94-27473. Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 219 (Tuesday, November 15, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-27473]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: November 15, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-NM-51-AD; Amendment 39-9063; AD 94-23-01]
    
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 Series 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
    (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 series 
    airplanes, that currently requires inspection of the wing rear spar 
    lower cap aft tang fastener and the wing trailing edge access door sill 
    to detect fatigue cracking, and repair, if necessary. This amendment 
    requires installation of a crack preventative modification of the wing 
    rear spar lower cap, and follow-on inspections. This amendment is 
    prompted by reports of additional cracking found in the current 
    inspection area. The actions specified by this AD are intended to 
    prevent propagation of cracks in the subject area, which could 
    compromise the structural integrity of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective December 15, 1994.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications, as listed 
    in the regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register 
    as of December 15, 1994.
        The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service 
    Bulletin A57-123, dated July 25, 1991, listed in the regulations was 
    approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of 
    October 23, 1991 (56 FR 50650, October 8, 1991).
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, P.O. Box 1771, Long Beach, 
    California 90801-1771, Attention: Business Unit Manager, Technical 
    Administrative support, Dept. L51, M.C. 2-98. This information may be 
    examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 3229 East Spring Street, Long Beach, 
    California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol 
    Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen Moreland, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 3229 East Spring Street, Long 
    Beach, California 90806-2425; telephone (310) 988-5238; fax (310) 988-
    5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 91-21-05, 
    amendment 39-8052 (56 FR 50650, October 8, 1991), which is applicable 
    to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10 series airplanes was published 
    in the Federal Register on July 22, 1994 (59 FR 37443). That action 
    proposed to require installation of a crack preventative modification 
    of the wing rear spar lower cap, and follow-on inspections.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the two comments received.
        Both commenters support the proposed rule.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
        There are approximately 282 Model DC-10 series airplanes of the 
    affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 175 
    airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
        The currently required inspections take approximately 8 work hours 
    per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work 
    hour. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the current 
    inspection requirements of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $84,000, or $480 per airplane, per inspection.
        The modification will take approximately 12 work hours to 
    accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required 
    parts will cost between $3,730 and $6,730 per airplane, depending upon 
    the airplane model. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of 
    the modification requirement of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated 
    to be between $4,450 and $7,450 per airplane.
        The post-modification inspections will take approximately 12 work 
    hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per 
    work hour. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the post-
    modification inspection requirements of this AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $126,000, or $720 per airplane, per inspection.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    94-23-01 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-9063. Docket 94-NM-51-AD. 
    Supersedes AD 91-21-05, Amendment 39-8052.
    
        Applicability: Model DC-10-10, -10F, and -15 series airplanes, 
    fuselage numbers through 379 inclusive; and Model DC-10-30, -30F, 
    and -40 series airplanes, fuselage numbers through 275 inclusive, 
    certificated in any category.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To ensure the structural integrity of these airplanes, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this AD, 
    prior to the accumulation of 7,000 total landings or within 30 days 
    after October 23, 1991 (the effective date of AD 91-21-05, amendment 
    39-8051), whichever occurs later, conduct the initial inspections 
    specified in either paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this AD.
        (1) Conduct an eddy current inspection of the wing rear spar 
    lower cap aft tang, and a dye penetrant inspection of the wing 
    trailing edge access door sill located between Xors=417.000 and 
    Xors=424.000, in accordance with Option III of McDonnell 
    Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A57-123, dated July 25, 1991, or 
    Revision 1, dated June 8, 1993. In addition, within 1,500 landings 
    after performing the eddy current and dye penetrant inspections, 
    conduct the inspections specified in either paragraph (a)(2) or 
    (a)(3) of this AD, and repeat them thereafter as indicated. Or
        (2) Conduct an ultrasonic inspection of the area around the six 
    wing rear spar lower cap aft tang fastener holes, and a dye 
    penetrant inspection of the wing trailing edge access door sill 
    located between stations Xors=417.000 and Xors=424.000, in 
    accordance with Option II of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service 
    Bulletin A57-123, dated July 25, 1991, or Revision 1, dated June 8, 
    1993. Repeat these inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 
    1,900 landings until the modification required by paragraph (g) of 
    this AD is accomplished. Or
        (3) Conduct an eddy current inspection of the six wing rear spar 
    lower cap aft tang fastener holes, and a dye penetrant inspection of 
    the wing trailing edge access door sill located between stations 
    Xors=417.000 and Xors=424.000, in accordance with Option I 
    of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A57-123, dated July 25, 
    1991, or Revision 1, dated June 8, 1993. Repeat these inspections 
    thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,300 landings until the 
    modification required by paragraph (g) of this AD is accomplished.
        (b) The requirements of paragraph (c) of this AD apply to 
    airplanes on which both of the following actions have been 
    accomplished:
        (1) A dye penetrant inspection of the wing trailing edge access 
    door sill located between stations Xors=417.000 and 
    Xors=422.000 has been accomplished prior to October 23, 1991, 
    in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 57-61, 
    Revision 2, dated August 15, 1990; and
        (2) An eddy current inspection of the wing rear spar lower cap 
    aft tang has been accomplished prior to October 23, 1991, per DC-10 
    Supplemental Inspection Document, Principal Structural Element (PSE) 
    57.10.007 and 57.10.008, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas 
    Service Bulletin 57-61, Revision 2, dated August 15, 1990.
        (c) For airplanes specified in paragraph (b) of this AD: Conduct 
    the initial inspections specified in either paragraph (c)(1) or 
    (c)(2) of this AD within 1,500 landings after accomplishing the 
    inspections (dye penetrant and eddy current) specified in paragraph 
    (b) of this AD, or within 30 days after October 23, 1991, whichever 
    occurs later.
