 60728 and 56 FR 60582 at 60583). In those documents, the 
    agency stated that there are many risk factors that contribute to the 
    development of CVD, and specifically CHD, one of the most serious forms 
    of CVD and among the leading causes of death and disability. The agency 
    also stated that there is general agreement that elevated blood 
    cholesterol levels are one of the major ``modifiable'' risk factors in 
    the development of CVD and, more specifically, CHD.
        The Federal Government and others who have reviewed the matter have 
    concluded that there is substantial epidemiologic evidence that high 
    blood levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol are a cause of 
    atherosclerosis (inadequate circulation of blood to the heart due to 
    narrowing of the arteries) and represent major contributors to CHD (56 
    FR 60727 at 60728, 56 FR 60582 at 60583, Refs. 4 through 6). Factors 
    that decrease total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol will also tend to 
    decrease the risk of CHD. High intakes of saturated fat and, to a 
    lesser degree, of dietary cholesterol are associated with elevated 
    blood total and LDL-cholesterol levels (56 FR 60727 at 60728). Thus, it 
    is generally accepted that blood total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol 
    levels can influence the risk of developing CHD, and, therefore, that 
    dietary factors affecting these blood cholesterol levels affect the 
    risk of CHD (Refs. 4 through 6).
        When considering the effect that the diet or components of the diet 
    have on blood (or serum) lipids, it is also useful to consider the 
    effect that these factors may have on blood levels of high density 
    lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. HDL-cholesterol appears to have a 
    protective effect because it is involved in the regulation of 
    cholesterol transport out of cells and to the liver, from which it is 
    ultimately excreted (Refs. 4 and 8).
        For these reasons, the agency based its evaluation of the 
    relationship between consumption of soy protein and CHD primarily on 
    changes in blood total and LDL-cholesterol resulting from dietary 
    intervention with soy protein-containing products. A secondary 
    consideration was that beneficial changes in total and LDL-cholesterol 
    should not be accompanied by potentially adverse changes in HDL-
    cholesterol. This focus is consistent with that used by the agency in 
    response to the 1990 amendments in deciding on the dietary saturated 
    fat and cholesterol and CHD health claim, Sec. 101.75 (56 FR 60727 and 
    58 FR 2739); the fruits, vegetables, and grain products and CHD claim, 
    Sec. 101.77 (56 FR 60582 and 58 FR 2552); and the soluble fiber from 
    certain foods and CHD claim, Sec. 101.81 (61 FR 296, 62 FR 3584, 62 FR 
    28234, and 63 FR 8119).
    
    B. Review of Scientific Evidence
    
    1. Evidence Considered in Reaching the Decision
        The petitioner submitted scientific studies (Refs. 27 through 66) 
    evaluating the relationship between soy protein in the diet and serum 
    lipid levels in humans (Refs. 1 and 2). The studies submitted were 
    conducted between 1976 and 1998. The petition included tables that 
    summarized the outcome of the studies and a summary of the evidence. In 
    the approach taken previously in the diet and CVD proposed rules, the 
    agency began its review of scientific evidence in support of a health 
    claim by considering those studies that were published since 1988, the 
    date of publication of the ``Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and 
    Health,'' which is the most recent and comprehensive Federal review of 
    the scientific evidence on dietary factors and CVD. In a brief 
    discussion of the role of protein in coronary heart disease, the 
    Surgeon General's report noted that studies of the substitution of soy 
    protein and other vegetable proteins for animal protein in the diets of 
    hyperlipidemic patients have shown a marked reduction in serum 
    cholesterol levels but only a small change in persons with normal 
    cholesterol levels (Ref. 4). Because of the brevity of this 
    consideration of soy protein, the agency reviewed all of the studies on 
    soy protein submitted by the petitioner, including those published 
    prior to 1988.
        The petition also presented some findings from studies that 
    employed animal models and from in vitro
    
    [[Page 62980]]
    
    experiments. Human studies are weighted most heavily in the evaluation 
    of evidence on a diet and disease relationship; animal model and in 
    vitro studies can be considered as supporting evidence but cannot, in 
    the absence of human studies, serve as the basis for establishing that 
    a diet and disease relationship exists. Such studies may be useful in 
    providing information on the mechanism of action of soy protein's 
    effects on blood cholesterol levels.
    2. Criteria for Selection of Human Studies
        The criteria that the agency used to select the most pertinent 
    studies were consistent with those that the agency used to evaluate the 
    relationship between other substances and CHD. These criteria were that 
    the studies: (1) Present data and adequate descriptions of the study 
    design and methods; (2) be available in English; (3) include estimates 
    of, or enough information to estimate, soy protein intakes; (4) include 
    direct measurement of blood total cholesterol and other blood lipids 
    related to CHD; and (5) be conducted in persons who represent the 
    general U.S. population. In the case of (5), these persons can be 
    considered to be adults with blood total cholesterol levels less than 
    300 mg/dL. Studies of special population groups, such as adults with 
    very high serum cholesterol (mean greater than 300 mg/dL) and children 
    with hypercholesterolemia, were considered relative to the nature of 
    the support they provided for evidence of effect seen in studies of 
    subjects more representative of the general U.S. population.
        In a previous rulemaking (62 FR 28234 at 28238 and 63 FR 8103 at 
    8107), the agency concluded that hypercholesterolemic study populations 
    are relevant to the general population because, based on data from the 
    National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) III, the 
    prevalence of individuals with elevated blood cholesterol (i.e., 200 
    mg/dL or greater) is high, i.e., approximately 51 percent of adults 
    (Ref. 7). The proportion of adults having moderately elevated blood 
    cholesterol levels (i.e., between 200 and 239 mg/dL) was estimated to 
    be approximately 31 percent, and the proportion of adults with high 
    blood cholesterol levels (240 mg/dL or greater) was estimated to be 
    approximately 20 percent (Ref. 7). It is also estimated that 52 million 
    Americans 20 years of age and older would be candidates for dietary 
    intervention to lower blood cholesterol (Ref. 7). As the leading cause 
    of death in this country, CHD is a disease for which the general U.S. 
    population is at risk. The risk of dying from CHD is related to serum 
    cholesterol levels in a continuous and positive manner, increasing 
    slowly for levels between 150 mg/dL and 200 mg/dL and more rapidly when 
    the cholesterol level exceeds 200 mg/dL (Ref. 67). The public health 
    policy elucidated by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), 
    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, is to extend the benefits of 
    cholesterol lowering to the population as a whole by promoting adoption 
    of eating patterns that can help lower the blood cholesterol levels of 
    most Americans (Ref. 67). A dietary intervention that lowers blood 
    cholesterol levels mainly or only in persons with high levels would, 
    like an intervention that lowers cholesterol levels across the entire 
    population range, cause a shift in the population distribution of blood 
    cholesterol levels resulting in a decrease in the mean value for the 
    blood cholesterol level in the general population (Ref. 67). The 
    anticipated effect of such a shift would be to reduce the morbidity 
    from CHD and to produce a continued or accelerated decline in the CHD 
    mortality rate in the United States. Accordingly, in this proposal, the 
    agency has reviewed and considered the evidence of effects of soy 
    protein on serum lipids in hypercholesterolemic subjects.
        In selecting human studies for review, the agency excluded studies 
    that were published in abstract form because they lacked sufficient 
    detail on study design and methodologies, and because they could not 
    provide the primary data.
    3. Criteria for Evaluating the Relationship Between Soy Protein and CHD
        Well reasoned approaches for evaluating studies supporting diet/
    disease relationships are summarized in the comprehensive report ``Diet 
    and Health'' issued by the National Academy of Sciences (Ref. 68) and 
    ``The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services'' issued by the U.S. 
    Preventive Services Task Force (Ref. 69). The criteria articulated in 
    these documents provided a starting point for FDA's review of 
    individual studies on the relationship between dietary factors and CHD 
    in previous rulemakings: In the 1991 proposed rule on lipids and CVD 
    (56 FR 60727), in the 1991 proposed rule on dietary fiber and CVD (56 
    FR 60582), in the January 1996 proposed rule on whole oats and CHD (61 
    FR 296), and in the May 22, 1997, proposed rule on soluble fiber from 
    psyllium and CHD (62 FR 28234).
        The criteria that the agency used in evaluating the studies for 
    this rulemaking include: (1) Reliability and accuracy of the methods 
    used in nutrient intake analysis, including measurements of soy protein 
    intake; (2) estimates of intake of saturated fat and cholesterol; (3) 
    available information on the soy protein test products and control 
    foods; (4) measurement of study endpoints (i.e., measurement of blood 
    lipid levels); and (5) general study design characteristics.
        The general study design characteristics for which the agency 
    looked included randomization of subjects, appropriateness of controls, 
    selection criteria for subjects, attrition rates (including reasons for 
    attrition), potential for misclassification of individuals with regard 
    to dietary intakes, presence of recall bias and interviewer bias, 
    recognition and control of confounding factors (for example, monitoring 
    body weight and control of weight loss), appropriateness of statistical 
    tests and comparisons, and statistical power of the studies. The agency 
    considered whether the intervention studies that it evaluated had been 
    of long enough duration, greater than or equal to 3 weeks duration, to 
    ensure reasonable stabilization of blood lipids.
    
    C. Review of Human Studies
    
        FDA conducted a comprehensive review of 41 of 43 human intervention 
    studies submitted in the petition and reported in 38 references by the 
    petitioner (Refs. 27 through 64). The two studies FDA excluded from 
    consideration at the outset (Refs. 32 and 52) were of infants. Of the 
    studies reviewed, 27 met the aforementioned criteria for selection 
    (Refs. 27, 28, 29, 30 (1 trial), 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40 (2 trials), 
    42 and 45 (1 trial), 43, 44, 46, 49, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 60, 
    63, and 64). Of these, the agency gave particular weight to 14 trials 
    (Refs. 27, 28, 30 (1 trial), 31, 36, 37 (1 trial), 40 (2 trials), 44, 
    49, 51, 54, 58, and 59) that included subjects representative of the 
    general U.S. population and that were well controlled, reported intakes 
    of saturated fat and cholesterol, and avoided problems associated with 
    small sample size, lack of a placebo, and other design problems. These 
    studies are summarized in Table 1 at the end of this document and 
    discussed in section III.C.1 of this document. Three additional similar 
    trials that were included in the review but accorded less weight 
    because of issues concerning the populations studied and diets fed 
    (Refs. 29, 43, and 53) are also summarized in Table 1 of this document 
    and discussed in section III.C.1 of this document. Seven trials in 
    adults (Refs. 33, 35, 46,
    
    [[Page 62981]]
    
