98-30084. Intend To Prepare a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) for Proposed Improvements to the Cheasapeake & Delaware Canal and Connecting Channels, Delaware and Maryland  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 217 (Tuesday, November 10, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 63033-63034]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-30084]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army
    
    
    Intend To Prepare a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact 
    Statement (DSEIS) for Proposed Improvements to the Cheasapeake & 
    Delaware Canal and Connecting Channels, Delaware and Maryland
    
    AGENCY: U.S. Corps of Engineers, DoD.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Intent.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The action being taken is an evaluation of the outstanding 
    issues of concern raised by State and Federal agencies and local 
    interest groups during the Feasibility Study for the Cheaspeake and 
    Delaware Canal-Baltimore Harbor Connecting Channels (Deepening), 
    Delaware and Maryland.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Questions regarding the DSEIS should be addressed to Ms. Barbara 
    Conlin, (215) 656-6557, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CENAP-PL-E, 
    Wanamaker
    
    [[Page 63034]]
    
    Building, 100 Penn Square East, Philadelphia, PA 19107-3390.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    1. Proposed Action
    
        a. The proposed document will address outstanding economic issues 
    including the appropriate channel depth. Potential environmental 
    impacts will be further evaluated, including possible impacts to 
    groundwater quality from the disposal of dredged material, loss of 
    groundwater into the canal/river, bank erosion, impacts to aquatic 
    resources and water quality impacts in the Chesapeake Bay.
        b. The authority for the proposed project is the resolution adopted 
    by the House of Representatives Committee on Public Works and 
    Transportation September 8, 1988.
        c. The resolution authorized the review of existing reports of the 
    Chief of Engineers for the Inland Waterway-Delaware River to Chesapeake 
    Bay, Delaware and Maryland, and the report on the Baltimore Harbor and 
    Channels, Maryland, with a view to determine the feasibility of 
    measures to promote and encourage the efficient, economic, and logical 
    development of the channel system serving the Port of Baltimore.
    
    2. Alternatives
    
        In response to the study resolution a reconnaissance report was 
    completed in February 1990 at 100% Federal expense. The results 
    indicated there was Federal interest in further feasibility phase 
    studies of improvements to the canal and the connecting channels. The 
    feasibility phase of study was cost-shared 50%-50% between the Maryland 
    Port Administration (MPA) and the Federal government and was completed 
    in December 1996 with the issuance of the Chief of Engineers' report. 
    The Chief of Engineers' report concluded that the plan developed by the 
    reporting officers was engineeringly sound. The review also found that 
    the Reedy Point entrance flare, bend widening at Sandy Point, and the 
    establishment of an emergency anchorage at Howell Point were 
    economically justified. However, questions remain regarding the 
    appropriate channel depth which are to be addressed during this phase 
    of study (Planning, Engineering and Design).
    
    3. Scoping
    
        a. The Planning, Engineering and Design (PED) phase was initiated 8 
    April 1997 with the execution of a cost sharing agreement between the 
    Federal government and the MPA. As part of the PED phase a working 
    group has been established to help disseminate information to the 
    interested public, review the information, make suggestions on the 
    study process, and assure that all the issues are addressed. Also, as 
    part of the PED phase, several repositories have been established at 
    local libraries, Corps offices, and the MPA offices. The repositories 
    contain pertinent reports from the feasibility study as well as 
    information developed during the on-going PED phase.
        b. The scoping process is on-going and has involved coordination 
    with Federal, State, and local agencies and interest groups. The public 
    and all agencies are invited to comment on this proposal. Any pertinent 
    information that Federal, State or local agencies or the private sector 
    can provide will be used to the greatest extent possible. We welcome 
    any assistance and suggestions pertaining to the conduct of this study. 
    All comments should be directed to the above address, Attn: CENAP-PL-E.
    
    4. Availability
    
        It is estimated that the DSEIS will be made available to the public 
    in Spring 2000.
    Leonard J. Lipski,
    Assistant Chief of Planning Division.
    [FR Doc. 98-30084 Filed 11-9-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/10/1998
Department:
Engineers Corps
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Intent.
Document Number:
98-30084
Pages:
63033-63034 (2 pages)
PDF File:
98-30084.pdf