99-29715. Virginia Regulatory Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 61805-61807]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-29715]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
    
    30 CFR Part 946
    
    [VA-116-FOR]
    
    
    Virginia Regulatory Program
    
    AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), 
    Interior.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of public comment period.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: OSM is reopening the public comment period on a proposed 
    amendment to the Virginia regulatory program (hereinafter referred to 
    as the Virginia program) under the Surface Mining Control and 
    Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The proposed amendment consists of the 
    following: a statutory change to the Virginia Act at
    
    [[Page 61806]]
    
    section 45.1-235 C as enacted in the 1999 session of the Virginia 
    General Assembly; proposed regulation changes at section 4 VAC 25-130-
    700.5 to the definitions of ``government financed construction'' and 
    ``qualified laboratory;'' and proposed regulation changes to section 4 
    VAC 25-130 Part 795 concerning the small operator assistance program 
    (SOAP). The comment period is being reopened to provide opportunity to 
    comment on two changes to 4 VAC 25-130-795.11(b) concerning SOAP 
    funding. The amendment is intended to revise the Virginia program to be 
    consistent with the corresponding Federal provisions.
    
    DATES: Your written comments must be received by 4 p.m., on November 
    30, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Your written comments and requests to speak at the hearing 
    should be mailed or hand delivered to Mr. Robert A. Penn, Director, Big 
    Stone Gap Field Office at the first address listed below.
        Copies of the Virginia program, the proposed amendment, a listing 
    of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments that we 
    receive in response to this document will be available for your review 
    at the addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday 
    through Friday, excluding holidays. Each person may receive one free 
    copy of the proposed amendment by contacting OSM's Big Stone Gap Field 
    Office.
    
    Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Big Stone Gap 
    Field Office, 1941 Neeley Road, Suite 201, Compartment 116, Big Stone 
    Gap, Virginia 24219, Telephone: (703) 523-4303
    Virginia Division of Mined Land Reclamation, P.O. Drawer 900, Big Stone 
    Gap, Virginia 24219, Telephone: (703) 523-8100
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert A Penn, Director, Big Stone 
    Gap Field Office, Telephone: (703) 523-4303.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background on the Virginia Program
    
        On December 15, 1981, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally 
    approved the Virginia program. You can find background information on 
    the Virginia program, including the Secretary's findings, the 
    disposition of comments, and the conditions of approval in the December 
    15, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 61085-61115). You can find later 
    actions concerning the conditions of approval and program amendments at 
    30 CFR 946.12, 946.13, 946.15, and 946.16.
    
    II. Discussion of the Proposed Amendment
    
        By letter dated August 2, 1999 (Administrative Record No. VA-978), 
    the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME) submitted 
    an amendment to the Virginia program. This amendment is the State's 
    response to changes made to the Federal SOAP regulations at 30 CFR Part 
    795, and to the Federal definition of ``government-financed 
    construction'' at 30 CFR 707.5.
        We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the August 20, 
    1999, Federal Register (64 FR 45489), invited public comment, and 
    provided an opportunity for a public hearing on the adequacy of the 
    proposed amendment. The comment period closed on September 20, 1999. No 
    one requested to speak at a public hearing, so no hearing was held.
        By letters dated October 1, 1999 (Administrative Record Number VA-
    987), and October 28, 1999 (Administrative Record Number VA-993) the 
    DMME submitted amendments to 4 VAC 25-130-795.11(b). We are reopening 
    the comment period to provide opportunity to comment on the two new 
    changes which are described below. 4 VAC 25-130-795.11(b) Assistance 
    Funding.
        This provision is amended by deleting the words ``is authorized 
    to'' and replacing those words with the word ``shall.'' As amended, 
    this provision states that the Division shall establish a formula for 
    allocating funds to provide services for eligible small operators if 
    available funds are less than those required to provide the services 
    pursuant to this part.
        In addition, the DMME submitted its formula for allocating limited 
    funds. The DMME stated that, should available funds ever be 
    insufficient to provide all requested and appropriate assistance to 
    eligible small operators, the DMME will provide services on a first 
    come, first serve basis. The funds will be used in order of the 
    application dates for the requested assistance.
    
    III. Public Comment Procedures
    
        In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are now 
    seeking your comments on whether the amendments discussed above satisfy 
    the applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we 
    determine that the amendments are adequate, they will become part of 
    the Virginia program.
    
    Written Comments
    
        Our practice is to make comments, including names and home 
    addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular 
    business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold 
    their home address from the rulemaking [or administrative] record, 
    which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also may be 
    circumstances in which we would withhold from the rulemaking [or 
    administrative] record a respondent's identity, as allowable by law. If 
    you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this 
    prominently at the beginning of your comment. However, we will not 
    consider anonymous comments. We will make all submissions from 
    organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying 
    themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or 
    businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
        Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to the 
    issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support 
    of your recommendations. If your comments are received after the time 
    indicated under DATES or at locations other than the Big Stone Gap 
    Field Office, we will not necessarily consider them in the final 
    rulemaking or include them in the Administrative Record.
    
    IV. Procedural Determinations
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and 
    Review).
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required 
    by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has 
    determined that, to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the 
    applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section. 
    However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of 
    State regulatory programs and program amendments since each such 
    program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM. 
    Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30 
    CFR 730.11, 732.15 and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State 
    regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must 
    be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is 
    consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and 
    whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have 
    been met.
    
    [[Page 61807]]
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since 
    section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency 
    decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not 
    constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section 
    102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 
    4332(2)(C)).
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule does not contain information collection requirements that 
    require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
    3507 et seq.).
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
    The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon 
    counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was 
    prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a 
    significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small 
    entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements 
    previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In 
    making the determination as to whether this rule would have a 
    significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and 
    assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any 
    given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.
    
    List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 946
    
        Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
    
        Dated: November 3, 1999.
    Vann Weaver,
    Acting Regional Director, Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center.
    [FR Doc. 99-29715 Filed 11-12-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-05-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/15/1999
Department:
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule; reopening of public comment period.
Document Number:
99-29715
Dates:
Your written comments must be received by 4 p.m., on November 30, 1999.
Pages:
61805-61807 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
VA-116-FOR
PDF File:
99-29715.pdf
CFR: (1)
30 CFR 946