    55, 56, 60, and 64) and three trials in children (Refs. 34, 42 and 45 
    (1 trial), and 63) with type II or familial hypercholesterolemia are 
    summarized in Table 2 at the end of this document and discussed in 
    section III.C.2 of this document. The fourteen remaining intervention 
    trials (Refs. 30 (1 trial), 37 (1 trail), 38, 39 (2 trials), 41, 47, 
    48, 50 (2 trials), 57, 61, and 62 (2 trials)) failed to meet the 
    inclusion criteria because of small sample size, inadequate period of 
    intervention, inadequate characterization of the soy protein tested, 
    inadequate information on dietary intake, or lack of data on outcome 
    variables. The results of one epidemiological study (Ref. 65) and a 
    meta-analysis (Ref. 66) that included a number of the soy protein 
    studies submitted in the petition are discussed in sections III.C.3 and 
    III.C.4, respectively, of this document.
    1. Studies of Adult Subjects Representative of the General U.S. 
    Population (Serum Cholesterol <300 mg/dl)="" the="" agency="" began="" its="" consideration="" of="" the="" data="" with="" the="" 14="" well="" controlled="" and="" representative="" studies="" identified="" previously="" (refs.="" 27,="" 28,="" 30="" (1="" trial),="" 31,="" 36,="" 37="" (1="" trial),="" 40="" (2="" trials),="" 44,="" 49,="" 51,="" 54,="" 58,="" and="" 59).="" several="" of="" these="" studies="" examined="" the="" interaction="" of="" protein="" and="" other="" components="" of="" soy="" protein="" sources="" hypothesized="" to="" have="" an="" impact="" on="" lipid-lowering="" effects="" (i.e.,="" isoflavones,="" dietary="" fiber,="" and="" soy="" lipids)="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" and="" 44).="" findings="" with="" respect="" to="" soy="" protein="" are="" described="" in="" this="" section,="" while="" findings="" regarding="" the="" specific="" influence="" of="" soy="" isoflavones="" (refs.="" 31="" and="" 28)="" are="" discussed="" in="" more="" detail="" in="" section="" iii.c.5="" of="" this="" document.="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects,="" crouse="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 31,="" documented="" in="" ref.="" 1="" with="" corrections="" noted="" in="" ref.="" 2)="" found="" that="" 25="" grams="" (g)="" of="" soy="" protein="" from="" isp="" containing="" 2.5="" mg="" total="" aglycone="" isoflavones/g="" protein="" lowered="" total=""><0.05) and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels=""><0.05) by="" 4="" and="" 6="" percent,="" respectively,="" while="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" not="" altered.="" furthermore,="" in="" subjects="" with="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" in="" the="" top="" half="" of="" the="" study="" population,="" serum="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" reduced="" by="" 9="" percent=""><0.03) and="" 12="" percent=""><0.03), respectively,="" by="" the="" isp="" with="" 2.5="" mg="" total="" aglycone="" isoflavones/g="" protein,="" and="" by="" 8="" percent=""><0.03) and="" 9="" percent=""><0.03), respectively,="" by="" the="" isp="" with="" 1.6="" mg="" total="" aglycone="" isoflavones/g="" protein.="" hdl-cholesterol="" concentrations="" were="" unchanged.="" these="" results="" indicate="" that="" soy="" protein,="" in="" a="" diet="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol,="" can="" exert="" hypocholesterolemic="" effects="" but="" suggest="" these="" effects="" may="" be="" modulated="" by="" the="" presence="" of="" isoflavones.="" in="" hypercholesterolemic,="" postmenopausal="" women,="" baum="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 28)="" also="" investigated="" the="" impact="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" isp="" containing="" different="" levels="" of="" isoflavones.="" adjusted="" mean="" differences="" in="" the="" change="" from="" baseline="" for="" total="" serum="" cholesterol="" level="" did="" not="" differ="" in="" the="" two="" soy="" groups="" and="" the="" control="" group.="" however,="" there="" was="" a="" statistically="" significant="" reduction="" of="" 8="" to="" 9="" percent="" in="" non-hdl="" (ldl="" plus="" very="" low="" density="" lipoprotein="" (vldl))="" cholesterol="" in="" both="" of="" the="" isp="" treatment="" groups=""><0.05) compared="" to="" the="" control="" group.="" hdl-="" cholesterol="" was="" also="" significantly="" increased=""><0.05) in="" both="" soy="" groups="" compared="" to="" the="" control.="" the="" level="" of="" isoflavones="" did="" not="" affect="" any="" of="" the="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" measured.="" this="" study="" also="" indicates="" the="" ability="" of="" soy="" protein="" provided="" in="" a="" diet="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" to="" reduce="" ldl-cholesterol.="" two="" studies="" that="" examined="" the="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" adults="" consuming="" low="" fat="" diets="" also="" evaluated="" whether="" soy="" cotyledon="" fiber="" had="" additional="" lipid-lowering="" effects.="" bakhit="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 27)="" used="" 25="" g="" protein="" and="" 20="" g="" dietary="" fiber="" as="" treatment="" levels="" while="" potter="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 51)="" used="" 50="" g="" protein="" and="" 20="" g="" dietary="" fiber.="" soy="" protein="" was="" provided="" as="" isp="" (refs.="" 27="" and="" 51)="" and="" sf="" (ref.="" 51)="" incorporated="" into="" baked="" products.="" bakhit="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 27)="" studied="" subjects="" who="" had="" initially="" been="" screened="" for="" eligibility="" based="" on="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" concentrations="" greater="" than="" 220="" mg/dl="" before="" starting="" the="" study.="" during="" the="" baseline="" dietary="" period,="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" decreased="" to="" levels="" below="" 220="" mg/dl="" in="" 10="" of="" the="" subjects;="" these="" subjects="" did="" not="" have="" any="" further="" decrease="" in="" total="" or="" ldl-cholesterol="" with="" any="" of="" the="" experimental="" diets.="" the="" subjects="" whose="" cholesterol="" remained="" greater="" than="" the="" 220="" mg/dl="" intent-to-treat="" level="" did="" show="" a="" statistically="" significant="" decrease="" from="" post-baseline="" dietary="" levels="" for="" total="" cholesterol,="" but="" not="" for="" ldl-cholesterol,="" after="" consuming="" isp.="" in="" the="" subset="" analysis,="" bakhit="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 27)="" found="" a="" statistically="" significant="" decrease="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" of="" 7="" percent=""><0.05) from="" post-stabilization="" levels="" with="" ingestion="" of="" isp.="" addition="" of="" soy="" cotyledon="" fiber="" to="" the="" isp="" diet="" resulted="" in="" a="" statistically="" significant="" decrease=""><0.05) of="" 8="" percent="" in="" total="" cholesterol.="" ingestion="" of="" the="" casein="" plus="" cellulose="" control="" diet="" produced="" a="" nonsignificant="" decrease="" (p="">0.05) in total cholesterol of 3 percent. Differences in LDL- and 
    HDL-cholesterol from baseline or control after the two soy diets were 
    not statistically significant. In the subset analysis, the additional 
    effect of soy fiber on blood cholesterol levels was not significant 
    when evaluated by analysis of covariance (p=0.04 for protein effects; 
    p=0.07 for fiber effects). This study supports a conclusion that the 
    protein and not the fiber component of the soybean is largely 
    responsible for effects on blood lipids.
        Potter et al. (Ref. 51) reported a statistically significant 
    (p<0.05) decrease="" in="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" from="" baseline="" of="" 8="" percent="" with="" ingestion="" of="" diets="" containing="" isp="" whether="" soy="" cotyledon="" fiber="" or="" cellulose="" was="" also="" consumed.="" the="" 8-percent="" decrease="" observed="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" from="" baseline="" was="" statistically="" significant="" only="" when="" the="" isp="" diet="" also="" contained="" soy="" cotyledon="" fiber=""><0.05). total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" also="" significantly=""><0.01) lower="" with="" the="" isp="" diets="" compared="" to="" the="" nonfat="" dry="" milk-cellulose="" control="" diet.="" no="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" in="" hdl-cholesterol="" were="" observed="" with="" any="" of="" the="" soy="" protein="" diets.="" changes="" from="" baseline="" were="" not="" statistically="" significant="" for="" any="" of="" the="" blood="" lipids="" when="" the="" diet="" providing="" soy="" protein="" as="" sf="" was="" consumed.="" however,="" the="" difference="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" observed="" after="" ingestion="" of="" sf="" was="" 19="" mg/dl="" lower="" than="" that="" on="" the="" control="" diet="" of="" nonfat="" dry="" milk="" and="" cellulose=""><0.01). these="" findings="" suggest="" that="" the="" principal="" dietary="" component="" responsible="" for="" the="" lipid-lowering="" observed="" in="" this="" study="" is="" the="" soy="" protein="" fraction,="" and="" that="" soy="" fiber="" may="" have="" an="" incremental="" effect.="" kurowska="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 44)="" tested="" the="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" and="" soy="" oil="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects="" by="" adding="" combinations="" of="" ``milk''="" and="" desserts="" to="" provide="" a="" total="" of="" 31="" g="" protein="" from="" either="" cow's="" milk="" or="" soy="" milk="" and="" 16="" g="" fat="" from="" either="" cow's="" milk,="" soybean="" oil,="" or="" whole="" soybean="" soy="" milk.="" the="" three="" dietary="" treatments="" were="" cow's="" milk="" (2-="" percent="" fat),="" skim="" cow's="" milk="" (0-percent="" fat)="" plus="" soy="" oil="" (16="" g),="" or="" soybean="" milk.="" no="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" from="" baseline="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" were="" observed="" in="" response="" to="" any="" of="" the="" dietary="" treatments.="" the="" 4-percent="" decline="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" observed="" with="" the="" soybean="" milk="" diet="" was="" not="" statistically="" significant.="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" increased="" 7="" percent="" from="" baseline="" (p="0.04)" with="" the="" whole="" soybean="" milk="" treatment.="" in="" the="" subjects="" with="" the="" highest="" initial="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" level="" and="" ldl/hdl-cholesterol="" ratio,="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" reduced="" by="" 11="" percent="" by="" the="" soybean="" milk="" diet.="" [[page="" 62982]]="" five="" earlier="" studies="" included="" in="" table="" 1="" reported="" on="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects.="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects,="" goldberg="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 37)="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" isp="" (99="" g="" of="" soy="" protein)="" incorporated="" as="" a="" meat="" analog="" or="" formulated="" in="" beverage="" compared="" to="" a="" control="" animal="" protein="" diet="" consisting="" of="" analogous="" meat="" products="" and="" nonfat="" dry="" milk.="" both="" diets="" resulted="" in="" statistically="" significant="" reductions="" in="" serum="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels.="" with="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet,="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" decreased="" by="" 15="" percent=""><0.001) and="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" decreased="" by="" 17="" percent=""><0.001) from="" baseline="" values.="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" 8="" mg/dl="" lower=""><0.005), and="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" 10="" mg/="" dl="" lower=""><0.05), at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" dietary="" period="" when="" soy="" protein="" was="" ingested="" as="" compared="" to="" the="" animal="" protein="" diet.="" both="" the="" change="" in="" hdl-cholesterol="" from="" the="" baseline="" and="" the="" difference="" in="" hdl-cholesterol="" between="" the="" soy="" and="" control="" diets="" were="" small="" and="" not="" statistically="" significant.="" mercer="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 49)="" tested="" the="" effects="" of="" approximately="" 17="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" from="" isp="" as="" a="" replacement="" for="" 2-percent="" fat="" cow's="" milk="" in="" subjects="" with="" mild="" to="" moderate="" hypercholesterolemia.="" total="" cholesterol="" levels="" were="" not="" significantly="" different="" (p="">0.05) on the two diets. 
    However, among the subjects whose baseline total cholesterol was above 
    the 90th percentile, the soy protein diet resulted in a decrease from 
    baseline in mean total cholesterol of 4 percent and a level 9 percent 
    lower (16 mg/dL; p<0.05) than="" the="" level="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" cow's="" milk="" period.="" there="" were="" no="" statistically="" significant="" differences="" in="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" and="" hdl-cholesterol="" between="" isp="" and="" cow's="" milk="" diets="" either="" for="" all="" subjects="" or="" for="" the="" subset="" of="" subjects="" with="" the="" highest="" initial="" total="" cholesterol="" levels.="" holmes="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 40)="" conducted="" two="" trials="" with="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects="" testing="" sf="" as="" a="" texturized="" vegetable="" protein="" product="" formulated="" with="" egg="" yolk,="" beef="" tallow,="" and="" cottonseed="" oil="" to="" create="" an="" analog="" for="" lean="" ground="" beef.="" an="" average="" of="" 27="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" was="" consumed="" in="" the="" partially="" substituted="" diet="" in="" the="" first="" trial="" and="" 62="" g="" was="" consumed="" in="" the="" completely="" substituted="" diet="" in="" the="" second="" trial.="" in="" trial="" 1,="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" in="" total="" cholesterol=""><0.02) and="" ldl-cholesterol=""><0.05) occurred="" during="" the="" initial="" stabilization="" period="" when="" the="" control="" diet="" was="" consumed;="" no="" further="" changes="" occurred="" after="" the="" second="" period="" during="" which="" the="" partially="" substituted="" soy="" diet="" was="" consumed.="" in="" trial="" 2,="" both="" diets="" significantly="" lowered="" mean="" total="" cholesterol="" during="" the="" first="" dietary="" sequence=""><0.05), the="" animal="" protein="" diet="" by="" 18="" percent="" and="" the="" soy="" diet="" by="" 19="" percent.="" crossing="" over="" the="" diets="" had="" no="" further="" effect.="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" levels="" were="" not="" reduced="" by="" either="" diet.="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" not="" significantly="" affected="" by="" diet="" in="" either="" trial.="" the="" two="" trials="" were="" unique="" in="" the="" source="" of="" soy="" protein="" and="" in="" including="" subjects="" with="" type="" iv="" hyperlipidemia.="" shorey="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 54)="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" 57="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" (mean="" intake)="" consumed="" as="" isp="" incorporated="" both="" into="" meat="" analogs="" and="" a="" soy-based="" beverage="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" young="" men.="" a="" statistically="" significant="" (p="0.027)" decrease="" from="" baseline="" total="" cholesterol="" of="" 7="" percent="" was="" noted="" in="" the="" group="" consuming="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet;="" however,="" these="" values="" were="" 6="" mg/dl="" higher="" than="" change="" from="" baseline="" values="" obtained="" from="" the="" control="" group.="" hdl-cholesterol="" also="" significantly="" (p="0.001)" decreased="" from="" baseline="" values="" by="" 15="" percent.="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" not="" measured="" in="" this="" study.="" although="" the="" two="" diets="" were="" well="" matched="" for="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol,="" interpretation="" of="" these="" findings="" is="" complicated="" by="" the="" fact="" that="" body="" weight="" was="" significantly=""><0.004) decreased="" in="" both="" groups="" of="" subjects.="" subjects="" who="" showed="" a="" significant="" hypocholesterolemic="" response="" on="" either="" diet="" were="" those="" who="" substantially="" reduced="" their="" customary="" protein="" and="" fat="" intakes="" on="" the="" experimental="" diets.="" in="" contrast="" to="" other="" studies,="" subjects="" in="" this="" study="" with="" lower="" baseline="" values="" experienced="" more="" pronounced="" reductions="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" level.="" four="" additional="" well-controlled="" studies="" included="" in="" table="" 1="" of="" this="" document="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" normocholesterolemic="" subjects.="" the="" study="" of="" carroll="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 30)="" compared="" isp="" (44="" g="" soy="" protein="" estimated)="" incorporated="" into="" foods="" and="" a="" soy-based="" beverage="" to="" a="" mixed="" protein/animal-based="" diet="" in="" healthy="" young="" women.="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" significantly=""><0.05) lower,="" by="" 10="" mg/dl,="" when="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" was="" consumed="" as="" compared="" with="" the="" mixed="" protein="" diet.="" neither="" ldl-cholesterol="" nor="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" measured.="" giovannetti="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 36)="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" isp="" (66="" to="" 80="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" depending="" on="" energy="" intake)="" incorporated="" as="" meat="" and="" dairy="" analogs="" in="" healthy="" young="" adult="" women="" in="" both="" high-="" and="" low-fat="" diets.="" on="" the="" high-fat="" diet,="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" 4="" mg/dl="" lower,="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" 6="" mg/dl="" lower,="" and="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" 3="" mg/dl="" lower="" after="" ingestion="" of="" the="" soy="" protein="" than="" after="" ingestion="" of="" the="" mixed="" protein="" control.="" none="" of="" the="" changes="" in="" blood="" lipids="" reached="" statistical="" significance.="" on="" the="" low-fat="" diet,="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" 1="" mg/dl="" higher,="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" 5="" mg/dl="" lower,="" and="" hdl-="" cholesterol="" was="" 2="" mg/dl="" higher="" after="" soy="" protein="" than="" after="" the="" mixed="" protein="" control;="" these="" differences="" were="" not="" statistically="" significant.="" the="" magnitude="" of="" reduction="" in="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" with="" soy="" protein="" was="" similar="" on="" the="" high-fat="" and="" low-fat="" diets,="" 10="" percent="" and="" 9="" percent,="" respectively.="" substitution="" of="" soy="" protein="" caused="" reductions="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" during="" the="" high-fat="" diet="" in="" 11="" of="" 12="" subjects="" and="" during="" the="" low-fat="" diet="" in="" 9="" of="" 12="" subjects.="" van="" raaij="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 58)="" tested="" the="" effects="" of="" isp="" in="" young="" normocholesterolemic="" men="" and="" women="" consuming="" three="" diets="" that="" differed="" in="" protein="" composition="" with="" 65="" percent="" of="" the="" total="" protein="" replaced="" by="" either="" soy="" protein="" (54="" g),="" or="" casein,="" or="" an="" approximately="" 2:1="" mixture="" of="" casein="" (36="" g):soy="" (17="" g).="" in="" the="" group="" consuming="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet,="" total="" serum="" cholesterol="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" decreased="" (-2="" percent="" and="" -8="" percent,="" respectively)="" and="" hdl-cholesterol="" increased="" (+10="" percent)="" compared="" to="" values="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" lead-in="" period.="" the="" changes="" in="" both="" ldl-cholesterol="" and="" hdl-cholesterol="" were="" statistically="" significant=""><0.05). in="" addition,="" decreases="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" significantly=""><0.05) greater="" with="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" compared="" to="" changes="" with="" the="" casein="" diet.="" although="" weight="" loss="" did="" occur="" among="" subjects="" consuming="" both="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" (n="9)" and="" the="" casein="" diet="" (n="6)," when="" data="" from="" the="" subset="" without="" a="" weight="" loss="" of="" more="" than="" 2="" kilograms="" (kg)="" were="" analyzed="" separately,="" the="" same="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" ingestion="" on="" blood="" lipid-lowering="" were="" observed.="" the="" lipid="" changes="" in="" the="" group="" that="" remained="" on="" the="" 2:1="" casein:soy="" diet="" were="" not="" statistically="" significantly="" different="" from="" the="" casein="" group,="" nor="" were="" changes="" from="" the="" end="" of="" the="" stabilization="" period="" significant="" in="" this="" group.="" in="" a="" trial="" with="" both="" normocholesterolemic="" and="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects,="" van="" raaij="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 59)="" tested="" both="" isp="" and="" spc="" (each="" providing="" an="" average="" of="" 55="" g="" of="" soy="" protein)="" compared="" to="" a="" casein="" control.="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" decreased="" from="" baseline="" by="" 4="" percent="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" decreased="" by="" 3="" percent="" on="" the="" isp="" diet.="" these="" changes="" were="" significantly="" different="" from="" those="" on="" the="" spc="" diet=""><0.05) but="" not="" significantly="" different="" from="" those="" on="" the="" casein="" diet.="" hdl-cholesterol="" showed="" a="" slight="" but="" statistically="" significant="" [[page="" 62983]]="" increase="" of="" 2="" percent="" from="" baseline="" on="" the="" isp="" diet,="" a="" change="" that="" was="" also="" significantly="" different="" from="" that="" on="" the="" casein="" diet.="" when="" spc="" was="" used="" as="" the="" protein="" source,="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" not="" altered,="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" was="" increased="" by="" 6="" percent,="" and="" hdl-cholesterol="" decreased="" by="" 3="" percent="" compared="" to="" baseline.="" none="" of="" these="" changes="" in="" blood="" lipids="" from="" baseline="" or="" differences="" between="" the="" casein="" and="" spc="" diets="" was="" statistically="" significant.="" interpretation="" of="" this="" study="" is="" complicated="" by="" differential="" weight="" loss="" on="" the="" experimental="" diets="" (weight="" loss="" was="" greatest="" in="" the="" casein="" group)="" and="" differential="" fiber="" intake.="" three="" additional="" studies="" (refs.="" 29,="" 43,="" and="" 53),="" in="" which="" interpretation="" is="" complicated="" by="" design="" issues="" such="" as="" choice="" of="" subjects,="" concerns="" about="" weight="" loss,="" or="" uncertainties="" about="" other="" components="" in="" diets,="" are="" also="" summarized="" in="" table="" 1="" of="" this="" document="" and="" discussed="" as="" follows.="" bosello="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 29)="" and="" jenkins="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 43)="" both="" studied="" the="" hypocholesterolemic="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" versus="" casein="" in="" the="" context="" of="" hypocaloric="" diets="" fed="" to="" obese="" persons="" to="" achieve="" significant="" weight="" reduction.="" in="" bosello="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 29),="" obese="" subjects="" (="">150 percent of ideal body weight) received 375 kilocalorie 
    (kcal)/day initially, followed by an 800 kcal/day diet. During both 
    phases, the 375 kcal portion was provided by commercial textured 
    protein products that delivered either 27 g protein from casein or 27 g 
    protein from soy protein (type of soy protein not given). During the 
    second phase, the 375 kcal/day was ``integrated'' with an extra 425 
    kcal/day from conventional foods. Mean weight losses for the soy and 
    casein groups were 17 and 16 kg, respectively. Total cholesterol and 
    LDL-cholesterol in the soy group were both 16 percent lower compared to 
    baseline (p<0.01). compared="" to="" the="" casein="" group,="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" 20="" mg/dl="" lower=""><0.01 )="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" 16="" mg/dl="" lower=""><0.01). hdl-cholesterol="" was="" decreased="" in="" both="" groups="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" study;="" however,="" only="" in="" the="" casein="" group="" was="" the="" difference="" statistically="" significant=""><0.01). additionally,="" the="" decrease="" in="" hdl-="" cholesterol="" in="" the="" casein="" group="" was="" significantly=""><0.01) greater="" than="" that="" observed="" in="" the="" soy="" protein="" group.="" jenkins="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 43)="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" ingestion="" on="" serum="" cholesterol="" in="" obese="" women="" who="" were="" also="" consuming="" a="" hypocaloric="" diet="" for="" weight="" reduction.="" the="" three="" treatments="" were:="" a="" control,="" hypocaloric="" diet="" of="" 1,000="" total="" kcal="" consumed="" as="" conventional="" foods;="" the="" same="" diet="" with="" two="" meals="" per="" day="" replaced="" by="" a="" soy="" protein="" (18.4="" g="" provided="" as="" isp)="" liquid="" formula="" preparation;="" or="" the="" same="" diet="" with="" two="" meals="" per="" day="" replaced="" by="" a="" milk="" protein="" (17.6="" g="" as="" milk="" protein="" isolate="" and="" nonfat="" dry="" milk)="" liquid="" formula.="" an="" average="" 2.5="" kg="" weight="" loss="" per="" month="" occurred="" during="" the="" study=""><0.05) across="" diet="" treatments.="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" from="" baseline="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" of="" 10="" percent=""><0.05) and="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" of="" 17="" percent=""><0.05) occurred="" only="" during="" the="" period="" when="" the="" soy="" protein="" formula="" was="" ingested.="" changes="" in="" hdl-cholesterol="" were="" not="" statistically="" significant.="" these="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" were="" independent="" of="" the="" order="" the="" soy="" diet="" was="" consumed="" relative="" to="" the="" conventional="" hypocaloric="" diet.="" the="" levels="" of="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" achieved="" with="" ingestion="" of="" soy="" protein="" were,="" respectively,="" 10="" mg/dl="" and="" 8="" mg/dl="" lower="" with="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" as="" compared="" with="" the="" casein="" diet.="" neither="" the="" conventional="" hypocaloric="" diet="" nor="" the="" casein="" formula="" hypocaloric="" diet="" resulted="" in="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" in="" total="" or="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" despite="" weight="" loss.="" calculations="" of="" the="" expected="" decline="" in="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" based="" on="" changes="" in="" weight,="" dietary="" cholesterol,="" and="" saturated="" and="" polyunsaturated="" fat="" accurately="" predicted="" the="" observed="" changes="" in="" both="" the="" hypocaloric="" diet="" and="" milk="" formula="" groups,="" but="" significantly="" underestimated="" the="" decrease="" observed="" in="" the="" soy="" formula="" group.="" sacks="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 53)="" studied="" the="" effects="" of="" 27="" g="" of="" protein="" consumed="" daily="" as="" isp="" or="" casein="" incorporated="" into="" muffins="" and="" oatmeal="" in="" adults="" who="" were="" strict="" vegetarians.="" not="" unexpectedly,="" given="" the="" very="" low="" baseline="" lipid="" concentrations="" and="" very="" low="" dietary="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" intake,="" no="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" or="" differences="" in="" total="" cholesterol,="" ldl-cholesterol="" or="" hdl-cholesterol="" were="" observed="" from="" consumption="" of="" either="" soy="" protein="" or="" casein.="" a.="" summary--hypercholesterolemic="" subjects="" consuming="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol.="" in="" five="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" and="" 44)="" of="" seven="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" 44,="" and="" 40="" (2="" trials))="" well-controlled="" studies="" of="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects="" consuming="" low="" saturated="" fat="" and="" low="" cholesterol="" diets,="" soy="" protein="" intake="" was="" associated="" with="" significant="" decreases="" in="" total="" and/or="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels.="" crouse="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 31,="" documented="" in="" ref.="" 1="" with="" corrections="" noted="" in="" ref.="" 2)="" found="" that="" soy="" protein="" from="" isp="" containing="" 2.5="" mg="" total="" aglycone="" isoflavones/g="" protein="" statistically="" significantly="" lowered="" total=""><0.05) and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels=""><0.05), by="" 4="" and="" 6="" percent,="" respectively,="" while="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" not="" altered.="" in="" a="" subset="" of="" subjects="" with="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" in="" the="" top="" half="" of="" the="" study="" population,="" serum="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" reduced="" by="" 9="" percent=""><0.03) and="" 12="" percent=""><0.03), respectively,="" by="" the="" isp="" with="" 2.5="" mg="" total="" aglycone="" isoflavones/g="" protein,="" and="" by="" 8="" percent=""><0.03) and="" 9="" percent=""><0.03), respectively,="" by="" the="" isp="" with="" 1.6="" mg="" total="" aglycone="" isoflavones/g="" protein.="" baum="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 28)="" found="" that="" the="" adjusted="" mean="" difference="" in="" total="" serum="" cholesterol="" level="" was="" not="" significantly="" (p="">0.05) different in the two groups consuming soy as ISP and the 
    control group. However, there was a statistically significant reduction 
    of 8 to 9 percent in non-HDL (LDL plus VLDL) cholesterol in both of the 
    ISP treatment groups (p=0.04) compared to the control group.
        Bakhit et al. (Ref. 27) found, in a subset of subjects whose 
    cholesterol remained greater than the 220 mg/dL intent-to-treat level 
    after run-in with the baseline diet, a statistically significant 
