94-28257. Philadelphia Electric Co.; Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-28257]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: November 16, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353]
    
     
    
    Philadelphia Electric Co.; Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 
    and 2
    
    Exemption
    
    I.
        Philadelphia Electric Company (the licensee) is the holder of 
    Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85, which authorize 
    operation of the Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2. The 
    licenses provide, among other things, that the license is subject to 
    all rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter 
    in effect.
        The facilities consist of two boiling water reactors located in 
    Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
    II.
        It is stated in 10 CFR 73.55, ``Requirements for physical 
    protection of licensed activities in nuclear power reactors against 
    radiological sabotage,'' paragraph (a), that ``The licensee shall 
    establish and maintain an onsite physical protection system and 
    security organization which will have as its objective to provide high 
    assurance that activities involving special nuclear material are not 
    inimical to the common defense and security and do not constitute an 
    unreasonable risk to the public health and safety.''
        It is specified in 10 CFR 73.55(d), ``Access Requirements,'' 
    paragraph (1), that ``The licensee shall control all points of 
    personnel and vehicle access into a protected area.'' It is specified 
    in 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5) that ``A numbered picture badge identification 
    system shall be used for all individuals who are authorized access to 
    protected areas without escort * * *.'' It also states that an 
    individual not employed by the licensee (i.e., contractors) may be 
    authorized access to protected areas without escort provided the 
    individual ``receives a picture badge upon entrance into the protected 
    area which must be returned upon exit from the protected area * * *.''
        The licensee proposed to implement an alternative unescorted access 
    control system which would eliminate the need to issue and retrieve 
    badges at each entrance/exit location and would allow all individuals 
    with unescorted access to keep their badge with them when departing the 
    site.
        An exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5) is required to allow 
    contractors who have unescorted access to take their badges offsite 
    instead of returning them when exiting the site. By letter dated August 
    10, 1994, the licensee requested an exemption from certain requirements 
    of 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5) for this purpose.
    III.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, ``Specific exemptions,'' the Commission 
    may, upon application of any interested person or upon its own 
    initiative, grant such exemptions in this part as it determines are 
    authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common 
    defense and security, and are otherwise in the public interest. 
    Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55, the Commission may authorize a licensee to 
    provide measures for protection against radiological sabotage provided 
    the licensee demonstrates that the measures have ``the same high 
    assurance objective'' and meet ``the general performance requirements'' 
    of the regulation, and ``the overall level of system performance 
    provides protection against radiological sabotage equivalent'' to that 
    which would be provided by the regulation.
        At the LGS units, unescorted access into protected areas is 
    controlled through the use of a photograph on a combination badge and 
    keycard. (Hereafter, these are referred to as badge.) The security 
    officers at each entrance station use the photograph on the badge to 
    visually identify the individual requesting access. The badges for both 
    licensee employees and contractor personnel, who have been granted 
    unescorted access, are issued upon entrance at each entrance/exit 
    location and are returned upon exit. The badges are stored and are 
    retrievable at each entrance/exit location. In accordance with 10 CFR 
    73.55(d)(5), contractor individuals are not allowed to take badges 
    offsite. In accordance with the plant's physical security plans, 
    neither licensee employees nor contractors are allowed to take badges 
    offsite.
        Under the proposed system, each individual who is authorized for 
    unescorted entry into protected areas would have the physical 
    characteristics of their hand (hand geometry) registered with their 
    badge number in the access control system. When an individual enters 
    the badge into the card reader and places the hand on the measuring 
    surface, the system would record the individual's hand image. The 
    unique characteristics of the extracted hand image would be compared 
    with the previously stored template in the access control system to 
    verify authorization for entry. Individuals, including licensee 
    employees and contractors, would be allowed to keep their badge with 
    them when they depart the site and thus eliminate the process to issue, 
    retrieve and store badges at the entrance stations to the plant. Badges 
    do not carry any information other than a unique identification number.
        All other access processes, including search function capability, 
    would remain the same. This system would not be used for persons 
    requiring escorted access, i.e. visitors.
        Based on a Sandia report entitled, ``A Performance Evaluation of 
    Biometric Identification Devices'' (SAND91--0276 UC--906 Unlimited 
    Release, Printed June 1991), and on the licensee's experience with the 
    current photo-identification system, the licensee demonstrated that the 
    false-accept rate for the hand geometry system will be better than is 
    achieved by the current system. The biometric system has been in use 
    for a number of years at several sensitive Department of Energy 
    facilities. The licensee will implement a process for testing the 
    proposed system to ensure continued overall level of performance 
    equivalent to that specified in the regulation. The Physical Security 
    Plans for Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 will be revised to 
    include implementation and testing of the hand geometry access control 
    system and to allow licensee employees and contractors to take their 
    badges offsite.
        The licensee will control all points of personnel access into a 
    protected area under the observation of security personnel through the 
    use of a badge and verification of hand geometry. A numbered picture 
    badge identification system will continue to be used for all 
    individuals who are authorized unescorted access to protected areas. 
    Badges will continue to be displayed by all individuals while inside 
    the protected area.
    IV.
        Since both the badge and hand geometry would be necessary for 
    access into the protected area, the proposed system would provide for a 
    positive verification process and potential loss of a badge by an 
    individual, as a result of taking the badge offsite, would not enable 
    an unauthorized entry into protected areas.
        For the foregoing reasons, pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55, the NRC staff 
    has determined that the proposed alternative measures for protection 
    against radiological sabotage meet ``the same high assurance 
    objective,'' and ``the general performance requirements'' of the 
    regulation and that ``the overall level of system performance provides 
    protection against radiological sabotage equivalent'' to that which 
    would be provided by the regulation.
        Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 
    73.5, an exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or 
    property or common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public 
    interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Philadelphia Electric 
    Company an exemption from those requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(d)(5) 
    relating to the returning of picture badges upon exit from the 
    protected area such that individuals not employed by the licensee, 
    i.e., contractors, who are authorized unescorted access into the 
    protected area, can take their badges offsite.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the 
    granting of this exemption will not result in any significant adverse 
    environmental impact (59 FR 55863).
        This exemption is effective upon issuance.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of November, 1994.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Steven A. Varga,
    Director, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
    Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 94-28257 Filed 11-15-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
11/16/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-28257
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: November 16, 1994, Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353