[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 221 (Thursday, November 16, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57598-57599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-28301]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Health and Safety Administration
Proposed Information Collection Request Submitted for Public
Comment and Recommendations; Permissible Exposure Limits Site Visits
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance
consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing
collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A). This program helps to
ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed.
Currently, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration is
soliciting comments concerning the proposed new collection of
information to develop the economic analysis for a Permissible Exposure
Limit (PEL) rulemaking that the Agency is undertaking.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before January 16,
1996. The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments
that:
evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques
or other forms of information technology e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
ADDRESSES: Comments are to be submitted to the Docket Office, Docket
No. ICR-95-1, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution
Ave, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20010, telephone (202) 219-7894 (not a
toll-free number). Written comments of 10 pages or less may also be
transmitted by facsimile to (202) 219-5046.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Agency proposed new permissible exposure limits (PELs) for more
than 400 substances of 1988 (53 FR No. 109, June 7, 1989). Final PELs
for these substances were published in 1989 (54 FR No. 12, January 19,
1989). The United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, vacated
the standard on July 7, 1992, stating that OSHA had not met its burden
of establishing that the new exposure limits were either economically
or technologically feasible; that existing limits presented a
significant risk of material health impairment; or that the new limits
would eliminate or substantially reduce the risk. OSHA has begun a new
[[Page 57599]]
rulemaking effort to meet the burdens imposed by the Court. This
rulemaking will set new PELs for fewer chemical substances than the
original 1988-89 effort. To determine economic and technological
feasibility for these substances, the Agency proposes to gather
information from affected industries and other sources. The Agency
proposes to conduct as many as 50 site visits to affected employers and
to contact and interview by phone as many as 200 firms, trade
associations, labor organizations, or experts.
II. Current Actions
The proposed collection of information consists of site visits to
as many as 50 establishments within industries affected by the proposed
standard and phone interviews with as many as 200 employers, trade
associations, labor organizations, or experts in the field. Information
to be sought by these site visits will consist of identifying processes
that have exposures to the PEL substances; a description of the
production technology, controls, and occupations of each process;
occupational exposure levels of employees at those processes; potential
new technologies or controls that may reduce exposures; estimates of
costs of current technology as well as technology that could reduce
exposure levels; other means used to control or reduce exposure levels
such as administrative controls or work practices.
Type of Review: New.
Agency: Occupational Health and Safety Administration.
Title: Permissible Exposure Limit Site Visits.
OMB Number: None.
Agency Number: ICR-95-1.
Frequency: Once.
Affected Public: Private businesses, state and federal government.
Number of Respondents: 250.
Estimated time per Respondent: 30 hours, on average, for site
visits; 1 hour on average for phone interviews.
Total Estimated Cost: $85,000.
For Further Information Contact: Anne C. Cyr, Acting Director,
Office of Information and Consumer Affairs, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3647, 200
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone (202) 219-8148.
Copies of the information collection request are available for
inspection and copying in the Docket Office and will be immediately
mailed to persons who request copies by telephoning Vivian Allen at
(202) 219-8076. For electronic copies, contact the Labor News bulletin
Board (202) 219-4784; or OSHA's WebPage on Internet at http://
www.osha.gov/.
Dated: November 9, 1995.
Marthe Kent,
Director, Office of Regulatory Analysis, Directorate of Policy,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
Collection of information sought by OSHA for each substance in the
proposed permissible exposure limit rulemaking:
1. Identification of processes or operations that may result in
exposures to employees.
2. A description of the production process, its technology, and
control technology.
3. A description of activities by occupation that result in worker
exposures. How are employees exposed? During what work activities? What
is the length and frequency of exposure?
4. How many employees work in each process with exposures to the
substance in question? How many employees are in each occupation at
that process?
5. What data is available of exposure levels of each occupation of
the process? Is historical data available?
6. What technology or controls are capable of reducing exposures?
What exposure levels could be achieved with other control technologies?
Are there substitutes for the substance in question? Are there other
technologies employed by the industry?
7. Are there changes in administrative controls or work practices
that could affect employee exposures?
8. Estimates of the cost of the various means of reducing
occupational exposure levels. Estimates of the cost of current
controls.
9. General information from the establishment on number of
employees, number of production employees, products and production
levels.
10. Information about the technology, controls, and exposures for
the rest of the industry.
11. What are the economic benefits of installing production
technology that reduces exposures?
[FR Doc. 95-28301 Filed 11-15-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-M