    decrease in total cholesterol of 7 percent (p<0.05) from="" post-="" stabilization="" levels="" with="" ingestion="" of="" isp;="" addition="" of="" soy="" cotyledon="" fiber="" to="" the="" isp="" diet="" resulted="" in="" a="" significant="" decrease=""><0.05) of="" 8="" percent="" in="" total="" cholesterol.="" levels="" of="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" not="" statistically="" significantly="" affected="" by="" either="" soy="" diet.="" potter="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 51)="" reported="" a="" statistically="" significant="" decrease=""><0.05) from="" baseline="" in="" total="" plasma="" cholesterol="" of="" 8="" percent="" with="" ingestion="" of="" diets="" containing="" isp="" whether="" soy="" cotyledon="" fiber="" or="" cellulose="" was="" also="" consumed.="" the="" 8-percent="" decrease="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" from="" baseline="" was="" statistically="" significant="" only="" when="" the="" isp="" diet="" also="" contained="" soy="" cotyledon="" fiber=""><0.05). total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" also="" significantly="" lower=""><0.01) with="" the="" isp="" diets="" compared="" to="" the="" nonfat="" dry="" milk-cellulose="" diet.="" changes="" from="" baseline="" were="" not="" statistically="" significant="" for="" any="" of="" the="" blood="" lipids="" when="" the="" diet="" providing="" soy="" protein="" as="" sf="" was="" consumed.="" however,="" the="" difference="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" observed="" after="" ingestion="" of="" sf="" was="" 19="" mg/dl="" lower="" than="" that="" on="" the="" control="" diet="" of="" nonfat="" dry="" milk="" and="" cellulose=""><0.01). with="" diets="" providing="" either="" cow's="" milk="" (2-percent="" fat),="" or="" skim="" cow's="" milk="" (0-percent="" fat)="" plus="" soy="" oil="" (16="" g),="" or="" soybean="" milk,="" kurowska="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 44)="" found="" no="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" from="" baseline="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" in="" response="" to="" any="" of="" the="" dietary="" treatments.="" in="" the="" subjects="" with="" the="" highest="" initial="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" and="" ldl/hdl-cholesterol="" ratios,="" ldl-="" [[page="" 62984]]="" cholesterol="" was="" reduced="" by="" 11="" percent="" by="" the="" soybean="" milk="" diet.="" holmes="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 40)="" conducted="" two="" trials="" testing="" sf="" as="" a="" texturized="" vegetable="" protein="" product,="" with="" averages="" of="" 27="" and="" 62="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" consumed,="" respectively,="" in="" the="" first="" and="" the="" second="" trial.="" in="" trial="" 1,="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" occurred="" during="" the="" stabilization="" period="" when="" the="" control="" diet="" was="" consumed;="" no="" further="" changes="" occurred="" after="" the="" second="" dietary="" period="" during="" which="" the="" partially="" substituted="" soy="" diet="" was="" consumed.="" in="" trial="" 2,="" both="" diets="" resulted="" in="" a="" statistically="" significant="" lowering="" of="" total="" cholesterol="" during="" the="" first="" dietary="" sequence,="" the="" animal="" protein="" diet="" by="" 18="" percent="" and="" the="" soy="" diet="" by="" 19="" percent.="" crossing="" over="" the="" diets="" had="" no="" further="" effect.="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" not="" reduced="" by="" either="" diet.="" these="" studies="" were="" unique="" in="" the="" source="" of="" soy="" protein="" used="" and="" in="" including="" subjects="" with="" type="" iv="" hyperlipidemia.="" levels="" of="" hdl-cholesterol="" were="" also="" measured="" in="" each="" of="" these="" seven="" studies="" and="" were="" found="" either="" to="" be="" unchanged="" (refs.="" 31,="" 27,="" 51,="" and="" 40="" (2="" trials))="" or="" to="" show="" a="" slight="" but="" statistically="" significant="" increase="" (refs.="" 28="" and="" 44)="" in="" response="" to="" consumption="" of="" diets="" containing="" soy="" protein.="" levels="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" isp="" found="" to="" be="" effective="" in="" lowering="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" ranged="" in="" these="" studies="" from="" 25="" to="" 50="" g="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" and="" 51).="" as="" whole="" soybean="" milk,="" 31="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" lowered="" ldl-cholesterol="" only="" in="" the="" subset="" of="" subjects="" with="" the="" highest="" initial="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" and="" ldl/hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" (ref.="" 44).="" diets="" providing="" 50="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" sf="" did="" not="" cause="" significant="" changes="" from="" baseline="" for="" any="" of="" the="" blood="" lipids,="" but="" the="" decrease="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" observed="" after="" ingestion="" of="" sf="" was="" significantly="" greater="" than="" that="" on="" the="" control="" diet="" of="" nonfat="" dry="" milk="" and="" cellulose="" (ref.="" 51).="" diets="" providing="" 27="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" sf="" in="" a="" textured="" product="" had="" no="" significant="" effects="" on="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" compared="" to="" a="" control="" diet,="" and="" a="" higher="" level="" (62="" g)="" significantly="" lowered="" total="" cholesterol="" only="" in="" the="" experimental="" group="" fed="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" first="" (ref.="" 40).="" b.="" summary--hypercholesterolemic="" subjects="" consuming="" ``usual''="" diets.="" three="" studies="" reported="" on="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects="" consuming="" ``usual''="" diets="" that="" were="" generally="" high="" in="" total="" fat,="" saturated="" fat,="" and="" cholesterol="" (refs.="" 37,="" 49,="" and="" 54).="" goldberg="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 37)="" found,="" on="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" (with="" 99="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" isp),="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" from="" baseline="" of="" 15="" percent="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" and="" 17="" percent="" in="" ldl-="" cholesterol.="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" 8="" mg/dl="" lower=""><0.005), and="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" was="" 10="" mg/dl="" lower=""><0.05), at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" dietary="" period="" when="" soy="" protein="" was="" ingested="" as="" compared="" to="" the="" animal="" protein="" diet.="" mercer="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 49)="" found="" that="" a="" diet="" with="" approximately="" 17="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" from="" isp="" did="" not="" produce="" changes="" in="" serum="" cholesterol="" that="" were="" significantly="" different="" from="" those="" of="" a="" cow's="" milk="" control="" diet.="" among="" subjects="" whose="" baseline="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" above="" the="" 90th="" percentile,="" mercer="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 49)="" found="" that="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" resulted="" in="" a="" decrease="" from="" baseline="" in="" mean="" total="" cholesterol="" of="" 4="" percent="" and="" a="" level="" 9="" percent="" lower="" (16="" mg/dl;=""><0.05) than="" the="" level="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" cow's="" milk="" control="" period.="" ldl-cholesterol="" did="" not="" differ="" significantly="" between="" isp="" and="" cow's="" milk="" diets="" for="" all="" subjects="" or="" for="" the="" subset="" of="" subjects="" with="" the="" highest="" initial="" total="" cholesterol="" levels.="" shorey="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 54)="" found="" diets="" with="" 57="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" isp="" was="" associated="" with="" a="" statistically="" significant="" decrease="" from="" baseline="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" of="" 7="" percent="" (p="0.027);" however,="" these="" values="" were="" 6="" mg/dl="" higher="" than="" change="" from="" baseline="" values="" obtained="" from="" the="" control="" group.="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" not="" measured="" in="" this="" study.="" although="" the="" two="" diets="" were="" well="" matched="" for="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol,="" interpretation="" of="" these="" findings="" is="" complicated="" by="" the="" fact="" that="" body="" weight="" was="" significantly="" decreased="" in="" both="" groups="" of="" subjects=""><0.004). subjects="" who="" showed="" a="" significant="" hypocholesterolemic="" response="" on="" either="" diet="" were="" those="" who="" substantially="" reduced="" their="" customary="" protein="" and="" fat="" intakes="" on="" the="" experimental="" diets.="" in="" contrast="" to="" other="" studies,="" subjects="" in="" this="" study="" with="" lower="" baseline="" values="" experienced="" more="" pronounced="" reductions="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" level.="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" also="" measured="" in="" these="" three="" studies.="" changes="" were="" small="" and="" not="" statistically="" significant="" in="" two="" studies="" (refs.="" 37="" and="" 49),="" but="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" significantly="" decreased="" from="" baseline="" values="" by="" 15="" percent="" in="" one="" study="" (ref.="" 54).="" (this="" latter="" study="" had="" a="" number="" of="" anomalous="" results.)="" each="" of="" these="" three="" studies="" fed="" soy="" protein="" in="" experimental="" diets="" as="" isp="" (refs.="" 37,="" 49,="" and="" 54).="" with="" a="" diet="" containing="" a="" very="" high="" level="" (99="" g)="" of="" soy="" protein="" from="" this="" source="" (ref.="" 37),="" statistically="" significant="" differences="" in="" both="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" reported.="" results="" were="" less="" consistent="" with="" a="" relatively="" low="" level="" of="" soy="" protein="" (17="" g)="" (ref.="" 49).="" an="" intermediate="" level="" of="" soy="" protein="" (57="" g)="" was="" found="" to="" be="" ineffective="" in="" lowering="" total="" cholesterol="" in="" the="" study="" of="" shorey="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 54).="" c.="" summary--normocholesterolemic="" subjects.="" five="" studies="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" normocholesterolemic="" subjects="" (refs.="" 30,="" 36,="" 58,="" 59,="" and="" 53).="" the="" study="" of="" carroll="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 30)="" found="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" significantly="" lower="" (-10="" mg/dl)="" when="" a="" soy="" protein="" diet="" (low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" and="" providing="" an="" estimated="" 44="" g="" soy="" protein="" as="" isp)="" was="" consumed="" as="" compared="" with="" a="" mixed="" protein="" control="" diet=""><0.05). ldl-cholesterol="" was="" not="" measured.="" giovannetti="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 36)="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" isp="" (66="" to="" 80="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" depending="" on="" energy="" intake)="" in="" both="" high-="" and="" low-fat="" diets.="" changes="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" with="" the="" soy="" protein="" diets="" were="" not="" statistically="" significantly="" different="" from="" changes="" with="" the="" corresponding="" control="" diets,="" regardless="" of="" fat="" content.="" the="" magnitude="" of="" reduction="" in="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" with="" soy="" protein="" was="" similar="" on="" the="" high-fat="" and="" low-fat="" diets,="" 10="" percent="" and="" 9="" percent,="" respectively.="" substitution="" of="" soy="" protein="" caused="" reductions="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" during="" the="" high-fat="" diet="" in="" 11="" of="" 12="" subjects="" and="" during="" the="" low-fat="" diet="" in="" 9="" of="" 12="" subjects.="" van="" raaij="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 58)="" tested="" the="" effects="" of="" isp="" using="" three="" diets="" high="" in="" total="" fat,="" saturated="" fat,="" and="" cholesterol="" that="" differed="" in="" protein="" composition="" with="" 65="" percent="" of="" the="" total="" protein="" comprising="" either="" soy="" protein="" (54="" g),="" or="" casein,="" or="" an="" approximately="" 2:1="" mixture="" of="" casein="" (36="" g):soy="" (17="" g).="" in="" the="" group="" consuming="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet,="" the="" decrease="" in="" total="" serum="" cholesterol="" (-2="" percent)="" was="" not="" statistically="" significant,="" but="" the="" decrease="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" (-8="" percent)="" was="" statistically="" significant=""><0.05). in="" addition,="" decreases="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" significantly="" greater="" with="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" compared="" to="" changes="" with="" the="" casein="" diet=""><0.05). in="" a="" trial="" with="" both="" normocholesterolemic="" and="" moderately="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects,="" van="" raaij="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 59)="" tested="" both="" isp="" and="" spc="" (each="" providing="" an="" average="" of="" 55="" g="" of="" soy="" protein)="" compared="" to="" a="" casein="" control="" in="" diets="" high="" in="" total="" fat,="" saturated="" fat,="" and="" cholesterol.="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" decreased="" from="" baseline="" by="" 4="" percent="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" decreased="" by="" 3="" percent="" on="" the="" isp="" diet.="" these="" changes="" were="" statistically="" significantly="" different="" from="" those="" on="" the="" spc="" diet=""><0.05) but="" not="" significantly="" different="" from="" those="" on="" the="" casein="" diet.="" when="" spc="" was="" used="" as="" the="" protein="" source,="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" not="" altered="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" increased="" by="" 6="" percent="" compared="" to="" [[page="" 62985]]="" baseline.="" none="" of="" these="" changes="" in="" blood="" lipids="" from="" baseline="" or="" differences="" between="" the="" casein="" and="" spc="" diets="" was="" statistically="" significant.="" interpretation="" of="" this="" study="" is="" complicated="" by="" differential="" weight="" loss="" on="" the="" experimental="" diets="" (weight="" loss="" was="" greatest="" in="" the="" casein="" group)="" and="" differential="" fiber="" intake.="" sacks="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 53)="" studied="" the="" effects="" of="" 27="" g="" of="" protein="" consumed="" daily="" as="" isp="" or="" casein="" incorporated="" into="" muffins="" and="" oatmeal,="" in="" diets="" very="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" in="" adults="" who="" were="" strict="" vegetarians.="" not="" unexpectedly,="" given="" the="" very="" low="" baseline="" lipid="" concentrations="" and="" very="" low="" dietary="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" intake,="" no="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" or="" differences="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" or="" ldl-cholesterol="" or="" hdl-cholesterol="" were="" observed="" from="" consumption="" of="" either="" soy="" protein="" or="" casein.="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" measured="" in="" four="" of="" these="" studies,="" with="" statistically="" significant="" increases="" associated="" with="" soy="" protein="" intake="" found="" in="" two="" (refs.="" 58="" and="" 59)="" and="" no="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" in="" two="" (refs.="" 36="" and="" 53).="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" less="" consistent="" in="" normocholesterolemic="" subjects="" than="" in="" moderately="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects.="" as="" isp,="" 44="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" was="" effective="" in="" statistically="" significantly="" lowering="" total="" cholesterol="" in="" one="" study="" (ref.="" 30),="" and="" 54="" g="" statistically="" significantly="" lowered="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" in="" one="" study="" (ref.="" 58).="" with="" very="" low="" initial="" blood="" lipid="" levels,="" the="" impact="" of="" dietary="" changes="" appears="" to="" be="" lessened.="" d.="" summary--subjects="" consuming="" hypocaloric="" diets.="" bosello="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 29)="" and="" jenkins="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 43)="" both="" studied="" the="" hypocholesterolemic="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" versus="" casein="" in="" the="" context="" of="" hypocaloric="" diets="" fed="" to="" obese="" persons="" to="" achieve="" significant="" weight="" reduction.="" in="" bosello="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 29),="" total="" cholesterol="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" in="" the="" soy="" group="" (which="" consumed="" 27="" g="" of="" soy="" protein)="" were="" both="" 16="" percent="" lower="" compared="" to="" baseline=""><0.01). compared="" to="" the="" casein="" control="" group,="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" 20="" mg/dl="" lower=""><0.01 )="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" 16="" mg/dl="" lower=""><0.01) in="" the="" soy="" protein="" group.="" jenkins="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 43)="" found="" that="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" from="" baseline="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" of="" 10="" percent=""><0.05) and="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" of="" 17="" percent=""><0.05) occurred="" only="" during="" the="" period="" when="" the="" soy="" protein="" formula="" (which="" provided="" 17="" g="" of="" soy="" protein)="" was="" ingested.="" the="" levels="" of="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" achieved="" with="" ingestion="" of="" soy="" protein="" were,="" respectively,="" 10="" mg/dl="" and="" 8="" mg/dl="" lower="" with="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" compared="" with="" casein="" diet.="" neither="" the="" conventional="" hypocaloric="" diet="" nor="" the="" casein="" formula="" hypocaloric="" diet="" resulted="" in="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" in="" total="" or="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" despite="" weight="" loss.="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" decreased="" in="" both="" groups="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" first="" study="" (ref.="" 29);="" however,="" only="" the="" casein="" group's="" values="" were="" significantly=""><0.01) different="" from="" baseline.="" additionally,="" the="" decrease="" in="" hdl-cholesterol="" in="" the="" casein="" group="" was=""><0.01) greater="" than="" that="" observed="" in="" the="" soy="" protein="" group.="" in="" the="" second="" study="" (ref.="" 43),="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" not="" significantly="" affected="" by="" dietary="" treatment.="" these="" two="" studies="" (refs.="" 29="" and="" 43)="" demonstrated="" decreases="" in="" both="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" during="" hypocaloric="" diets="" that="" provided="" relatively="" low="" amounts="" (27="" and="" 17="" g,="" respectively)="" of="" soy="" protein.="" 2.="" studies="" of="" subjects="" with="" type="" ii="" and="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia="" (mean="" total="" cholesterol="" level="">300 mg/dL)
        Ten studies (Refs. 33, 35, 46, 55, 56, 60, 64, 34, 42 and 45 (1 
    trial), and 63) of subjects with severe (type II or familial) 
    hypercholesterolemia (mean total cholesterol level>300 mg/dL) are 
    summarized in Table 2 of this document and discussed in section III. 
    C.2 of this document. Seven report results in adults (Refs. 33, 35, 46, 
    55, 56, 60, and 64) and three in children (Refs. 34, 42 and 45 (1 
    trial), and 63).
        a. Studies in adults. Sirtori et al. (Ref. 55) reported a decrease 
    of 21 percent in both total (p<0.001) and="" ldl-cholesterol=""><0.01) with="" soy="" protein="" consumption="" in="" adults="" with="" type="" ii="" hyperlipoproteinemia.="" total="" intake="" of="" soy="" protein,="" as="" a="" textured="" protein="" isolate,="" was="" not="" given="" but="" was="" approximately="" 13="" percent="" of="" kcal="" or="" 60="" g.="" the="" order="" in="" which="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" was="" consumed="" did="" not="" affect="" the="" results="" and="" the="" changes="" in="" total="" plasma="" cholesterol="" level="" far="" exceeded="" those="" expected="" based="" on="" the="" small="" differences="" in="" ratio="" of="" polyunsaturated="" to="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" content="" of="" the="" diets.="" when="" the="" control="" diet="" was="" fed="" first,="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" were="" not="" observed;="" when="" it="" was="" fed="" second,="" total="" cholesterol="" increased="" statistically="" significantly.="" these="" investigators="" also="" reported="" that="" addition="" of="" 500="" mg="" cholesterol="" in="" a="" small,="" similar="" study="" showed="" that="" level="" of="" dietary="" cholesterol="" did="" not="" modify="" the="" cholesterol-lowering="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" observed.="" descovich="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 33)="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" replacing="" animal="" protein="" in="" adults="" with="" stable="" type="" iia="" and="" iib="" hypercholesterolemia.="" subjects="" consumed="" an="" average="" of="" 47="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" the="" form="" of="" texturized="" soy="" protein="" (from="" sf)="" mixed="" into="" main="" dishes.="" during="" the="" baseline="" control="" period="" with="" a="" lipid-lowering="" diet,="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" decreased="" 3="" percent="" from="" baseline="" levels.="" when="" soy="" protein="" was="" substituted="" for="" animal="" protein="" in="" the="" second="" dietary="" period,="" total="" cholesterol="" decreased="" by="" 24="" percent=""><0.001) at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" experimental="" period.="" all="" of="" the="" subjects="" demonstrated="" decreases="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" of="" at="" least="" 10="" percent.="" upon="" returning="" to="" the="" control="" diet,="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" increased="" 7="" percent="" in="" men="" and="" 9="" percent="" in="" women.="" ldl-cholesterol="" also="" showed="" a="" statistically="" significant="" decrease,="" by="" 31="" percent="" from="" baseline="" levels=""><0.001), while="" hdl-cholesterol="" remained="" stable="" over="" the="" course="" of="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" (+0.4="" mg/dl="" for="" men="" and="" +1.0="" mg/dl="" for="" women).="" wolfe="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 64)="" tested="" the="" effects="" of="" ingesting="" 47="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" the="" form="" of="" isp="" incorporated="" into="" main="" dishes="" and="" a="" beverage,="" while="" animal="" proteins="" were="" incorporated="" into="" similar="" main="" dishes="" and="" cow's="" milk="" was="" consumed="" during="" the="" mixed="" protein="" control="" period.="" baseline="" lipid="" concentrations="" were="" not="" given;="" however,="" mean="" total="" cholesterol="" concentrations="" were="" 280="" mg/dl="" after="" the="" soy="" protein="" treatment="" and="" 321="" mg/dl="" after="" the="" control="" treatment.="" thus,="" compared="" with="" the="" control="" period,="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" 41="" mg/dl="" lower="" with="" ingestion="" of="" soy="" protein=""><0.05) and="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" 43="" mg/dl="" lower=""><0.05). hdl-cholesterol="" was="" similar="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" soy="" protein="" and="" control="" dietary="" periods.="" sirtori="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 56)="" conducted="" a="" trial="" that="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" complete="" and="" partial="" substitution="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" sf="" (60="" g="" or="" 30="" g="" of="" soy="" protein),="" in="" a="" lecithinated="" textured="" vegetable="" protein,="" for="" animal="" protein="" in="" adults="" with="" type="" iia="" hyperlipoproteinemia.="" plasma="" cholesterol="" levels="" were="" not="" altered="" during="" the="" first="" control="" diet="" period.="" total="" plasma="" cholesterol="" levels="" were="" significantly=""><0.01) reduced="" in="" both="" periods="" of="" soy="" protein="" administration,="" by="" 18.6="" percent="" when="" 60="" g="" were="" consumed="" and="" by="" 13.2="" percent="" when="" 30="" g="" were="" consumed.="" serum="" cholesterol="" values="" returned="" almost="" completely="" to="" baseline="" during="" the="" second="" control="" period.="" changes="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" superimposable="" to="" those="" of="" total="" cholesterol.="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" tended="" to="" increase="" during="" the="" two="" soy="" periods="" and="" decline="" to="" baseline="" levels="" during="" the="" second="" control="" period,="" but="" these="" differences="" were="" not="" statistically="" significant.="" verillo="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 60)="" compared="" the="" effects="" of="" substituting="" 31="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" [[page="" 62986]]="" as="" sf="" for="" animal="" protein="" versus="" the="" addition="" of="" 31="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" sf="" to="" animal="" protein="" in="" adults="" with="" stable="" type="" ii="" hypercholesterolemia.="" slight,="" nonsignificant="" decreases="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" reported="" during="" the="" initial="" control="" period.="" among="" subjects="" who="" consumed="" the="" soy-substituted="" diet,="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" declined="" significantly=""><0.01) from="" the="" end="" of="" the="" baseline="" diet="" by="" 35="" percent="" and="" 23="" percent="" in="" type="" iia="" and="" type="" iib="" patients,="" respectively.="" ldl-cholesterol="" declined="" significantly=""><0.01) from="" the="" end="" of="" the="" baseline="" diet="" by="" 44="" percent="" and="" 23="" percent="" in="" type="" iia="" and="" type="" iib="" patients,="" respectively.="" hdl-cholesterol="" increased="" 8="" percent,="" but="" this="" change="" did="" not="" reach="" statistical="" significance.="" the="" same="" hypocholesterolemic="" effects="" were="" also="" seen="" among="" subjects="" who="" consumed="" the="" soy-added="" diet.="" a="" comparison="" of="" results="" at="" the="" ends="" of="" the="" soy="" periods="" versus="" the="" means="" of="" final="" values="" of="" both="" control="" periods="" showed="" differences="" in="" serum="" lipids="" that="" were="" of="" similar="" magnitudes,="" but="" not="" statistically="" significantly="" different.="" the="" hypocholesterolemic="" response="" to="" soy="" was="" significantly="" related="" to="" cholesterol="" level="" at="" entry="" to="" the="" study.="" the="" study="" of="" lovati="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 46)="" in="" adults="" with="" type="" ii="" hypercholesterolemia="" provided="" soy="" protein="" as="" sf,="" from="" textured="" vegetable="" protein,="" in="" amounts="" varying="" between="" 70="" and="" 105="" g="" depending="" upon="" total="" energy="" consumed.="" plasma="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" both="" decreased="" by="" 16="" percent=""><0.01) during="" the="" period="" when="" soy="" protein="" diet="" was="" ingested="" compared="" with="" levels="" at="" the="" start="" of="" the="" experimental="" period.="" changes="" in="" these="" parameters="" on="" the="" control="" diet="" were="" negligible.="" hdl-cholesterol="" concentrations="" were="" not="" documented="" but="" were="" reported="" to="" be="" unchanged="" on="" the="" two="" diet="" regimens.="" gaddi="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 35)="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" replacing="" animal="" protein="" and="" non-soy="" plant="" protein="" with="" approximately="" 75="" g="" soy="" protein="" from="" sf="" in="" a="" lecithinated="" textured="" soy="" protein,="" in="" adults="" with="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia.="" the="" control="" diet="" did="" not="" affect="" plasma="" lipid="" values="" during="" the="" initial="" experimental="" period.="" after="" ingestion="" of="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet,="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" decreased="" by="" 21="" percent=""><0.0l) and="" ldl-cholesterol="" decreased="" by="" 25="" percent=""><0.01) from="" levels="" measured="" after="" the="" first="" control="" diet="" period.="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" unchanged.="" plasma="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" returned="" to="" concentrations="" close="" to="" those="" at="" baseline="" following="" resumption="" of="" the="" control="" diet="" during="" the="" third="" experimental="" period.="" b.="" studies="" in="" children.="" gaddi="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 34)="" studied="" children="" from="" 3="" to="" 12="" years="" of="" age="" with="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia.="" after="" a="" baseline="" dietary="" period="" during="" which="" subjects="" consumed="" a="" low="" lipid="" diet,="" soy="" protein="" in="" the="" form="" of="" sf="" replaced="" a="" portion="" of="" the="" animal="" protein="" intake.="" no="" significant="" changes="" in="" plasma="" lipids="" occurred="" over="" the="" duration="" of="" the="" baseline="" dietary="" period.="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" soy="" protein="" dietary="" period="" was="" 20="" percent="" lower="" than="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" baseline="" dietary="" period=""><0.001). ldl-cholesterol="" was="" 24="" percent="" lower=""><0.01) and="" hdl-cholesterol="" level="" was="" not="" affected.="" widhalm="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 63)="" examined="" the="" lipid-lowering="" effects="" of="" incorporating="" isp="" (13.5-18="" g="" protein)="" into="" food="" and="" beverage="" recipes="" in="" children="" with="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia.="" after="" the="" soy="" protein="" dietary="" periods,="" plasma="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" 16="" percent="" lower=""><0.005) than="" baseline="" levels="" in="" the="" group="" that="" consumed="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" before="" the="" control="" diet="" and="" 18="" percent="" lower=""><0.001) in="" the="" group="" that="" consumed="" soy="" last.="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" also="" statistically="" significantly="" decreased=""><0.001) by="" 22="" percent="" in="" the="" first="" group="" and="" 25="" percent="" in="" the="" second="" group.="" during="" the="" control="" diet="" periods,="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" reduced="" by="" 8="" percent="" and="" 7="" percent="" in="" the="" first="" group="" and="" by="" 12="" percent="" and="" 13="" percent="" in="" the="" second="" group,="" respectively.="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" not="" statistically="" significantly="" affected="" by="" dietary="" treatment.="" laurin="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 45)="" and="" jacques="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 42)="" both="" reported="" on="" a="" test="" of="" the="" lipid-lowering="" effects="" of="" isp="" (28="" g="" of="" soy="" protein)="" in="" children,="" 6="" to="" 12="" years="" of="" age,="" with="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia.="" children="" consumed="" either="" a="" conventional="" low="" fat="" diet="" with="" 2-percent="" cow's="" milk="" or="" the="" same="" low="" fat="" diet="" with="" a="" soy-based="" beverage="" made="" with="" 2-percent="" butterfat="" substituted="" for="" the="" 2-percent="" cow's="" milk.="" comparisons="" between="" the="" two="" treatment="" groups="" indicated="" that="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" not="" altered.="" hdl-cholesterol="" level="" was="" increased="" 4="" percent=""><0.04) with="" soy="" protein="" compared="" to="" cow's="" milk.="" c.="" summary--subjects="" with="" type="" ii="" or="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia.="" each="" of="" the="" ten="" studies="" of="" the="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" subjects="" with="" severe="" (type="" ii="" or="" familial)="" hypercholesterolemia="" employed="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" (refs.="" 33,="" 35,="" 46,="" 55,="" 56,="" 60,="" 64,="" 34,="" 42="" and="" 45="" (1="" trial),="" and="" 63),="" and="" most="" subjects="" had="" been="" consuming="" such="" a="" therapeutic="" diet="" prior="" to="" the="" study.="" six="" of="" the="" ten="" trials="" were="" conducted="" by="" workers="" from="" the="" same="" group="" (refs.="" 55,="" 33,="" 56,="" 46,="" 35,="" and="" 34).="" most="" used="" sf="" in="" tvp="" as="" the="" source="" of="" soy="" protein,="" in="" amounts="" ranging="" from="" 14="" to="" 105="" g="" (refs.="" 33,="" 56,="" 60,="" 46,="" 35,="" 34,="" and="" 63);="" the="" remainder="" used="" isp="" as="" the="" source="" of="" soy="" protein,="" in="" amounts="" ranging="" from="" 28="" to="" 60="" g="" (refs.="" 55,="" 64,="" and="" 42="" and="" 45="" (1="" trial)).="" in="" all="" the="" studies="" conducted="" in="" adults="" (refs.="" 33,="" 35,="" 46,="" 55,="" 56,="" 60,="" and="" 64),="" using="" both="" fixed="" sequence="" and="" crossover="" study="" designs,="" large="" and="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" in="" both="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" observed="" in="" response="" to="" consumption="" of="" diets="" containing="" soy="" protein.="" in="" the="" six="" trials="" in="" which="" they="" were="" measured,="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" either="" not="" statistically="" significantly="" affected="" (refs.="" 33,="" 64,="" 60,="" 46,="" and="" 35)="" or="" were="" statistically="" significantly="" increased="" (ref.="" 56).="" in="" the="" studies="" conducted="" in="" children="" with="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia,="" two="" of="" the="" three="" trials="" demonstrated="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" from="" baseline="" levels="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" during="" the="" periods="" when="" soy="" protein="" diets="" were="" consumed="" (refs.="" 34="" and="" 63).="" however,="" interpretation="" of="" these="" findings="" is="" complicated="" by="" uncertainty="" about="" the="" control="" of="" intake="" of="" other="" dietary="" constituents,="" especially="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol.="" in="" the="" study="" reported="" by="" laurin="" et="" al.="" and="" jacques="" et="" al.="" (refs.="" 45="" and="" 42),="" differences="" in="" these="" dietary="" components="" were="" controlled.="" with="" diets="" providing="" 12="" percent="" of="" kcal="" from="" saturated="" fat="" and="" 163="" to="" 180="" mg="" of="" cholesterol,="" plasma="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" not="" statistically="" significantly="" different,="" but="" the="" hdl-cholesterol="" level="" was="" statistically="" significantly="" higher,="" on="" the="" soy="" diet="" than="" on="" the="" cow's="" milk="" diet.="" 3.="" epidemiologic="" evidence="" on="" soy="" protein="" and="" blood="" lipids="" the="" petitioner="" also="" submitted="" one="" epidemiologic="" study="" by="" nagata="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 65)="" that="" described="" the="" relationship="" between="" soy="" product="" and="" soy="" protein="" intake="" and="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" concentrations="" in="" japanese="" men="" and="" women.="" participants="" in="" this="" study="" were="" 1,242="" men="" and="" 3,596="" women="" from="" the="" takayama="" study,="" a="" prospective="" cohort="" study="" on="" the="" impact="" of="" diet="" and="" lifestyle="" on="" cancer,="" who="" attended="" the="" annual="" health="" checkup="" program="" between="" april="" and="" october="" 1992.="" data="" regarding="" food="" intake="" were="" collected="" by="" a="" validated,="" semiquantitative="" food="" frequency="" questionnaire="" (ffq).="" blood="" samples="" were="" also="" taken="" for="" each="" subject="" and="" analyzed="" for="" total="" cholesterol="" concentrations.="" soy="" products="" identified="" in="" the="" ffq="" included="" tofu="" (plain,="" fried,="" deep-fried,="" or="" dried),="" miso,="" fermented="" soybeans,="" soy="" milk,="" and="" boiled="" soybeans.="" the="" estimated="" amount="" of="" soy="" protein="" consumed="" from="" these="" sources="" was="" 8.00=""> 4.95 
    g/day for men and 6.88
    
