2021-24578. Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Results

AGENCY:

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY:

On October 27, 2021, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, sustaining the Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s second remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period from November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. Commerce is notifying the public that it is amending the final results of review with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Bosun Tools Co., Ltd. (Bosun) and the 22 non-selected respondents that received a separate rate.

DATES:

Applicable November 6, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: [phone].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On June 12, 2017, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2014-2015 AD administrative review of diamond sawblades and parts thereof from China. Commerce calculated a rate of 6.91 for Bosun and assigned that rate to the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate.^[1]

The Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition (the petitioner) appealed Commerce's Final Results. On October 23, 2018, the CIT remanded the Final Results to Commerce to further clarify or reconsider Commerce's conclusion that Bosun acted to the best of its ability in responding to Commerce's requests for information.^[2]

In its first remand redetermination, issued in April 2019, Commerce concluded that Bosun failed to cooperate to the best of its ability and applied a rate based entirely on adverse facts available (AFA) to Bosun; Commerce also assigned that rate to the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate.^[3] The CIT sustained the first remand redetermination, but later remanded for a second time for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which ruled that Commerce needed to determine whether there was any basis to disregard the Bosun-supplied origin information for certain sales to unaffiliated U.S. customers during the period of review.^[4]

In its second remand redetermination, issued in July 2021, Commerce found that AFA was appropriate to apply to only certain of Bosun's sales to U.S. customers. Accordingly, Commerce recalculated Bosun's margin and assigned Bosun's rate to the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate.^[5] The CIT sustained Commerce's final redetermination.^[6]

Amended Final Results

Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending its Final Results with respect to Bosun and the 22 non-selected respondents that received a separate rate as follows:

Company	Amended final margin (percent)
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd	15.91
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd	15.91
Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd	15.91
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd	15.91
Danyang Like Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd	15.91
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd	15.91
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd	15.91
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd	15.91
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd	15.91
Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd	15.91
Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd	15.91
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation	15.91
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd	15.91
Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd	15.91
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd	15.91
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd	15.91
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd	15.91
Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd	15.91
Sino Tools Co., Ltd	15.91
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd	15.91
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd	15.91
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd	15.91
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd	15.91

Cash Deposit Requirements

Because all the exporters listed above have a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e., there have been final results published in a subsequent administrative review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice does not affect the current cash deposit rate.

Liquidation of Suspended Entries

At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from issuing instructions to liquidate entries that were exported by Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., and imported by or sold to (as indicated on the commercial invoice or Customs documentation) Bosun Tools, Inc. or Bosun Tools Inc., or exported by the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate, and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. These entries will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the injunction during the pendency of any appeals process.

In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, is upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise exported by Bosun Tools Co., Ltd., and imported by or sold to (as indicated on the commercial invoice or Customs documentation) Bosun Tools, Inc. or Bosun Tools Inc., or exported by the non-selected respondents that received a separate rate in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Where an import-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,^[7] we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

Dated: November 4, 2021.

Ryan Majerus,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Footnotes

1.   See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 82 FR 26912 (June 12, 2017) ( Final Results ).

2.   See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, Slip Op. 18-146 (CIT October 23, 2018).

3.   See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, Slip Op. 18-146, dated April 17, 2019, available at https://access.trade.gov/​resources/​remands/​18-146.pdf.

4.   See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167 (CIT March. 25, 2021) (referencing Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United States, 986 F.3d 1351 (CAFC 2021)).

5.   See Final Remand Redetermination, Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, Appeal No. 20-1478, dated July 13, 2021.

6.   See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 17-00167, Slip Op. 21-150 (CIT October 27, 2021).

7.   See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).