        (1) Conduct an ultrasonic inspection of the area around the six 
    wing rear spar lower cap aft tang fastener holes, and a dye 
    penetrant inspection of the wing trailing edge access door sill 
    located between stations Xors=417.000 and Xors=424.000, in 
    accordance with Option II of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service 
    Bulletin A57-123, dated July 25, 1991, or Revision 1, dated June 8, 
    1993. Repeat these inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 
    1,900 landings until the modification required by paragraph (g) of 
    this AD is accomplished. Or
        (2) Conduct an eddy current inspection of the six wing rear spar 
    lower cap aft tang fastener holes, and a dye penetrant inspection of 
    the wing trailing edge access door sill located between stations 
    Xors=417.000 and Xors=424.000, in accordance with Option I 
    of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A57-123, dated July 25, 
    1991, or Revision 1, dated June 8, 1993. Repeat these inspections 
    thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,300 landings until the 
    modification required by paragraph (g) of this AD is accomplished.
        (d) The requirements of paragraph (e) of this AD apply to 
    airplanes on which both of the following actions have been 
    accomplished:
        (1) A dye penetrant inspection of the wing trailing edge access 
    door sill located between stations Xors=417.000 and 
    Xors=422.000 has been accomplished prior to October 23, 1991, 
    in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 57-61, 
    Revision 2, dated August 15, 1990; and
        (2) An eddy current inspection of the wing rear spar lower cap 
    aft tang fastener holes located between stations Xors=417.000 
    and Xors=422.000 has been accomplished prior to October 23, 
    1991, per DPS 4.735-9, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service 
    Bulletin 57-61, Revision 2, dated August 15, 1990.
        (e) For airplanes specified in paragraph (d) of this AD: Conduct 
    the initial inspections specified in either paragraph (e)(1) or 
    (e)(2) of this AD within 3,300 landings after the accomplishment of 
    the inspection specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this AD, or within 
    30 days after October 23, 1991, whichever occurs later.
        (1) Conduct an ultrasonic inspection of the area around the six 
    wing rear spar lower cap aft tang fastener holes, and a dye 
    penetrant inspection of the wing trailing edge access door sill 
    located between stations Xors=417.000 and Xors=424.000, in 
    accordance with Option II of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service 
    Bulletin A57-123, dated July 25, 1991, or Revision 1, dated June 8, 
    1993. Repeat these inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 
    1,900 landings until the modification required by paragraph (g) of 
    this AD is accomplished. Or
        (2) Conduct an eddy current inspection of the six wing rear spar 
    lower cap aft tang fastener holes, and a dye penetrant inspection of 
    the wing trailing edge access door sill located between stations 
    Xors=417.000 and Xors=424.000, in accordance with Option I 
    of McDonnell Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A57-123, dated July 25, 
    1991, or Revision 1, dated June 8, 1993. Repeat these inspections 
    thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,300 landings until the 
    modification required by paragraph (g) of this AD is accomplished.
        (f) If any crack(s) is found during any inspection conducted in 
    accordance with paragraphs (a) through (e) of this AD, prior to 
    further flight, repair in a manner approved by the Manager, Los 
    Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate.
        (g) Prior to the accumulation of 10,000 total landings, or 
    within 5 years after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 
    later, accomplish the crack preventative modification in accordance 
    with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 57-123, dated June 8, 1993. 
    Accomplishment of this modification constitutes terminating action 
    for the inspection requirements of paragraphs (a) through (e) of 
    this AD.
        (h) Prior to the accumulation of 10,000 total landings after the 
    accomplishment of the crack preventative modification required by 
    paragraph (g) of this AD, conduct an inspection of the wing rear 
    spar lower cap in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 
    57-123, dated June 8, 1993. Repeat this inspection thereafter in 
    accordance with the following schedule. Any crack(s) found during 
    any inspection required by this paragraph must be repaired, prior to 
    further flight, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, 
    Los Angeles ACO, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate.
        (1) For Model DC-10-10, -10F, and -15 series airplanes: Repeat 
    the inspection at intervals not to exceed 4,550 landings.
        (2) For Model DC-10-30 and -30F series airplanes: Repeat the 
    inspection at intervals not to exceed 2,810 landings.
        (3) For Model DC-10-40 series airplanes: Repeat the inspection 
    at intervals not to exceed 3,400 landings.
        (i) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through 
    an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add 
    comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
        (j) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (k) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell 
    Douglas Alert Service Bulletin A57-123, Revision 1, dated June 8, 
    1993; McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 57-123, dated June 8, 1993; 
    and McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 57-61, Revision 2, dated 
    August 15, 1990. The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas 
    Alert Service Bulletin 57-61, dated July 25, 1991, was approved 
    previously by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance 
    with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51 as of October 23, 1991 (56 FR 
    50650, October 8, 1991). The incorporation by reference of the 
    remainder of the service documents listed above is approved by the 
    Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) 
    and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained from McDonnell Douglas 
    Corporation, P.O. Box 1771, Long Beach, California 90801-1771, 
    Attention: Business Unit Manager, Technical Administrative support, 
    Dept. L51, M.C. 2-98. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or 
    at the FAA, Los Angeles ACO, Transport Airplane Directorate, 3229 
    East Spring Street, Long Beach, California; or at the Office of the 
    Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
        (l) This amendment becomes effective on December 15, 1994.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 1, 1994.
    S. R. Miller,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-27473 Filed 11-14-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/15/1994
Published:
11/15/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-27473
Dates:
Effective December 15, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: November 15, 1994, Docket No. 94-NM-51-AD, Amendment 39-9063, AD 94-23-01
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13