    [[Page 62987]]
    
     4.06 g/day for women. The authors noted that their FFQ may 
    underestimate soy product intake; they also estimated that 4 to 9 g 
    additional soy protein may be consumed daily from soy protein added to 
    meats and fish pastes that was not accounted for in the FFQ. Thus, 
    analyses were presented in terms of relative soy protein intake. Using 
    energy-adjusted means for quartiles of soy protein intake, a 
    statistically significant negative trend was observed for lower serum 
    total cholesterol concentrations with higher levels of soy protein 
    intake (p<0.0001 for="" both="" men="" and="" women).="" the="" analysis="" for="" men="" was="" controlled="" for="" age,="" smoking="" status,="" and="" total="" energy,="" protein,="" and="" fat="" intake.="" the="" analysis="" for="" women="" was="" controlled="" for="" age,="" menopausal="" status,="" body="" mass="" index,="" and="" intake="" of="" energy="" and="" vitamin="" c.="" further="" adjustments="" for="" physical="" activity,="" coffee="" and="" tea="" consumption,="" and="" intakes="" of="" cholesterol,="" carbohydrates,="" fiber,="" and="" vitamin="" e="" were="" performed="" and="" results="" were="" not="" affected.="" between="" the="" 1st="" and="" 4th="" quartiles="" in="" men,="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" lower="" by="" 12="" mg/dl="" with="" a="" 9.6-g="" increase="" in="" soy="" protein="" intake.="" for="" women,="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" lower="" by="" 9="" mg/dl="" with="" a="" 7.9-g="" increase="" in="" soy="" protein="" intake.="" 4.="" meta-analysis="" of="" studies="" of="" soy="" protein="" and="" blood="" lipids="" the="" petitioner="" presented="" the="" results="" of="" a="" 1995="" meta-analysis="" (ref.="" 66)="" of="" the="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" blood="" lipids.="" while="" the="" role="" of="" ``research="" synthesis''="" studies,="" including="" meta-analyses,="" is="" of="" interest,="" it="" is="" as="" yet="" unresolved.="" the="" appropriateness="" of="" such="" analytical="" techniques="" to="" establish="" diet/health="" relationships="" in="" particular="" is="" not="" known.="" there="" are="" on-going="" efforts="" to="" identify="" criteria="" and="" critical="" factors="" to="" consider="" in="" both="" conducting="" and="" using="" such="" analyses,="" but="" this="" science="" is="" still="" emerging.="" therefore,="" the="" meta-="" analysis="" did="" not="" weigh="" heavily="" within="" the="" body="" of="" evidence="" for="" this="" relationship.="" in="" summary,="" anderson="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 66)="" pooled="" data="" from="" studies="" that="" were="" deemed="" comparable="" in="" methodology="" in="" order="" to="" perform="" a="" meta-="" analysis="" of="" the="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" blood="" lipids.="" of="" the="" 37="" publications="" identified="" by="" these="" investigators="" that="" presented="" data="" on="" soy="" protein="" and="" lipid="" changes,="" 29="" met="" the="" criteria="" of="" using="" either="" isp="" or="" texturized="" soy="" protein="" as="" the="" soy="" protein="" source,="" employing="" either="" a="" parallel="" or="" crossover="" design,="" and="" providing="" initial="" or="" baseline="" cholesterol="" values="" to="" allow="" calculation="" of="" decreases.="" these="" 29="" publications="" reported="" the="" findings="" from="" 38="" separate="" trials.="" each="" of="" these="" publications="" was="" included="" in="" the="" petition="" and="" was="" considered="" for="" review="" individually="" by="" fda="" as="" described="" previously.="" thirty-four="" of="" the="" trials="" were="" conducted="" among="" adults="" and="" four="" among="" children.="" study="" samples="" included="" individuals="" with="" normal="" blood="" cholesterol="" levels="" as="" well="" as="" those="" with="" mildly="" to="" severely="" elevated="" levels.="" twelve="" of="" the="" trials="" were="" conducted="" in="" subjects="" with="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia.="" the="" specific="" analytical="" approach="" is="" described="" in="" anderson="" et="" al.="" (66).="" based="" on="" examining="" the="" difference="" from="" baseline="" between="" the="" soy="" protein="" and="" control="" protein="" groups,="" the="" analysis="" indicated="" that="" soy="" protein="" consumption="" statistically="" significantly="" decreased="" total="" cholesterol="" for="" the="" pooled="" data="" by="" 9.3="" percent="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" by="" 12.9="" percent.="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" increased="" by="" a="" net="" of="" 2.4="" percent="" with="" soy="" protein="" ingestion,="" but="" this="" change="" was="" not="" statistically="" significant.="" this="" analysis="" also="" suggested="" that="" the="" initial="" level="" of="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" the="" most="" important="" determinant="" of="" serum="" lipid="" response="" to="" soy="" protein.="" when="" changes="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" were="" examined="" by="" quartile="" of="" baseline="" cholesterol="" concentration,="" a="" progressively="" greater="" magnitude="" of="" change="" was="" observed="" from="" the="" lowest="" to="" the="" highest="" quartiles.="" additional="" analyses="" indicated="" that="" the="" type="" and="" amount="" of="" soy="" protein="" consumed="" and="" type="" of="" background="" diet="" did="" not="" substantially="" influence="" the="" results.="" to="" examine="" further="" the="" effects="" of="" the="" type="" and="" amount="" of="" soy="" protein,="" an="" analysis="" was="" performed="" using="" changes="" observed="" with="" the="" soy="" diet="" alone="" instead="" of="" net="" changes="" as="" the="" outcome="" variable.="" initial="" serum="" cholesterol="" concentration="" was="" also="" the="" major="" determinant="" of="" effects="" in="" this="" model,="" but="" statistically="" significant="" effects="" (p="0.02)" were="" also="" obtained="" for="" amount="" of="" soy="" protein.="" this="" model="" predicted,="" after="" adjustment="" for="" initial="" values="" and="" other="" variables,="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" decreases="" of="" 8.9="" mg/dl="" with="" 25="" g/day="" soy="" protein,="" 17.4="" mg/="" dl="" with="" 50="" g/day="" of="" soy="" protein,="" and="" 26.3="" mg/dl="" with="" 75="" g/day="" of="" soy="" protein.="" 5.="" studies="" of="" the="" role="" soy="" isoflavones="" isoflavones="" are="" a="" class="" of="" naturally-occurring="" compounds="" with="" weak="" estrogenic/antiestrogenic="" activities="" that="" are="" present="" in="" a="" wide="" variety="" of="" plants.="" the="" 12="" major="" isomers="" of="" naturally-occurring="" isoflavones="" in="" soybeans="" are="" genistein,="" genestin,="" 6``-o-acetylgenistin,="" 6``-o-="" malonylgenestin,="" diadzein,="" diadzin,="" 6``-o-acetyldiadzin,="" 6``-o-="" malonyldiadzin,="" glycitein,="" glycitin,="" 6``-o-acetylglycitin,="" and="" 6``-o-="" malonyglycitin.="" the="" levels="" of="" isoflavones="" in="" soybeans="" are="" known="" to="" vary="" with="" cultivar="" and="" growing="" conditions.="" soy="" isoflavones="" are="" retained="" to="" variable="" degrees="" in="" soy="" protein="" products="" and="" soy="" foods,="" depending="" on="" the="" particular="" processing="" techniques="" used.="" for="" example,="" essentially="" all="" of="" the="" isoflavones="" in="" soy="" protein="" products="" can="" be="" extracted="" by="" alcohol="" washing,="" and="" their="" levels="" can="" also="" be="" reduced="" by="" repeated="" aqueous="" washings="" and="" some="" texturization="" techniques.="" because="" of="" the="" estrogenic="" activities="" of="" the="" soy="" isoflavones,="" they="" have="" been="" hypothesized="" to="" contribute="" to="" the="" hypocholesterolemic="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein.="" the="" petitioner="" submitted="" an="" unpublished="" study="" by="" crouse="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 31,="" documented="" in="" ref.="" 1="" with="" corrections="" noted="" in="" ref.="" 2)="" that="" examined="" the="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" containing="" different="" levels="" of="" isoflavones="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" men="" and="" women="" (summarized="" in="" table="" 1="" of="" this="" document).="" potential="" subjects="" were="" provided="" instruction="" in="" an="" ncep="" step="" 1="" diet="" and="" followed="" this="" diet="" for="" 1="" month.="" subjects="" with="" qualifying="" serum="" lipid="" levels="" (ldl-cholesterol="">140 mg/dL) were given a 
    casein drink containing 25 g protein to consume in place of other 
    protein in the NCEP Step 1 diet. Subjects compliant with this regimen 
    were then randomized into one of five treatment groups and baseline 
    blood lipid values were obtained. The treatment groups received 25 g 
    protein from ISP prepared from soy with different levels of isoflavones 
    (either 1.0, 1.6, or 2.5 mg total aglycone isoflavones/g protein), or 
    25 g protein from alcohol-washed ISP that contained essentially no 
    isoflavones (0.2 mg total aglycone isoflavones/g protein) or 25 g 
    protein from casein (no isoflavones) in beverages for 9 weeks. Dietary 
    intake was assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. Diet was 
    reported to be stable and comparable between groups throughout the 
    study, with 9 percent of energy derived from saturated fat. Body weight 
    was also stable, with no differences between groups at baseline or at 
    the end of the trial. Results indicated the ISP containing the highest 
    level of isoflavones significantly lowered total (p<0.05) and="" ldl-="" cholesterol=""><0.05), by="" 4="" percent="" and="" 6="" percent,="" respectively,="" while="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" not="" altered="" (table="" 1).="" furthermore,="" in="" subjects="" with="" ldl-cholesterol="" in="" the="" top="" half="" of="" the="" study="" population,="" serum="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" reduced="" by="" 9="" percent=""><0.03) and="" 12="" percent=""><0.03), respectively,="" by="" the="" isp="" with="" the="" highest="" isoflavone="" content,="" and="" by="" 8="" percent=""><0.03) and="" 9="" percent=""><0.03), respectively="" by="" the="" isp="" with="" the="" second="" highest="" isoflavone="" content,="" while="" hdl-="" cholesterol="" concentrations="" were="" maintained.="" [[page="" 62988]]="" baum="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 28)="" also="" investigated="" the="" impact="" in="" soy="" protein="" containing="" different="" levels="" of="" isoflavones="" on="" cholesterol="" lowering="" and="" examined="" whether="" changes="" in="" blood="" lipids="" were="" lasting="" or="" transient.="" subjects="" were="" moderately="" hypercholesterolemic="" women,="" who="" were="" at="" least="" 1="" year="" since="" last="" menstrual="" period,="" and="" were="" not="" taking="" medications="" known="" to="" alter="" lipid="" or="" bone="" metabolism.="" following="" a="" 2-week="" run-in="" period="" during="" which="" subjects="" consumed="" an="" ncep="" step="" i="" diet,="" subjects="" were="" randomly="" assigned="" to="" one="" of="" three="" treatment="" groups="" consisting="" of="" 40="" g="" protein="" from="" either="" isp="" with="" 1.4="" mg="" total="" aglycone="" isoflavones/g="" protein,="" isp="" with="" 2.3="" mg="" total="" aglycone="" isoflavones/g="" protein,="" or="" casein/nonfat="" dry="" milk="" for="" the="" 24-week="" treatment="" period.="" although="" the="" adjusted="" mean="" difference="" in="" total="" serum="" cholesterol="" level="" was="" not="" statistically="" significantly="" different="" in="" the="" soy="" groups="" and="" the="" control="" group,="" there="" was="" a="" significant="" reduction="" of="" 8="" to="" 9="" percent="" in="" non-hdl="" (ldl="" plus="" vldl)="" cholesterol="" in="" both="" of="" the="" isp="" treatment="" groups="" (p="0.04)" compared="" to="" the="" control="" group.="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" also="" significantly="" increased="" in="" both="" soy="" groups="" compared="" to="" the="" control.="" body="" weight="" remained="" stable,="" and="" dietary="" intake="" was="" assessed="" and="" was="" reported="" to="" be="" similar="" among="" treatment="" groups="" although="" details="" were="" not="" reported.="" the="" petitioner="" concluded="" that="" these="" two="" studies="" (refs.="" 31="" and="" 28)="" provided="" evidence="" that="" the="" hypocholesterolemic="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" is="" dependent="" on="" processing="" techniques="" that="" enable="" retention="" of="" the="" naturally="" occurring="" isoflavones="" in="" conjunction="" with="" the="" soy="" protein.="" as="" additional="" supportive="" evidence="" for="" this="" conclusion,="" the="" petitioner="" cited="" studies="" of="" the="" lipid-lowering="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" with="" naturally="" occurring="" isoflavones="" in="" nonhuman="" primates="" (refs.="" 22="" and="" 70).="" in="" these="" experiments,="" the="" effects="" of="" diets="" including="" isp="" with="" naturally="" occurring="" isoflavones="" compared="" with="" those="" of="" diets="" containing="" either="" casein="" or="" alcohol-washed="" isp="" stripped="" of="" essentially="" all="" naturally="" occurring="" isoflavones="" were="" examined="" in="" two="" species="" of="" monkeys.="" the="" studies="" demonstrate="" significant="" depressions="" in="" total="" and="" non-hdl="" (ldl="" plus="" vldl)="" cholesterol="" levels="" in="" response="" to="" diets="" containing="" unextracted="" isp="" as="" compared="" with="" the="" diets="" containing="" casein="" or="" alcohol-washed="" isp.="" as="" evidence="" that="" soy="" isoflavones="" alone,="" in="" the="" absence="" of="" soy="" protein,="" are="" ineffective="" in="" lowering="" blood="" lipids,="" the="" petitioner="" cited="" the="" study="" of="" nestel="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 71).="" in="" that="" study,="" consumption="" of="" a="" tablet="" containing="" 80="" mg="" of="" total="" aglycone="" isoflavones="" (mainly="" genistein="" and="" diadzein)="" had="" no="" impact="" on="" blood="" lipid="" profiles="" in="" postmenopausal="" women.="" although="" the="" petitioner="" suggested,="" based="" on="" the="" studies="" of="" crouse="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 31)="" and="" baum="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 28),="" that="" isoflavone="" content="" exceeding="" a="" certain="" threshold="" was="" a="" useful="" marker="" for="" soy="" protein="" that="" would="" be="" effective="" in="" lowering="" blood="" lipid="" levels,="" fda="" has="" tentatively="" concluded="" that="" the="" evidence="" is="" not="" sufficient="" to="" establish="" that="" the="" presence="" of="" isoflavones="" accounts="" for="" or="" is="" related="" to="" the="" effect="" on="" blood="" lipids.="" the="" agency="" notes="" that="" there="" are="" a="" variety="" of="" methods="" for="" processing="" soy="" that="" could="" give="" rise="" to="" variable="" amounts="" of="" naturally-="" occurring="" isoflavones="" in="" soy="" protein="" products,="" and="" this="" is="" a="" possible="" hypothesis="" for="" explaining="" some="" of="" the="" variability="" in="" the="" results="" of="" human="" intervention="" studies.="" however,="" with="" two="" exceptions="" (refs.="" 31="" and="" 28),="" the="" studies="" reviewed="" and="" described="" in="" this="" document="" did="" not="" include="" concurrent="" measures="" of="" the="" isoflavone="" content="" of="" the="" soy="" protein="" products="" studied.="" more="" importantly,="" a="" recent="" letter="" to="" the="" editor="" from="" sirtori="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 72),="" which="" was="" not="" included="" in="" the="" petition,="" contradicts="" the="" conclusions="" of="" crouse="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 31)="" and="" baum="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 28).="" these="" researchers="" (ref.="" 72)="" reported="" that="" the="" tvp="" fed="" in="" their="" studies="" contained="" essentially="" no="" isoflavones="" and="" still="" considerable="" impact="" on="" ldl-cholesterol="" was="" observed.="" these="" studies="" (refs.="" 33,="" 56,="" 46,="" 35,="" and="" 34)="" were="" conducted="" in="" subjects="" with="" type="" ii="" hypercholesterolemia="" and="" all="" showed="" large="" and="" significant="" decreases="" in="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels.="" given="" the="" limited="" number="" of="" studies="" and="" the="" contradictory="" outcomes,="" fda="" is="" not="" persuaded="" that="" the="" isoflavone="" component="" of="" soy="" protein="" is="" a="" relevant="" factor="" to="" the="" diet-disease="" relationship.="" rather,="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" evidence="" from="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" studies="" using="" differently="" processed="" soy="" protein="" is="" supportive="" of="" a="" relationship="" between="" soy="" protein="" per="" se="" and="" reduced="" risk="" of="" chd.="" 6.="" summary="" in="" five="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" and="" 44)="" of="" seven="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" 44,="" and="" 40="" (2="" trials))="" well-controlled="" studies="" of="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects="" consuming="" low="" saturated="" fat="" and="" low="" cholesterol="" diets,="" soy="" protein="" intake="" was="" associated="" with="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" in="" total="" and/or="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels,="" either="" in="" the="" entire="" study="" populations="" or="" subsets="" of="" subjects="" with="" higher="" initial="" blood="" lipid="" levels.="" levels="" of="" hdl-cholesterol="" were="" found="" either="" to="" be="" unchanged="" (refs.="" 31,="" 27,="" 51,="" and="" 40="" (2="" trials))="" or="" slightly="" but="" statistically="" significantly="" increased="" (refs.="" 28="" and="" 44)="" by="" consumption="" of="" diets="" containing="" soy="" protein.="" levels="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" isp="" found="" to="" be="" effective="" in="" lowering="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels,="" in="" the="" context="" of="" a="" diet="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol,="" ranged="" in="" these="" studies="" from="" 25="" to="" 50="" g="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" and="" 51).="" as="" whole="" soybean="" milk,="" 31="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" lowered="" ldl-cholesterol="" only="" in="" the="" subset="" of="" subjects="" with="" the="" highest="" initial="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" and="" ldl/hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" (ref.="" 44).="" diets="" providing="" 50="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" sf="" did="" not="" cause="" significant="" changes="" from="" baseline="" for="" any="" of="" the="" blood="" lipids,="" but="" the="" decrease="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" observed="" after="" ingestion="" of="" sf="" was="" significantly="" greater="" than="" that="" on="" the="" control="" diet="" of="" nonfat="" dry="" milk="" and="" cellulose="" (ref.="" 51).="" diets="" providing="" 27="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" as="" sf="" in="" a="" textured="" product="" had="" no="" significant="" effects="" on="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" compared="" to="" a="" control="" diet,="" and="" a="" higher="" level="" (62="" g)="" significantly="" lowered="" total="" cholesterol="" only="" in="" the="" experimental="" group="" fed="" the="" soy="" protein="" diet="" first="" (ref.="" 40).="" three="" intervention="" studies="" reported="" on="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects="" consuming="" ``usual''="" diets="" that="" were="" generally="" high="" in="" total="" fat,="" saturated="" fat,="" and="" cholesterol="" (refs.="" 37,="" 49,="" and="" 54).="" in="" each="" of="" these="" three="" studies,="" soy="" protein="" was="" fed="" in="" experimental="" diets="" as="" isp="" (refs.="" 37,="" 49,="" and="" 54).="" with="" a="" diet="" containing="" a="" very="" high="" level="" (99="" g)="" of="" soy="" protein="" from="" this="" source="" (ref.="" 37),="" statistically="" significant="" differences="" in="" both="" total="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" were="" reported.="" results="" were="" less="" consistent,="" showing="" a="" significant="" decrease="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" only="" in="" subjects="" with="" the="" highest="" baseline="" levels,="" with="" a="" relatively="" low="" level="" of="" soy="" protein="" (17="" g)="" (ref.="" 49).="" an="" intermediate="" level="" of="" soy="" protein="" (57="" g)="" was="" found="" to="" be="" ineffective="" in="" lowering="" total="" cholesterol="" in="" the="" study="" of="" shorey="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 54).="" (this="" latter="" study="" had="" a="" number="" of="" anomalous="" results.)="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" also="" measured="" in="" these="" three="" studies.="" changes="" were="" small="" and="" not="" statistically="" significant="" in="" two="" studies="" (refs.="" 37="" and="" 49),="" but="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" statistically="" significantly="" decreased="" from="" baseline="" values="" by="" 15="" percent="" in="" one="" study="" (ref.="" 54).="" five="" intervention="" studies="" examined="" the="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" normocholesterolemic="" subjects="" (refs.="" 30,="" 36,="" 58,="" 59,="" and="" 53).="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" less="" consistent="" in="" normocholesterolemic="" subjects="" than="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects.="" as="" isp,="" 44="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" was="" effective="" in="" significantly="" lowering="" total="" cholesterol="" in="" one="" study="" (ref.="" 30)="" and="" 54="" g="" [[page="" 62989]]="" significantly="" lowered="" ldl-cholesterol="" in="" one="" study="" (ref.="" 58).="" with="" very="" low="" initial="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" seen="" in="" some="" of="" these="" studies,="" the="" impact="" of="" dietary="" changes="" is="" considerably="" lessened.="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" measured="" in="" four="" of="" these="" studies,="" with="" statistically="" significant="" increases="" associated="" with="" soy="" protein="" intake="" found="" in="" two="" (refs.="" 58="" and="" 59)="" and="" no="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" in="" two="" (refs.="" 36="" and="" 53).="" two="" intervention="" studies="" (refs.="" 29="" and="" 43)="" examined="" the="" hypocholesterolemic="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" versus="" casein="" in="" the="" context="" of="" hypocaloric="" diets="" fed="" to="" obese="" persons="" to="" achieve="" significant="" weight="" reduction.="" these="" two="" studies="" (refs.="" 29="" and="" 43)="" demonstrated="" large="" decreases="" in="" both="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" during="" hypocaloric="" diets="" that="" provided="" relatively="" low="" amounts="" (27="" and="" 17="" g,="" respectively)="" of="" soy="" protein.="" hdl-cholesterol="" was="" decreased="" in="" both="" soy="" and="" casein="" groups="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" first="" study="" (ref.="" 29);="" however,="" only="" the="" casein="" group's="" values="" were="" significantly="" different=""><0.01) from="" baseline.="" additionally,="" the="" decrease="" in="" hdl-cholesterol="" in="" the="" casein="" group="" was="" significantly="" greater=""><0.01) than="" that="" observed="" in="" the="" soy="" protein="" group.="" in="" the="" second="" study="" (ref.="" 43),="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" not="" significantly="" affected="" by="" dietary="" treatment.="" in="" all="" seven="" intervention="" studies="" conducted="" in="" adults="" with="" type="" ii="" or="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia="" (refs.="" 33,="" 35,="" 46,="" 55,="" 56,="" 60,="" and="" 64),="" large="" and="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" in="" both="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" observed="" in="" response="" to="" consumption="" of="" diets="" containing="" soy="" protein.="" in="" the="" six="" trials="" in="" which="" they="" were="" measured,="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" either="" not="" statistically="" significantly="" affected="" (refs.="" 33,="" 64,="" 60,="" 46,="" and="" 35)="" or="" statistically="" significantly="" increased="" (ref.="" 56).="" each="" of="" these="" studies="" in="" adults="" with="" severe="" (type="" ii="" or="" familial)="" hypercholesterolemia="" employed="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" (refs.="" 33,="" 35,="" 46,="" 55,="" 56,="" 60,="" and="" 64)="" and="" most="" subjects="" had="" been="" consuming="" such="" a="" therapeutic="" diet="" prior="" to="" the="" study.="" most="" trials="" used="" sf="" in="" tvp="" as="" the="" source="" of="" soy="" protein,="" in="" amounts="" ranging="" from="" 31="" to="" 105="" g="" (refs.="" 33,="" 56,="" 60,="" 46,="" and="" 35);="" the="" remainder="" used="" isp="" as="" the="" source="" of="" soy="" protein,="" in="" amounts="" ranging="" from="" 28="" to="" 60="" g="" (refs.="" 55="" and="" 64).="" two="" of="" the="" three="" trials="" conducted="" in="" children="" with="" familial="" hypercholesterolemia="" demonstrated="" significant="" decreases="" from="" baseline="" levels="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" during="" the="" periods="" when="" soy="" protein="" diets="" were="" consumed="" (refs.="" 34="" and="" 63).="" evidence="" from="" one="" epidemiologic="" study="" (ref.="" 65)="" supported="" a="" significant="" negative="" trend="" for="" lower="" serum="" total="" cholesterol="" concentrations="" with="" higher="" levels="" of="" soy="" protein="" intake=""><0.0001 for="" both="" men="" and="" women).="" between="" the="" first="" and="" fourth="" quartiles="" in="" men="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" lower="" by12="" mg/dl="" with="" a="" 9.6-g="" increase="" in="" soy="" protein="" intake.="" for="" women,="" total="" cholesterol="" was="" lower="" by="" 9="" mg/dl="" with="" a="" 7.9-g="" increase="" in="" soy="" protein="" intake.="" based="" on="" these="" studies,="" fda="" tentatively="" finds="" there="" is="" scientific="" evidence="" for="" a="" consistent,="" clinically="" significant="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol.="" the="" hypocholesterolemic="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" is="" seen="" in="" addition="" to="" the="" effects="" of="" a="" low="" saturated="" fat="" and="" low="" cholesterol="" diet.="" the="" degree="" of="" lowering="" of="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" is="" consistently="" and="" highly="" dependent="" on="" initial="" levels,="" within="" and="" across="" studies="" of="" subjects="" with="" normal,="" moderately="" elevated,="" and="" severely="" elevated="" blood="" lipid="" levels,="" with="" persons="" having="" higher="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" showing="" greater="" effects.="" soy="" protein="" consistently="" causes="" only="" statistically="" nonsignificant="" effects="" or="" slight="" elevations="" in="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels.="" the="" intervention="" studies="" suggest="" that="" a="" minimum="" level="" of="" approximately="" 25="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" is="" needed="" to="" have="" a="" clinically="" significant="" effect="" on="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels.="" these="" conclusions,="" drawn="" from="" the="" review="" of="" the="" individual,="" well="" controlled="" studies,="" are="" also="" supported="" by="" the="" meta-analysis="" of="" anderson="" et="" al.="" (66).="" iv.="" decision="" to="" propose="" a="" health="" claim="" relating="" soy="" protein="" to="" reduction="" in="" risk="" of="" chd="" the="" petition="" provided="" and="" fda="" reviewed="" information="" on="" pertinent="" human="" studies="" that="" evaluated="" the="" effects="" on="" serum="" cholesterol="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" levels="" from="" dietary="" intervention="" with="" soy="" protein="" in="" subjects="" with="" normal="" to="" elevated="" serum="" cholesterol="" levels.