94-27989. United Carolina Bancshares Corporation, Whiteville, North Carolina; Application to Engage in Nonbanking Activities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 218 (Monday, November 14, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-27989]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: November 14, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
     
    
    United Carolina Bancshares Corporation, Whiteville, North 
    Carolina; Application to Engage in Nonbanking Activities
    
        United Carolina Bancshares Corporation, Whiteville, North Carolina 
    (Applicant), has applied pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the Bank 
    Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) (BHC Act) and Sec.  
    225.23(a) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)) to retain its 
    investment in Southeast Switch, Inc. (Company), which engages in data 
    processing and related nonbanking activities pursuant to Regulation Y. 
    Applicant currently owns indirectly 8.33 percent of the Class A shares 
    of Company. Applicant also has joined the application filed by Bank 
    South Corporation, et al., for Company to provide card production and 
    related services to entities that are not members of the Honor 
    electronic funds transfer (EFT) network. See 59 FR 51197 (October 7, 
    1994).
    
    Closely Related to Banking Standard
    
        Section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act provides that a bank holding company 
    may, with Board approval, engage in any activity ``which the Board 
    after due notice and opportunity for hearing has determined (by order 
    or regulation) to be so closely related to banking or managing or 
    controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto....'' In 
    determining whether a proposed activity is closely related to banking 
    for purposes of the BHC Act, the Board considers, inter alia, the 
    matters set forth in National Courier Association v. Board of Governors 
    of the Federal Reserve System, 516 F.2d 1229 (D.C. Cir. 1975). These 
    considerations are (1) whether banks generally have in fact provided 
    the proposed services, (2) whether banks generally provide services 
    that are operationally or functionally so similar to the proposed 
    services as to equip them particularly well to provide the proposed 
    services, and (3) whether banks generally provide services that are so 
    integrally related to the proposed services as to require their 
    provision in a specialized form. See 516 F.2d at 1237. In addition, the 
    Board may consider any other basis that may demonstrate that the 
    activity has a reasonable or close relationship to banking or managing 
    or controlling banks. Board Statement Regarding Regulation Y, 49 FR 806 
    (January 5, 1984).
        Applicant would engage through Company in those nonbanking 
    activities in which Company may currently engage and in providing card 
    production and related services to entities that are not members of the 
    Honor electronic funds transfer (EFT) network, as proposed by Bank 
    South et al. Applicant maintains that the proposed card production 
    activities are closely related to banking within the meaning of the BHC 
    Act. Specifically, Applicant maintains that the Board has previously 
    authorized bank holding companies to provide data processing services 
    to nonfinancial customers. See, e.g., Citicorp, 72 Federal Reserve 
    Bulletin 497 (1986). In addition, Applicant maintains that the Board 
    has authorized card embossing and issuance functions with respect to 
    medical benefits cards issued by payer organizations. Banc One 
    Corporation, 80 Federal Reserve Bulletin 139 (1994). Applicant also 
    maintains that the Board has authorized card embossing and encoding 
    functions with respect to stored value cards for nonfinancial 
    institutions. Banc One Corporation, 79 Federal Reserve Bulletin 1158 
    (1993). Applicant further maintains that the data embossed on the type 
    of cards that are the subject of this application are banking, 
    economic, or financial data that permit the cardholder to initiate or 
    consummate a banking or financial transaction, and that the identity of 
    the customer does not change the financial nature of the information 
    being encoded and processed.
    
    Proper Incident to Banking Standard
    
        In order to approve the proposal, the Board also must determine 
    that the proposed activities to be conducted by Company ``can 
    reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
    greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
    that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
    resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
    unsound banking practices.'' 12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8).
        Applicant believes that the proposal will produce public benefits 
    that outweigh any potential adverse effects. In particular, Applicant 
    maintains that the proposal will enhance customer convenience and 
    efficiency. In addition, Applicant states that the proposed activities 
    will not result in adverse effects such as an undue concentration of 
    resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
    unsound banking practices.
        In publishing the proposal for comment, the Board does not take a 
    position on issues raised by the proposal. Notice of the proposal is 
    published solely in order to seek the views of interested persons on 
    the issues presented by the application, and does not represent a 
    determination by the Board that the proposal meets or is likely to meet 
    the standards of the BHC Act.
        Any comments or requests for hearing should be submitted in writing 
    and received by William W. Wiles, Secretary, Board of Governors of the 
    Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551, not later than December 
    5, 1994. Any request for a hearing on this application must, as 
    required by Sec.  262.3(e) of the Board's Rules of Procedure (12 CFR 
    262.3(e)), be accompanied by a statement of the reasons why a written 
    presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
    specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
    evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
    party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal.
        This application may be inspected at the offices of the Board of 
    Governors, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, or the Federal Reserve 
    Bank of Richmond.
    
        Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 7, 
    1994.
    Jennifer J. Johnson,
    Deputy Secretary of the Board.
    [FR Doc. 94-27989 Filed 11-10-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/14/1994
Department:
Federal Reserve System
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-27989
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: November 14, 1994