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that,="" based="" on="" the="" totality="" of="" publicly="" available="" scientific="" evidence,="" there="" is="" significant="" scientific="" agreement="" to="" support="" the="" relationship="" between="" consumption="" of="" soy="" protein="" included="" in="" a="" diet="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" and="" the="" risk="" of="" chd.="" the="" strongest="" evidence="" for="" the="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" the="" risk="" of="" chd="" is="" provided="" by="" studies="" that="" measured="" the="" effect="" of="" dietary="" soy="" protein="" consumption="" on="" the="" two="" major="" risk="" factors="" for="" chd,="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol.="" in="" most="" intervention="" trials="" in="" subjects="" with="" total=""><300 mg/dl,="" soy="" protein="" was="" found="" to="" reduce="" total="" and/or="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" to="" a="" clinically="" significant="" degree="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" 44,="" 37,="" 49,="" 30,="" 58,="" 29,="" and="" 43).="" moreover,="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels="" were="" unchanged="" (refs.="" 31,="" 27,="" 51,="" 40,="" 37,="" 49,="" 36,="" and="" 53)="" or="" slightly="" increased="" (refs.="" 28,="" 44,="" 58,="" and="" 59).="" in="" some="" cases="" (refs.="" 27,="" 44,="" and="" 49),="" decreases="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" statistically="" significant="" only="" in="" subsets="" of="" subjects="" with="" the="" higher="" initial="" blood="" lipid="" levels.="" results="" in="" normocholesterolemic="" subjects="" (refs.="" 30,="" 36,="" 58,="" 59,="" and="" 53)="" were="" more="" variable="" than="" in="" hypercholesterolemic="" subjects="" (31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" 44,="" 40,="" 37,="" 49,="" 54,="" 29,="" and="" 43).="" the="" outcome="" of="" an="" epidemiologic="" study="" (ref.="" 65)="" also="" supported="" a="" relationship="" between="" higher="" levels="" of="" soy="" protein="" intake="" and="" lower="" blood="" lipid="" levels.="" most="" of="" the="" studies="" in="" subjects="" with="" total=""><300 mg/dl="" used="" low="" saturated="" fat="" and="" low="" cholesterol="" diets="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" 44,="" 30,="" 36,="" 53,="" 29,="" and="" 43),="" but="" some="" used="" ``usual''="" diets="" (refs.="" 37,="" 49,="" 54,="" 36,="" 58,="" and="" 59).="" although="" soy="" protein="" was="" found="" to="" lower="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" in="" some="" of="" the="" studies="" using="" ``usual''="" diets,="" hypocholesterolemic="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" were="" more="" consistently="" observed="" with="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol.="" in="" some="" studies="" (especially="" those="" without="" run-in="" periods)="" (refs.="" 40="" and="" 54),="" the="" control="" low="" saturated="" fat="" and="" low="" cholesterol="" diets="" induced="" significant="" decreases="" in="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" making="" it="" difficult="" to="" detect="" any="" additional="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein.="" at="" the="" same="" time,="" in="" two="" studies="" in="" which="" soy="" protein="" containing="" hypocaloric="" diets="" were="" compared="" to="" similar="" diets="" without="" soy="" (refs.="" 29="" and="" 43),="" only="" the="" soy="" protein="" containing="" diets="" induced="" significant="" changes="" in="" blood="" lipid="" levels.="" given="" the="" variability="" of="" amounts="" and="" forms="" in="" which="" soy="" protein="" was="" provided="" in="" the="" diets,="" the="" response="" of="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" appears="" robust.="" data="" from="" studies="" of="" adults="" with="" type="" ii="" and="" familial="" forms="" of="" hypercholesterolemia="" (and="" total="" cholesterol="" levels="" in="" excess="" of="" 300="" mg/="" dl)="" (refs.="" 55,="" 33,="" 64,="" 56,="" 64,="" 46,="" and="" 35)="" were="" more="" consistent="" than="" studies="" in="" persons="" with="" lower="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" in="" showing="" large="" and="" statistically="" significant="" decreases="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol,="" accompanied="" by="" no="" changes="" or="" slight="" increases="" in="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels.="" nearly="" all="" of="" the="" subjects="" in="" these="" trials="" consumed="" low="" saturated="" fat="" and="" low="" cholesterol="" diets="" during="" the="" studies="" and="" had="" consumed="" such="" diets="" prior="" to="" studies="" with="" soy="" protein.="" soy="" protein="" was="" tested="" in="" a="" variety="" of="" food="" forms="" (as="" soy="" beverages,="" formulated="" into="" meat="" and="" dairy="" product="" analogs,="" added="" to="" soups,="" or="" baked="" into="" foods,="" such="" as="" muffins="" and="" breads)="" but="" produced="" fairly="" consistent="" results="" [[page="" 62990]]="" regardless="" of="" the="" food="" form="" fed="" and="" apparent="" differences="" in="" processing="" techniques.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes,="" based="" on="" the="" evidence="" submitted="" and="" reviewed,="" that="" soy="" protein,="" included="" in="" a="" diet="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol,="" can="" lower="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels,="" without="" adversely="" affecting="" hdl-cholesterol="" levels.="" the="" agency="" also="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" effect="" is="" due="" to="" soy="" protein="" per="" se="" and="" is="" not="" consistently="" related="" to="" the="" presence="" or="" absence="" of="" isoflavones.="" the="" intervention="" studies="" suggest="" that="" a="" minimum="" level="" of="" approximately="" 25="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" is="" needed="" to="" have="" a="" clinically="" significant="" effect="" on="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels.="" based="" on="" the="" totality="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence="" presented="" in="" the="" petition,="" the="" agency="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" there="" is="" significant="" scientific="" evidence="" to="" show="" that="" soy="" protein,="" included="" in="" a="" diet="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol,="" will="" help="" reduce="" serum="" lipids,="" and="" that="" such="" reductions="" may="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" chd.="" in="" the="" majority="" of="" clinical="" studies="" evaluating="" soy="" products,="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" the="" lipid="" fractions="" shown="" to="" be="" the="" most="" affected="" by="" soy="" protein="" intervention.="" as="" part="" of="" a="" diet="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol,="" regular="" consumption="" of="" soy="" protein,="" in="" an="" amount="" to="" provide="" 25="" g/day,="" resulted="" in="" reduced="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" in="" subjects="" with="" normal="" and="" elevated="" serum="" cholesterol="" levels.="" as="" stated="" in="" section="" iii.a="" of="" this="" document,="" federal="" government="" and="" other="" reviews="" have="" concluded="" that="" there="" is="" substantial="" epidemiologic="" and="" clinical="" evidence="" that="" high="" blood="" levels="" of="" total="" cholesterol="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" represent="" major="" contributors="" to="" chd="" (56="" fr="" 60727="" at="" 60728,="" and="" refs.="" 4="" through="" 7).="" dietary="" factors="" that="" decrease="" total="" cholesterol="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" will="" affect="" the="" risk="" of="" chd="" (refs.="" 4="" through="" 7).="" given="" all="" of="" this="" evidence,="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" a="" health="" claim="" on="" the="" relationship="" between="" soy="" protein="" and="" reduced="" risk="" of="" chd.="" v.="" description="" and="" rationale="" for="" components="" of="" health="" claim="" a.="" relationship="" between="" soy="" protein="" and="" chd="" and="" the="" significance="" of="" the="" relationship="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(a)="" describes="" the="" relationship="" between="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" containing="" soy="" protein="" and="" the="" risk="" of="" chd.="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(a)(1),="" the="" agency="" recounts="" that="" chd="" is="" the="" most="" common="" and="" serious="" form="" of="" cvd,="" and="" that="" chd="" refers="" to="" diseases="" of="" the="" heart="" muscle="" and="" supporting="" blood="" vessels.="" the="" proposed="" section="" also="" notes="" that="" high="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" are="" associated="" with="" increased="" risk="" of="" developing="" chd="" and="" identifies="" the="" levels="" of="" total="" cholesterol="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" that="" would="" put="" an="" individual="" at="" high="" risk="" of="" developing="" chd,="" as="" well="" as="" those="" serum="" lipid="" levels="" that="" are="" associated="" with="" borderline="" high="" risk.="" this="" information="" will="" assist="" consumers="" in="" understanding="" the="" seriousness="" of="" chd.="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(a)(2),="" the="" agency="" recounts="" that="" populations="" with="" a="" low="" incidence="" of="" chd="" tend="" to="" have="" low="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" levels.="" it="" states="" that="" these="" populations="" also="" tend="" to="" have="" dietary="" patterns="" that="" are="" low="" in="" total="" fat,="" saturated="" fat,="" and="" cholesterol="" and="" high="" in="" plant="" foods="" that="" contain="" fiber="" and="" other="" components.="" this="" information="" is="" consistent="" with="" that="" provided="" in="" the="" authorized="" health="" claim="" for="" fruits,="" vegetables,="" and="" grain="" products="" and="" chd="" (sec.="" 101.77)="" and="" so="" the="" agency="" believes="" that="" this="" information="" provides="" a="" basis="" for="" a="" better="" understanding="" of="" the="" numerous="" factors="" that="" contribute="" to="" the="" risk="" of="" chd="" and="" the="" relationship="" with="" soy="" protein="" and="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol.="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(a)(3)="" states="" that="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesteral="" may="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" chd.="" the="" paragraph="" further="" states="" that="" soy="" protein,="" when="" added="" to="" such="" a="" diet,="" may="" also="" help="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" chd.="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(b)="" describes="" the="" significance="" of="" the="" diet-="" disease="" relationship.="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(b)(1),="" the="" agency="" recounts="" that="" chd="" remains="" a="" major="" public="" health="" concern="" in="" the="" united="" states="" because="" the="" disease="" accounts="" for="" more="" deaths="" than="" any="" other="" disease="" or="" group="" of="" diseases.="" the="" claim="" states="" that="" early="" management="" of="" modifiable="" risk="" factors="" for="" chd="" is="" a="" major="" public="" health="" goal="" that="" can="" assist="" in="" reducing="" the="" risk="" of="" chd.="" this="" information="" is="" consistent="" with="" the="" evidence="" that="" lowering="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels="" reduces="" the="" risk="" of="" chd="" (56="" fr="" 60727,="" 58="" fr="" 2739,="" and="" refs.="" 4="" through="" 8).="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(b)(2),="" the="" significance="" of="" the="" relationship="" between="" soy="" protein="" and="" chd="" risk="" factors="" in="" context="" of="" the="" total="" diet="" is="" discussed.="" the="" agency="" recounts="" that="" many="" americans'="" intakes="" of="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" exceed="" recommended="" levels,="" and="" it="" summarizes="" public="" health="" recommendations="" for="" the="" diet="" (56="" fr="" 60727="" at="" 60738="" and="" sec.="" 101.75(b)(3)).="" this="" paragraph="" also="" states="" that="" scientific="" evidence="" demonstrates="" that="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" and="" that="" contain="" soy="" protein="" are="" associated="" with="" reduced="" blood="" lipids.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" latter="" statement="" is="" scientifically="" valid="" based="" on="" the="" evidence="" that="" it="" has="" reviewed="" on="" this="" nutrient-disease="" relationship.="" b.="" nature="" of="" the="" claim="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(c)(1),="" fda="" is="" proposing="" to="" require="" that="" all="" of="" the="" general="" requirements="" for="" health="" claims="" set="" out="" in="" sec.="" 101.14="" be="" met.="" this="" provision="" is="" consistent="" with="" the="" provisions="" of="" the="" other="" specific="" health="" claim="" regulations="" in="" 21="" cfr="" part="" 101,="" subpart="" e.="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(c)(2)(i),="" fda="" is="" proposing="" to="" authorize="" a="" health="" claim="" on="" the="" relationship="" between="" diets="" that="" contain="" soy="" protein="" and="" are="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" and="" the="" risk="" of="" chd.="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" to="" do="" so="" based="" on="" its="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence="" on="" this="" nutrient-disease="" relationship,="" which="" shows="" that="" diets="" that="" contain="" soy="" protein="" and="" are="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" help="" to="" reduce="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels,="" especially="" in="" individuals="" with="" elevated="" blood="" total="" cholesterol="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" 44,="" 37,="" 49,="" 30,="" 58,="" 29,="" 43,="" 55,="" 33,="" 64,="" 56,="" 64,="" 46,="" and="" 35).="" this="" result="" is="" significant="" for="" the="" risk="" of="" heart="" disease="" because="" elevated="" levels="" of="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" are="" associated="" with="" increased="" risk="" of="" chd="" (refs.="" 4="" through="" 7).="" most="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence="" for="" an="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" was="" provided="" by="" studies="" that="" used="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol.="" although="" soy="" protein="" was="" found="" to="" lower="" blood="" lipid="" levels="" in="" some="" of="" the="" studies="" using="" ``usual''="" diets="" (refs.="" 37,="" 49,="" and="" 58),="" hypocholesterolemic="" effects="" of="" soy="" protein="" were="" more="" consistently="" observed="" with="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol.="" moreover,="" as="" stated="" in="" section="" v.a="" of="" this="" document,="" chd="" is="" a="" major="" public="" health="" concern="" in="" the="" united="" states,="" and="" the="" totality="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence="" provides="" strong="" and="" consistent="" support="" that="" diets="" high="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" are="" associated="" with="" elevated="" levels="" of="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" and,="" thus,="" chd="" (56="" fr="" 60727="" at="" 60737).="" dietary="" estimates="" for="" american="" adults="" show="" that="" the="" average="" saturated="" fat="" intakes="" of="" american="" adults="" are="" about="" 13="" percent="" of="" calories,="" total="" fat="" intakes="" are="" about="" 37="" percent="" of="" calories,="" and="" average="" cholesterol="" intakes="" range="" from="" 300="" to="" over="" 400="" mg="" daily="" for="" adult="" men="" and="" women="" (56="" fr="" 60727="" at="" 60738).="" the="" current="" intakes="" of="" saturated="" fat="" and="" total="" fat="" are="" thus="" well="" in="" excess="" of="" recommended="" goals="" of="" less="" than="" 10="" percent="" and="" 30="" percent="" of="" calories.="" [[page="" 62991]]="" dietary="" guidelines="" from="" both="" government="" and="" private="" scientific="" bodies="" conclude="" that="" the="" majority="" of="" the="" american="" population="" would="" benefit="" from="" decreased="" consumption="" of="" dietary="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" (refs.="" 4="" through="" 7).="" the="" results="" of="" several="" studies="" showed="" that="" daily="" consumption="" of="" soy="" protein="" lowered="" total="" cholesterol="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol,="" and="" the="" effects="" of="" dietary="" intake="" of="" soy="" protein="" were="" evident="" when="" the="" diets="" were="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" 44,="" 30,="" 29,="" and="" 43).="" thus,="" the="" agency="" tentatively="" finds="" that="" it="" will="" be="" more="" helpful="" to="" americans'="" efforts="" to="" maintain="" healthy="" dietary="" practices="" if="" the="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" serum="" lipids="" is="" characterized="" in="" the="" context="" of="" a="" diet="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol.="" in="" sec.="" 101.82(c)(2)(i)(a),="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" to="" require,="" consistent="" with="" other="" health="" claims,="" that="" the="" relationship="" be="" qualified="" with="" the="" terms="" ``may''="" or="" ``might.''="" these="" terms="" are="" used="" to="" make="" clear="" that="" not="" all="" persons="" can="" necessarily="" expect="" to="" benefit="" from="" these="" dietary="" changes="" (56="" fr="" 60727="" at="" 60740="" and="" 58="" fr="" 2552="" at="" 2573).="" the="" requirement="" that="" the="" claim="" use="" the="" term="" ``may''="" or="" ``might''="" to="" relate="" the="" ability="" of="" soy="" protein="" to="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" heart="" disease="" is="" also="" intended="" to="" reflect="" the="" multifactorial="" nature="" of="" the="" disease.="" in="" sec.="" 101.82(c)(2)(i)(b),="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" to="" require,="" consistent="" with="" other="" authorized="" health="" claims,="" that="" the="" terms="" ``coronary="" heart="" disease''="" or="" ``heart="" disease''="" be="" used="" in="" specifying="" the="" disease.="" these="" terms="" are="" commonly="" used="" in="" dietary="" guidance="" materials,="" and="" therefore="" they="" should="" be="" readily="" understandable="" to="" the="" consumer="" (56="" fr="" 60727="" at="" 60740="" and="" 58="" fr="" 2552="" at="" 2573).="" in="" sec.="" 101.82(c)(2)(i)(c),="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" that="" the="" claim="" specify="" the="" substance="" as="" ``soy="" protein.''="" based="" on="" its="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence="" submitted="" with="" the="" petition,="" the="" agency="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" there="" is="" significant="" scientific="" agreement="" that="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" that="" contain="" soy="" protein="" may="" help="" to="" reduce="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels,="" the="" major="" modifiable="" risk="" factors="" for="" chd="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" 44,="" 37,="" 49,="" 30,="" 58,="" 29,="" 43,="" 55,="" 33,="" 64,="" 56,="" 64,="" 46,="" and="" 35).="" as="" discussed="" in="" section="" iii.c.5="" of="" this="" document,="" fda="" did="" not="" find="" persuasive="" the="" limited="" and="" contradictory="" evidence="" that="" soy="" isoflavones="" are="" a="" relevant="" factor="" in="" the="" diet-disease="" relationship="" persuasive.="" therefore,="" fda="" has="" tentatively="" concluded="" that="" evidence="" from="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" studies="" supports="" a="" relationship="" between="" soy="" protein="" per="" se="" and="" reduced="" risk="" of="" chd.="" as="" discussed="" previously,="" the="" agency="" tentatively="" finds="" that="" for="" the="" public="" to="" understand="" fully,="" in="" the="" context="" of="" the="" total="" daily="" diet,="" the="" significance="" of="" consumption="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" the="" risk="" of="" chd="" (see="" section="" 403(r)(3)(b)(iii)="" of="" the="" act),="" information="" about="" the="" total="" diet="" must="" be="" included="" as="" part="" of="" the="" claim.="" therefore,="" in="" sec.="" 101.82(c)(2)(i)(d),="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" to="" require="" that="" the="" claim="" include="" the="" fact="" that="" the="" effect="" of="" dietary="" consumption="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" the="" risk="" of="" chd="" is="" evident="" when="" it="" is="" consumed="" as="" part="" of="" a="" healthy="" diet="" and="" that,="" consistent="" with="" other="" authorized="" health="" claims,="" the="" fat="" component="" of="" the="" diet="" be="" specified="" as="" ``saturated="" fat''="" and="" ``cholesterol.''="" based="" on="" its="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence="" submitted="" with="" the="" petition,="" the="" agency="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" there="" is="" significant="" scientific="" agreement="" that="" diets="" containing="" soy="" protein="" and="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" are="" associated="" with="" reduced="" blood="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" levels.="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(c)(2)(i)(e),="" consistent="" with="" other="" authorized="" health="" claims,="" requires="" that="" the="" claim="" not="" attribute="" any="" degree="" of="" risk="" reduction="" of="" chd="" to="" consumption="" of="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" that="" contain="" soy="" protein.="" none="" of="" the="" studies="" that="" the="" agency="" reviewed="" provide="" a="" basis="" for="" determining="" the="" percent="" reduction="" in="" risk="" of="" chd="" likely="" from="" consuming="" diets="" that="" contain="" soy="" protein="" and="" are="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol.="" also="" consistent="" with="" other="" authorized="" claims,="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(c)(2)(i)(f)="" requires="" that="" the="" claim="" not="" imply="" that="" consumption="" of="" diets="" low="" in="" saturated="" fat="" and="" cholesterol="" and="" that="" contain="" soy="" protein="" is="" the="" only="" recognized="" means="" of="" reducing="" chd="" risk.="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.82(c)(2)(i)(g)="" requires="" that="" the="" claim="" specify="" the="" daily="" dietary="" intake="" of="" soy="" protein="" needed="" to="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" chd="" and="" the="" contribution="" one="" serving="" of="" the="" product="" makes="" to="" achieving="" the="" specified="" daily="" dietary="" intake.="" this="" requirement="" is="" consistent="" with="" requirements="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 101.81.="" in="" the="" studies="" showing="" a="" statistically="" significant="" effect="" of="" soy="" protein="" on="" total="" or="" ldl-cholesterol,="" the="" amounts="" fed="" ranged="" from="" 17="" to="" 105="" g/day="" (refs.="" 31,="" 28,="" 27,="" 51,="" 44,="" 37,="" 49,="" 30,="" 58,="" 29,="" 43,="" 55,="" 33,="" 64,="" 56,="" 64,="" 46,="" and="" 35).="" in="" proposing="" 25="" g/day="" as="" an="" effective="" daily="" intake="" of="" soy="" protein,="" the="" petitioner="" relied="" on="" the="" meta-analysis="" by="" anderson="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 65)="" and="" noted="" that="" the="" estimate="" suggested="" by="" the="" meta-analysis="" was="" confirmed="" by="" the="" recent="" study="" of="" crouse="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 31)="" that="" found="" reductions="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" of="" 4="" and="" 6="" percent,="" respectively,="" with="" ingestion="" of="" 25="" g/day="" of="" soy="" protein="" containing="" high="" levels="" of="" isoflavones.="" fda="" notes="" that,="" although="" none="" of="" the="" studies="" reviewed="" attempted="" to="" determine="" an="" effective="" or="" optimal="" amount="" of="" soy="" protein,="" the="" study="" by="" sirtori="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 56)="" suggests="" the="" existence="" of="" a="" dose-response.="" in="" that="" study="" of="" subjects="" with="" type="" ii="" hypercholesterolemia,="" total="" cholesterol="" levels="" were="" reduced="" by="" 13="" and="" 19="" percent,="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" levels="" were="" reduced="" by="" 18="" and="" 23="" percent,="" compared="" to="" control="" by="" ingestion="" of="" 30="" and="" 60="" g/day="" of="" soy="" protein,="" respectively.="" with="" levels="" of="" soy="" protein="" intake="" lower="" than="" the="" proposed="" effective="" amount,="" findings="" have="" been="" variable.="" mercer="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 49)="" found="" a="" statistically="" significant="" reduction="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" in="" response="" to="" 17="" g/day="" of="" soy="" protein="" only="" in="" those="" subjects="" with="" high="" initial="" values.="" feeding="" the="" same="" amount="" (17="" g/day)="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" a="" hypocaloric="" diet,="" however,="" jenkins="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 43)="" found="" statistically="" significant="" reductions="" of="" 10="" and="" 17="" percent="" in="" total="" and="" ldl-="" cholesterol,="" respectively.="" with="" 25="" g/day="" of="" soy="" protein,="" bakhit="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 27)="" found="" a="" statistically="" significant="" reduction="" in="" total="" cholesterol="" (about="" 8="" percent)="" in="" subjects="" with="" blood="" cholesterol="" levels="" greater="" than="" 220="" mg/dl.="" crouse="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 31)="" found="" that="" 25="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" that="" contained="" a="" high="" level="" of="" isoflavones="" significantly="" lowered="" total=""><0.05) and="" ldl-cholesterol=""><0.05), by="" 4="" percent="" and="" 6="" percent,="" respectively.="" furthermore,="" in="" subjects="" with="" ldl-cholesterol="" in="" the="" top="" half="" of="" the="" study="" population,="" serum="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol="" were="" reduced="" by="" 9="" percent=""><0.03) and="" 12="" percent=""><0.03), respectively,="" by="" soy="" protein="" with="" the="" highest="" isoflavone="" content,="" and="" by="" 8="" percent=""><0.03) and="" 9="" percent=""><0.03), respectively,="" by="" soy="" protein="" with="" the="" second="" highest="" isoflavone="" content.="" although="" holmes="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 40)="" did="" not="" find="" statistically="" significant="" changes="" in="" blood="" lipids="" with="" 27="" g="" of="" soy="" protein,="" using="" 28="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" in="" a="" hypocaloric="" diet,="" bosello="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 29)="" observed="" decreases="" of="" 16="" percent="" from="" baseline="" in="" both="" total="" and="" ldl-cholesterol=""><0.01). with="" 31="" g="" of="" soy="" protein,="" kurowska="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 44)="" found="" an="" 11-percent="" reduction="" in="" ldl-cholesterol="" in="" subjects="" with="" the="" highest="" initial="" ldl-="" cholesterol="" levels="" and="" ldl/hdl-cholesterol="" ratios.="" as="" a="" substitution="" or="" as="" an="" addition,="" verillo="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 60)="" found="" 31="" g="" of="" soy="" protein="" produced="" large="" (="">20 percent) reductions in both total and LDL-
    cholesterol in subjects with type II hypercholesterolemia.
        Based on these data that support a dose-response and that show 
    clinically significant reductions in total and LDL-
    
    [[Page 62992]]
    
    cholesterol with soy protein ingestion in the range of 17 to 31 g/day, 
    and recognizing that the hypocholesterolemic effects of soy protein are 
    highly dependent on initial blood lipid levels, the agency has 
    tentatively accepted that 25 g/day represents a reasonable effective 
    amount of soy protein. In addition, an amount of 25 g/day of soy 
    protein represents half of the Reference Daily Intake (RDI) of 50 g for 
    protein and is a reasonable level of consumption in the context of the 
    total daily diet. Thus, FDA tentatively concludes that the amount of 
    soy protein associated with reduction in total and LDL-cholesterol 
    levels and, thus, with reduced risk of CHD is 25 g or more of soy 
    protein per day. The agency is asking for comments on this tentative 
    determination.
    
    C. Nature of the Substance
    
        Proposed Sec. 101.82(c)(2)(ii)(A) indicates that soy protein from 
    the legume seed Glycine max is the substance that is the subject of 
    this claim.
        Proposed Sec. 101.82(c)(2)(ii) (B) sets out FDA's tentative 
    decision that soy protein when evaluated for compliance purposes by the 
    agency will be measured using the Association of Official Analytical 
    Chemists International (AOAC) official method of analysis No. 988.10.
        The petitioner proposed that measurement of total soy isoflavones 
    be used as a marker for the content of soy protein in foods and as an 
    indicator of the effectiveness of soy protein products in reducing 
    blood cholesterol. As discussed in section C.III.5 of this document, 
    FDA disagrees with the petitioner's conclusions regarding the 
    significance of soy isoflavones with respect to the observed 
    hypocholesterolemic effects of soy protein. Accordingly, FDA finds the 
    proposed methodology to assess isoflavones irrelevant. The AOAC method 
    that FDA is proposing instead is an enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay 
    that detects soy protein in raw and heat-processed meat products. With 
    this assay, samples are compared to standard commercial soy protein and 
    appropriate blanks. The method is described as semi-quantitative, but 
    it can be quantitative when the nature of the soy protein in the 
    samples is known and the assay is calibrated accordingly. The sample 
    extraction procedure, which involves preparation of an acetone powder, 
    has been shown to be appropriate for a complex food matrix (meat). FDA 
    believes, therefore, that this assay should also be suitable for other 
    food matrices. FDA is requesting comments on the suitability of this 
    method for assuring that foods bearing the health claim contain 
    qualifying levels of soy protein.
    
    D. Nature of the Food
    
        Proposed Sec. 101.82(c)(2)(iii)(A) requires that the food bearing 
    the health claim contain at least 6.25 g of soy protein per reference 
    amount customarily consumed (RACC) of the food product.
        Using 25 g of soy protein as the qualifying amount for a CHD claim, 
    the petitioner suggested that a single serving of a soy protein-
    containing product (i.e., 1 RACC) should provide 1/4 of this amount 
    (based on 4 servings a day). Thus, a soy protein-containing product 
    would have to contain at least 6.25 g soy protein (1/4 x 25 g) per 
    RACC. The petitioner stated that this approach is reasonable because it 
    would permit a wide variety of low fat, soy protein containing products 
    to bear the health claim. The petitioner provided a list of products on 
    the market that currently meet the proposed requirements and a list of 
    products that could be modified to meet them (Ref. 1, Appendix V).
        The agency has generally made the assumption that a daily food 
    consumption pattern includes three meals and a snack (see 58 FR 2302 at 
    2379, January 6, 1993). Because of the wide variety of types of foods 
    that could contain qualifying levels of soy protein (baked goods, tofu, 
    soy beverages and shakes, meat analogs), the agency has tentatively 
    concluded that the assumption of 4 servings/d of soy protein containing 
    foods is reasonable. Therefore, the agency tentatively finds that use 
    of the qualifying criterion set forth in the petition for this proposed 
    rule is appropriate and is proposing this level in this document. The 
    qualifying level of protein, 6.25 g/RACC, exceeds the amount required 
    for a food to qualify as a ``good source'' of protein, i.e., 10 percent 
    of the RDI of 50 g or 5 g/RACC).
        In Sec. 101.82(c)(2)(iii)(B), the agency is proposing, consistent 
    with other authorized heart disease health claims, that foods bearing 
    the health claim meet requirements for ``low saturated fat,'' ``low 
    cholesterol,'' and ``low fat.'' In the preamble to the final rule on 
    fruits, vegetables, and grain products and heart disease (Sec. 101.77, 
    58 FR 2552 at 2572), the agency stated that populations with diets rich 
    in these low saturated fat and low cholesterol foods experience many 
    health advantages, including lower rates of heart disease. In the 
    preamble to the proposed rule on dietary lipids and heart disease (56 
    FR 60727 at 60739), the agency stated that while total fat is not 
    directly linked to increased risk of CHD, it may have significant 
    indirect effects. Foods that are low in total fat facilitate reductions 
    in intakes of saturated fat and cholesterol to recommended levels. 
    Therefore, the agency tentatively concludes that proposed 
    Sec. 101.82(c)(2)(iii)(B) sets forth an appropriate requirement for 
    food to be eligible to bear the soy protein and CHD claim.
    
    E. Optional Information
    
        FDA is proposing in Sec. 101.82(d)(1) that the claim may state that 
    the development of heart disease depends on many factors and, 
    consistent with authorized CHD health claims, may list the risk factors 
    for heart disease that are listed in Secs. 101.75(d)(1), 101.77(d)(1), 
    and 101.81(d)(1). The agency is also proposing, in response to the 
    petition, that the claim may provide additional information about the 
    benefits of exercise and body weight management. This additional 
    information can provide a context that is useful for an understanding 
    of the relationship between soy protein and heart disease, but 
    manufacturers should be cautioned that it should not be presented in a 
    way that is misleading to the consumer.
        In proposed Sec. 101.82(d)(2), consistent with Secs. 101.75(d)(2), 
    101.77(d)(2), and 101.81(d)(2), FDA is providing that the claim may 
    state that the relationship between a diet high in soy protein and 
    reduced risk of heart disease is through the intermediate link of 
    ``blood cholesterol'' or ``blood total cholesterol'' and ``LDL- 
    cholesterol.'' The relationship between soy protein and reduced blood 
    total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol is supported by the scientific 
    evidence presented in this proposal.
        In Sec. 101.82(d)(3), the agency is proposing that, consistent with 
    Secs. 101.75(d)(3), 101.77(d)(3), and 101.81(d)(3), the claim may 
    include information from Sec. 101.82(a) and (b). These paragraphs 
    summarize information regarding the relationship between diets high in 
    soy protein and the risk of CHD and about the significance of that 
    relationship. This information helps to convey the seriousness of CHD 
    and the role that a diet high in soy protein can play to help reduce 
    the risk of CHD.
        The agency is proposing that the claim may include any of the 
    optional information authorized to be included in Secs. 101.75(d)(5), 
    (d)(6), and (d)(7), 101.77(d)(5), (d)(6), and (d)(7), and 101.81(d)(5), 
    (d)(6), and (d)(7). The health claim may state that diets high in soy 
    protein and low in saturated fat and cholesterol are part of a dietary 
    pattern
    
    [[Page 62993]]
    
    that is consistent with dietary guidelines for Americans. The claim may 
    state that individuals with elevated serum lipids should consult their 
    physicians for medical advice and treatment and may include information 
    on the prevalence of CHD in the United States. The intent of this 
    information is to provide consumers with information that will help 
    them understand the seriousness of CHD in the United States and to help 
    them understand that diets high in soy protein are consistent with 
    dietary guidelines.
    
    F. Model Health Claims
    
        In proposed Sec. 101.82(e), FDA is providing model health claims to 
    illustrate the requirements of new Sec. 101.82. FDA emphasizes that 
    these model health claims are illustrative only. These model claims 
    illustrate the required, and some of the optional, elements of the 
    proposed rule. If the agency authorizes a claim about the relationship 
    between soy protein and CHD, manufacturers will be free to design their 
    own claim so long as it is consistent with Sec. 101.82(c).
        In Secs. 101.82(e)(1) and (e)(2), the model claim illustrates all 
    of the required elements of the proposed health claim. The claim states 
    ``25 grams of soy protein a day, as part of a diet low in saturated fat 
    and cholesterol, may reduce the risk of heart disease. A serving of 
    [name of food] supplies ---------- grams of soy protein.'' or ``Diets 
    low in saturated fat and cholesterol that include 25 grams of soy 
    protein may reduce the risk of heart disease. One serving of [name of 
    food] provides ---------- grams of soy protein.''
    
    VI. Environmental Impact
    
        The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(k) that this action is 
    of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
    effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
    assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
    
    VII. Analysis of Impacts
    
    A. Cost-Benefit Analysis
    
        FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive 
    Order 12866. Executive Order 12866 directs Federal agencies to assess 
    all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when 
    regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
    net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
    health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and 
    equity). According to Executive Order 12866, a regulatory action is 
    ``economically significant'' if it meets any one of a number of 
    specified conditions, including having an annual effect on the economy 
    of $100 million or adversely affecting in a material way a sector of 
    the economy, competition, or jobs. A regulation is considered 
    ``significant'' under Executive Order 12866 if it raises novel legal or 
    policy issues. FDA finds that this proposed rule is neither an 
    economically significant nor a significant regulatory action as defined 
    by Executive Order 12866.
        In addition, in accordance with the Small Business Regulatory 
    Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A)(ii)), the Administrator 
    of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office and 
    Management and Budget (the Administrator) has determined that this 
    proposed rule is not a major rule for the purpose of congressional 
    review. A major rule for this purpose is defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2) as 
    one that the Administrator has determined has resulted or is likely to 
    result in: (1) An annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; 
    or (2) a major increase in costs for prices for consumers, individual 
    industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic 
    regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, 
    investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of U.S.-based 
    enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic or 
    export markets.
        This proposed rule will give firms the option of making certain 
    label claims involving soy protein. No costs will be generated by this 
    proposed rule because it will not require any labels to be changed or 
    any product to be reformulated. Firms will only relabel or reformulate 
    products if the benefits to those firms outweigh the costs. Social 
    benefits may be generated by this proposed rule because the value some 
    consumers place on the information provided in these claims may be 
    greater than the cost to industry of making these claims. In general, 
    consumers may value this type of information because it will enable 
    them to eat a healthier diet. Consumers may value this type of 
    information presented on product labels, in particular, because it 
    would obviate the need to consult other sources of information and 
    because it may reassure consumers who are aware of the role of FDA in 
    regulating health claims on product labels that the information is 
    truthful, not misleading, and scientifically valid.
        Consumer valuation of this information will reflect the value that 
    consumers place on reducing the likelihood of CHD and the perceived 
    usefulness of this information for reducing the likelihood of CHD. 
    However, consumers may either underestimate or overestimate the 
    usefulness of this information in reducing the likelihood of CHD. 
    Therefore, another metric for valuing the social benefits of this 
    proposed rule is the health care costs avoided by the reduction in CHD-
    related disease and disability made possible by this proposed rule. If 
    consumers were aware of these health care costs and had an accurate 
    notion of the likelihood that such costs could be avoided by using the 
    information provided in the claims allowed by this proposed rule, then 
    consumer valuation of this information would be at least as great as 
    the value of any health care costs avoided. The value of the 
    information might be greater because some consumers might value the 
    information but might not choose to modify their behavior so as to 
    reduce the likelihood of CHD.
        In general terms, the relevant regulatory options available to FDA 
    are as follows: (1) Allow this claim to be made under a broader set of 
    conditions than those specified in this proposed rule (e.g., with fewer 
    required elements in the claim, or with a lower level of soy protein in 
    a serving of food), and (2) allow this claim to be made under a more 
    restricted set of conditions than those specified in this rule (e.g., 
    more required elements or higher levels of soy protein). Neither of 
    these alternatives would generate net costs because, like the proposed 
    action, firms would only relabel or reformulate products if the 
    benefits to those firms outweigh the costs. These options would 
    generate higher benefits than the proposed action if allowing this 
    claim to be made under either a broader set of conditions or more 
    restricted set of conditions than the proposed conditions would provide 
    consumers with more valuable information (that would nonetheless be 
    truthful, not misleading, and scientifically valid) or would make 
    possible a greater reduction in health care costs than would the 
    proposed action. FDA tentatively believes that no alternative 
    conditions exist that would render the net benefits of this proposed 
    rule greater than the proposed conditions. In particular, FDA believes 
    that the information proposed to be required in a health claim about 
    the relationship between soy protein and CHD is the minimum necessary 
    for the claim to be truthful, not misleading, and
    
    [[Page 62994]]
    
    scientifically valid, thereby maximizing the likelihood that qualifying 
    foods will be labeled with the claim and that consumers will be able to 
    use the information. Similarly, FDA believes that the amount of soy 
    protein proposed to be required for a food bearing this claim will 
    allow both the claim to appear on a significant number of foods and 
    consumers who use the claim, in the aggregate, to benefit from the use 
    of soy protein in their diet. However, FDA requests comments and 
    supporting information on any modifications of the conditions under 
    which this claim is allowed that would increase the net benefits of 
    this proposed rule.
    
    B. Small Entity Analysis
    
        FDA has examined the impacts of this proposed rule under the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). The Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act requires Federal agencies to consider alternatives that 
    would minimize the economic impact of their regulations on small 
    businesses and other small entities. No costs will be generated by this 
    proposed rule because it will not require any labels to be changed, or 
    any product to be reformulated. Therefore, small businesses will only 
    relabel or reformulate products if the benefits (e.g., increased sales 
    of their products) to those small businesses outweigh the costs. 
    Accordingly, under the Regulatory Flexibility Act) (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), 
    the Commissioner of Food and Drugs certifies that this proposed rule, 
    if issued, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities.
    
    VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        FDA tentatively concludes that the labeling requirements proposed 
    in this document are not subject to review by the Office of Management 
    and Budget because they do not constitute a ``collection of 
    information'' under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
    3501-3520). Rather, the proposed food labeling health claim on the 
    association between soy protein and coronary heart disease would be a 
    ``public disclosure of information originally supplied by the Federal 
    government to the recipient for the purpose of disclosure to the 
    public'' (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
    
    IX. Effective Date
    
         FDA is proposing to make these regulations effective upon 
    publication in the Federal Register of a final rule based upon this 
    proposal.
    
    X. Comments
    
        Interested persons may, on or before January 25, 1999, submit to 
    the Dockets Management Branch (address above) written comments 
    regarding this proposal. Two copies of any comments are to be 
    submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to 
    be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading 
    of this document. Received comments may be seen in the office above 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
    XI. References
    
        The following references have been placed on display in the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) and may be seen by interested persons 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
        1. Protein Technologies International, Inc., ``Health Claim 
    Petition,'' (CP1, vol. 1-3), May 4, 1998.
        2. Protein Technologies International, Inc., ``Addendum to Health 
    Claim Petition,'' (CPI, vol. 4) August 10, 1998.
        3. Pilch, S. M., Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 
    letter to M. M. Marcus, Protein Technologies International, Inc., 
    August 12, 1998.
        4. DHHS, Public Health Service (PHS), ``The Surgeon General's 
    Report on Nutrition and Health,'' U.S. Government Printing Office, 
    Washington, DC, pp. 83-137, 1988.
        5. Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences, ``Diet 
    and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk,'' National 
    Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 291-309 and 529-547, 1989.
        6. DHHS, Public Health Service (PHS) and National Institutes of 
    Health, ``National Cholesterol Education Program: Population Panel 
    Report,'' Bethesda, MD, pp. 1-40, 1990.
        7. Sempos, C. T., J. I. Cleeman, M. D. Carroll, C. L. Johnson, P.S. 
    Bachorik, D. J. Gordon, V. L. Burt, R. R. Briefel, C. D. Brown, K. 
    Lippel, and B. M. Rifkind, ``Prevalence of High Blood Cholesterol Among 
    U.S. Adults. An Update Based on Guidelines From the Second Report of 
    the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel,'' 
    Journal of the American Medical Association, 269:3009-3014, 1993.
        8. Ross, R., ``Atherosclerosis,'' in Cecil Textbook of Medicine, 
    edited by J. B. Wyndaarden, L. H. Smith, and J. C. Bennett, Harcourt 
    Brace Johanevich, Inc., Philadelphia, p. 293, 1992.
        9. Van Sickle, G. J., G. K. Powell, P. J. McDonald, and R. M. 
    Goldblum, ``Milk- and Soy Protein-induced Enterocolitis: Evidence for 
    Lymphocyte Sensitization to Specific Food Proteins,'' Gastroenterology, 
    88:1915-1921, 1985.
        10. Sampson, H. A. and S. M. Scanlon, ``Natural History of Food 
    Hypersensitivity in Children with Atopic Dermatitis,'' Journal of 
    Pediatrics, 115:23-27, 1989.
        11. Roebuck, B. D., ``Trypsin Inhibitors: Potential Concern for 
    Humans?'' Journal of Nutrition, 117:398-400, 1987.
        12. Anderson, R. L. and W. J. Wolf, ``Compositional Changes in 
    Trypsin Inhibitors, Phytic Acid, Saponins and Isoflavones Related to 
    Soybean Processing,'' Journal of Nutrition, 125:581S-588S, 1995.
        13. Erdman, J. W., Jr., ``Effects of Soya Protein on Mineral 
    Availability,'' Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 58:489-
    493, 1981.
        14. Liener, I., ``Significance for Humans of Biologically Active 
    Factors in Soybeans and Other Food Legumes,'' Journal of the American 
    Oil Chemists' Society, 56:121-129, 1979.
        15. Kennedy, A. R., ``The Evidence for Soy Products as Cancer 
    Preventive Agents,'' Journal of Nutrition, 125:733S-743S, 1995.
        16. Adlercreutz, H. and W. Mazur, ``Phyto-oestrogens and Western 
    Diseases,'' Annals of Medicine, 29:95-120, 1997.
        17. Liener, I. E., ``Factors Affecting the Nutritional Quality of 
    Soya Products,'' Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 58:406-
    415, 1981.
        18. Erdman, J. W., Jr. and E. J. Fordyce, ``Soy Products and the 
    Human Diet,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 49:725-737, 1989.
        19. Breslau, N. A., L. Brinkley, K. D. Hill, and C. Y. C. Pak, 
    ``Relationship of Animal Protein-rich Diet to Kidney Stone Formation 
    and Calcium Metabolism,'' Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and 
    Metabolism, 66:140-146, 1988.
        20. Portale, A. A., B. P. Halloran, M. M. Murphy, and R. C. Morris, 
    Jr., ``Oral Intake of Phosphorus Can Determine the Serum Concentration 
    of 1,25-Dihydroxy-vitamin D by Determining its Production Rate in 
    Humans,'' Journal of Clinical Investigation, 77:46-55, 1986.
        21. Moule, G. R., ``Clinical Aspects of Nutritional Infertility of 
    Ewes,'' Australian Veterinary Journal, 46(9):428-435, 1970.
        22. Anthony, M. S., T. B. Clarkson, C. L. Hughes, Jr., T. M. 
    Morgan, and G. L. Burke, ``Soybean Isoflavones Improve Cardiovascular 
    Risk Factors Without Affecting the Reproductive System of Peripubertal 
    Rheusus Monkeys,'' Journal of Nutrition, 126:43-50, 1996.
        23. Honore, E. K., J. K. Williams, M. S. Anthony, and T. B. 
    Clarkson, ``Soy
    
    [[Page 62995]]
    
    Isoflavones Enhance Coronary Vascular Reactivity in Atherosclerotic 
    Female Macaques,'' Fertility and Sterility, 67:148-154, 1997.
        24. Cline, J. M., J. C. Paschold, M. S. Anathony, I. O. Obasanjo, 
    M. R. Adams, ``Effects of Hormonal Therapies and Dietary Soy 
    Phytoestrogens on Vaginal Cytology in Surgically Postmenopausal 
    Macaques,'' Fertility and Sterility, 65:1031-1035, 1996.
        25. Lee, H. P., L. Gourley, S. W. Duffy, J. Esteve, J. Lee, and N. 
    E. Day, ``Dietary Effects on Breast-cancer Risk in Singapore,'' The 
    Lancet, 337:1197-1200, 1991.
        26. Cassidy, A., S. Bingham, and K. R. Setchell, ``Biological 
    Effects of a Diet of Soy Protein Rich in Isoflavones on the Menstrual 
    Cycle of Premenopausal Women,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 
    60:333-340, 1994.
        27. Bakhit, R. M., B. P. Klein, D. Essex-Sorlie, J. O. Ham, J. W. 
    Erdman, Jr., and S. M. Potter, ``Intake of 25 g of Soybean Protein With 
    or Without Soybean Fiber Alters Plasma Lipids in Men with Elevated 
    Cholesterol Concentrations,'' Journal of Nutrition, 124:213-222, 1994.
        28. Baum, J. A., H. Teng, J. W. Erdman, Jr., R. M. Weigel, B. P. 
    Klein, V. W. Persky, S. Freels, P. Surya, R. M. Bakhit, E. Ramos, N. F. 
    Shay, and S. M. Potter, ``Long-term Intake of Soy Protein Improves 
    Blood Lipid Profiles and Increases Mononuclear Cell LDL Receptor mRNA 
    in Hypercholesterolemic Postmenopausal Women,'' American Journal of 
    Clinical Nutrition, in press.
        29. Bosello, O., L. Cominacini, I. Zocca, U. Garbin, R. Compri, A. 
    Davoli, and L. Brunetti, ``Short- and Long-term Effects of Hypocaloric 
    Diets Containing Proteins of Different Sources on Plasma Lipids and 
    Apoproteins of Obese Subjects,'' Annals of Nutrition Metabolism, 
    32:206-214, 1988.
        30. Carroll, K. K., P. M. Giovannetti, M. W. Huff, O. Moase, D. C. 
    K. Roberts, and B. M. Wolfe, ``Hypocholesterolemic Effect of 
    Substituting Soybean Protein for Animal Protein in the Diet of Healthy 
    Young Women,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 31:1312-1321, 
    1978.
        31. Crouse, J. R. III, T. Morgan, J. G. Terry, J. Ellis, M. 
    Vitolins, and G. L. Burke, ``Effects of Soy Protein and Isoflavones on 
    Plasma Concentrations of Lipids and Lipoproteins,'' (submitted).
        32. Cruz, M. L. A., W. W. Wong, F. Mimouni, D. L. Hachey, K. D. R. 
    Setchell, P. D. Klein, and R. C. Tsang, ``Effects of Infant Nutrition 
    on Cholesterol Synthesis Rates,'' Pediatric Research, 35:135-140, 1994.
        33. Descovich, G. C., C. Ceredi, A. Gaddi, M. S. Benassi, G. 
    Mannino, L. Colombo, L. Cattin, G. Fontana, U. Senin, E. Mannarino, C. 
    Caruzzo, E. Bertelli, C. Fragiacomo, G. Noseda, M. Sirtori, and C. R. 
    Sirtori, ``Multicentre Study of Soybean Protein Diet for Outpatient 
    Hypercholesterolaemic Patients,'' Lancet, 2:709-712, 1980.
        34. A. Gaddi, G. C. Descovich, G. Noseda, C. Fragiacomo, A. 
    Nicolini, G. Montanari, G. Vanetti, M. Sirtori, E. Gatti, and C. R. 
    Sirtori, ``Hypercholesterolaemia Treated by Soybean Protein Diet,'' 
    Archives of Disease in Childhood, 62:274-278, 1987.
        35. Gaddi, A., A. Ciarrocchi, A. Matteucci, S. Rimondi, G. 
    Ravaglia, G. C. Descovich, and C. R. Sirtori, ``Dietary Treatment for 
    Familial Hypercholesterolemia--Differential Effects of Dietary Soy 
    Protein According to the Apolipoprotein E Phenotypes,'' American 
    Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53:1191-1196, 1991.
        36. Giovannetti, P. M., K. K. Carroll, and B. M. Wolfe, ``Constancy 
    of Fasting Serum Cholesterol of Healthy Young Women Upon Substitution 
    of Soy Protein Isolate for Meat and Dairy Protein in Medium and Low Fat 
    Diets,'' Nutrition Research, 6:609-618, 1986.
        37. Goldberg, A. P., A. Lim, J. B. Kolar, J. J. Grundhauser, F. H. 
    Steinke, and G. Schonfeld, ``Soybean Protein Independently Lowers 
    Plasma Cholesterol Levels in Primary Hypercholesterolemia,'' 
    Atherosclerosis, 43:355-368, 1982.
        38. Gooderham, M. J., H. Adlercreutz, S. T. Ojala, K. Wahala, and 
    B. J. Holub, ``A Soy Protein Isolate Rich in Genistein and Daidzein and 
    its Effects on Plasma Isoflavone Concentrations, Platelet Aggregation, 
    Blood Lipids and Fatty Acid Composition on Plasma Phospholipid in 
    Normal Men,'' Journal of Nutrition, 126:2000-2006, 1996.
        39. Grundy, S. M. and J. J. Abrams, ``Comparison of Actions of Soy 
    Protein and Casein on Metabolism of Plasma Lipoproteins and Cholesterol 
    in Humans,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 38:245-252, 1983.
        40. Holmes, W. L., G. B. Rubel, and S. S. Hood, ``Comparison of the 
    Effect of Dietary Meat Versus Dietary Soybean Protein on Plasma Lipids 
    of Hyperlipidemic Individuals,'' Atherosclerosis, 36:379-387, 1980.
        41. Huff, M. W., P. M. Giovannetti, and B. M. Wolfe, ``Turnover of 
    Very Low-density Lipoprotein--Apoprotein B is Increased by Substitution 
    of Soybean Protein for Meat and Dairy Protein in the Diets of 
    Hypercholsterolemic Men,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 
    39:888-897, 1984.
        42. Jacques, H., D. Laurin, S. Moorjani, F. H. Steinke, C. Gagne, 
    D. Brun, and P. J. Lupien, ``Influence of Diets Containing Cow's Milk 
    or Soy Protein Beverage on Plasma Lipids in Children with Familial 
    Hypercholesterolemia,'' Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 
    11(S):69S-73S, 1992.
        43. Jenkins, D. J. A., T. M. S. Wolever, G. Spiller, G. Buckley, Y. 
    Lam, A. L. Jenkins, and R. G. Josse, ``Hypocholesterolemic Effect of 
    Vegetable Protein in a Hypocaloric Diet,'' Atherosclerosis, 78:99-107, 
    1989.
        44. Kurowska, E. M., J. Jordan, J. D. Spence, S. Wetmore, L. A. 
    Piche, M. Radzikowski, P. Dandona, K. K. Carroll, ``Effects of 
    Substituting Dietary Soybean Protein and Oil for Milk Protein and Fat 
    in Subjects With Hypercholesterolemia,'' Clinical Investigative 
    Medicine, 20(3):162-170, 1997.
        45. Laurin, D., H. Jacques, S. Moorjani, F. H. Steinke, C. Gagne, 
    D. Brun, and P. J. Lupien, ``Effects of a Soy-protein Beverage on 
    Plasma Lipoproteins in Children With Familial Hypercholesterolemia,'' 
    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 54:98-103, 1991.
        46. Lovati, M. R., C. Manzoni, A. Canavesi, M. Sirtori, V. 
    Vaccarino, M. Marchi, G. Gaddi, and C. R. Sirtori, ``Soybean Protein 
    Diet Increases Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Activity in Mononuclear 
    Cells From Hypercholesterolemic Patients,'' Journal of Clinical 
    Investigation, 80:1498-1502, 1987.
        47. Meinertz, H., O. Faergeman, K. Nilausen, M. J. Chapman, S. 
    Goldstein, and P. M. Laplaud, ``Effects of Soy Protein and Casein in 
    Low Cholesterol Diets on Plasma Lipoproteins in Normlipidemic 
    Subjects,'' Atherosclerosis, 72:63-70, 1988.
        48. Meinertz, H., K. Nilausen, and O. Faergeman, ``Soy Protein and 
    Casein in Cholesterol-Enriched Diets: Effects on Plasma Lipoproteins in 
    Normolipidemic Subjects,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 
    50:786-793, 1989.
        49. Mercer, N. J. H., K. K. Carroll, P. M. Giovannetti, F. H. 
    Steinke, and B. M. Wolfe, ``Effects on Human Plasma Lipids of 
    Substituting Soybean Protein Isolate for Milk Protein in the Diet,'' 
    Nutrition Reports International, 35(2):279-287, 1987.
        50. Meredith, L., M. Liebman, and K. Graves, ``Alterations in 
    Plasma Lipid Levels Resulting From Tofu and Cheese Consumption in Adult 
    Women,'' Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 8(6):573-579, 
    1989.
        51. Potter, S. M., R. M. Bakhit, D. L. Essex-Sorlie, K. E. 
    Weingartner, K. M.
    
    [[Page 62996]]
    
    Chapman, R. A. Nelson, M. Prabhudesai, W. D. Savage, A. I. Nelson, L. 
    W. Winter, and J. W. Erdman, Jr., ``Depression of Plasma Cholesterol in 
    Men by Consumption of Baked Products Containing Soy Protein,'' American 
    Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 58:501-506, 1993.
        52. Potter, J. M. and P. J. Nestel, ``Greater Bile Acid Excretion 
    With Soy Bean Than With Cow Milk In Infants,'' American Journal of 
    Clinical Nutrition, 29:546-551, 1976.
        53. Sacks, F. M., J. L. Breslow, P. G. Wood, and E. H. Kass, ``Lack 
    of an Effect of Dairy Protein (Casein) and Soy Protein on Plasma 
    Cholesterol of Strict Vegetarians. An Experiment and a Critical 
    Review,'' Journal of Lipid Research, 24:1012-1020, 1983.
        54. Shorey, R. L., B. Bazan, G. S. Lo, and F. H. Steinke, 
    ``Determinants of Hypercholesterolemic Response to Soy and Animal 
    Protein-Based Diets,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 34:1769-
    1778, 1981.
        55. Sirtori, C. R., E. Agradi, F. Conti, O. Mantero, and E. Gatti, 
    ``Soybean-protein Diet in the Treatment of Type-II 
    Hyperlipoproteinaemia,'' Lancet, 1:275-277, 1977.
        56. Sirtori, C. R., C. Zucchi-Dentone, M. Sirtori, E. Gatti, G. C. 
    Descovich, A. Gaddi, L. Cattin, P. G. Da Col, U. Senin, E. Mannarino, 
    G. Avellone, L. Colombo, C. Fragiacomo, G. Noseda, and S. Lenzi, 
    ``Cholesterol-lowering and HDL-raising Properties of Lecithinated Soy 
    Proteins in Type II Hyperlipidemic Patients,'' Annals of Nutrition 
    Metabolism, 29:348-357, 1985.
        57. Steele, M. G., ``The Effect on Serum Cholesterol Levels of 
    Substituting Milk with a Soya Beverage,'' Australian Journal of 
    Nutrition and Dietetics, 49(1):24-28, 1992.
        58. Van Raaij, J. M. A., M. B. Katan, J. G. A. J. Hautvast, and R. 
    J. J. Hermus, ``Effects of Casein Versus Soy Protein Diets on Serum 
    Cholesterol and Lipoproteins in Young Healthy Volunteers,'' American 
    Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 34:1261-1271, 1981.
        59. Van Raaij, J. M. A., M. B. Katan, C. E. West, and J. G. A. J. 
    Hautvast, ``Influence of Diets Containing Casein, Soy Isolate, and Soy 
    Concentrate on Serum Cholesterol and Lipoproteins in Middle-aged 
    Volunteers,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 35:925-934, 1982.
        60. Verrilo, A., A. de Teresa, P. C. Giarrusso, and S. La Rocca, 
    ``Soybean Protein Diets in the Management of Type II 
    Hyperlipoproteinaemia,'' Atherosclerosis, 54:321-331, 1985.
        61. Vessby, B., B. Karlstrom, H. Lithell, I. B. Gustafsson, and I. 
    Werner, ``The Effects on Lipid and Carbohydrate Metabolism of Replacing 
    Some Animal Protein by Soy-protein in a Lipid-Lowering Diet for 
    Hypercholesterolaemic Patients,''  Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition, 
    36A:179-189, 1982.
        62. Wang, M. F., S. Yamamoto, H. M. Chung, S. Y. Chung, S. 
    Miyatani, M. Mori, T. Okita, and M. Sugano, ``Antihypercholesterolemic 
    Effect of Undigested Fraction of Soybean Protein in Young Female 
    Volunteers,'' Journal of Nutrition Science Vitaminology, 41:187-195, 
    1995.
        63. Widhalm, K., G. Brazda, B. Schneider, and S. Kohl, ``Effect of 
    Soy Protein Diet Versus Standard Low Fat, Low Cholesterol Diet on Lipid 
    and Lipoprotein Levels in Children With Familial or Polygenic 
    Hypercholesterolemia,'' Journal of Pediatrics, 123:30-34, 1993.
        64. Wolfe, B. M., P. M. Giovannetti, D. C. H. Cheng, D. C. K. 
    Roberts, and K. K. Carroll, ``Hypolipidemic Effect of Substituting 
    Soybean Protein Isolate for all Meat and Dairy Protein in the Diets of 
    Hypercholesterolemic Men,'' Nutrition Reports International, 
    24:(6)1187-1198, 1981.
        65. Nagata, C., N. Takatsuka, Y. Kurisu, and H. Shimizu, 
    ``Decreased Serum Total Cholesterol Concentration is Associated With 
    High Intake of Soy Products in Japanese Men and Women,'' Journal of 
    Nutrition, 128:209-213, 1998.
        66. Anderson, J.W., B.M. Johnstone, and M.E. Cook-Newell, ``Meta-
    analysis of the Effects of Soy Protein Intake on Serum Lipids,''  New 
    England Journal of Medicine,, 333:276-282, 1995.
        67. DHHS, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National 
    Cholesterol Education Porgram, ``Report of the Expert Panel on 
    Population Strategies for Blood Cholesterol Reduction (Population Panel 
    Report),'' Chapter II. Background and Introduction, NIH Publication No. 
    93-3046, Bethesda, MD, 1993.
        68. Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences, ``Diet 
    and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk,'' National 
    Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 23-40, 1989.
        69. U.S Preventive Services Task Force, ``Guide to Clinical 
    Preventive Services: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of 169 
    Interventions,'' Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp. xix-xxx, 
    1989.
        70. Anthony, M. S., T. B. Clarkson, B. C. Bullock, and J. D. 
    Wagner, ``Soy Protein Versus Soy Phytoestrogens in the Prevention of 
    Diet-induced Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis of Male Cynomolgus 
    Monkeys,'' Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 
    17(11)2524-2531. 1997.
        71. Nestle, P. J., T. Yamashita, T. Sashara, S. Pomeroy, A. Dart, 
    P. Komesaroff, A. Owen, and M. Abbey, ``Soy Isoflavones Improve 
    Systemic Arterial Compliance But Not Plasma Lipids in Menopausal and 
    Perimenopausal Women,'' Ateriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular 
    Biology, 17:3392-3398, 1997.
        72. Sitori, C. R., E. Gianazza, C. Manzoni, M. R. Lovati, and P. A. 
    Murphy, ``Role of Isoflavones in the Cholesterol Reduction of Soy 
    Proteins in the Clinic,'' letter to the editor, American Journal of 
    Clinical Nutrition, 65:166-167, 1997.
    
    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 101
    
        Food labeling, Incorporation by reference, Nutrition, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
        Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
    authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, it is 
    proposed that 21 CFR part 101 be amended as follows:
    
    PART 101--FOOD LABELING
    
        1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 101 continues to read as 
    follows:
        Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1453, 1454, 1455; 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 342, 
    343, 348, 371.
        2. New Sec. 101.82 is added to subpart E to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 101.82   Health claims: Soy protein and risk of coronary heart 
    disease (CHD).
    
          (a) Relationship between diets that are low in saturated fat and 
    cholesterol and that include soy protein and the risk of CHD. (1) 
    Cardiovascular disease means diseases of the heart and circulatory 
    system. CHD is one of the most common and serious forms of 
    cardiovascular disease and refers to diseases of the heart muscle and 
    supporting blood vessels. High blood total cholesterol and low density 
    lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels are associated with increased risk 
    of developing CHD. High CHD rates occur among people with high total 
    cholesterol levels of 240 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (6.21 
    (millimole per liter (mmol/L))) or above and LDL-cholesterol levels of 
    160 mg/dL (4.13 mmol/L) or above. Borderline high risk total 
    cholesterol levels range from 200 to 239 mg/dL (5.17 to 6.18 mmol/L) 
    and 130 to 159 mg/dL (3.36 to 4.11 mmol/L) of LDL-cholesterol. The 
    scientific evidence establishes that diets high in saturated fat and 
    cholesterol are associated with increased levels of blood total and 
    LDL-cholesterol and, thus, with increased risk of CHD.
    
    [[Page 62997]]
    
         (2) Populations with a low incidence of CHD tend to have 
    relatively low blood total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels. 
    These populations also tend to have dietary patterns that are not only 
    low in total fat, especially saturated fat and cholesterol, but are 
    also relatively high in plant foods that contain dietary fiber and 
    other components.
         (3) Scientific evidence demonstrates that diets low in saturated 
    fat and cholesterol may reduce the risk of CHD. Other evidence 
    demonstrates that the addition of soy protein to a diet that is low in 
    saturated fat and cholesterol may also help to reduce the risk of CHD.
        (b) Significance of the relationship between diets that are low in 
    saturated fat and cholesterol and that include soy protein and the risk 
    of CHD. (1) CHD is a major public health concern in the United States. 
    It accounts for more deaths than any other disease or group of 
    diseases. Early management of risk factors for CHD is a major public 
    health goal that can assist in reducing risk of CHD. High blood total 
    and LDL-cholesterol are major modifiable risk factors in the 
    development of CHD.
         (2) Intakes of saturated fat exceed recommended levels in the 
    diets of many people in the United States. One of the major public 
    health recommendations relative to CHD risk is to consume less than 10 
    percent of calories from saturated fat and an average of 30 percent or 
    less of total calories from all fat. Recommended daily cholesterol 
    intakes are 300 mg or less per day. Scientific evidence demonstrates 
    that diets low in saturated fat and cholesterol are associated with 
    lower blood total and LDL-cholesterol levels. Soy protein, when 
    included in a low saturated fat and cholesterol diet, also helps to 
    lower blood total and LDL-cholesterol levels.
         (c) Requirements. (1) All requirements set forth in Sec. 101.14 
    shall be met.
        (2) Specific requirements--(i) Nature of the claim. A health claim 
    associating diets that are low in saturated fat and cholesterol and 
    that include soy protein with reduced risk of heart disease may be made 
    on the label or labeling of a food described in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) 
    of this section, provided that:
        (A) The claim states that diets that are low in saturated fat and 
    cholesterol and that include soy protein ``may'' or ``might'' reduce 
    the risk of heart disease;
        (B) In specifying the disease, the claim uses the following terms: 
    ``heart disease'' or ``coronary heart disease'';
        (C) In specifying the substance, the claim uses the term ``soy 
    protein'';
        (D) In specifying the fat component, the claim uses the terms 
    ``saturated fat'' and ``cholesterol'';
         (E) The claim does not attribute any degree of risk reduction for 
    CHD to diets that are low in saturated fat and cholesterol and that 
    include soy protein;
        (F) The claim does not imply that consumption of diets that are low 
    in saturated fat and cholesterol and that include soy protein is the 
    only recognized means of achieving a reduced risk of CHD; and
        (G) The claim specifies the daily dietary intake of soy protein 
    that is necessary to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and the 
    contribution one serving of the product makes to the specified daily 
    dietary intake level. The daily dietary intake level of soy protein 
    that has been associated with reduced risk of coronary heart disease is 
    25 grams (g) or more per day of soy protein.
        (ii) Nature of the substance. (A) Soy protein from the legume seed 
    Glycine max.
        (B) FDA will measure soy protein by method No. 988.10 from the 
    ``Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official 
    Analytical Chemists International,'' 16th Ed. (1995), which is 
    incorporated by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 522(a) and 1 CFR 
    part 51. Copies may be obtained from the Association of Official 
    Analytical Chemists International, 481 North Frederick Ave., suite 500, 
    Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2504, or may be examined at the Center for Food 
    Safety and Applied Nutrition's Library, 200 C St. SW., rm. 3321, 
    Washington, DC, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol St. NW., suite 700, Washington, DC;
        (iii) Nature of the Food Eligible to Bear the Claim. (A) The food 
    product shall contain at least 6.25 g of soy protein reference amount 
    customarily consumed of the food product;
        (B) The food shall meet the nutrient content requirements in 
    Sec. 101.62 for a ``low saturated fat,'' ``low cholesterol,'' and ``low 
    fat'' food.
         (d) Optional information. (1) The claim may state that the 
    development of heart disease depends on many factors and may identify 
    one or more of the following risk factors for heart disease about which 
    there is general scientific agreement: A family history of CHD; 
    elevated blood total and LDL-cholesterol; excess body weight; high 
    blood pressure; cigarette smoking; diabetes; and physical inactivity. 
    The claim may also provide additional information about the benefits of 
    exercise and management of body weight to help lower the risk of heart 
    disease;
         (2) The claim may state that the relationship between intake of 
    diets that are low in saturated fat and cholesterol and that include 
    soy protein and reduced risk of heart disease is through the 
    intermediate link of ``blood cholesterol'' or ``blood total and LDL-
    cholesterol;''
        (3) The claim may include information from paragraphs (a) and (b) 
    of this section, which summarize the relationship between diets that 
    are low in saturated fat and cholesterol and that include soy protein 
    and CHD and the significance of the relationship;
         (4) The claim may state that a diet low in saturated fat and 
    cholesterol that includes soy protein is consistent with ``Nutrition 
    and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans,'' U.S. Department of 
    Agriculture (USDA) and Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), 
    Government Printing Office (GPO);
         (5) The claim may state that individuals with elevated blood total 
    and LDL-cholesterol should consult their physicians for medical advice 
    and treatment. If the claim defines high or normal blood total and LDL-
    cholesterol levels, then the claim shall state that individuals with 
    high blood cholesterol should consult their physicians for medical 
    advice and treatment;
        (6) The claim may include information on the number of people in 
    the United States who have heart disease. The sources of this 
    information shall be identified, and it shall be current information 
    from the National Center for Health Statistics, the National Institutes 
    of Health, or ``Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for 
    Americans,'' USDA and DHHS, GPO;
         (e) Model health claim. The following model health claims may be 
    used in food labeling to describe the relationship between diets that 
    are low in saturated fat and cholesterol and that include soy protein 
    and reduced risk of heart disease:
        (1) 25 grams of soy protein a day, as part of a diet low in 
    saturated fat and cholesterol, may reduce the risk of heart disease. A 
    serving of [name of food] supplies -------------- grams of soy protein.
         (2) Diets low in saturated fat and cholesterol that include 25 
    grams of soy protein may reduce the risk of heart disease. One serving 
    of [name of food] provides ---------------- grams of soy protein.
    
        Dated: November 2, 1998.
    William B. Schultz,
    Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-30008 Filed 11-9-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    [[Page 62998]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.001
    
    
    
    [[Page 62999]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.002
    
    
    
    [[Page 63000]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.003
    
    
    
    [[Page 63001]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.004
    
    
    
    [[Page 63002]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.005
    
    
    
    [[Page 63003]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.006
    
    
    
    [[Page 63004]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.007
    
    
    
    [[Page 63005]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.008
    
    
    
    [[Page 63006]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.009
    
    
    
    [[Page 63007]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.010
    
    
    
    [[Page 63008]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.011
    
    
    
    [[Page 63009]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.012
    
    
    
    [[Page 63010]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.013
    
    
    
    [[Page 63011]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.014
    
    
    
    [[Page 63012]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.015
    
    
    
    [[Page 63013]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.016
    
    
    
    [[Page 63014]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.017
    
    
    
    [[Page 63015]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10NO98.018
    
    
    
    [FR Doc. 98-30008 Filed 11-9-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/10/1998
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
98-30008
Dates:
Written comments by January 25, 1999.
Pages:
62977-63015 (39 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98P-0683
PDF File:
98-30008.pdf
CFR: (6)
21 CFR 101.82(c)(2)(i)(D)
21 CFR 101.82(c)(2)(iii)(B)
21 CFR 101.62
21 CFR 101.70
21 CFR 101.77
More ...